|
Science Forum Index » Astro - Amateur Forum » astronomers
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Sitav |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Brian Tung |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Brian Tung |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Shawn wrote:
Quote: Tyson has better graphics though.
Hardly a ringing endorsement, I think. :-o
Quote: The saddest part of the
comparison is that there was a guy popularizing astronomy and science 25
years ago, and there's a guy doing it now and Bill Nye for kids in
between.
I must be having trouble parsing this: What is sad about the thing you
pointed out?
--
Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Shawn |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sitav wrote:
Quote: who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.
Edwin Hubble, the guy the space telescope is named after.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hubble
Carl Sagan has done more than any other individual scientist in history
to make science and especially astronomy accessible and interesting to
the general public.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Sagan
Shawn |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Shawn |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sitav wrote:
Quote: who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.
Oh, 21st century. Hmm, those other guys are dead.
Neil deGrasse Tyson of Nova Now fame. Following in Sagan's footsteps as
far as making science accessible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Greg Crinklaw |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sitav wrote:
Quote: who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.
Famous to whom? I'll never forget when I first started college I took a
writing class. We had the assignment to write about someone famous. I
chose to write about Sir William Herschel.
In this class we all sat in a circle. The author read his/her paper
while the rest of the class listened. Everyone was encouraged to offer
critiques during the reading.
When it came my turn I was pretty nervous. My very first sentence went
something like, ".. the famous astronomer William Herschel..." Right
away a woman spoke up (she no doubt had written about some pop star) and
said, "How can he be famous, I've never heard of him!" The rest of the
class looked at each other and agreed!
Yet of course Herschel is one of the most famous astronomers of all
time, most notably because he discovered Uranus, which put him among a
very select few who could make such a claim.
The problem, of course, was that the young college students in the class
couldn't have named *any* famous astronomers, except perhaps Sagan.
My point is that perhaps "famous" isn't really the right question. It
relies too much on popular culture. Perhaps "noteworthy" would be better?
As far as noteworthy astronomers go, I might suggest Geoffrey Marcy, who
leads the pack in discovering the exoplanets.
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html
To reply take out your eye |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Shawn |
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Brian Tung wrote:
Quote: Shawn wrote:
Neil deGrasse Tyson of Nova Now fame. Following in Sagan's footsteps as
far as making science accessible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson
Tyson is a featherweight compared to Sagan. His command of analogy is
far inferior--that's a big difference, considering that well-constructed
analogies are a great way to convey science to the general public.
Tyson has better graphics though. The saddest part of the
comparison is that there was a guy popularizing astronomy and science 25
years ago, and there's a guy doing it now and Bill Nye for kids in
between.
Shawn |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chris L Peterson |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 27 Jan 2007 15:28:16 -0800, "Sitav" <sitav_nabi@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.
We're not too far into the 21st Century, so in terms of major work done
in the last five years, that would be hard to say. But there are many
famous astronomers who have produced great work in the last 25 year or
so, and remain active today:
Alan Guth
Stephen Hawking
Kip Thorne
Jocelyn Bell
Roger Penrose
Of course, most of these will probably be remembered in the long run as
20th Century scientists. The most famous 21st Century astronomers are
probably still in grade school.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Brian Tung |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Shawn |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Brian Tung wrote:
Quote: Shawn wrote:
Tyson has better graphics though. :-)
Hardly a ringing endorsement, I think.
How about this: Tyson has a conversational manner that I find more
engaging than Sagan's gee whiz sharing of his wonder at the Cosmos. IMO
I find Tyson informative, more of a reporter, whereas Sagan was more of
an evangelist.
Quote: The saddest part of the
comparison is that there was a guy popularizing astronomy and science 25
years ago, and there's a guy doing it now and Bill Nye for kids in
between.
I must be having trouble parsing this: What is sad about the thing you
pointed out?
