convicted neighbor kumar wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldlywrote:
neighbor Tim Shoppa (sho...@trailing-edge.com) wrote:
convicted neighbor "kumar" <lordshiva5...@rediffmail.com> wrote:
....
Insulin therapy has been shown to benefit the prognosis in patients
with type 2 diabetes, but its initiation and intensification is often
delayed through concerns about hypoglycemia and weight gain. In
addition, weight gain is linked to the pathophysiology of type 2
diabetes and contributes to the overall risk for adverse
cardiovascular outcomes. This article attempts to summarize this issue
and examine the options available for weight management.
Results
Unfortunately, the great benefits of insulin therapy may be
potentially undermined by weight gain. Weight gain is physiologically
and psychologically undesirable, especially in patients with diabetes
who are already overweight. The fear of weight gain with some
medications contributes to psychological insulin resistance, which may
discourage patients from commencing or following insulin regimens.
However, new diabetes treatments and lifestyle interventions can be
used to mitigate these
....
As such, in view of above quotes and other commonly indicated datas
about weight gain/obesity related to type2, how avoiding overeating
or
eating optimally or right eating is unjustified and contradicted in
diabetics2 and other metabolic related problems?
Whether a person is contradicted or his mentionings?
One basic problem with most insulin treatments is that the timing of
insulin into the bloodstream is not perfect.
For the type-2 diabetic, becoming insulin requiring is a bigger
problem because it indicates that the underlying metabolic syndrome
(MetS) has been going on for far too long (typically years).
So sometimes there is too much insulin, other times too little insulin
for the "optimal" diet. Optimal diet obviously will vary from person
to person.
The optimal amount will not vary from person to person, however.
How it can be possible?
By GOD's design.
Whether 2pounds of mixed/desired foods intake is sufficient and
optimal(covering need for all nutrients) in all diabetic and normal
people?
Yes.
Hypoglycemia is a risk.
Indeed it is more likely to kill a type-2 diabetic outright than
hyperglycemia.
As can be seen in a different thread in a.s.d,
some folks seem genuinely surprised that even though they are a Type 2
and have become well educated about insulin therapy and dosing and
timing, they can still encounter hypoglycemia while taking too much
insulin. In that particular thread I'd regard the OP as above average
in intelligence and diabetes knowledge - if you get the drift that
insulin therapy has difficulties even when you're trying hard to do it
right, you'd be right. That particular thread also illustrates how
trying too hard to do it right can lead to the rollercoaster. But it
also has great power and there are many aspects to making the therapy
be more flexible.
Traditionally the diet was re-arranged to accomodate the insulin. This
is largely blamed for the weight gain of both Type 1's and Type 2's on
insulin. In folks with IR the additional high insulin levels in the
blood is associated with a lot of the other problems you like to talk
about.
New insulin types and pumps have some promise to limit weight gain
while on insulin therapy but it remains a fact that weight gain is
statistically likely. Even with the most modern dosing methods there
is some weight gain due to insulin therapy. And this cannot be
attributed solely to insulin resistance, which makes the effect even
larger.
Weight gain in a type-2 diabetic comes from overeating.
Overeating arises from the false belief that "hunger is bad."
I am tempted to go all Carl Lydick on Chung's ass for all the stupid
crap he posts about that make it sound like there is a single easy
answer.
Eating less is simple but not easy.
Indeed, it is practically impossible for someone who is not aware of
how much s/he is eating to eat less. Only folks who know in the heart
of their souls that "hunger is good" even want to know how much they
are eating.
Yes, just telling that eat less or eat optimal or eat this and that,
may not be practical, but telling specific amounts can be. Moreover,
it can be difficult and impractical to manipulate and practice
specific nutrients based diets persistently for long time and it may
also not valid/optimal all the times. I think 2P is for the sake of
practical purpose, for to cover unknown defficiencies and for
simplicity in practicing....obisiously if it don't cause
defficiencies.
Where there is hunger there is no deficiency.
If hunger is still there after taking 2P, then?
Please ignore all the stuff he writes. There is some truth to
it but his intense focus on a single solution causes him to ignore the
real world.
It remains my choice to continue to write truthfully and ignore that
which is untruthful in this world.
Though demons are real, there is nothing meaningful about them because
they will forever remain satan's sock-puppets.
May reading the following help you and others to cure their MetS and
quite possibly their type-2 diabetes:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/overweight.asp
Angels and devils are two opposite sided entities to balance.
Sometimes one dominates other time other. Due to current practices, if
we are progressing towards our ultimate destructions/decrease, one can
think logically that devils are dominating due to previous excessive
dominance of angels prevailed.
It will be the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, Who will prevail.
Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhDhttp://EmoryCardiology.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
