| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Medicine - Cardiology Forum » Common Painkillers Can Raise Blood Pressure: Study
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| William Wagner |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Bill who takes aspirin daily and has High BP thought this was
interesting. Sort of damed if you do damed if you don't.
.......................
http://online.barrons.com/article/ON-CO-20070226-812585.html?mod=9_0002_d
jbn_home
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2007 4:10 p.m. EST
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
By Val Brickates Kennedy
BOSTON (Dow Jones) -- Older men who frequently use three of the most
popular over-the-counter pain relievers face a heightened risk of
developing high blood pressure, a new medical study shows.
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
"This is important because acetaminophen, ibuprofen and aspirin are the
three most commonly used drugs in the U.S., and high blood pressure
affects about 60 million Americans," said the hospital's Dr. John
Forman, author of the study, in an e-mail interview. "High blood
pressure is one of the leading causes of heart disease and death."
Forman said he did not want to comment on whether the Food and Drug
Administration should have the drugs carry warning labels advising of
the risk, stating that was a public-policy issue.
The study found the highest risk was associated with a group of pain
relievers known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs,
which include ibuprofen and naproxen. Ibuprofen is also marketed under
the brand names Advil, Motrin and Nuprin. Naproxen can be found under
the names Aleve and Naprosyn.
Men who used NSAIDs six or seven times a week showed a 38% increased
risk of developing hypertension, the researchers found.
Acetaminophen users had the next highest risk, with an increased
hypertension rate of 34% when the drug was used six to seven times a
week. Acetaminophen is also marketed under the brand names Tylenol and
Panadol.
Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs already have
warnings advising caution when taken by patients who drink three or more
alcoholic drinks per day.
Aspirin, which is commonly prescribed to patients at risk of suffering a
heart attack because of its blood-thinning properties, also carried a
risk. Men who used the medication six to seven times a week exhibited a
26% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.
The results were based on an analysis of data collected from 2000
through 2004 on men with a median age of 65 and no history of
hypertension who were taking the medications. Of the 16,031 men
analyzed, 1,968 developed high blood pressure. The data is part of a
larger ongoing study started by the hospital in 1986 that is tracking
the health patterns of male medical professionals.
Any elevation can be harmful
The study did not measure to what degree the men's blood pressure was
raised or whether the symptoms subsided once they stopped taking the
drugs, said Forman.
"That being said, it is well established that even small increases in
blood pressure translate into significant increases in risk of
cardiovascular death and disease," said Forman. "Therefore, 'slightly'
elevated blood pressure is also dangerous."
Despite the findings, Forman noted that the drugs are still a valuable
medical option.
"While we are highlighting certain potential risks, these medications
also have benefits, including pain control, and in the case of aspirin
for some people, reduction in heart-attack risk," said Forman.
"Patients and their clinicians should make informed choices," Forman
added.
Results of the study will be published in the Feb. 26 issue of the
Archives of Internal Medicine, a publication of the American Medical
Society. The research was funded by the American Heart Association and
the National Institutes of Health.
--
S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade
http://www.ocutech.com/ High tech Vison aid
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that generalized inflammation leads to
both the aches/pains that require the OTC painkillers and the
elevation in blood pressure.
This is borne out by the clinical observation that when the OTC
painkillers are stopped, the elevation in blood pressure persists.
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
William Wagner wrote:
Quote: Bill who takes aspirin daily and has High BP thought this was
interesting. Sort of damed if you do damed if you don't.
......................
http://online.barrons.com/article/ON-CO-20070226-812585.html?mod=9_0002_d
jbn_home
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2007 4:10 p.m. EST
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
By Val Brickates Kennedy
BOSTON (Dow Jones) -- Older men who frequently use three of the most
popular over-the-counter pain relievers face a heightened risk of
developing high blood pressure, a new medical study shows.
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
"This is important because acetaminophen, ibuprofen and aspirin are the
three most commonly used drugs in the U.S., and high blood pressure
affects about 60 million Americans," said the hospital's Dr. John
Forman, author of the study, in an e-mail interview. "High blood
pressure is one of the leading causes of heart disease and death."