It's great that Sagan, Tyson, Nye, or even the Myth Busters are (or
were) out there spreading science to the public. But we live in a
society utterly dependent on technology based on scientific discovery,
and yet a bunch of science geeks (us) can only come up with a handful of
names of people out there trying to teach astronomy to the masses.
Compare and Contrast with the number of football pundits out there
(American or otherwise FTM). I find it sad.
Shawn |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Sam Wormley |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sitav wrote:
Quote: who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.
The Century is technically only five (5) years old. What major
astronomical work has come to light in the last five years and
who are the players?
When you say "famous", do you mean astronomers known to the "man
on the street", those that have revolutionized our understanding
of nature significantly, or some other criteria?
Some to consider are
o Mars Rover team
o WMAP team
o Late John Bahcall (Solar Neutrinos)
Ask me in 95 years! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| atasselli@hotmail.com |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 28 Jan, 04:53, Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
Quote: On 27 Jan 2007 15:28:16 -0800, "Sitav" <sitav_n...@yahoo.com> wrote:
who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.We're not too far into the 21st Century, so in terms of major work done
in the last five years, that would be hard to say. But there are many
famous astronomers who have produced great work in the last 25 year or
so, and remain active today:
Alan Guth
Stephen Hawking
Kip Thorne
Jocelyn Bell
Roger Penrose
Are all those mentioned above truly astronomers? I don't think so.
Andrea T. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chris L Peterson |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 28 Jan 2007 15:31:59 -0800, "atasselli@hotmail.com"
<atasselli@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Alan Guth
Stephen Hawking
Kip Thorne
Jocelyn Bell
Roger Penrose
Are all those mentioned above truly astronomers? I don't think so.
I would argue that they are. But it is certainly true that the modern
definition of "astronomer" is a loose one. All of the above have
contributed in profound ways to our understanding of the Universe.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Greg Crinklaw |
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
atasselli@hotmail.com wrote:
Quote: Alan Guth
Stephen Hawking
Kip Thorne
Jocelyn Bell
Roger Penrose
Are all those mentioned above truly astronomers? I don't think so.
Yes, they are as far as I'm concerned. If you are claiming they are
astrophysicists, most astronomers don't care if you call them
astronomers or astrophysicists. The modern definition of both is pretty
much identical.
In practice the terms "observational" and "theoretical"
astronomer/astrophysicist is often applied with much greater meaning.
In the end, anyone who is scientifically studying the universe beyond a
narrow view of the earth is basically an astronomer.
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html
To reply take out your eye |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David |
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: As far as noteworthy astronomers go, I might suggest Geoffrey Marcy, who
leads the pack in discovering the exoplanets.
Marci was first, but back in late 20th century when he was still at
SFSU.
On Jan 27, 6:04 pm, Greg Crinklaw <theskyhoundyour...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Quote: Sitav wrote:
who are the "famous" astronomers of the 21st century. i havent heard
of many well known astronomers or astrophysicists.........yet.
Famous to whom? I'll never forget when I first started college I took a
writing class. We had the assignment to write about someone famous. I
chose to write about Sir William Herschel.
In this class we all sat in a circle. The author read his/her paper
while the rest of the class listened. Everyone was encouraged to offer
critiques during the reading.
When it came my turn I was pretty nervous. My very first sentence went
something like, ".. the famous astronomer William Herschel..." Right
away a woman spoke up (she no doubt had written about some pop star) and
said, "How can he be famous, I've never heard of him!" The rest of the
class looked at each other and agreed!
Yet of course Herschel is one of the most famous astronomers of all
time, most notably because he discovered Uranus, which put him among a
very select few who could make such a claim.
The problem, of course, was that the young college students in the class
couldn't have named *any* famous astronomers, except perhaps Sagan.
My point is that perhaps "famous" isn't really the right question. It
relies too much on popular culture. Perhaps "noteworthy" would be better?
As far as noteworthy astronomers go, I might suggest Geoffrey Marcy, who
leads the pack in discovering the exoplanets.
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing:http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html
To reply take out your eye |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |