| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Agriculture - Poultry Forum » Chicken Lice?
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Keith Kent |
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I think one of my hens has lice,they are around the vent area.The critters
are visable and a orange/brown color ,fast moving and look like the shape of
ear wigs but obviously loads smaller .I have got Gold label lice/flee/mite
and general critter powder.I gave my two hens there first dusting today.When
should they be clear,this may be the reason why one of the hens comb is
floppy and paler?
thanks keith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Keith Kent" <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:KiHFh.44943$Da4.24172@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
Quote: I think one of my hens has lice,they are around the vent area.The critters
are visable and a orange/brown color ,fast moving and look like the shape
of ear wigs but obviously loads smaller .I have got Gold label
lice/flee/mite and general critter powder.I gave my two hens there first
dusting today.When should they be clear,this may be the reason why one of
the hens comb is floppy and paler?
thanks keith
Not heard of either of these treatments which means nothing but its best to
use really effective treatments
If you do not have confidence in your vet who would be the first port of
call for bugs as they can identify them accurately as to species which
affects treatment I would strongly suggest that you contact
http://www.interhatch.com/ and chat to them
They are very reputable
It may well take more than a bit of powder to make them clear
You will need to treat all the places they can get re-contaminated
And a pale comb is a sign of anaemia
If you can see them easily -- they have lots
Get something that is properly specific.
Jill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Keith Kent |
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Jill" <mail@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e74369$0$8744$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Quote:
"Keith Kent" <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:KiHFh.44943$Da4.24172@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
I think one of my hens has lice,they are around the vent area.The critters
are visable and a orange/brown color ,fast moving and look like the shape
of ear wigs but obviously loads smaller .I have got Gold label
lice/flee/mite and general critter powder.I gave my two hens there first
dusting today.When should they be clear,this may be the reason why one of
the hens comb is floppy and paler?
thanks keith
Not heard of either of these treatments which means nothing but its best
to use really effective treatments
If you do not have confidence in your vet who would be the first port of
call for bugs as they can identify them accurately as to species which
affects treatment I would strongly suggest that you contact
http://www.interhatch.com/ and chat to them
They are very reputable
It may well take more than a bit of powder to make them clear
You will need to treat all the places they can get re-contaminated
And a pale comb is a sign of anaemia
If you can see them easily -- they have lots
Get something that is properly specific.
Jill
Hi Jill,Hopefully i can nip it in the bud before there is a infestation.The
bugs only appear on the older of my two hens around vent area only.I have
only had the hens since last saturday from a poultry farm.Me being me when i
do something i usually go for it and research/read .So thought with them
coming from a place were there are lots of hens i would give them the once
over.I think there will be lots of people out there with bugs affecting
there birds and don`t know it/never will.Or even never even thought about
it.Here is a link to the Get Rid by gold label i am using for those who may
be interested,i will post how effective it is in a couple of weeks.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/RED-MITE-LICE-FLEAS-Killer-Organic-Powder-by-Gold-Label_W0QQitemZ180079063395QQihZ008QQcategoryZ16237QQcmdZViewItem
Thanks Keith
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Keith Kent" <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:JgIFh.41298$Fm2.31985@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
Quote:
Hi Jill,Hopefully i can nip it in the bud before there is a infestation
If you can see them -- it already IS
Sorry but its best to be realistic and honest
Quote: The bugs only appear on the older of my two hens around vent area only.I
have only had the hens since last saturday from a poultry farm.
Then they won't have been with any other birds on your property, will they ?
Me being me when i
Quote: do something i usually go for it and research/read .So thought with them
coming from a place were there are lots of hens i would give them the once
over.I think there will be lots of people out there with bugs affecting
there birds and don`t know it/never will.
Not if they are half decent bird keepers
Its one of the jobs we all do -- checking and treating if necessary
Quote: Or even never even thought about
I doubt it and certainly from the mail I get I really doubt it
There will always be a minority of irresponsible animal keepers [and
parents!].
Contact Interhatch
They will provide a proper species specific treatment
Mites and lice are different within species let alone between species
And the treatments for mites are different from those for lice
This is a similar but weaker [and therefore cheaper] version of things like
Poultry Shield. PS can be very effective against such infections
There are others that are more specific for certain species of bugs.
Interhatch are much more experienced in recognising which is which from
amateur descriptions. A vet would be able to at least identify the accurate
species which would allow you to hit them hard and effectively
Without experience and a microscope you cannot do so
What about all the eggs that may have been carried in - your treatment says
nothing about treating the eggs
Your birds are already showing symptoms of potential severe infection -
droopy pale comb
Good luck
Jill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Keith Kent |
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Jill" <mail@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e7554b$0$8733$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Quote:
"Keith Kent" <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:JgIFh.41298$Fm2.31985@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
Hi Jill,Hopefully i can nip it in the bud before there is a infestation
If you can see them -- it already IS
Sorry but its best to be realistic and honest
The bugs only appear on the older of my two hens around vent area only.I
have only had the hens since last saturday from a poultry farm.
Then they won't have been with any other birds on your property, will they
?
Me being me when i
do something i usually go for it and research/read .So thought with them
coming from a place were there are lots of hens i would give them the
once over.I think there will be lots of people out there with bugs
affecting there birds and don`t know it/never will.
Not if they are half decent bird keepers
Its one of the jobs we all do -- checking and treating if necessary
Or even never even thought about
I doubt it and certainly from the mail I get I really doubt it
There will always be a minority of irresponsible animal keepers [and
parents!].
it.Here is a link to the Get Rid by gold label i am using for those who
may be interested,i will post how effective it is in a couple of weeks.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/RED-MITE-LICE-FLEAS-Killer-Organic-Powder-by-Gold-Label_W0QQitemZ180079063395QQihZ008QQcategoryZ16237QQcmdZViewItem
Contact Interhatch
They will provide a proper species specific treatment
Mites and lice are different within species let alone between species
And the treatments for mites are different from those for lice
This is a similar but weaker [and therefore cheaper] version of things
like Poultry Shield. PS can be very effective against such infections
There are others that are more specific for certain species of bugs.
