|
Science Forum Index » Energy - Hydrogen Forum » I designed a hydrogen car (runs on air, powered by large bat
Page 7 of 8 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Eeyore |
 Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Since when have you ever made a single positive contribution here ?
Oh, please do define 'positive contribution'...
Anything other than "it can't be done" or "it won't make a difference" maybe ?
And, why don't you support the hydrogen economy?
I thought that was pretty obvious. Using hydrogen as a fuel requires more energy
overall than not using hydrogen !
Quote: Why all the negative posts?
Because of the above.
Quote: You will be the only one that doesn't understand how stupid your answer
is. I take that back. Josh and H2PV won't get it.........
As ever you talk in riddles.
Why don't you say what you actually think would be a good idea for once instead of
playing the court jester ?
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
All present production may amount to a quarter of a quad. The world will
demand another 75 quad over the next 20 years.
What does that mean ? Liquid fuels alone ? An average of 75/20 quads p.a. over
20 years so assuming a linear increase then 7.5 quad p.a. on top of existing use
after 20 yrs have passed ?
If you don't like the number, argue with the EIA.
As ever, I ask a straight question and you answer it with a riddle.
Get over yourself.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dan Bloomquist |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote:
Why don't you say what you actually think would be a good idea for once instead of
playing the court jester ?
I have. As far as 'court jester', look in the mirror. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dan Bloomquist |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
All present production may amount to a quarter of a quad. The world will
demand another 75 quad over the next 20 years.
What does that mean ? Liquid fuels alone ? An average of 75/20 quads p.a. over
20 years so assuming a linear increase then 7.5 quad p.a. on top of existing use
after 20 yrs have passed ?
If you don't like the number, argue with the EIA.
As ever, I ask a straight question and you answer it with a riddle.
You hear a riddle because you are busy playing 'thick head'.
Nothing to get over. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:28 pm |
|
|
|
|
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45DCE145.DD2354F4@hotmail.com...
Quote:
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
I can prove that I have doubled the mileage of a regular Gasoline car
without
hybridgeing
with battery's power or with hydrogen.
What did you do ?
Graham
Sorry can't tell! but I can prove if any media wants to see the living
proofs.
I'm waiting for Gas price to sky-rocket again, then I'll tell people... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| User |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 19 Feb 2007 11:25:44 -0800, "gb6724@yahoo.com" <gb6724@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Quote: www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/new_hydrogen_car.htm
You'd be much better off if you added an electric motor and used the
battery power directly.
Have you done any calculations to determine what percentage of the
battery energy would actually make it into energy to drive the vehicle
using your scheme? You might be surprised. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:48 pm |
|
|
|
|
"Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
news:t15Dh.3337$B25.562@news01.roc.ny...
Quote:
Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Since when have you ever made a single positive contribution here ?
Oh, please do define 'positive contribution'...
Anything other than "it can't be done" or "it won't make a difference"
maybe ?
And, why don't you support the hydrogen economy? Why all the negative
posts?
Sorry to jump in, if you can prove that your car can run on Hydrogen alone,
then I would believe you.
On the other hand, I can prove that a car can run efficiently with Gasoline
alone, no hybrid, no hydrogen. 2X on performance and mileage. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:51 pm |
|
|
|
|
<gb6724@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1171991886.507350.294210@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Quote: www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/new_hydrogen_car.htm
You're an idiot.
Graham
I agree he is.
Ideas are dangerous - Stalin. Work is mandatory - Stalin.
Orwell's factory is safety - Stalin. Ideas are for Stalin - Stalin.
Hey man,
I think your idea might help boosting the car's energy, do you know where I
can buy the water electrolytic container? I will supply my own battery. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Why don't you say what you actually think would be a good idea for once instead of
playing the court jester ?
I have. As far as 'court jester', look in the mirror.
But as ever you won't say when asked.
You're a jerk.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
Quote: "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
I can prove that I have doubled the mileage of a regular Gasoline car
without hybridgeing with battery's power or with hydrogen.
What did you do ?
Graham
Sorry can't tell!
Are you afraid that Big Oil would have you killed ?
Quote: but I can prove if any media wants to see the living proofs.
I'm waiting for Gas price to sky-rocket again, then I'll tell people...
Yeah, right.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
Quote: "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Since when have you ever made a single positive contribution here ?
Oh, please do define 'positive contribution'...
Anything other than "it can't be done" or "it won't make a difference"
maybe ?
And, why don't you support the hydrogen economy? Why all the negative
posts?
Sorry to jump in, if you can prove that your car can run on Hydrogen alone,
then I would believe you.
On the other hand, I can prove that a car can run efficiently with Gasoline
alone, no hybrid, no hydrogen. 2X on performance and mileage.
So prove it. Lean burn by any chance ?
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dan Bloomquist |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
Quote: "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
news:t15Dh.3337$B25.562@news01.roc.ny...
Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Since when have you ever made a single positive contribution here ?
Oh, please do define 'positive contribution'...
Anything other than "it can't be done" or "it won't make a difference"
maybe ?
And, why don't you support the hydrogen economy? Why all the negative
posts?
Sorry to jump in, if you can prove that your car can run on Hydrogen alone,
then I would believe you.
And, why would I want to 'prove' that? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dan Bloomquist |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
In your eyes. I'm flattered. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Don Lancaster |
| Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
User wrote:
Quote: On 19 Feb 2007 11:25:44 -0800, "gb6724@yahoo.com" <gb6724@yahoo.com
wrote:
www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/new_hydrogen_car.htm
You'd be much better off if you added an electric motor and used the
battery power directly.
Have you done any calculations to determine what percentage of the
battery energy would actually make it into energy to drive the vehicle
using your scheme? You might be surprised.
Detailed analysis at http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu05.asp for Nov 19th.
But it turns out my estimate for fanbelt efficiency at 97 percent was
way high. Typically 93 percent or less.
This gets you down to around 75 watts recovered at the pulley for 1000
watts input.
The system is thus a dynamic brake.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@tinaja.com
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Charlie Edmondson |
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Quote:
Eeyore wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Since when have you ever made a single positive contribution here ?
Oh, please do define 'positive contribution'...
Anything other than "it can't be done" or "it won't make a difference"
maybe ?
And, why don't you support the hydrogen economy? Why all the negative
posts?
You will be the only one that doesn't understand how stupid your answer
is. I take that back. Josh and H2PV won't get it.........
Dan,
Please don't insult Josh by putting him in the same league as H2PV.
Josh is just someone who has seen all the glowing websites produced by
the car companies and the government, and believes them. After all, they
are professionals, and we are just the amatuers! 8-)
H2PV ain't even sure what universe he is in...
Charlie |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
