Bush in most ways thinks like Ceausescu. The high-importance
lays with security, police-America, listening to all phone calls in
the world, and thinking little of the little people. Bush's remodeling
projects involves personal supremacy as the head of police.
Bush erects a model Iraq today, a country better than Arabs,
Bush not seeing his violation of culture and humanity with
his private obsession as a rich man in power. Bush created
mass racism, 80-90 percent of Arabs now think negatively
of Americans, while in the past Arabs thought positively of
Americans. Bush takes a supremacist stance (be it as American
or otherwise) over Arabs. The USA is now the world's most hated
country, it was one of the most popular countries. A cold stance
by a leader who knows no other way than to be the man on top
is a a supremacy disorder seen particularly strongly by Hitler,
his pursuit to be the winner, his military that takes nothing but a
win as supreme. It is sad, but that's the case. This is world war
III today, like it or not.

The overall result, is that if investing 45 horsepowers
for one hour to do electrolysis, we get one gallon worth
of gasoline power to run the car's engine on hydrogen.
Another 2-15 horsepowers can get all the needed water.

"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote: gb6...@yahoo.com wrote:
"gb6...@yahoo.com" <gb6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Of course we will never see it [the hilarious car] in the real world, because
everybody is a stubborn fascist Hitler, like Bush.

It is neither fair nor reasonable to compare Bush to Hitler.

Hitler was one of the 20th centuries most outstanding highway engineers.

Hitler himself ?

Sorry, but you are talking to an intelligent man.

More like a daft kid who flunked high school actually.

Go troll somewhere else. Bored now !

Graham

"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
So we find that... Eeyore, are you still here? So we find
that it costs about 50-60 horsepowers to produce
one gasoline-gallon worth of car energy

The first thing you need to do is understand the difference between power and energy.

The above statement is fatuously wrong.

Graham

"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
But this car offers drinking water.

So does mine when I take a drinks bottle with me.

Water from condensation tastes crap btw.

Graham

"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
Of course we will never see it [your car] in the real world,

No we won't because its based on 'nonsense science'.

because everybody is a stubborn fascist Hitler, like Bush.

Not at all.

May I suggest you take a crash course in basic science fundamentals before wasting
your time putting on the net fanciful ideas based on a half-misunderstanding of how
things work.

Graham

"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
One needs energy to separate H and O atoms in water.

Indeed.

How much energy?

More than you get back by burning the hydrogen. A *lot* more in fact.

That's where all such dreams about using hydrogen as a fuel fall down. It's
hopelessly inefficient.

Graham

The overall result, is that if investing 45 horsepowers
for one hour to do electrolysis, we get one gallon worth
of gasoline power to run the car's engine on hydrogen.
Another 2-15 horsepowers can get all the needed water.

If you understood the tiniest bit about science you would instantly see the flaw in
your own case.

Graham

Don Lancaster wrote:


It is neither fair nor reasonable to compare Bush to Hitler.

Hitler was one of the 20th centuries most outstanding highway engineers.


Which US President was it who instigated the Inter-State highway network ?

Graham

Not one Iraqi killed an American citizen before Bush went
there in the name of war against terrorism.

how old are you? 15 and premature?

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote:
"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
Of course we will never see it [your car] in the real world,

No we won't because its based on 'nonsense science'.

because everybody is a stubborn fascist Hitler, like Bush.

Not at all.

May I suggest you take a crash course in basic science fundamentals before wasting
your time putting on the net fanciful ideas based on a half-misunderstanding of how
things work.

Graham

Directing people over 18 is authoritarianism (authority), biggotry.

That tends to lead to violence, and has no realistic effect.

Hitler raised his hand as an authority. He was by all means an authority over his race
and matters of the racist community. When you will turn 18, you will understand it.
You are smart, but you are too dedicated.

"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote:
"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote:
"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/new_hydrogen_car.htm

You're an idiot.

Graham

You don't believe it can run on air?

It can't.

Graham

I changed the introduction so you understand what this car is.
It runs on a battery. The battery is powered like a hybrid
car. A hybrid car is not a free energy car. Japanese haven't
figured out how to make hybrid cars free in terms of energy
yet.

www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/new_hydrogen_car.htm

" this hydrogen car could run for up to 125 miles on hydrogen taken from
straight from the air using electricity

this car does not need a hydrogen tank, it works hard in getting the hydrogen
itself from the air "

There is no hydrogen in the air.

Graham

Typically there is humidity in the air. If you go to check the weather,
you can check the humidity. Typically it is above 30 percent unless
you live in a desert or in cold places.

There is a product that makes water from the air, and works in most
places around the world. It uses something called watts. 1 watt = 746
horsepowers.

Actually you got that the wrong way round.

What exactly is the point of capturing moisture from the air ?

Graham

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote:
"gb6...@yahoo.com" wrote:
One needs energy to separate H and O atoms in water.

Indeed.

How much energy?

More than you get back by burning the hydrogen. A *lot* more in fact.

That's where all such dreams about using hydrogen as a fuel fall down. It's
hopelessly inefficient.

Graham

15000-16500 watts. Chemical factories producing hydrogen use 16500
watts. Given 1 watt is 746 horsepowers, that is equivalent to
16500*746 horsepowers of energy to process one gallon of water
for hydrogen.

The overall result, is that if investing 45 horsepowers
for one hour to do electrolysis, we get one gallon worth
of gasoline power to run the car's engine on hydrogen.
Another 2-15 horsepowers can get all the needed water.

If you understood the tiniest bit about science you would instantly see the flaw in
your own case.

Graham

Sorry but I am right.

I made one mistake somewhere.

As I said, everybody is as stubborn as Bush, so this car will never see light.