Interhatch are much more experienced in recognising which is which from
amateur descriptions. A vet would be able to at least identify the
accurate species which would allow you to hit them hard and effectively
Without experience and a microscope you cannot do so
What about all the eggs that may have been carried in - your treatment
says nothing about treating the eggs
Your birds are already showing symptoms of potential severe infection -
droopy pale comb
Good luck
Jill
Hi Jill,
if the powder kills mites do we have to worry about the eggs as they will
hatch and die with the treatment completing the cycle?
Snip
Not if they are half decent bird keepers
Quote: Its one of the jobs we all do -- checking and treating if necessary
Or even never even thought about
I doubt it and certainly from the mail I get I really doubt it
There will always be a minority of irresponsible animal keepers [and
parents!].
I don`t know about ALL do and what is [parents]?
The people you refer to above are not the ones we need to worry about ,it is
farmers who neglect there birds for profit on a massive scale ie battery
hens which should be outlawed.But after all it is only a chicken in
two/three years they are of no use to the farmer.I cannot totally blame
farmers as they are driven to provide the cheapest meat/eggs so maybe they
have no choice if they want to make a living ,but the poor treatment of any
animal for the purpose of providing cheap crap which most buyers think is
good has to stop.On the other hand organic/free range means they think they
have the right to rip you off.Until organic food is comparible in price
nothing will change, ie organic chicken breast 8.50, free range
6.40,standard 2.99!How many are going to pick the organic up?The
labels/packaging say the cheap meat is all good.Not many fully understand
the process off cruelty of how it gets there.This cruelty is most unlikely
to happen for someone keepimg back yard chickens ,most will be living a life
of luxury compared to the other short life they could have.
--
Thanks Keith
Nottingham UK
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Keith Kent wrote:
Quote:
Hi Jill,
if the powder kills mites do we have to worry about the eggs as they
will hatch and die with the treatment completing the cycle?
That depends on what mites they are - they all have different hatching
cycles.
And some can be long lived
Quote:
I don`t know about ALL do and what is [parents]?
Merely a throwaway comment on the state of parenting in view of various news
items recently
There are good and bad in all fields
Quote:
The people you refer to above are not the ones we need to worry about
Where does this all come from?
You said
<quote> I think there will be lots of people out there with bugs affecting
there birds and don`t know it/never will. <unquote>
I disagreed with you - most poultry keepers are very conscientious
Of all scales - large and small.
Quote: ,it is farmers who neglect there birds for profit on a massive scale
ie battery hens which should be outlawed.
Most intensive poultry keepers look after their birds extremely well. If
they don't they lose money very quickly
It is a very precarious business reliant on smooth and fast turnover. Any
glitches are VERY expensive and have an immediate effect on viability of a
business.
Birds get sick very easily, therefore anyone who whats to sustain a business
and even make a profit in the intensive world works extremely hard to keep
the birds as well as they can
That is why the industry spends millions each year on ventilation systems;
on vaccinations; on breeding docility; on breeding out many of the bugs that
affect free range birds on a daily basis and which had brought our egg
production industry to its knees in the 1950's
But after all it is only a
Quote: chicken in two/three years they are of no use to the farmer.
And a lamb is slaughtered before its a year old. That is food production
The population want eggs as cheap as they can get them
If everyone went into their supermarket and left the battery eggs on the
shelf there would be only free range eggs available within 6 months -
however they would mostly be imported from countries where the welfare
conditions are beyond your worst imagination but thats alright isn't it?
Quote: .On the other
hand organic/free range means they think they have the right to rip
you off.
You obviously do not understand the costs and economics of the agricultural
industry
Until organic food is comparible in price nothing will
The only way that happens is when its all imported from countries who are
rapidly increasing their organic production except there are very few
controls or regulations
The only way anything is going to change is when the population of this
country faces up to the fact that they have to start PAYING for their food
again. Like they do in France and other countries where they support their
agricultural industry.
In the 1950's we spent around 35% of our income on food
Now we spend less than 10% but we demand more and more and more for less and
less money
Quote: This cruelty
is most unlikely to happen for someone keepimg back yard chickens
,most will be living a life of luxury compared to the other short
life they could have.
Many backyard chickens can have far more 'stress' than intensive ones -
most clearly illustrated by the fact that no outdoor bird will lay as much
as one inside.
- they have to cope with constantly changing weather and insufficient
shelter
- they have to cope with high volume, low nutrition food
- they have to cope with overflying birds [which instinctively might be
predators]
- they have to cope with humans in their face all teh time
- they have to cope with constant disease challenges from other wild birds
- they have to cope with the ever changing politics of a flock which can be
downright evil and canabalistic at times. [there are good reasons for the
terms hen-pecked and pecking order]
- they have to cope with being poorly bred for their conditions
- they have to cope with being rarely treated properly for their ailments
[while most people will happily spend hundreds of pounds on their cat which
they got given; they will not spend ten pounds on taking a bird that they
have actually paid good money for to a professional.]
- they have to cope with often dying of painful conditions ["HenyPeny who we
wescued went all quiet last week then she died in her sleep, And she had
been laying too" : = Properly translates as a bird that should have been
humane culled at the end of her last lay had an egg crack inside her,
causing a fatal peritonitis to develop which killed her. ]
The intensive bird has been bred to be very subdued and meek to reduce
aggression
A well run unit will have constant light patterns; constantly regulated
environmental controls, constant high value feed; low noise; disease
prevention measures;
A stressed bird stops laying.
