Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Engineering - Joining (Welding) Forum  »  Plasma cutting: drag & stand-off
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Bob Engelhardt
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:38 pm
Guest
My new Powermax 380 was described as having "shielded consumables",
implying drag cutting ability. But the Operator Manual says that the
torch should be held 1/16" above the work. So I guess that it is not a
drag-cutting machine 8-( I really wouldn't care except that keeping the
torch 1/16" away seems like it will be a real challenge. 'Course they
don't give a tolerance on the 1/16. As I understand it, contact is a
no-no as the arc will transfer to the nozzle will harsh effects on its
life. As to the maximum spacing ... ???

Any words of advice? Either in terms of the importance of the spacing,
or manual technique to keep the spacing, or the practicality of making
a spacer to keep the distance.

Thanks,
Bob
Martin H. Eastburn
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:31 pm
Guest
I have a 600 and optional RT60 torch...

You have a protective screw on - the part that can touch the metal -
It has 4 posts that point outward in axis of the beam that flows between.
They can be dragged - the beam is up inside and won't be 'snuffed out' by
touching it onto metal...

There are other 'noses' - one for gouge trying to cut metal that is thick...

No problem with the castle (4 turrets) nose. I use them all of the time
in hand cutting, but use other tips for CNC cutting.

Martin

Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
TSRA, Life; NRA LOH & Endowment Member, Golden Eagle, Patriot"s Medal.
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member.
http://lufkinced.com/



Bob Engelhardt wrote:
Quote:
My new Powermax 380 was described as having "shielded consumables",
implying drag cutting ability. But the Operator Manual says that the
torch should be held 1/16" above the work. So I guess that it is not a
drag-cutting machine 8-( I really wouldn't care except that keeping the
torch 1/16" away seems like it will be a real challenge. 'Course they
don't give a tolerance on the 1/16. As I understand it, contact is a
no-no as the arc will transfer to the nozzle will harsh effects on its
life. As to the maximum spacing ... ???

Any words of advice? Either in terms of the importance of the spacing,
or manual technique to keep the spacing, or the practicality of making
a spacer to keep the distance.

Thanks,
Bob

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Bob Engelhardt
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:22 pm
Guest
Martin H. Eastburn wrote:
Quote:
I have a 600 and optional RT60 torch...

You have a protective screw on - the part that can touch the metal -
It has 4 posts that point outward in axis of the beam that flows between.
...

Thanks for the quick reply. I went looking for the thing with the posts
and couldn't find it. Then I looked at the 600 parts and realized that
your torch is different. You have a multi-versioned "shield" that
screws on the retaining cap. One version of which has the posts. I
don't have a separate shield - just the retaining cap. And there don't
seem to be any options on that cap.

Bob
Ernie Leimkuhler
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:26 pm
Guest
In article <k92dnSjk07t3riDYnZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@comcast.com>,
Bob Engelhardt <bobengelhardt@comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:
My new Powermax 380 was described as having "shielded consumables",
implying drag cutting ability. But the Operator Manual says that the
torch should be held 1/16" above the work. So I guess that it is not a
drag-cutting machine 8-( I really wouldn't care except that keeping the
torch 1/16" away seems like it will be a real challenge. 'Course they
don't give a tolerance on the 1/16. As I understand it, contact is a
no-no as the arc will transfer to the nozzle will harsh effects on its
life. As to the maximum spacing ... ???

Any words of advice? Either in terms of the importance of the spacing,
or manual technique to keep the spacing, or the practicality of making
a spacer to keep the distance.

Thanks,
Bob

You can drag cut with that machine, but not on metal heavier than 14 ga
running on 110v or 1/8" running on 220v.

I learned this from experience with the 380 we had at South Seattle.
Nice machine.

I am surprised you got a 380.
The machine I want to upgrade to is the Hypertherm 30.

http://www.hypertherm.com/languages/english/pmx30_launch.php

I have had a Thermal Dynamics Pak38XL for 8 years and it works great,
but I would like something a little more portable.
Bob Engelhardt
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:50 pm
Guest
Ernie Leimkuhler wrote:
Quote:
You can drag cut with that machine, but not on metal heavier than 14 ga
running on 110v or 1/8" running on 220v.
Great! That's what I wanted to hear.


Quote:
I learned this from experience with the 380 we had at South Seattle.
That's also what I wanted to hear.


Quote:
Nice machine.
Well, I Googled SEJW archives and found your recommendations for it, so

that was a major consideration.

