On Feb 28, 1:04 pm,
j...@tele2.se wrote:
On 28 Feb, 18:40, "Igor" <thoov...@excite.com> wrote:
On Feb 28, 11:35 am,
j...@tele2.se wrote:
There is no stupidity involved in chosing the Euclidian space as
cordinate system for plotting events in space.
There is if you're trying to map a globally non-Euclidean space to a
globally Euclidean space. It won't go. You can only treat a non-
Euclidean space as Euclidean locally.
No space is Euclidian always was you live in an illusion and do not
even dare plot events in flat spacetime because it will debunk your
illusion of invariant light and finally your silly idea of SR and
curved spacetime.
You are the one who
claim spacetime exist and that it is curved AKA different worldlines
"straight
lines" between A and B can have as many distances/lengths that there
is paths in spacetime.
Who's this "you" and what exactly are you trying to say? There is a
sharp distinction between curved (non-Euclidean) space and flat
(Euclidean) space. And all your moaning will not change that.
Well since you bothered to answer i guess some part was directed to
you. I am well aware of the differece between the illusion of curved
geometric spacetime due to minkowsky and lorentz transformation and
flat real euclidian spacetime and cartessian coordinate systems.
I say it is an illusion of the chosen geometry Minkowski and the
Lorentz transformation.
How can curvature be an illusion of those things, when SR says
absolutely nothing about curvature?
Well SR cerainly affect the enclosure metric and make the lightpaths
vector dependent a child could see that and so could even someone like
you if you just cared to plot the events. But you will not.
I think that you refuse to do a simple excersize plot three ships and
two moving lightpulses in a cordinate system, that actually could be
used to study the events.
That tells me alot about your intention, you know
that llight travel variant in space and that *INVARIANT LIGHTSPEED* is
a fraud. You know that receeding and enclosure velocities of light is
variant in flat Euclidian space.
Invariant lightspeed is an intrinsic assumption of SR and its
consequences have never been falsified. And just what do you mean by
"variant"?
Fuck you people make up your mind intrisic assumption, as measured, by
definition, will your delusions never end????
I falsified it here and now just plot the events in the cartesian
coordinate system, it will show you that the enclosure velocity
differs, and if you now start to say that different enclosure
velocities and light that moves not none symmetric through space not
invalidate *INVARIANT LIGHTSPEED* i just feel sorry for you.
They are only invariant in the *ILLUSION* of Minkowsky spacetime and
the Lorentz transformation AKA curved spacetime.
Where do you get that? Minkowski spacetime can be flat and LTs can be
applied to flat spaces. SR is entirely Euclidean. You're the one
that seems to under an illusion.
NO ERIC THE UNIVERSE WON'T BUDGE FOR A MOVING PARTICLE, NOT EVEN FOR
A
SHIP. IT WILL NOT WRINKLE LIKE A SHEET AND IT WILL NOT CURVE TRUTH IS
IT WILL NOT EVEN CURL A HAIR ON MY HEAD.
It always helps to understand exactly what you're trying to refute
before you try to refute it. Apparently, you know nothing about
relativity and this nonsense post proves it.
Well i actually understand what i say you however have no idea what
you calculate, because you are parroting.
Best regards Jonas Thörnvall
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought I was addressing someone who was only
slightly confused and was possibly willing to actually learn something
about real physics. I guess I was wrong about both. Come back when
you graduate from the third grade.- Dölj citerad text -
- Visa citerad text -