A chicken is hatched with the number of eggs she can produce already inside
her. Modern breeding aims to get as many of these made and out in the first
2 years.
One of the consequences of breeding for high production has been a weakness
of the shell in each subsequent lay. This results in eggs cracking inside
and death by peritonitis. This as well as their general weakness and much
reduced productivity in the years after their 2nd year of lay is the reason
for them being slaughtered at this time.
There are 40 million chickens in production in the UK and we import a
significant percentage of eggs. This is not a situation that can be resolved
with simplistic theories.
Don't get me wrong -- I love keeping birds and working to improve the
breeding of the birds we have and to do our best to keep them as happy and
healthy as possible.
But I have done a great deal of homework and I am VERY realistic about all
facets of the poultry keeping world [and the food industry]
I know that in our climate and location and social structure we cannot
provide perfect conditions for chickens indoors or out.
Really the best places for that are the dry scrubby areas of the world, not
too hot, not too wet, not too windy. Plenty of shelter from the rain when it
comes; and the heat of the day. Lots of spare land to give birds plenty of
freedom. Lots of cheap labour to tend to them night and day; -- parts of
India and Africa would be far better suited than any of us in the Northern
Hemisphere <grin>
--
regards
Jill Bowis
Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| 0tterbot |
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e87e74$0$8745$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Quote: I agree that is one other trigger that affects most backyard birds but
even when provided with light free range birds still cannot match their
sisterhood inside
correlation is not causation. there are multiple factors to consider.
Quote: Why does having light all year around cause stress?
perhaps "stress" isn't the right word - but if a hen is designed to take a
break from laying in winter for physiological reasons & is denied that
break, some people would not approve of that, and while i might not agree
i'd not dispute their disapproval, either.
Quote: - they have to cope with constantly changing weather and insufficient
shelter
Nonsense. They have plenty of shelter in the same houses they are shut
away in at night. Sometimes, they simply choose to stay outside in all
weathers.
Spending time too close and personal with other birds is stressful
Everyone knows that periods of prolonged confinement caused problems
i'm not sure what you are arguing here - are you not claiming that battery
birds are kept as stress-free as possible, while also allowing (unspoken)
that they are in (ahem) "periods of prolonged confinement"? so, which is it?
undoubtedly battery birds' keepers try to keep their environment as
stress-free as possible _considering the circumstances_, but it can't be
without stress, because it's unnatural to their nature to be confined
thusly. and since confinement causes problems, again, which is it?
my chooks stay outside for as long as possible, in all weather except when
it's storming so hard they're actually getting drenched to the skin. in the
type of rain that drives me inside without thinking twice, they stay
outside. when we had a day of 42degrees-in-the-shade heat, they stayed
outside (in the dappled shade of trees, not in the total shade of their
house or outdoor shelter). they just like to be outside, & that's all there
is to it they do not think in terms of laying or what's (purportedly)
"good for them", they operate according to what they naturally prefer, &
without doubt being outside is what they prefer. if that's what they like,
who would argue with that?
Quote: - they have to cope with high volume, low nutrition food
Like layers pellets?
No - like bugs, grains, seeds, kitchen scraps, greens, etc
Many of the people who describe their birds as having been rescued and
having such a wonderful life outside do not just feed layers ration
I have this "conversation" daily with many emails I recieve - one today
about birds with probable feather pecking due to poor nutrition yet the
email was full of descriptors like treats, running free etc. Folks are
genuine about what they think is what chickens need. Often misguidedly
i put it to you that chickens know what they need. if a hen can range and is
supplied with a full layer's ration as well, you could conclude they'd never
eat any bugs they find - there'd be no need, and they wouldn't want them,
they wouldn't be interested. yet no bug is safe from a hen - to imply that
the extra protein hens get from bugs they find, or the joy and nutrition
(not to mention nice yolk colour) they get from greens is just a frippery
they don't need is a little odd to me, frankly.
laying pellets may be nutritionally balanced in strict technical terms - yet
ime it's not exactly their favourite food. this would indicate that, perhaps
or perhaps not nutritionally, there's something "missing" they go looking
for if they can. (my hens refuse outright to eat it if it's in pellet form,
even - i give it as a mash). it may be textural, behavioural, or related to
some other factor.
one very small example - i reported here featherlessness amongst my hens
from bullying while they were caged for auction (and in one case, bullying
in general). i just couldn't get any improvement until i started giving them
extra protein - above & beyond laying pellets - every single day. sometimes
it's meat & sometimes it's blood-&-bone meal & sometimes cooked soybeans &
sometimes milk... but it's made a massive difference. one weakness of laying
pellets is the pre-assumption that your particular hens don't need anything
beyond the extremely rigid formulation of "what a hen needs", but there are
times hens _need_ something extra. whether it's nutritional or psychological
or something else, it's still a valid need the pellets aren't supplying.
Quote: Yes - but you are a sentient being
Anthropomorphism has no place is good animal behaviour studies
it certainly isn't, but i hope you're not claiming chickens aren't sentient
the mark for sentience is that the creature is aware of itself and of
its own suffering (if any). in terms of extreme self-awareness
(self-consciousness), only humans (and even then, only those with an iq
above a certain point) are genuinely sentient. but on the less rigid and
more reasonable scale that most of us use, chickens are obviously sentient.
a chicken's not capable of visualising and wishing for something it doesn't
have (but then, neither is a dog or a pig) but it is aware if it suffers
because of its living conditions.
Quote: You can have birds with acres of range and a big house still being
dominant and bullying
Any damage on a bird from any cause will be pounced upon swiftly
(snip)
well of course it's not!! it depends on the bird, its place in the
hierarchy, and the tendencies of its companions!! a remark like that is
nonsensical because we can observe it's not true.