Quote:
I am surprised you got a 380.
The machine I want to upgrade to is the Hypertherm 30.

The '30 looked nice (better duty cycle and much lighter), but the 380 is
being closed out and I got a good deal on it: $799.99, where the 30 was
$1035, IIRC. For my limited hobby use, $800 was just barely
justifiable, but not $1035. You should definitely get the 30 Cool.

Thanks,
Bob
Ernie Leimkuhler
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:59 am
Guest
In article <8JedndNp3bdB_SDYnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com>,
Bob Engelhardt <bobengelhardt@comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:
Ernie Leimkuhler wrote:
You can drag cut with that machine, but not on metal heavier than 14 ga
running on 110v or 1/8" running on 220v.
Great! That's what I wanted to hear.

I learned this from experience with the 380 we had at South Seattle.
That's also what I wanted to hear.

Nice machine.
Well, I Googled SEJW archives and found your recommendations for it, so
that was a major consideration.

I am surprised you got a 380.
The machine I want to upgrade to is the Hypertherm 30.

The '30 looked nice (better duty cycle and much lighter), but the 380 is
being closed out and I got a good deal on it: $799.99, where the 30 was
$1035, IIRC. For my limited hobby use, $800 was just barely
justifiable, but not $1035. You should definitely get the 30 Cool.

Thanks,
Bob

BTW Remember that you can use a guide to make straight cuts, but it
can't me metal, or at least can't contact the cutting tip.
If the copper tip contacts a metal guide the arc will try to ground
through side of the tip.

I use 5" wooden base molding.
You can get it at any lumber yard and will have the top edge milled down
to about 3/8" thick.
This works perfectly for long straight cuts in sheet metal.

Just hand pick a few really straight pieces in some semi hard wood like
alder or maple.


You can also cut guides from 3/8" MDF or plywood.
This works great for mass producing sheet metal shapes.
You just have to offset your pattern by half the diameter of the cutting
tip.
Jon
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:08 am
Guest
My Hobart came with training wheels which attach to the cup. It is really
called standoff roller guide. It adjusts for clearance between the tip and
surface I am cutting. Works for me doing straight, curved or cuts on curved
metal without a problem.

Jon
"Ernie Leimkuhler" <stagesmith@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:stagesmith-03652B.23594528012007@news.west.earthlink.net...
Quote:
In article <8JedndNp3bdB_SDYnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com>,
Bob Engelhardt <bobengelhardt@comcast.net> wrote:

Ernie Leimkuhler wrote:
You can drag cut with that machine, but not on metal heavier than 14 ga
running on 110v or 1/8" running on 220v.
Great! That's what I wanted to hear.

I learned this from experience with the 380 we had at South Seattle.
That's also what I wanted to hear.

Nice machine.
Well, I Googled SEJW archives and found your recommendations for it, so
that was a major consideration.

I am surprised you got a 380.
The machine I want to upgrade to is the Hypertherm 30.

The '30 looked nice (better duty cycle and much lighter), but the 380 is
being closed out and I got a good deal on it: $799.99, where the 30 was
$1035, IIRC. For my limited hobby use, $800 was just barely
justifiable, but not $1035. You should definitely get the 30 Cool.

Thanks,
Bob

BTW Remember that you can use a guide to make straight cuts, but it
can't me metal, or at least can't contact the cutting tip.
If the copper tip contacts a metal guide the arc will try to ground
through side of the tip.

I use 5" wooden base molding.
You can get it at any lumber yard and will have the top edge milled down
to about 3/8" thick.
This works perfectly for long straight cuts in sheet metal.

Just hand pick a few really straight pieces in some semi hard wood like
alder or maple.


You can also cut guides from 3/8" MDF or plywood.
This works great for mass producing sheet metal shapes.
You just have to offset your pattern by half the diameter of the cutting
tip.
Bob Engelhardt
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:28 pm
Guest
Ernie Leimkuhler wrote:
Quote:
BTW Remember that you can use a guide to make straight cuts, but it
can't me metal, or at least can't contact the cutting tip.


Quote:
If the copper tip contacts a metal guide the arc will try to ground
through side of the tip.
....


I'm glad you said that, 'cause it makes me think that I don't understand
something. Doesn't "drag cutting" mean that the tip is touching the
work? If so, how is it different than the tip touching a metal guide
that is in contact with the work? If not, what *is* "drag cutting"?

Thanks again,
Bob
Grant Erwin
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:18 pm
Guest
Bob Engelhardt wrote:
Quote:
Ernie Leimkuhler wrote:
BTW Remember that you can use a guide to make straight cuts, but it

can't me metal, or at least can't contact the cutting tip.



If the copper tip contacts a metal guide the arc will try to ground
through side of the tip.

...

I'm glad you said that, 'cause it makes me think that I don't understand
something. Doesn't "drag cutting" mean that the tip is touching the
work? If so, how is it different than the tip touching a metal guide
that is in contact with the work? If not, what *is* "drag cutting"?


Bob, my Hyp 350 (dang near identical to the 380) didn't work worth a dang drag
cutting. Plus, drag cutting really ups your consumable consumption. Now I have
a Hyp 1000 and it has consumables that are made for drag and many more that aren't.

Maybe log onto Hypertherm's forum page (have to register & all that) and post
the question there? There are some real gurus there.

GWE
Bob Engelhardt
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:27 pm
Guest
I asked this question on the plasmacutting Yahoo group and got a reply
from Jim Colt, a long time Hypertherm employee. His answer was that the
current is key. Under 40A can be dragged, without appreciable nozzle
wear. The 380 is 27A max, so drag cutting is OK. Piercing should be
started with a stand off and more power is available with standoff
cutting, but dragging works. Which is what Ernie said about dragging
only working on thinner material.


Bob
Grant Erwin
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:01 am
Guest
Bob Engelhardt wrote:

Quote:
I asked this question on the plasmacutting Yahoo group and got a reply
from Jim Colt, a long time Hypertherm employee. His answer was that the
current is key. Under 40A can be dragged, without appreciable nozzle
wear. The 380 is 27A max, so drag cutting is OK. Piercing should be
started with a stand off and more power is available with standoff
cutting, but dragging works. Which is what Ernie said about dragging
only working on thinner material.

Well, one thing I learned the hard way was that when I made a circle cutting
tool which had a ball bearing which closely fit the outside of the nozzle of my
old 350, the whole circle cutter being made of conductive metal, the thing
self-destructed due to current flowing sideways through the bearing. This I know
for a fact, having done it myself.

Drag nozzles are castle-shaped. I haven't seen one of those for a 350/380 yet,
maybe they make 'em.

1/4" plywood templates should work really well, Bob. They always did for me. The
standoff with the thing resting on the plywood, nozzle sticking down over the
lip, was about right as I remember. Drag on the plywood, easy as pie.

GWE
Bart D. Hull
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:00 am
Guest
I just did a whole bunch of drag cutting with a old 20Amp Century Plasma
cutter this weekend. (8ft cuts every 3 or 5 inches on 3/32 rusty
sheetmetal. I pulled the gun towards me and kept it right on the metal
and drug it against a sheet metal fence to keep it nice and straight.
Worked like a charm, only scratches on the side of the consumable cap
from the fence.

Did the same for 1/4" steel diamond plate that I was cutting up for
scrap. Had to run the cut a few times due to the bumpiness of the
diamond plate but it sure had a nice narrow cut and smooth edge. Still
didn't bother the consumable cup.

The old consumables were unusable. The plasma stream would cut out and
not want to light again. New consumables from HTP and it worked like
greased lightening. I could not believe how quickly I could pull the cut
on the smooth 3/32 sheetmetal and get perfectly clean cuts.

I did have a nice big 10HP gas motored compressor to supply lots of
65psi air and two water filters to keep the air clean.

NICE!!!

Bart D. Hull
bdhull-nospam@inficad.com
Tempe, Arizona

Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/engine.html
for my Subaru Engine Conversion
Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/fuselage.html
for Tango II I'm building.

Remove -nospam to reply via email.

Bob Engelhardt wrote:
Quote:
My new Powermax 380 was described as having "shielded consumables",
implying drag cutting ability. But the Operator Manual says that the
torch should be held 1/16" above the work. So I guess that it is not a
drag-cutting machine 8-( I really wouldn't care except that keeping the
torch 1/16" away seems like it will be a real challenge. 'Course they
don't give a tolerance on the 1/16. As I understand it, contact is a
no-no as the arc will transfer to the nozzle will harsh effects on its
life. As to the maximum spacing ... ???

Any words of advice? Either in terms of the importance of the spacing,
or manual technique to keep the spacing, or the practicality of making
a spacer to keep the distance.

Thanks,
Bob
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:03 pm