| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Astro - Seti Forum » First Contact public lecture - UFO and Cover up - Ottawa, ON
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:45 pm |
|
|
|
|
M. Lalancette will be presenting the aspect of cover up of the UFO
phenomenon as well as a personal experience with the Team led by Dr.
Steven Greer, CSETI.
You can find the details on the poster at the end of his Blog :
RichardLalancette.blogspot.com. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Woolley |
| Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <1170459916.370660.323420@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
Disclosure.Project.Canada@gmail.com wrote:
[ Content relating to UFOs ]
This subject is an explicit violation of the charter for this newsgroup.
It was also multiposted, which is a violation of netiquette (it may
also violate the no advertising clause)! This is the relevant part of
the charter:
Inappropriate posts include:
3) Discussions concerning UFOs, "alien abductions", etc,
which should take place in other groups.
The full charter is as follows:
The charter, culled from the vote result announcement:
This group will be unmoderated and distributed worldwide. This
newsgroup is intended for the discussion of the Search for
Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence.
Appropriate topics for discussion include the following:
1) Discussion of SETI projects (such as SERINDIP, Phoenix,
SETI@home, BETA, ARGUS, etc.)
2) Installation and configuration of the SETI@home client
or other SETI projects using distributed computing.
3) Trouble shooting the use of the SETI client programs.
4) The possibilities of Alien life (Drake equation, planetary
abundance and its relavance to SETI, etc.)
5) Discussion of statistical results for SETI projects.
6) The potential content of alien messages and how to decode
them, as well as any messages we (humans) have / will /
could send into space that are intended for ETI's (such as
the Voyager record, the Arecibo message to M13, the Encounter
2001 project, etc.)
7) Potential alien technology in the context of detection /
communication by / with humans (using visible light lasers
instead of radio, for example).
 Discussion of school curricula built around a SETI
program
Inappropriate posts include:
1) Commercial advertisements of any kind, including those for
items related to SETI or any SETI project.
2) Binaries, with the exception of cryptographic signatures.
3) Discussions concerning UFOs, "alien abductions", etc,
which should take place in other groups. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Brad Guth |
| Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:T1170512009@djwhome.demon.co.uk
David, you lie and/or avoid the truth so much that it doesn't hardly
matter what gets posted in this SETI infomercial group of lies upon
lies.
You obviously don't believe in ETs or in intelligent design, therefore
you don't honestly believe in the foundation/basis of SETI to begin
with.
You even lie about our having walked on the moon. Is there anything you
SETI folks don't lie about?
It's rather odd, that your silly team SETI would actually bother as to
shun the regular laws of physics, and to otherwise banish whatever's the
best available replicated science. I wonder as to what parts of their
faith-based Old Testament hocus-pocus shadow are they so deathly afraid
of?
Where does it say or interpret within their Old Testament: Thou shalt
lie (and get paid the really big offshore or otherwise tax-avoidance
bucks for doing so).
At best, SETI is looking at whatever's 25 million if not a good billion
or trillion fold further away than Venus, whereas Venus holds and
thereby offers more intelligent sustaining promise of other exobiology
life than all of the other exo whatever planets and moons combined have
thus far to offer.
And meanwhile, the grand orchestrated ruse/sting of our mutually
perpetrated cold-war century goes on and on, just like the phony baloney
war in Iraq and of nearly countless other fiascos around our badly
polluted and energy raped globe that's failing us rather badly in more
unfortunate ways than we can count or otherwise manage to biologically
evolve ourselves fast enough in order to save our frail DNA/RNA sorry
butts.
http://www.thothweb.com/article2704.html
Quote: All we can say for sure is that despite our supposed
advanced technology, NASA seems to be able to offer very
few answers to our questions about the moon. The veil of
secrecy that surrounds the truth means that the facts are
often suppressed because it is not deemed ‘in the public’s
interest’ for them to be made known. Sooner or later though,
it is inevitable that the moon will reveal its secrets and
a whole new chapter in our understanding of the universe
might well be opened when that happens.
Perhaps the honset to God problem here is that we simply have not quite
gotten around to that little pesky part of having actually walked on
that nasty and somewhat salty moon of ours that has loads of lethal
gamma and hard-X-rays to share. But lo and behold, there's lots more
truth to share and share alike.
The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.'
http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sci/sci.astro/d8fe6a9add1a7d36188a9e05ae97e4af.49644%40mygate.mailgate.org
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_frm/thread/6bf2faae457116d5/1998c2faf3d0e608?lnk=st&q=brad+guth&rnum=2&hl=en#1998c2faf3d0e608
"88Countach" <rl351_KILLALLSPAMMERS_@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:45c7654e$0$6496$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com
My God and freaking Christ almighty on yet another stick, you're all
sooooo impressed with YouTube's used toilet paper, as for representing
your fully subjective/conditional physics and science that oddly can't
be replicated. If that's not the best ever subjective infomercial video
crapolla that's flowing uphill and/or on a seriously ugly stick, then
absolutely nothing is.
"This is a video response to Apollo 11 Real or Hoax?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc
You folks obviously can't count those frames per second, nor hardly
accomplish the meters/second worth on behalf of the most basic math, can
you. Are all such incest cloned Jews and Third Reich members this
easily snookered and/or simply dumbfounded past the infomercial spewed
point of no return? (apparently so)
Pretending or rather suggesting that such an unusually thin layer of
clumping bone dry moon dust that isn't the least bit electrostatic,
looks and reacts exactly like portland cement and cornmeal (and/or
somewhat guano island albedo like, as though xenon lamp spectrum
illuminated) falls at 9.8 m/s is rather pathetic. Unfortunately, most
of us village idiot outsiders haven't waked on clumping portland cement,
as I and a few others have. The 50/50 blend of portland cement and
cornmeal, or perhaps local guano dust, is just about what the
NASA/Apollo hocus-pocus doctor ordered.
Great God almighty, where's that good old vibrant and nearby Venus, as
of missions A11, A14 and A16? (or is that too much honest physics and
replicated science truth to behold?)
Any half-assed 3D simulator that's offering us the visiual perceived
orbital mechanics, as obtained from any given time and location on the
lunar surface, is what way more than proves the truth and nothing but
the truth, that we've all been badly snookered (some to death) by those
having "the right stuff".
Their unfiltered Kodak film, as having been exposed in more ways then
the human visible spectrum, while on such naked EVAs and otherwise while
in orbit, had way more than sufficient DR(dynamic range) to have easily
recorded Venus and a few other off-moon items besides Earth as viewed
above that physically dark lunar terrain. So, what's the NASA/Apollo
official lie this time?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:39 am
|
|