Quote: But if every other household was to keep a few pet chickens, there
would no need to import eggs since demand would go down.
And the disease in the national poultry flock would be horrendous - as
would the humans.
oh for goodness' sake. i can't even begin to fathom this continual and
relentless theme of "biosecurity", but beyond that, a few points:
caring for livestock is mostly commonsense & experience & having sources to
refer to if something isn't right, & people have been doing so for millenia.
when a critical mass of people participate in a pretty easy & common
activity, there's a well of experience and knowledge for people to access in
order to improve. it's _because_ ordinary people (indeed, every second
household!) have been keeping chickens & other livestock for millenia that
we know so much about them now & have much better ideas about how to help
them live contentedly and healthily.
Quote: go to any SE Asian country
why?
Quote: Go back to the 1950's when the mortality rate for most flocks was anything
up to 50% even in the good ones
a quarter of a percent is still "up to 50%", so this is meaningless.
Quote: Mycoplasmans; Salmonelas, there is a never ending list of trouble
by my reading, the list of trouble is a great deal more limited than, say,
common human diseases... in fact, it's astonishingly brief... but let's not
quibble.
Quote: Let alone the fact that its totally impractical
clearly, only people interested in keeping <animal x> actually do so. when
home hen-keeping began to diminish somewhat, it was hardly due to being
"totally impractical" rather than balancing that against buying eggs/meat at
the shop when all things were considered. i have chooks but buy chicken meat
at the shop. is this because killing my hens is "totally impractical" or
some other reason?
(snip)
there is NEVER any one "right way" to do _anything_. if there was, we'd all
be doing it like little automatons & nobody would ever make any positive
discoveries & we'd never progress at all because what we are doing is
already "right". in reality, there's a range of right ways to do things for
the individuals concerned, the process of what they are doing, and what they
are trying to achieve, and within all of that there's scope for benign
difference.
one feature of animal-related groups on usenet, i've noticed, is a tendency
for one "right way" to develop on the group, & everyone else be damned.
groupthink is brain numbing (but surprisingly common).
kylie |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| enigma |
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Amy Blankenship" <Amy_nospam@magnoliamultimedia.com> wrote
in news:8uiGh.1734$B7.40@bigfe9:
Quote: Designed is a good word. Cutting off their beaks so they
can't do it is one way of designing them. Filling them so
full of meds they don't get sick under unnatural conditions
is another.
you forgot removing their wings...
lee <it's more battered birds than battery birds in the US>
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
0tterbot wrote:
Quote: "Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e87e74$0$8745$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
I agree that is one other trigger that affects most backyard birds
but even when provided with light free range birds still cannot
match their sisterhood inside
correlation is not causation. there are multiple factors to consider.
I agree
And stress is not always obvious
My point really is that most declarations of what is best for chickens is
very anthropomorphic.
Quote:
Why does having light all year around cause stress?
perhaps "stress" isn't the right word - but if a hen is designed to
take a break from laying in winter for physiological reasons & is
denied that break, some people would not approve of that, and while i
might not agree i'd not dispute their disapproval, either.
Designed is a very good word
That is what the chicken is now -- designed by Man. It bears little
resemblance to anything "original" or wild. And its naive to consider it so.
Whether that is pompoms such that the bird cannot see; extreme feathering
such that the birds cannot be outside in normal conditions; or having a
short, highly productive life without a moult
All of these things are part of the genetic capability of the birds that Man
has used - in the case of the latter there is a overriding benefit to Man -
in the case of many of the other extremes it is fashion, fancy and 'cos they
could with no benefit to either Man or beast
Quote:
- they have to cope with constantly changing weather and
insufficient shelter
Nonsense. They have plenty of shelter in the same houses they are
shut away in at night. Sometimes, they simply choose to stay
outside in all weathers.
Spending time too close and personal with other birds is stressful
Everyone knows that periods of prolonged confinement caused problems
i'm not sure what you are arguing here
I am not arguing anything
Just exploring the subject rather more than the usual fluffbunny
declarations ;)
Quote: - are you not claiming that
battery birds are kept as stress-free as possible, while also
allowing (unspoken) that they are in (ahem) "periods of prolonged
confinement"? so, which is it?
Battery birds are bred [designed if you wish] to be extremely docile and so
cope with the confinement without the aggression which would be shown if you
put most ofther chickens into the same conditions
[the previous answer was specifically about confining normal purebreeds in
close quarters]
Quote:
undoubtedly battery birds' keepers try to keep their environment as
stress-free as possible _considering the circumstances_, but it can't
be without stress, because it's unnatural to their nature to be
confined thusly.
Using that arguement It is unnatural to have pompoms; Its unnatural to live
in temperate small gardens; its unnatural to be housed and washed for shows.
EVERYTHING about poultry keeping has been "unnatural" [or man managed] for
over 300 years
Quote:
my chooks stay outside for as long as possible, in all weather except
when it's storming so hard they're actually getting drenched to the
skin. in the type of rain that drives me inside without thinking
twice, they stay outside. when we had a day of 42degrees-in-the-shade
heat, they stayed outside (in the dappled shade of trees, not in the
total shade of their house or outdoor shelter). they just like to be
outside, & that's all there is to it
and if the breeds that make up the battery bird population do the same they
die in large numbers. Its happened when pophole doors have failed and birds
have got caught out in the rain. Over 60% can die overnight.
they do not think in terms
Quote: of laying or what's (purportedly) "good for them", they operate
according to what they naturally prefer,
You are giving them abilities they do not have.
They have not the sense of reason or to "think"
Quote:
i put it to you that chickens know what they need.
I would disagree most wholeheartedly from many many case studies. Given the
choice chickens will mostly eat whole grains even if of a highly productive
strain. This results in them being undernourished for their output.
The effects can be various -- feather pecking; loss of production; anaemia;
even death.