Forman said he did not want to comment on whether the Food and Drug
Administration should have the drugs carry warning labels advising of
the risk, stating that was a public-policy issue.
The study found the highest risk was associated with a group of pain
relievers known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs,
which include ibuprofen and naproxen. Ibuprofen is also marketed under
the brand names Advil, Motrin and Nuprin. Naproxen can be found under
the names Aleve and Naprosyn.
Men who used NSAIDs six or seven times a week showed a 38% increased
risk of developing hypertension, the researchers found.
Acetaminophen users had the next highest risk, with an increased
hypertension rate of 34% when the drug was used six to seven times a
week. Acetaminophen is also marketed under the brand names Tylenol and
Panadol.
Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs already have
warnings advising caution when taken by patients who drink three or more
alcoholic drinks per day.
Aspirin, which is commonly prescribed to patients at risk of suffering a
heart attack because of its blood-thinning properties, also carried a
risk. Men who used the medication six to seven times a week exhibited a
26% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.
The results were based on an analysis of data collected from 2000
through 2004 on men with a median age of 65 and no history of
hypertension who were taking the medications. Of the 16,031 men
analyzed, 1,968 developed high blood pressure. The data is part of a
larger ongoing study started by the hospital in 1986 that is tracking
the health patterns of male medical professionals.
Any elevation can be harmful
The study did not measure to what degree the men's blood pressure was
raised or whether the symptoms subsided once they stopped taking the
drugs, said Forman.
"That being said, it is well established that even small increases in
blood pressure translate into significant increases in risk of
cardiovascular death and disease," said Forman. "Therefore, 'slightly'
elevated blood pressure is also dangerous."
Despite the findings, Forman noted that the drugs are still a valuable
medical option.
"While we are highlighting certain potential risks, these medications
also have benefits, including pain control, and in the case of aspirin
for some people, reduction in heart-attack risk," said Forman.
"Patients and their clinicians should make informed choices," Forman
added.
Results of the study will be published in the Feb. 26 issue of the
Archives of Internal Medicine, a publication of the American Medical
Society. The research was funded by the American Heart Association and
the National Institutes of Health.
--
S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade
http://www.ocutech.com/ High tech Vison aid
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jim Chinnis |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
William Wagner <not-to-here-williamwag@gmail.com> wrote in part:
Quote: According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
These drugs have very different pharmacological actions. I suspect they
don't increase the risk of high blood pressure. I suspect the fact that
these people have frequent pain might be associated with developing high
blood pressure.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Susan |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
x-no-archive: yes
Jim Chinnis wrote:
Quote: William Wagner <not-to-here-williamwag@gmail.com> wrote in part:
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
These drugs have very different pharmacological actions. I suspect they
don't increase the risk of high blood pressure. I suspect the fact that
these people have frequent pain might be associated with developing high
blood pressure.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
That was my first thought, but I think it may be a little bit of both.
I think folks in chronic pain are likely dealing with conditions that
can raise bp. I also know that NSAIDS damage kidneys and may contribute
to ht that way. The fact that the rates of ht were so different for
acetaminophen and NSAIDS is suggestive of a link, too.
Susan |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WA |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <achung@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Quote: Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few days.
stupid fuck. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Father Haskell |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 26, 8:55 pm, "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!"
<nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote:
Quote: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in messagenews:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...> Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few days.
stupid fuck.
What, you really think he believes the bullshit he posts here? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jim Chinnis |
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Susan <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in part:
Quote: x-no-archive: yes
Jim Chinnis wrote:
William Wagner <not-to-here-williamwag@gmail.com> wrote in part:
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
These drugs have very different pharmacological actions. I suspect they
don't increase the risk of high blood pressure. I suspect the fact that
these people have frequent pain might be associated with developing high
blood pressure.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
That was my first thought, but I think it may be a little bit of both.
