"Anthony Cerrato" <tcerrato@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:hUYwh.726$Tx5.512@newsfe11.lga
That's rather odd, that team SETI would bother as to shun the regular
laws of physics, and to otherwise banish whatever's the best available
replicated science. I wonder as to what parts of their faith-based Old
Testament hocus-pocus shadow are they so deathly afraid of?
Where does it say or interpret within their Old Testament: Thou shalt
lie (and get paid the really big bucks for doing so).
And meanwhile the grand orchestrated ruse/sting of our mutually
perpetrated cold-war century goes on and on, just like the phony baloney
war in Iraq and of nearly countless other fiascos around our polluted
and energy raped globe that's failing us rather badly in more ways than
we can count or otherwise manage to biologically evolve fast enough in
order to save our frail DNA/RNA sorry butts.
http://www.thothweb.com/article2704.html
All we can say for sure is that despite our supposed
advanced technology, NASA seems to be able to offer very
few answers to our questions about the moon. The veil of
secrecy that surrounds the truth means that the facts are
often suppressed because it is not deemed ‘in the public’s
interest’ for them to be made known. Sooner or later though,
it is inevitable that the moon will reveal its secrets and
a whole new chapter in our understanding of the universe
might well be opened when that happens.
Perhaps the honset problem here is that we simply have not quite gotten
around to that pesky part of having actually walked on that nasty moon
of ours. But lo and behold, there's lots more truth to share and share
alike.
The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.'
http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sci/sci.astro/d8fe6a9add1a7d36188a9e05ae97e4a
f.49644%40mygate.mailgate.org
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_frm/thread/6bf2faae457116d5/199
8c2faf3d0e608?lnk=st&q=brad+guth&rnum=2&hl=en#1998c2faf3d0e608
"88Countach" <rl351_KILLALLSPAMMERS_@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:45c7654e$0$6496$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com
This is an excellent video series for anyone who doesn't believe
the Apollo landings were real:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc
My God and freaking Christ almighty on yet another stick, you're all
sooooo impressed with YouTube's used toilet paper, as for representing
your fully subjective/conditional physics and science that oddly can't
be replicated. If that's not the best ever subjective infomercial video
crapolla that's flowing uphill and/or on a seriously ugly stick, then
absolutely nothing is.
"This is a video response to Apollo 11 Real or Hoax?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc
You folks obviously can't count those frames per second, nor hardly
accomplish the meters/second worth on behalf of the most basic math, can
you. Are all such incest cloned Jews and Third Reich members this
easily snookered and/or simply dumbfounded past the infomercial spewed
point of no return? (apparently so)
Pretending or rather suggesting that such an unusually thin layer of
clumping bone dry moon dust that isn't the least bit electrostatic,
looks and reacts exactly like portland cement and cornmeal (and/or
somewhat guano island albedo like, as though xenon lamp spectrum
illuminated) falls at 9.8 m/s is rather pathetic. Unfortunately, most
of us village idiot outsiders haven't waked on clumping portland cement,
as I and a few others have. The 50/50 blend of portland cement and
cornmeal, or perhaps local guano dust, is just about what the
NASA/Apollo hocus-pocus doctor ordered.
Great God almighty, where's that good old vibrant and nearby Venus, as
of missions A11, A14 and A16? (or is that too much honest physics and
replicated science truth to behold?)
Any half-assed 3D simulator that's offering us the visiual perceived
orbital mechanics, as obtained from any given time and location on the
lunar surface, is what way more than proves the truth and nothing but
the truth, that we've all been badly snookered (some to death) by those
having "the right stuff".
Their unfiltered Kodak film, as having been exposed in more ways then
the human visible spectrum, while on such naked EVAs and otherwise while
in orbit, had way more than sufficient DR(dynamic range) to have easily
recorded Venus and a few other off-moon items besides Earth as viewed
above that physically dark lunar terrain. So, what's the NASA/Apollo
official lie this time?