Quote:
laying pellets may be nutritionally balanced in strict technical
terms - yet ime it's not exactly their favourite food. this would
indicate that, perhaps or perhaps not nutritionally, there's
something "missing" they go looking for if they can. (my hens refuse
outright to eat it if it's in pellet form, even - i give it as a
mash). it may be textural, behavioural, or related to some other
factor.
No - it simply means that they do not "think" like humans do.
Their innate ability is to provide themselves with sufficient to maintain
themselves. Nothing more.
Man has designed them to provide more eggs than their ancestors would have
done; barring some of the weakest fancies.
The birds who give little more than their ancesters can survive perfectly
well on grains and range alone as long as the latter is extensive and varied
enough.
Any birds who have had their productivity improved at all will need better
nutrition to compensate.
Man has created the change and therefore we have to provide the necessary
Quote:
one very small example - i reported here featherlessness amongst my
hens from bullying while they were caged for auction (and in one
case, bullying in general). i just couldn't get any improvement until
i started giving them extra protein - above & beyond laying pellets -
every single day. sometimes it's meat & sometimes it's blood-&-bone
meal & sometimes cooked soybeans & sometimes milk... but it's made a
massive difference.
Yes -- but then domestic layers ration is still relatively low in protein in
comparison to that of commercial birds.
Blood and bonemeal has long been known to be a superb tonic for birds.
Its a real shame we are no longer allowed to use it
Quote: Any damage on a bird from any cause will be pounced upon swiftly
(snip)
well of course it's not!! it depends on the bird, its place in the
hierarchy, and the tendencies of its companions!! a remark like that
is nonsensical because we can observe it's not true.
An open wound is rarely ignored by chickens
Quote:
But if every other household was to keep a few pet chickens, there
would no need to import eggs since demand would go down.
And the disease in the national poultry flock would be horrendous -
as would the humans.
oh for goodness' sake. i can't even begin to fathom this continual and
relentless theme of "biosecurity",
Well - living in a country which has just had a very real incidence of Avian
Influenza due entirely to a serious lapse in biosecurity we take it very
seriously
We have been miraculously lucky that it seems that it was contained and, so
far, there is no evidence that the virus got into the wild bird population.
If it had, given the location and the very high density of poultry of all
management types in the immediate area the results would have been
devastating
Quote: but beyond that, a few points:
caring for livestock is mostly commonsense
From my experience dealing with peoples questions day in day out I have to
say that you are naive.
When you have someone with 3 teenage daughters genuinely ask you if the hens
need to be "started" by a cockerel before they buy them and many many other
questions which would come under your term of "commonsense" you learn to be
rather more pragmatic.
Quote: go to any SE Asian country
why?
To see what conditions birds live in when owned by a majority of a
population as a backyard entity. They would not come up to what would be
acceptible here.
Quote:
Go back to the 1950's when the mortality rate for most flocks was
anything up to 50% even in the good ones
a quarter of a percent is still "up to 50%", so this is meaningless.
Sorry I was in a hurry to complete the post -- what I meant was averaging
around 50%
Quote:
Mycoplasmans; Salmonelas, there is a never ending list of trouble
by my reading, the list of trouble is a great deal more limited than,
say, common human diseases... in fact, it's astonishingly brief...
but let's not quibble.
It wasn't and isn't
Quote:
Let alone the fact that its totally impractical
clearly, only people interested in keeping <animal x> actually do so.
But the equation of home egg production, which was the point being
discussed, only works when the overriding majority do so. Otherwise you
have businesses farming for those who don't and you get back to the
situation we are in very quickly
Quote:
(snip)
there is NEVER any one "right way" to do _anything_. if there was,
I would not dream of ever suggesting there is.
Equally many things that create so much uproar are never completely wrong
either
Its my training -- I am always looking around any subject -- There are
always at least 2 sides to any question and if you look hard enough you can
usually find more than that
;)
--
regards
Jill Bowis
Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| 0tterbot |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e97c76$0$8744$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Quote: correlation is not causation. there are multiple factors to consider.
I agree
And stress is not always obvious
My point really is that most declarations of what is best for chickens is
very anthropomorphic.
i'm sure some of them are awfully so not sure about "most".
Quote: Designed is a very good word
That is what the chicken is now -- designed by Man. It bears little
resemblance to anything "original" or wild. And its naive to consider it
so. (snip)
well, yes, but (hopefully without being TOO naive , all domestic animals
could be described thusly, but they each still have innate traits, do they
not? and with no outlet for their innate traits, they must, logically,
experience some stress (although they cannot identify the stress/the cause),
unless there is some "consolation" for going without (i.e. something which
is offered as an alternative).
as an example, people can be astonished when their overbred domestic dog
exhibits "wild" traits with no warning. another - i have read numerous
stories of battery-hen rescues; the people report that eventually the
battery hens begin to exhibit "normal hen" behaviour based on no experience
or observation.
Quote: undoubtedly battery birds' keepers try to keep their environment as
stress-free as possible _considering the circumstances_, but it can't
be without stress, because it's unnatural to their nature to be
confined thusly.
Using that arguement
i'm not arguing either <g>
It is unnatural to have pompoms; Its unnatural to live
Quote: in temperate small gardens; its unnatural to be housed and washed for
shows.
EVERYTHING about poultry keeping has been "unnatural" [or man managed] for
over 300 years
certainly. i suppose it depends on where the line is drawn - of what is an
acceptable trade-off to both species (which only one species actually
negotiates , as it were. i wish my hens could have a really huuuuuge
enclosure, but it's not possible at this time. so they have _enough_ room
(well, more than enough, really), and that's fine. of course it's not
"natural". but that's the line there, for me (i live in a house even though
that's not "natural"). i wouldn't find a hen who can't see because of
feathering to be "acceptable", nor would i like to be washing and showing
them. we just have to negotiate what is acceptable amongst ourselves, don't
we.
but, i DO think that some things really should be mandatory - and that would
include the ability to indulge in instinctive behaviours (the point here),
even though that also means including/allowing instinctive behaviours which
i, personally, find loathesome (e.g. bossing & bullying.) everything's a
compromise what i'd mandate against (or for) if i was the queen is
different to what you would, or mrs-next-door, or whoever. so we all
compromise.