I think folks in chronic pain are likely dealing with conditions that
can raise bp. I also know that NSAIDS damage kidneys and may contribute
to ht that way. The fact that the rates of ht were so different for
acetaminophen and NSAIDS is suggestive of a link, too.
Susan
Yes. I think that's a good description of what is most likely going on.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WA |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172541738.074825.204110@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Feb 26, 8:55 pm, "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!"
nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
messagenews:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few days.
stupid fuck.
What, you really think he believes the bullshit he posts here?
no-he has no right giving his death dealer advice to those who seek medical
help.
those that are medically ill he preys on-thinking in their weakend condition
they will fall for his snake oil pitch.
i've known this all along-he is to simple to see thru. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:40 am |
|
|
|
|
On 26 Feb, 16:39, William Wagner <not-to-here-william...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote: Bill who takes aspirin daily and has High BP thought this was
interesting. Sort of damed if you do damed if you don't.
......................
http://online.barrons.com/article/ON-CO-20070226-812585.html?mod=9_00...
jbn_home
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2007 4:10 p.m. EST
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
By Val Brickates Kennedy
BOSTON (Dow Jones) -- Older men who frequently use three of the most
popular over-the-counter pain relievers face a heightened risk of
developing high blood pressure, a new medical study shows.
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
"This is important because acetaminophen, ibuprofen and aspirin are the
three most commonly used drugs in the U.S., and high blood pressure
affects about 60 million Americans," said the hospital's Dr. John
Forman, author of the study, in an e-mail interview. "High blood
pressure is one of the leading causes of heart disease and death."
Forman said he did not want to comment on whether the Food and Drug
Administration should have the drugs carry warning labels advising of
the risk, stating that was a public-policy issue.
The study found the highest risk was associated with a group of pain
relievers known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs,
which include ibuprofen and naproxen. Ibuprofen is also marketed under
the brand names Advil, Motrin and Nuprin. Naproxen can be found under
the names Aleve and Naprosyn.
Men who used NSAIDs six or seven times a week showed a 38% increased
risk of developing hypertension, the researchers found.
Acetaminophen users had the next highest risk, with an increased
hypertension rate of 34% when the drug was used six to seven times a
week. Acetaminophen is also marketed under the brand names Tylenol and
Panadol.
Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs already have
warnings advising caution when taken by patients who drink three or more
alcoholic drinks per day.
Aspirin, which is commonly prescribed to patients at risk of suffering a
heart attack because of its blood-thinning properties, also carried a
risk. Men who used the medication six to seven times a week exhibited a
26% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.
The results were based on an analysis of data collected from 2000
through 2004 on men with a median age of 65 and no history of
hypertension who were taking the medications. Of the 16,031 men
analyzed, 1,968 developed high blood pressure. The data is part of a
larger ongoing study started by the hospital in 1986 that is tracking
the health patterns of male medical professionals.
Any elevation can be harmful
The study did not measure to what degree the men's blood pressure was
raised or whether the symptoms subsided once they stopped taking the
drugs, said Forman.
"That being said, it is well established that even small increases in
blood pressure translate into significant increases in risk of
cardiovascular death and disease," said Forman. "Therefore, 'slightly'
elevated blood pressure is also dangerous."
Despite the findings, Forman noted that the drugs are still a valuable
medical option.
"While we are highlighting certain potential risks, these medications
also have benefits, including pain control, and in the case of aspirin
for some people, reduction in heart-attack risk," said Forman.
"Patients and their clinicians should make informed choices," Forman
added.
Results of the study will be published in the Feb. 26 issue of the
Archives of Internal Medicine, a publication of the American Medical
Society. The research was funded by the American Heart Association and
the National Institutes of Health.
--
S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade
http://www.ocutech.com/ High tech Vison aid
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit.
This is simply amazing. I thought everyone already knew that even 81
mg a day raised blood pressures measurably. How can it be new news? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| William Wagner |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <1172587246.478767.320260@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>,
James216440@yahoo.com wrote:
Quote: On 26 Feb, 16:39, William Wagner <not-to-here-william...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bill who takes aspirin daily and has High BP thought this was
interesting. Sort of damed if you do damed if you don't.
