| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Psychology - Psychotherapy Forum » Koochers Kooks: Total Lack of validity of psychological test
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| marcia |
 Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Captain Hook wrote:
Quote: On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory.
Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
Have you seen her mug shot?
Quote: Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
deserve it?
lol. I suppose if you consider driving 900 miles in a disguise to
pepper spray some woman in the face--and maybe pound her to death with
a hammer--a normal and reasonable reaction, then you have a good
point.
BTW, what did the boyfriend deserve? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1171178071.184665.108670@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
:
: Captain Hook wrote:
: > On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com>
: > wrote:
: >
: > >On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
: > >> NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out
psychotics
: > >> and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
: > >>
: > >> NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely
rigorous.
: > >>
: > >> But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed
to reveal
: > >> any psychopathology. .
: > >>
: > >> Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
: > >
: > >
: > >The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview
with a
: > >psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
: > >much for your theory.
: >
: > Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
:
: Have you seen her mug shot?
:
After viewing I took the fifth.
Fifth of Scotch.
:
: > Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
: > doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
: >
: > In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
: > deserve it?
:
: lol. I suppose if you consider driving 900 miles in a disguise to
: pepper spray some woman in the face--and maybe pound her to death with
: a hammer--a normal and reasonable reaction, then you have a good
: point.
:
: BTW, what did the boyfriend deserve?
:
At this point a trip to the space station for six months peace, plus
psychological counseling regarding why he ever dated that woman in the
first place.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| marcia |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dr. Wee Hung Lo wrote:
Quote: "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1171178071.184665.108670@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
:
: Captain Hook wrote:
: > On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
: > wrote:
:
: > >On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
: > >> NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out
psychotics
: > >> and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
:
: > >> NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely
rigorous.
:
: > >> But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed
to reveal
: > >> any psychopathology. .
:
: > >> Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
:
:
: > >The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview
with a
: > >psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
: > >much for your theory.
:
: > Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
:
: Have you seen her mug shot?
:
After viewing I took the fifth.
Fifth of Scotch.
:
: > Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
: > doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
:
: > In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
: > deserve it?
:
: lol. I suppose if you consider driving 900 miles in a disguise to
: pepper spray some woman in the face--and maybe pound her to death with
: a hammer--a normal and reasonable reaction, then you have a good
: point.
:
: BTW, what did the boyfriend deserve?
:
At this point a trip to the space station for six months peace, plus
psychological counseling regarding why he ever dated that woman in the
first place.
See, now that seems like a more reasonable response.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Captain Hook |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10 Feb 2007 23:14:31 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com>
wrote:
Quote:
Captain Hook wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory.
Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
Have you seen her mug shot?
You would diagnose based on an out of context police mug shot?
So much for science.
Quote:
Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
deserve it?
lol. I suppose if you consider driving 900 miles in a disguise to
pepper spray some woman in the face--
Reaction to loss, betrayal and broken love takes many forms.
These are not necessarily psychopathological.
Quote: and maybe pound her to death with
a hammer--a normal and reasonable reaction, then you have a good
point.
There is no evidence for any such thing.
Newscasters repeating it does not make it so.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0206073astronut1.html-
Quote: BTW, what did the boyfriend deserve?
A good point that his Boss is considering as we chat. I suspect his
wife might have some input too.
It must be pretty galling to have your husband publicly involved in an
love triangle that YOU are not even a part of. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| marcia |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Captain Hook wrote:
Quote: On 10 Feb 2007 23:14:31 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory.
Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
Have you seen her mug shot?
You would diagnose based on an out of context police mug shot?
So much for science.
What science? I'm basing my opinion on women's intuition. ;)
Quote:
Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
deserve it?
lol. I suppose if you consider driving 900 miles in a disguise to
pepper spray some woman in the face--
Reaction to loss, betrayal and broken love takes many forms.
These are not necessarily psychopathological.
I dunno--sounds a little borderliney to me.
The smoking gun says she had other weapons in her car, including a
mallet. Maybe that was for emergency car repairs?