Quote: they do not think in terms
of laying or what's (purportedly) "good for them", they operate
according to what they naturally prefer,
You are giving them abilities they do not have.
They have not the sense of reason or to "think"
they have no sense of reason. they can think to some extent, because they
can be trained by operant conditioning. but my point was they have the
ability to "prefer" one thing over another.
Quote: No - it simply means that they do not "think" like humans do.
Their innate ability is to provide themselves with sufficient to maintain
themselves. Nothing more.
well, that's it. they don't WANT to be laying x eggs per year, WE want that
it's not to say that they can't choose what will benefit THEM but not
necessarily us. (i don't know if i've stated this at all clearly, i've done
my best).
Quote: Yes -- but then domestic layers ration is still relatively low in protein
in comparison to that of commercial birds.
my point was really that what's "best" isn't actually always best at all -
it's very circumstantial.
Quote: Blood and bonemeal has long been known to be a superb tonic for birds.
Its a real shame we are no longer allowed to use it
indeed. although i personally find the hairs a bit disturbing <g>
Quote: An open wound is rarely ignored by chickens
well, i didn't know you meant open wounds specifically when you said
"damage".
Quote: oh for goodness' sake. i can't even begin to fathom this continual and
relentless theme of "biosecurity",
Well - living in a country which has just had a very real incidence of
Avian Influenza due entirely to a serious lapse in biosecurity we take it
very seriously
We have been miraculously lucky that it seems that it was contained and,
so far, there is no evidence that the virus got into the wild bird
population. If it had, given the location and the very high density of
poultry of all management types in the immediate area the results would
have been devastating
i'd say again - don't you think there's something _else_ awry, not related
to imports? something there appears (to a disinterested party on the other
side of the world) to be seriously awry because outbreak after outbreak in
what are _supposed_ to be "good" (biosecure??) circumstances is a warning
that there is something (else) wrong. focussing on biosecurity might be
looking for salvation in entirely the wrong place. dependence on biosecurity
alone is a response not unlike locking the gate after the horse has bolted.
Quote: caring for livestock is mostly commonsense
From my experience dealing with peoples questions day in day out I have to
say that you are naive.
i'd say that you deal with people who have dumb questions or lack
commonsense, and that is precisely why they are asking you. the people who
already know the answers or don't lack commonsense aren't asking you, are
they? :-)
caring for livestock IS mostly commonsense (part of which is knowing when to
ask someone else who is more expert). how else would one do it??
Quote: go to any SE Asian country
why?
To see what conditions birds live in when owned by a majority of a
population as a backyard entity. They would not come up to what would be
acceptible here.
many things in s.e. asia wouldn't be acceptable here, & animal husbandry
methods are but a part of that. it doesn't mean that s.e. asia is a living
example of why people shouldn't have backyard chooks. then again, you can
think about how (relatively) _little_ goes wrong in s.e. asian hen husbandry
when you consider the sheer scale...
Quote: Go back to the 1950's when the mortality rate for most flocks was
anything up to 50% even in the good ones
a quarter of a percent is still "up to 50%", so this is meaningless.
Sorry I was in a hurry to complete the post -- what I meant was averaging
around 50%
in australia it was 100%. because they got eaten on sundays <g>. as i said
before, progress is progress. the fact that we have made progress does not
mean interested parties shouldn't have backyard hens because that will turn
progress backwards. that's just nonsensical. my mum grew up in the 50s & had
to wear a thick woollen school uniform even in summer, and was beaten with
objects. that doesn't mean school should be outlawed - it means school
progressed (thank heavens). it's the same thing. comparisons don't work out
well sometimes because one must allow for progress, increased knowledge and
changes of attitude.
Quote: But the equation of home egg production, which was the point being
discussed, only works when the overriding majority do so. Otherwise you
have businesses farming for those who don't and you get back to the
situation we are in very quickly
i'm just not understanding you. i very much doubt anything like 50% of
households in australia have hens any more, but we don't import eggs
whatsoever.
?
Quote: Its my training -- I am always looking around any subject -- There are
always at least 2 sides to any question and if you look hard enough you
can usually find more than that
of course. but that means don't be so rigid about the "right" way, surely!
kylie |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
0tterbot wrote:
Quote: My point really is that most declarations of what is best for
chickens is very anthropomorphic.
i'm sure some of them are awfully so  not sure about "most".
Maybe I was thinking of the "fluffbunny" declarations. So much of what I
hear makes me cringe, as it does the birds in their care no service at all.
Quote: the people report that
eventually the battery hens begin to exhibit "normal hen" behaviour
based on no experience or observation.
Indeed. But no one has proven that without the ability to do this that the
hens "realise" they are bereft.
It gives birds consciousness that they simply do not have.
Quote:
undoubtedly battery birds' keepers try to keep their environment as
stress-free as possible _considering the circumstances_, but it
can't be without stress, because it's unnatural to their nature to
be confined thusly.
Using that arguement
i'm not arguing either <g
indeed 
Quote:
It is unnatural to have pompoms; Its unnatural to live
in temperate small gardens; its unnatural to be housed and washed for
shows.
EVERYTHING about poultry keeping has been "unnatural" [or man
managed] for over 300 years
certainly. i suppose it depends on where the line is drawn - of what
is an acceptable trade-off to both species (which only one species
actually negotiates  ,
Absolutely - there are no absolutes
Personally I find what is done to various pet species in the name of
fashion, and because they can, abhorant
Yet so many of the "fluffybunnies" can justify this.
