They are Much more alike, and acceptable than

1) Your assertion that Hypotheses tests and Court
Trials are the same thing
2) Your belief that the Null Hypotheses could be find
that is really true (or the alternative one),
3) The belief that the null hypotheses are a true
equality, not the statement that is not sufficient
evidence the concerned parameters are different.

AND SO ON...



________licas (Luis A. Afonso)

Only an absolute ignorant in the Hypotheses Test
matter thinks the following


1) Your assertion that Hypotheses tests and Court
Trials are the same thing,
2) Your belief that the Null Hypotheses could be find
being really true (or the alternative one),
3) The belief that the null hypotheses are true
equalities, not the statement that is not sufficient
evidence the concerned parameters are different.

They are CONCEPTS not merely term generalizations,
not a Byzantine *nickpick* but really just within the
realm of the matter to which none is allowed to
hesitate.

Note that in a) the persecutor’s identity switch, if
detected, we prove H0, a *forbidden* situation in
Hypotheses Test

Is surely on his matters Jack Tomsky should rethink
urgently.

__________licas (Luis A. Afonso)

*** These are not confidence intervals because then
every sample would have the same confidence interval.
Jack ***
... and consequently, facing the Population of normal
N(0,1) random samples of size n, you deny that is
expected that 95% of the means are in the interval
______[- 1.960 / sqrt (n) , 1.960 / sqrt (n)]
Isn’t?

Facing the Wikipedia definition:

*** In statistics, a confidence interval (CI) for a
population parameter is an interval between two
numbers with an associated probability p which is
generated from a random sample of an underlying
population, such that if the sampling was repeated
numerous times and the confidence interval
recalculated from each sample according to the same
method, a proportion p of the confidence intervals
would contain the population parameter in
question.***

What, IN SIMULATION terms, the algorithm is?
Is to synthesize a great number (2 millions) of n
sized samples, to evaluate the test statistics (JB
for example), to memorize its values and then from
the empirical distribution to evaluate the fractiles.
ALL FREQUENCIST STATICIANS (like me) are very
comfortable with this procedure and since the middle
of the 60´s to now there are millions of papers in
this context.
Are you so *brave* to state that are all WRONG?
If so, fight them and let me in peace and quite , I
am not even an *atom* in this CROWD. In fact I´m
working for you: I did point out at least 4 teams
that followed the procedure I used. : GO AND EAT
THEM! If you are interested I´ll give you the names a
full battalion, even an army !!!!!!!!!.

_________licas (Luis A. Afonso)

I do hesitate to classify you:
_________a clown?
_________a madman?
(I discard the hypotheses he is stupid).

MEANWHILE
I have the reward to find out, and show it with
pleasure to the Readers, that with a very poor tool
(computer) and scarce programming skills, everyone
can *replicate* results that are both *educative* and
*exact*. As exact as that are the same we read on
text-books and tables.

CONCLUSION
___*Tout le monde est en erreur sauf Jack Leon
Tomsky*. What an odd thing!!!!!!!!

________licas (Luis A. Afonso)

Jack:

The critical (WRONG) idea NOT TO ADMIT that simulated
samples are SAMPLES by its own right put you at a so
PECULIAR situation that you are compelled to deny all
the work that has been made since H. LILLIEFORS
(1967) p to now..
I repeat
Put your comments and critics (you can use the title
*Against the wrong way the scientists use to find
critical values or simulated samples are not samples*
and try to publish it, if you are sufficiently
persuaded you are RIGHT.
I dare if it was a Referee’s team of a serious
Journal to admit such a *trash*. Second time I invite
you to do so.
(Prenez bien garde : Tout le monde est en erreur sauf
moi, c´est un symptôme de folie, ou de GENIE).
YOU HAVE TO CHOOSE : OR YOU ARE A CRAZY OLD MAN OR
YOU ARE SO GENIAL THAT YOU GO TO LEAD A REVOLUTION IN
STATISTICS. (La choix est a vous).
MEANWHILE I appreciate you did not disturb my work
with your PECULIAR idea , not accepted by
statisticians, of what are genuine, truthful, samples
and simulated, false, ones.
IS IT A DEAL?
_________licas (Luis A. Afonso)