......................
http://online.barrons.com/article/ON-CO-20070226-812585.html?mod=9_00...
jbn_home
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2007 4:10 p.m. EST
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
By Val Brickates Kennedy
BOSTON (Dow Jones) -- Older men who frequently use three of the most
popular over-the-counter pain relievers face a heightened risk of
developing high blood pressure, a new medical study shows.
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk
of developing high blood pressure.
"This is important because acetaminophen, ibuprofen and aspirin are the
three most commonly used drugs in the U.S., and high blood pressure
affects about 60 million Americans," said the hospital's Dr. John
Forman, author of the study, in an e-mail interview. "High blood
pressure is one of the leading causes of heart disease and death."
Forman said he did not want to comment on whether the Food and Drug
Administration should have the drugs carry warning labels advising of
the risk, stating that was a public-policy issue.
The study found the highest risk was associated with a group of pain
relievers known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs,
which include ibuprofen and naproxen. Ibuprofen is also marketed under
the brand names Advil, Motrin and Nuprin. Naproxen can be found under
the names Aleve and Naprosyn.
Men who used NSAIDs six or seven times a week showed a 38% increased
risk of developing hypertension, the researchers found.
Acetaminophen users had the next highest risk, with an increased
hypertension rate of 34% when the drug was used six to seven times a
week. Acetaminophen is also marketed under the brand names Tylenol and
Panadol.
Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs already have
warnings advising caution when taken by patients who drink three or more
alcoholic drinks per day.
Aspirin, which is commonly prescribed to patients at risk of suffering a
heart attack because of its blood-thinning properties, also carried a
risk. Men who used the medication six to seven times a week exhibited a
26% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.
The results were based on an analysis of data collected from 2000
through 2004 on men with a median age of 65 and no history of
hypertension who were taking the medications. Of the 16,031 men
analyzed, 1,968 developed high blood pressure. The data is part of a
larger ongoing study started by the hospital in 1986 that is tracking
the health patterns of male medical professionals.
Any elevation can be harmful
The study did not measure to what degree the men's blood pressure was
raised or whether the symptoms subsided once they stopped taking the
drugs, said Forman.
"That being said, it is well established that even small increases in
blood pressure translate into significant increases in risk of
cardiovascular death and disease," said Forman. "Therefore, 'slightly'
elevated blood pressure is also dangerous."
Despite the findings, Forman noted that the drugs are still a valuable
medical option.
"While we are highlighting certain potential risks, these medications
also have benefits, including pain control, and in the case of aspirin
for some people, reduction in heart-attack risk," said Forman.
"Patients and their clinicians should make informed choices," Forman
added.
Results of the study will be published in the Feb. 26 issue of the
Archives of Internal Medicine, a publication of the American Medical
Society. The research was funded by the American Heart Association and
the National Institutes of Health.
--
S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade
http://www.ocutech.com/ High tech Vison aid
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit.
This is simply amazing. I thought everyone already knew that even 81
mg a day raised blood pressures measurably. How can it be new news?
I don't know but it was new to me. Information overload?
Anyway found below .
Bill
..................
: Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):842-7.
Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised
controlled trial.
€ McKinstry B, Hanley J, Heaney D, McCloughan L, Elton R, Webb DJ.
Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
brian.mckinstry@ed.ac.uk
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care.
One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of
patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their
care. AIM: To determine whether encouraging patients to manage their
hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information
in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to
become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would
improve their care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Single blind randomised controlled
trial of detailed guideline versus standard information. SETTING: Single
urban general practice over 1 year. METHOD: Patient-held guideline with
written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two
hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice
hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into
one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the
study. RESULTS: Primary outcome: average systolic blood pressure.
Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure < 150
mmHg systolic and < 90 mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion
of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline,
hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically
significant differences were found between intervention and control with
respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin
and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both
groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.
CONCLUSION: In this study there was no clinically significant perceived
benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension
guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic
illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such
interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.