Quote: as it were. i wish my hens could have a
really huuuuuge enclosure, but it's not possible at this time. so
they have _enough_ room (well, more than enough, really), and that's
fine. of course it's not "natural". but that's the line there, for me
(i live in a house even though that's not "natural"). i wouldn't find
a hen who can't see because of feathering to be "acceptable", nor
would i like to be washing and showing them. we just have to
negotiate what is acceptable amongst ourselves, don't we.
Yup - I find it interesting talking to our vet students about this all.
I am concerned how involved the veterinary world is becoming in the welfare
side of things when they get grossly insufficient training in the subject.
I want my vets to excell at making animals better when they are poorly --
not spend increasing amounts of time getting politically involved in things
that they have no experience in. The former is hard enough - its just about
the hardest profession there is, especially to keep up to date with all that
is new.
They do so little basic husbandry of all the species but almost nothing in
behaviour and such like.
Animal behaviour is a degree subject in itself and even then you only
collect the basics.
So little work has been done on poultry comparing systems in this way
There are some, frequently conflicting, often inconclusive, projects on
certain hormones
The breeding of the hybrids has certainly modified their behaviour a great
deal from their non-confined cousins.
Quote: You are giving them abilities they do not have.
They have not the sense of reason or to "think"
they have no sense of reason. they can think to some extent, because
they can be trained by operant conditioning. but my point was they
have the ability to "prefer" one thing over another.
Hmmm- prefer means "To choose or be in the habit of choosing as more
desirable or as having more value"
How is a chicken able to evaluate the cost / benefits of any activity?
How can they miss what is not stimulated?
One example is dustbathing [a popular cry for the anti intensive unit
folks] - this is an activity which helps to keep the feathers in good order.
However if the birds are kept in circumstances where they are not getting
wet, windy, dirty, dusty, there are no mites, etc, then the feathers are
going to need much less care? This is the sort of behavioural/ physiological
work that needs to be done to properly evaluate the "needs" that we
anthropomorphise. The new enhanced intensive units are going to have
dustbathes. However the birds are not outside so will they produce
sufficient oils to enable these to be used effectively?
There are thousands of domestic situations where a dustbath is not provided
yet these birds are outside having all these factors impinging on their
feathers. Which is more "cruel"
As I say -- there are more grey areas than clear ones and I hate the
categoric condemnation of systems when they are so poorly understood.
Quote:
Well - living in a country which has just had a very real incidence
of Avian Influenza due entirely to a serious lapse in biosecurity we
take it very seriously
We have been miraculously lucky that it seems that it was contained
and, so far, there is no evidence that the virus got into the wild
bird population. If it had, given the location and the very high
density of poultry of all management types in the immediate area the
results would have been devastating
i'd say again - don't you think there's something _else_ awry, not
related to imports? something there appears (to a disinterested party
on the other side of the world) to be seriously awry because outbreak
after outbreak in what are _supposed_ to be "good" (biosecure??)
circumstances is a warning that there is something (else) wrong.
Yes -- the populations value on food -- that is not going to change in a
hurry. ;(
Quote:
i'd say that you deal with people who have dumb questions or lack
commonsense, and that is precisely why they are asking you.
Certainly a possibility for some, but does not cover all ;)
Quote: many things in s.e. asia wouldn't be acceptable here, & animal
husbandry methods are but a part of that. it doesn't mean that s.e.
asia is a living example of why people shouldn't have backyard
chooks.
The response was to the suggestions that "EVERYONE" should have them so as
to negate the requirement for intenisve units
Very different from people choosing to enjoy having birds in their gardens
or smallholdings etc. These are the ones who, as you rightly say, will bring
to the table some clue as to what they are letting themsevles in for and
inform themselves
Quote: progress does not mean interested parties shouldn't have backyard
hens
See above -- my response was to the ideas that all should have - whomever
and whereever.
A VERY different scenario.
Quote: i'm just not understanding you. i very much doubt anything like 50% of
households in australia have hens any more, but we don't import eggs
whatsoever.
We have been importing eggs since the early 1800's
[just to be really picky and cos I picked this up researching AI along the
way
http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/Publishing.nsf/Content/health-avian_influenza-faq.htm
Q: Do we import eggs for consumption into Australia?
Answer: Australia does permit the importation of cooked, retorted (ie
commercially sterilised) eggs as well as a number of other products
containing egg. Only eggs and egg products that do not pose a risk of
introducing exotic diseases, including avian influenza, are permitted entry
into Australia. All imported and domestic egg products must be
pasteurised. ]
But - yes - you have a seriously commendable system of protecting your
borders in Australia. It drives a lot of breeders nuts, mind <grin>
Quote: of course. but that means don't be so rigid about the "right" way,
What right way ? There are many ways to solve every problem, and many
more do deal with teh consequences of our choices !!
--
regards
Jill Bowis
Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Amy Blankenship |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e9bcac$0$8733$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Quote: Amy Blankenship wrote:
Designed is a good word. Cutting off their beaks so they can't do it
is one way of designing them. Filling them so full of meds they
don't get sick under unnatural conditions is another.
No
The designing is the breeding / selection that has been going on ever
since Man decided that jungle fowl were useful and started to manipulate
their gene pool for their own use and inclination
While in the last 50 years the design has accelerated in terms of
production hybrids probably the most widespread manipulators were the
Victorians who created and stabilized the 300 plus breeds/ colours/ shapes
and sizes that make up the chicken world now
I don't know what things are like in your country but in the UK beak
trimming is due to be banned in 4 years time and is closely regulated
I never realized before you don't use periods (full stops). How odd...
