the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles

The next milestone - an experiment in which there was just one electron
in the apparatus at any one time - was reached by Akira Tonomura and
co-workers at Hitachi in 1989 when they observed the build up of the
fringe pattern with a very weak electron source and an electron biprism

The next milestone - an experiment in which there was just one electron
in the apparatus at any one time - was reached by Akira Tonomura and
co-workers at Hitachi in 1989 when they observed the build up of the
fringe pattern with a very weak electron source and an electron biprism

the work you cite, contains no experimental statistics

what was the precision of the electron generator at the weak source?
how was such precision measured?

experiments without statistics are not valid scientific evidence

The next milestone - an experiment in which there was just one electron
in the apparatus at any one time - was reached by Akira Tonomura and
co-workers at Hitachi in 1989 when they observed the build up of the
fringe pattern with a very weak electron source and an electron biprism

the work you cite, contains no experimental statistics

what was the precision of the electron generator at the weak source?
how was such precision measured?

experiments without statistics are not valid scientific evidence

the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

Hartmut Folter wrote:
the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles


Do you ever understand anything that you read? Try reading the
following article.

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/9/1

Be sure to read the followup letters further down the page. There is a
beautiful series of photos showing the build up of the interference
pattern from a series of individual electrons passing through the
system.

Hartmut Folter wrote:
the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles

You can repeat the experiment with neutrons and get similar results
(though I understand that the effect is a couple orders of magnitude
smaller).

the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles

Be sure to read the followup letters further down the page. There is a
beautiful series of photos showing the build up of the interference
pattern from a series of individual electrons passing through the
system.

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/9/1/1/bologna%2Dimage

the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles

in fact, since there is not even a hypothesis wherby the wave equation defaults to
Newtonian mechanics under certain circumstances, I highly doubt its validity

I think it is more likely that particles can only be characterized as waves, NOT be waves,
or exhibit wave properties, at least with the instrumental analysis we have today

for instance
amplitude is a power function - easily explained by momentum of particles
frequency - easily explained by flux of particles over time
wavelength - simply said, particles can have color, due to absorption or lack thereof

I suggest if you pipe the known accuracy and precision of today's measurement equipment,
into the wave equation, the probailities of phenomena would fall apart

what does this have to do with origins?

in fact, since there is not even a hypothesis wherby the wave equation
defaults to
Newtonian mechanics under certain circumstances, I highly doubt its validity

In talk.origins flabbergasted <bacon@rigidrotor.com> wrote:
Hartmut Folter wrote:
the double-slit experiment is typically cited as empirical evidence of the
validity of Schrodinger's wave equation

BUT, the slit experiment, is ONE SIDED, it only proves the particle properties of waves,
NOT the wave properties of particles


Do you ever understand anything that you read? Try reading the
following article.

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/9/1

[...]
Be sure to read the followup letters further down the page. There is a
beautiful series of photos showing the build up of the interference
pattern from a series of individual electrons passing through the
system.

You can also see a wmv movie of this:
http://www.hqrd.hitachi.co.jp/em/doubleslit.cfm

I have a question.

In the case of the Electron Double Slit experiment, the question is
where is there a case of frequency involved in the experiment that is
responsible for the wave interference pattern to be at the outcome of
the experiment ?

I assume that by releasing only one ELECTRON at a time, there is no
continuous frequency involved !