|
Science Forum Index » Psychology - Psychotherapy Forum » Koochers Kooks: Total Lack of validity of psychological test
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Linda |
 Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| John Jones |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:38 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 26 Oct 2004
Posts: 4263
|
On Feb 10, 7:20�pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
Quote: NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
I saw another of those astronaut trainings on TV a few years back.
Some of the guys seemed nuts - like always always in your face,
forcing the pace, and perpetually smiling.
Psychology is simply merchandising and whoever buys gets shoddy goods. |
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Linda" <indomitable2@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:5Wozh.23097$yx6.5953@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
: NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out
psychotics
: and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
:
: NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
:
: But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to
reveal
: any psychopathology. .
:
: Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
:
:
Lisa shows remorse, and acknowledges what she did, something you were
never able to do.
Your suppositions are obviously wrong, loser. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"John Jones" <jonescardiff@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1171136311.347114.229970@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 10, 7:20?pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
:
:whoever buys gets shoddy goods.
:
You've met linda? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| marcia |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
Quote: NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda Gore |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 10, 11:38 am, "John Jones" <jonescard...@aol.com> wrote:
Quote: On Feb 10, 7:20?pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is ?extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
I saw another of those astronaut trainings on TV a few years back.
Some of the guys seemed nuts - like always always in your face,
forcing the pace, and perpetually smiling.
Quote: Psychology is simply merchandising and whoever buys gets shoddy goods.
Psychological expertise is a double edged sword.
Example...
SERE used psychological knowledge/expertise to mold military personnel
to be resilient to programmed systematic torture.
BCST used the same exact knowledge/expertise to devise, implement,
and direct programs of systematic torture to break derainees.
First use is laudable, the second is unadulterated wickedness. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| flamestar |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
Is every test always right? Blood test are often wrong and so are
enterence exams. . Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk
takers. She acted very much like an astronaut. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
Reference please?
Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended administering
Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal her
psychopathology. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:1171145909.454149.256100@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
: On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
: > Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
: >
: > Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
:
: Reference please?
:
: Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended administering
: Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal her
: psychopathology.
:
errrrrrrrr
Reference please? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| flamestar |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 10, 5:18 pm, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote:
Quote: On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
Reference please?
Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended administering
Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal her
psychopathology.
Saying that the tests failed reveal psychopathology.doesn't mean that
they tested her for the condition that she has, |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"flamestar" <agnifire@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171161556.264949.62850@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Feb 10, 5:18 pm, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote:
On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
Reference please?
Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended administering
Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal her
psychopathology.
Saying that the tests failed reveal psychopathology.doesn't mean that
they tested her for the condition that she has,
Your initial assertion was "NASA uses *a* test ....."
Can you cite a reference substantiating your assertion? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| flamestar |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 10, 10:46 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
Quote: "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171161556.264949.62850@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 10, 5:18 pm, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote:
On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
Reference please?
Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended administering
Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal her
psychopathology.
Saying that the tests failed reveal psychopathology.doesn't mean that
they tested her for the condition that she has,
Your initial assertion was "NASA uses *a* test ....."
Can you cite a reference substantiating your assertion?
May be you should read your own message or have someone read it for
you.Here is what you said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Linda View profile
More options Feb 10, 2:20 pm
Newsgroups: alt.support.attn-deficit, alt.support.tourette,
alt.support.depression.medication, sci.psychology.psychotherapy
From: "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:20:33 GMT
Local: Sat, Feb 10 2007 2:20 pm
Subject: Koochers Kooks: Total Lack of validity of psychological
testing is proven
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out
psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to
reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
-------------------------------------------------------
You were the one that said that "NASA's psychological testing of Lisa
Nowak was extremely rigorous" you were the one who talked about
rigorous psychological testing the tests. Were yu lying when you
talked about NASA doing 'rigorous psychological testing." You said
they did a test you should cite referrences.not me.Morons who can't
think can always ask for refereence even if they don't understand the
conversation. Its a tired old trick but its the only one you have.
You claimed that one failure completely proved the lack of validity of
psychological testing. That claim has been refuted so you want to talk
abour the tests. You aren't ready for prime time.
.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Captain Hook |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com>
wrote:
Quote: On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory.
Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
deserve it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"flamestar" <agnifire@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171168844.866251.290420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Feb 10, 10:46 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
"flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171161556.264949.62850@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 10, 5:18 pm, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote:
On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing
Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
Reference please?
Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended administering
Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal her
psychopathology.
Saying that the tests failed reveal psychopathology.doesn't mean that
they tested her for the condition that she has,
Your initial assertion was "NASA uses *a* test ....."
Can you cite a reference substantiating your assertion?
snip...
I gather you can't cite any reference substantiating your assertion.
My motive for requesting a cite was to discover the facts, given the
contradictory assertions OP have made.
No biggee if you don't have any factual info... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:10 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Linda" <indomitable2@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OSxzh.161$x74.67@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
:
: "flamestar" <agnifire@gmail.com> wrote in message
: news:1171168844.866251.290420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
: > On Feb 10, 10:46 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
: >> "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
: >>
: >> news:1171161556.264949.62850@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
: >>
: >> > On Feb 10, 5:18 pm, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote:
: >> >> On Feb 10, 1:43 pm, "flamestar" <agnif...@gmail.com> wrote:
: >>
: >> >> > Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological
testing
: >>
: >> >> > Actually NASA uses a test that looks for risk takers.
: >>
: >> >> Reference please?
: >>
: >> >> Others are saying and estimated $2.5 mil was expended
administering
: >> >> Nowak the battery of psychological tests that failed to reveal
her
: >> >> psychopathology.
: >>
: >> > Saying that the tests failed reveal psychopathology.doesn't mean
that
: >> > they tested her for the condition that she has,
: >>
: >> Your initial assertion was "NASA uses *a* test ....."
: >>
: >> Can you cite a reference substantiating your assertion?
:
: snip...
:
: I gather you can't cite any reference substantiating your assertion.
:
: My motive for requesting a cite was to discover the facts, given
the
: contradictory assertions OP have made.
:
: No biggee if you don't have any factual info...
:
LOL, linda got all shook up, stuttered with the space bar as usual, and
that was without tics.
linda also did *NOT* have any factual information to present. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