Anyway, here there is little compassion for livestock, only profit. Beak
trimming is very common in commercial operations. I can't tell you how
thrilled I was when McDonald's mandated that their egg producers stop
trimming beaks and set standards for how many birds could be in a cage.
Quote: Medication is expensive and not cost effective - management and
preventative methods such as vaccines are preferred in this country
I've been able to find only one hatchery that offers a coccidiosis vaccine,
and the vaccine does not seem to be something a small flock owner can
purchase. When you *can* get a vaccine, the difference between medicated
and nonmedicated feed is definitely worth it...if you can find nonmedicated
chick feed that won't nullify your vaccine.
Quote: I do not disagree that there will be bad practitionners in every industry
but that should not mean the good ones should be condemned out of hand
They provide the majority of the world with good nutritious food at an
ever decreasing income.
Maybe in the UK in Europe. I think that the cruel practices that are
accepted here are probably more typical of what you'd see in much of the
rest of the world. You also should realize that here, chicken farmers are
more or less indentured servants to large corporations. Regardless of their
own intentions, they're told what to do and when to do it, and they are so
deeply in debt they have to.
-Amy |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Amy Blankenship |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45eab9ad$0$8733$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Quote: 0tterbot wrote:
stuff snipped
Quote: You are giving them abilities they do not have.
They have not the sense of reason or to "think"
they have no sense of reason. they can think to some extent, because
they can be trained by operant conditioning. but my point was they
have the ability to "prefer" one thing over another.
Hmmm- prefer means "To choose or be in the habit of choosing as more
desirable or as having more value"
How is a chicken able to evaluate the cost / benefits of any activity?
My chickens demonstrate every day that they prefer the bit of scratch I
throw in their pen to the continued opportunity to eat fresh grass, scratch
in the dirt, and pick up whatever bugs are on offer. Just _how_ they make
that determination and whether or not that is a _valid_ determination is
kind of irrelevant. It is obvious some sort of determination is made. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Amy Blankenship wrote:
Quote: "Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45eab9ad$0$8733$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
0tterbot wrote:
stuff snipped
You are giving them abilities they do not have.
They have not the sense of reason or to "think"
they have no sense of reason. they can think to some extent, because
they can be trained by operant conditioning. but my point was they
have the ability to "prefer" one thing over another.
Hmmm- prefer means "To choose or be in the habit of choosing as more
desirable or as having more value"
How is a chicken able to evaluate the cost / benefits of any
activity?
My chickens demonstrate every day that they prefer the bit of scratch
I throw in their pen to the continued opportunity to eat fresh grass,
scratch in the dirt, and pick up whatever bugs are on offer. Just
_how_ they make that determination and whether or not that is a
_valid_ determination is kind of irrelevant. It is obvious some sort
of determination is made.
But it has less value to their well being ;)
--
regards
Jill Bowis
Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jill |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Amy Blankenship wrote:
Quote: "Jill" <news@NOSPAMkintaline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e9bcac$0$8733$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
Amy Blankenship wrote:
Designed is a good word. Cutting off their beaks so they can't do
it is one way of designing them. Filling them so full of meds they
don't get sick under unnatural conditions is another.
No
The designing is the breeding / selection that has been going on ever
since Man decided that jungle fowl were useful and started to
manipulate their gene pool for their own use and inclination
While in the last 50 years the design has accelerated in terms of
production hybrids probably the most widespread manipulators were the
Victorians who created and stabilized the 300 plus breeds/ colours/
shapes and sizes that make up the chicken world now
I don't know what things are like in your country but in the UK beak
trimming is due to be banned in 4 years time and is closely regulated
I never realized before you don't use periods (full stops). How
odd...
Its worse with this new keyboard. I seem to miss them.
;)
Quote:
Anyway, here there is little compassion for livestock, only profit.
While running a profitable business is essential to put food on one's own
table and to provide for a family and to constantly maintain and upgrade a
farm, in the UK farming used to be a very compassionate area. Even large
family farms would be run by men and women who would do everything in their
powers to keep a lamb alive even if the costs outweighed the potential
profit. Even today proper farmers are still that way. Some of the most
decent, honest, hard working, compassionate, caring, environmentally aware,
proper people I have had the pleasure of meeting.
Its a shame if that stamp of person does not exist in Australia but I have
to say I am skeptical about your assertion.
Quote: Beak trimming is very common in commercial operations.
It is here still
Quote:
Medication is expensive and not cost effective - management and
preventative methods such as vaccines are preferred in this country
I've been able to find only one hatchery that offers a coccidiosis
vaccine, and the vaccine does not seem to be something a small flock
owner can purchase.
Coccidia are best prevented by good management but you might find this
useful
http://www.rirdc.gov.au/pub/newsletters/egg/nov99.html#COCCIDIOSIS
http://www.bioproperties.com.au/vaccines/Eimeriavax4m.htm
When you *can* get a vaccine, the difference
Quote: between medicated and nonmedicated feed is definitely worth it...if
you can find nonmedicated chick feed that won't nullify your vaccine.
We have few coccidiostats in feed here now
Quote:
I do not disagree that there will be bad practitionners in every
industry but that should not mean the good ones should be condemned
out of hand They provide the majority of the world with good
nutritious food at an ever decreasing income.
Maybe in the UK in Europe. I think that the cruel practices that are
accepted here are probably more typical of what you'd see in much of
the rest of the world. You also should realize that here, chicken
farmers are more or less indentured servants to large corporations.
Regardless of their own intentions, they're told what to do and when
to do it, and they are so deeply in debt they have to.
What a terrible and sweeping condemnation of an industry and all the people
in it. ;(
The amount of effort being spent on research in Australia might give a
different impression
http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au/dhtml/ss/section.php?sectID=111&tempID=1
--
regards
Jill Bowis
Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:07 am
|
|