PMID: 17132351 [PubMed - in process]
--
S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade
http://www.ocutech.com/ High tech Vison aid
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Machete |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!" <nuniagoddamn@bizniz.biz> wrote in message
news:7tednb4Es_bSTH7YnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@giganews.com...
Quote:
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172541738.074825.204110@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:55 pm, "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!"
nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
messagenews:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few days.
stupid fuck.
What, you really think he believes the bullshit he posts here?
no-he has no right giving his death dealer advice to those who seek
medical help.
those that are medically ill he preys on-thinking in their weakend
condition they will fall for his snake oil pitch.
i've known this all along-he is to simple to see thru.
Hey you guys, take it easy, this is Dr. Chung we're talking about here, show
some fucking respect! Actaully, he probably would have made a decent doctor
during the middle ages (when a doctor was just as likely to be the town
butcher.) Another thing to consider, Chung has his imaginary patients
follow his 2 pound per day diet, but Chung himself is carrying about 10 tons
worth of iridium around in his head, so he's an extremely dense individual.
Trying to get through to Chung is akin to shooting an airgun at a tank or
attempting to knock a power grid out by cutting a loud fart.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Machete |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Susan" <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:54hci8F1vc5s2U1@mid.individual.net...
Quote: x-no-archive: yes
Jim Chinnis wrote:
William Wagner <not-to-here-williamwag@gmail.com> wrote in part:
According to researchers at Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital, the
study showed that men who frequently took such widely used pain killers
as aspirin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen had up to a 38% increased risk of
developing high blood pressure.
These drugs have very different pharmacological actions. I suspect they
don't increase the risk of high blood pressure. I suspect the fact that
these people have frequent pain might be associated with developing high
blood pressure.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
That was my first thought, but I think it may be a little bit of both.
I think folks in chronic pain are likely dealing with conditions that can
raise bp. I also know that NSAIDS damage kidneys and may contribute to ht
that way. The fact that the rates of ht were so different for
acetaminophen and NSAIDS is suggestive of a link, too.
Susan
I've heard doctors go either way on this one, I've heard doctors say that
taking the max daily dose of Tylenol is ok for extended periods of time
(provided you don't drink) and I've heard doctors say that 2 mg's per day
for an extended perioid of time will eventually destroy the liver and/or
cause renal failure. I think it all depends on the person. I take Tylenol
all the time but I rarely drink, I have had several liver pannels done over
the course of the last 10 years and all have been normal. It certainly has
the potential to cause problems, we've all heard the stories about the
borderline alcoholic who pops 3 or 4 Tylenol in one sitting and ends up dead
5 days latter. Obviously, when taking Tylenol on a regular basis, an
individual should make it a point to avoid alcohol, especially if he/she
normally consumes 4 or more drinks per day.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Father Haskell |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 27, 1:03 pm, "Machete" <Mach...@home.com> wrote:
Quote: "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!" <nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote in messagenews:7tednb4Es_bSTH7YnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@giganews.com...
"Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172541738.074825.204110@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:55 pm, "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!"
nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
messagenews:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few days.
stupid fuck.
What, you really think he believes the bullshit he posts here?
no-he has no right giving his death dealer advice to those who seek
medical help.
those that are medically ill he preys on-thinking in their weakend
condition they will fall for his snake oil pitch.
i've known this all along-he is to simple to see thru.
Hey you guys, take it easy, this is Dr. Chung we're talking about here, show
some fucking respect! Actaully, he probably would have made a decent doctor
during the middle ages (when a doctor was just as likely to be the town
butcher.)
Or the barber, who usually sidelined in bloodletting, leaching, and
family dentistry.
Quote: Another thing to consider, Chung has his imaginary patients
follow his 2 pound per day diet, but Chung himself is carrying about 10 tons
worth of iridium around in his head, so he's an extremely dense individual.
Trying to get through to Chung is akin to shooting an airgun at a tank or
attempting to knock a power grid out by cutting a loud fart.