Quote:
BTW, what did the boyfriend deserve?
A good point that his Boss is considering as we chat. I suspect his
wife might have some input too.
It must be pretty galling to have your husband publicly involved in an
love triangle that YOU are not even a part of.
Agreed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Captain Hook |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:09 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 11 Feb 2007 00:13:19 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com>
wrote:
Quote:
Captain Hook wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007 23:14:31 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007 11:45:26 -0800, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory.
Why is it being assumed Lisa has any psychopathology at all?
Have you seen her mug shot?
You would diagnose based on an out of context police mug shot?
So much for science.
What science? I'm basing my opinion on women's intuition.
Ah
There is no answer to that one.
Quote:
Because you pepper spray a whore who fucks your boyfriend
doesn't automatically mean the presence of psychopathology.
In the absence of all the facts who are we to say she didn't fully
deserve it?
lol. I suppose if you consider driving 900 miles in a disguise to
pepper spray some woman in the face--
Reaction to loss, betrayal and broken love takes many forms.
These are not necessarily psychopathological.
I dunno--sounds a little borderliney to me.
Reaction to a real not imagined loss is not.
I believe she gave up her marriage for him and
a new life.
Quote:
and maybe pound her to death with
a hammer--a normal and reasonable reaction, then you have a good
point.
There is no evidence for any such thing.
Newscasters repeating it does not make it so.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0206073astronut1.html-
The smoking gun says she had other weapons in her car, including a
mallet. Maybe that was for emergency car repairs?
In America many lone women on long road trips have a weapon for
self-defense.Many have guns rather than a golf putter.
I suppose if she had had a gun you would automatically assume the
worst about that too?
Quote: BTW, what did the boyfriend deserve?
A good point that his Boss is considering as we chat. I suspect his
wife might have some input too.
It must be pretty galling to have your husband publicly involved in an
love triangle that YOU are not even a part of.
Agreed.
Surprisingly the "other" other woman seems to have managed to keep
a low profile in all of this.
Profile of Capt. Colleen Shipman
<http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/custom/space/orl-astvic0707feb07,0,5622491.story?coll=orl-home-headlines>
CAPE CANAVERAL -- Neighbors affectionately call her "the little
general" because she is so petite.
But on Tuesday, U.S. Air Force Capt. Colleen Shipman, 30, was nowhere
to be found as reporters descended on her usually tranquil
neighborhood, setting up camp outside her tan-and-white townhouse.
"She's not coming home," one resident yelled to the dozen or so news
media. "Not to all this."
Colleen Shipman.
Email this photo gallery
<http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/gallery?Site=A9&Date=20070208&Category=NEWS02&ArtNo=208015&Ref=PH&Profile=1086&Params=Itemnr=1> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Captain Hook" <all@sea.com> wrote in message
news:b9mts214cvp2a26g34hljvo4734u51gdhv@4ax.com...
: I believe she gave up her marriage for him and
: a new life.
:
She got her new life. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| card xii |
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1171136726.039868.246910@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Feb 10, 2:20 pm, "Linda" <indomitab...@nospam.com> wrote:
NASA's use of state of the art psychological testing to weed out
psychotics
and psychopaths is extraordinarily rigorous.
NASA's psychological testing of Lisa Nowak was extremely rigorous.
But, all the rigorous psychological testing of Lisa Nowak failed to
reveal
any psychopathology. .
Proving the complete lack of validity of psychological testing.
The "rigorous testing" consisted of a single two-hour interview with a
psychiatrist and psychologist; no psychological tests were used. So
much for your theory.
And of course Linda, being a hypocritical flut, knows the "real" reasons
for the behavior that led to Nowak's charges.
Linda Gore, consistent with her years of phony concern, would hang and
imprison somebody who is more likely to have an organic basis for
behavior than truly criminal intent.
But Linda, being a hypocrit and hysteric, paranoid failure, is the
criminal in all of this.
Linda? ...
HARFUL!!
card xii |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:22 pm
|
|
