I do know that Google originated messages cross posted to more
than 3 groups will get blocked by my NSP.

Heh, They are still doing that?

Like that isn't really having much of an effect is it?

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:24:16 -0000, in sci.geo.earthquakes, Skywise
into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:

Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in
news:5otvs2t9u841gss82ulfht02cl64r9ggoc@4ax.com:

Google is a piss poor way to access usenet. and franking the latest
stats show 70% of all abuse in text groups comes from come from
google posters.

I agree. The only thing it has going for it is the searchability
and statistics of it's archive.

I would be far more worried about the double and triple posts...

I do know that Google originated messages cross posted to more
than 3 groups will get blocked by my NSP.

Heh, They are still doing that?

Like that isn't really having much of an effect is it?

I left, under less than happy conditions... They really were not
suiting my needs anymore...

(usenet politics were involved...)

It wasn't a forgery, I forged nothing. Their software goofed.

One can say parts of the SA fault system
Snipola

3) most people do not want to give fudge proof predictions.

Bob Officer <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in
news:rutvs2d39krt0qpi97oc7hoj3sqlp28ouh@4ax.com:

Snipola
One can say parts of the SA fault system
Snipola

And that's the key. The SA - as are most large faults - systems.
They are not single breaks in the crust, but a series of
parallel overlapping breaks along a trend line.

An analogy would be a single strand of hair vs a thread of many
hairs. The SA is like the thread.

3) most people do not want to give fudge proof predictions.

That makes me feel good. I do not like being "most people".

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:02:34 -0000, in sci.geo.earthquakes, Skywise

Google is a piss poor way to access usenet. and franking the latest
stats show 70% of all abuse in text groups comes from come from
google posters.

Google groups is usenet for dummies. Plain and simple.

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:02:34 -0000, in sci.geo.earthquakes, Skywise
Google is a piss poor way to access usenet. and franking the latest
stats show 70% of all abuse in text groups comes from come from
google posters.

The idiot this the current and past quakes are an indicators of
future quakes. All past quakes show is a certain fault can store
enough energy to slip at a certain point.

One can say parts of the SA fault system can store enough energy to
create a 7.2 quake... other parts seem to slip/break after enough
energy is stored to create a 2.0... and even that isn't always
true... there are enough ancillary faults that can store energy.

The only two things I think might be right to say:
1) Past quakes are not indicators of future quakes.
2) Not all quakes have the same driving mechanism.

and
3) most people do not want to give fudge proof predictions.

On Feb 11, 9:13 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:02:34 -0000, in sci.geo.earthquakes, Skywise

Google is a piss poor way to access usenet. and franking the latest
stats show 70% of all abuse in text groups comes from come from
google posters.

LMAO as if there's a better way to access usenet!! That's almost beats
Bob's all-time dumb statement that 18/1000 = 20%.

"Steve" <philhendrie@aol.com> wrote in news:1171039669.620191.155900
@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com:

Snipola

Dude, why do you keep replying to the same post with different
replies? Are you tryign to cancel the previous edits in favor
of the new ones?

Actually I'm told that this is a known mis-feature of

This is getting old.