Difference between Dr. Meng^H^H^H Chung and a medieval barber is,
no medieval barber in his right mind would prescribe acetone as a
food supplement. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Machete |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172602410.733231.60070@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Feb 27, 1:03 pm, "Machete" <Mach...@home.com> wrote:
"I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!" <nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote in
messagenews:7tednb4Es_bSTH7YnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@giganews.com...
"Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172541738.074825.204110@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:55 pm, "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!"
nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
messagenews:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few
days.
stupid fuck.
What, you really think he believes the bullshit he posts here?
no-he has no right giving his death dealer advice to those who seek
medical help.
those that are medically ill he preys on-thinking in their weakend
condition they will fall for his snake oil pitch.
i've known this all along-he is to simple to see thru.
Hey you guys, take it easy, this is Dr. Chung we're talking about here,
show
some fucking respect! Actaully, he probably would have made a decent
doctor
during the middle ages (when a doctor was just as likely to be the town
butcher.)
Or the barber, who usually sidelined in bloodletting, leaching, and
family dentistry.
Another thing to consider, Chung has his imaginary patients
follow his 2 pound per day diet, but Chung himself is carrying about 10
tons
worth of iridium around in his head, so he's an extremely dense
individual.
Trying to get through to Chung is akin to shooting an airgun at a tank or
attempting to knock a power grid out by cutting a loud fart.
Difference between Dr. Meng^H^H^H Chung and a medieval barber is,
no medieval barber in his right mind would prescribe acetone as a
food supplement.
Doubtless, but would really made me realize Chung was completely spun was
the fact that he stated that people who are starving are not actually
hungry, huh?
"Stalingrad" by Antony Beevor is a book about the German invasion of
Stalingrad (Russia) that took place in August of 1942 and the subsequent
encirclement and destruction of Field Marshall Paulus's Sixth Army (nearly
300,000 men including the Russians who were captured and dragooned into
fighting or working for the Germany Army.) After the failed attempt on
Moscow, Hitler set his eyes on the Caucascus, the oil fields of southern
Russia. This eventually lead to a city called Stalingrad (on the Volga
River) where the most bloody and merciless battle in the history of the
world would take place. It started out with General Richthofen's relay
boming of the city in early August, killing close to 40,000 civilians and
totally destroying the city. This was simply the beginning, by the end of
the battle, over one million men, women and children would die in just six
months. Nearly twice the amount lost in the entire Civil War and twice the
amount of American deaths throughout the entire WW2 campaign (in both
theatres.) All in one 6 month battle. The amount of deaths was largly due
to Hitler's refusal to allow and breakouts of withdrawals and Stalin's same
attitude, not to mention the Soviet style of attack which in the beginning
of the battle, was nothing short of suicidal. Just wait, I am going
somewhere with this!
In the latter chapters, much attention is given to the effects of starvation
on an individual and one of the biggest side effects of starvation tends to
be hunger! Even in their death throes, German soliders could think of
nothing but food. Often times, men who were starving to death (and near
death) were suddenly brought large amounts of fatty food (sometimes air
supplies would slip through massive amounts of flak) and warned to eat it
very slowly, many did not and died as a result. Even men with diseases such
as Typhus and Typhoid were preoccupied with food. In fact, most German
soliders and officers were much more concerned about the decreased rations
than the fact that they were encircled and doomed to die by either a Soviet
bullet, shell, a death camp (if captured) or disease from the massive
infestations of lice. When it became apparent, after rations had been
reduced to about 250 calories a day, that there would be no one to rescue
them and that General Hoth's attempt to relieve them had failed, they were
still hungry.
What does all this BS proof, well, it proves that in many cases, hunger is
not good (at least not for the men who are dying of starvation) and that
Chung is full of shit. Of course, it also proves that Hitler was one stupid
son-of-a-bitch and that the 6th Army got their ass handed to them but that's
another thread. Have a good week Chungster!
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Father Haskell |
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 27, 4:49 pm, "Machete" <Mach...@home.com> wrote:
Quote: "Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172602410.733231.60070@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 27, 1:03 pm, "Machete" <Mach...@home.com> wrote:
"I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!" <nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote in
messagenews:7tednb4Es_bSTH7YnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@giganews.com...
"Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172541738.074825.204110@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:55 pm, "I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!"
nuniagodd...@bizniz.biz> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
messagenews:1172526847.172766.246600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Statistical association does not necessarily mean that the OTC pain
relievers are raising blood pressure.
A more likely explanation is that
snip
why do you care,chunks?according to you-we are all dead in a few
days.
stupid fuck.
What, you really think he believes the bullshit he posts here?
no-he has no right giving his death dealer advice to those who seek
medical help.
those that are medically ill he preys on-thinking in their weakend
condition they will fall for his snake oil pitch.
i've known this all along-he is to simple to see thru.
Hey you guys, take it easy, this is Dr. Chung we're talking about here,
show
some fucking respect! Actaully, he probably would have made a decent
doctor
during the middle ages (when a doctor was just as likely to be the town
butcher.)
Or the barber, who usually sidelined in bloodletting, leaching, and
family dentistry.
Another thing to consider, Chung has his imaginary patients
follow his 2 pound per day diet, but Chung himself is carrying about 10
tons
worth of iridium around in his head, so he's an extremely dense
individual.
Trying to get through to Chung is akin to shooting an airgun at a tank or
attempting to knock a power grid out by cutting a loud fart.
Difference between Dr. Meng^H^H^H Chung and a medieval barber is,
no medieval barber in his right mind would prescribe acetone as a
food supplement.
Doubtless, but would really made me realize Chung was completely spun was
the fact that he stated that people who are starving are not actually
hungry, huh?
"Stalingrad" by Antony Beevor is a book about the German invasion of
Stalingrad (Russia) that took place in August of 1942 and the subsequent
encirclement and destruction of Field Marshall Paulus's Sixth Army (nearly
300,000 men including the Russians who were captured and dragooned into
fighting or working for the Germany Army.) After the failed attempt on
Moscow, Hitler set his eyes on the Caucascus, the oil fields of southern
Russia. This eventually lead to a city called Stalingrad (on the Volga
River) where the most bloody and merciless battle in the history of the
world would take place. It started out with General Richthofen's relay
boming of the city in early August, killing close to 40,000 civilians and
totally destroying the city. This was simply the beginning, by the end of
the battle, over one million men, women and children would die in just six
months. Nearly twice the amount lost in the entire Civil War and twice the
amount of American deaths throughout the entire WW2 campaign (in both
theatres.) All in one 6 month battle. The amount of deaths was largly due
to Hitler's refusal to allow and breakouts of withdrawals and Stalin's same
attitude, not to mention the Soviet style of attack which in the beginning
of the battle, was nothing short of suicidal. Just wait, I am going
somewhere with this!
In the latter chapters, much attention is given to the effects of starvation
on an individual and one of the biggest side effects of starvation tends to
be hunger! Even in their death throes, German soliders could think of
nothing but food. Often times, men who were starving to death (and near
death) were suddenly brought large amounts of fatty food (sometimes air
supplies would slip through massive amounts of flak) and warned to eat it
very slowly, many did not and died as a result. Even men with diseases such
as Typhus and Typhoid were preoccupied with food. In fact, most German
soliders and officers were much more concerned about the decreased rations
than the fact that they were encircled and doomed to die by either a Soviet
bullet, shell, a death camp (if captured) or disease from the massive
infestations of lice. When it became apparent, after rations had been
reduced to about 250 calories a day, that there would be no one to rescue
them and that General Hoth's attempt to relieve them had failed, they were
still hungry.
Didn't the citizens -- a LOT of them -- resort to eating pets -- and
cannibalism --
in the face of starving to death?
Quote: What does all this BS proof, well, it proves that in many cases, hunger is
not good (at least not for the men who are dying of starvation) and that
Chung is full of shit. Of course, it also proves that Hitler was one stupid
son-of-a-bitch and that the 6th Army got their ass handed to them but that's
another thread. Have a good week Chungster! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 1:41 am
|
|