| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Anthropology - Paleo Forum » coherent, complex & dynamic timeline
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Chapstick |
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
my own snippett from an earlier thread:
"To summarize what I am trying to think... I am interested in a sort of
coherent, complex & dynamic, timeline of human development. I think we all
want that. How did we become this thinking being? and not just another
chimp? Does the chimp "think?" and etc."
and this timeline from sap (Charles and Phillip):
abbreviations:
LCA = Last Common Ancestor (with Pan)
PA = PaleoAnthropology
~ = about
mya = million years ago
kya = thousand years ago (this in preference to using BC)
HN = Homo Neanderthal...
hss = us, modern humans
225 mya = evolution of mammals during the Triassic
65.5 mya = the K-T boundary... extinction of dinosaurs, Cf. the Chicxulub
structure on the Yucatan
~16 mya = pongoids split into orangutangs/hominoids (gorilla, pan, homo)
~10 mya = gorilla/pan-homo split
~ 8 mya = pan/homo split (ie, our LCA was 5-9 mya)
4.5 mya = Ramidus (an intermediate??)
3.5 mya = early afarensis (Lucy) (apiths)
2.5 - 1.8 mya, = homo erectus (currently believed to be in our line)
~600 kya = Neanderthal/Homo sapien split (or 230 kya)
400 kya - various African erectoids.
~120 kya = something happens to make us "more human". (this date fluctuates
between 200 kya and 70 kya).*
60 kya = presumed that humans used a boat to arrive in Australia
40 kya = "explosion" into Hss...Cro-Magnon cultures expand
~30 kya = Neanderthals extinct.**
~25 kya = remnant erectoids of Austro-Asia go extinct
14.5 kya = Clovis culture Native Americans enter North America.
10 kya = invention of writing (this took until 7 kya to solidify)
4.5 kya = pyramids built
* one could say that between 180 kya and 120 kya, "a predisposition for
human culture distinct from other hominoids evolved." --Phillip D.
** the first presumed entry of modern humans into Europe, then the domain of
the Neanderthal, was about 43kya. The last known HN fossils are from Vindija
in Croatia dated between 28-29 kya.
and this little snippett about the K-T extinction from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous-Tertiary_extinction_event
"Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters appear to have survived quite
well. It is worth noting that at the end of the Cretaceous there seem to
have been no purely vegetarian or carnivorius mammals. Many mammals, and the
birds which survived the extinction, fed on insects, larvae, worms, snails
etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. So they survived the collapse
of plant-based food chains because they lived in "detritus-based" food
chains."
"No land animal larger than a cat survived."
Any strong disagreements about this data?
By the way, I think it of some interest that as far back as 16 mya, our
"line" was into some sort of nest-building, since the gorilla build a nest
every night & we share that trait.
--chap |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chapstick |
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Chapstick" <chapstick@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b570fd$0$28102$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote: my own snippett from an earlier thread:
"To summarize what I am trying to think... I am interested in a sort of
coherent, complex & dynamic, timeline of human development. I think we
all want that. How did we become this thinking being? and not just
another
chimp? Does the chimp "think?" and etc."
and this timeline from sap (Charles and Phillip):
abbreviations:
LCA = Last Common Ancestor (with Pan)
PA = PaleoAnthropology
~ = about
mya = million years ago
kya = thousand years ago (this in preference to using BC)
HN = Homo Neanderthal...
hss = us, modern humans
225 mya = evolution of mammals during the Triassic
65.5 mya = the K-T boundary... extinction of dinosaurs, Cf. the Chicxulub
structure on the Yucatan
~16 mya = pongoids split into orangutangs/hominoids (gorilla, pan, homo)
~10 mya = gorilla/pan-homo split
~ 8 mya = pan/homo split (ie, our LCA was 5-9 mya)
4.5 mya = Ramidus (an intermediate??)
3.5 mya = early afarensis (Lucy) (apiths)
2.5 - 1.8 mya, = homo erectus (currently believed to be in our line)
~600 kya = Neanderthal/Homo sapien split (or 230 kya)
400 kya - various African erectoids.
~120 kya = something happens to make us "more human". (this date
fluctuates between 200 kya and 70 kya).*
60 kya = presumed that humans used a boat to arrive in Australia
40 kya = "explosion" into Hss...Cro-Magnon cultures expand
~30 kya = Neanderthals extinct.**
~25 kya = remnant erectoids of Austro-Asia go extinct
14.5 kya = Clovis culture Native Americans enter North America.
10 kya = invention of writing (this took until 7 kya to solidify)
4.5 kya = pyramids built
* one could say that between 180 kya and 120 kya, "a predisposition for
human culture distinct from other hominoids evolved." --Phillip D.
** the first presumed entry of modern humans into Europe, then the domain
of the Neanderthal, was about 43kya. The last known HN fossils are from
Vindija in Croatia dated between 28-29 kya.
and this little snippett about the K-T extinction from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous-Tertiary_extinction_event
"Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters appear to have survived quite
well. It is worth noting that at the end of the Cretaceous there seem to
have been no purely vegetarian or carnivorius mammals. Many mammals, and
the birds which survived the extinction, fed on insects, larvae, worms,
snails etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. So they survived the
collapse of plant-based food chains because they lived in "detritus-based"
food chains."
"No land animal larger than a cat survived."
Any strong disagreements about this data?
By the way, I think it of some interest that as far back as 16 mya, our
"line" was into some sort of nest-building, since the gorilla build a nest
every night & we share that trait.
--chap
These dates are rather significant too, Re: the Toba eruption 74 kya.
http://j.dollan.home.bresnan.net/TLU01.html
80,000 BP: The ancestors of all non-African peoples are believed to
have migrated from Africa as a single population. October 25, 2005
74,000 BP: The Toba Caldera erupts in its most recent explosion,
spewing out 2,800 cubic kilometers of material, and thus forming the Young
Toba Tuff. This eruption is believed to have caused a genetic bottleneck in
Humans, due to the resulting extreme climatic conditions. October 25, 2005
71,000 BP: The documented time of the Human genetic bottleneck,
believed to have been caused by the Toba eruption. The Human population in
the world is thought to have fallen to as few as 15,000 individuals. In
short, Humans nearly became extinct. October 25, 2005 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chapstick |
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| deowll |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Chapstick" <chapstick@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b570fd$0$28102$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote: my own snippett from an earlier thread:
"To summarize what I am trying to think... I am interested in a sort of
coherent, complex & dynamic, timeline of human development. I think we
all want that. How did we become this thinking being? and not just
another
chimp? Does the chimp "think?" and etc."
and this timeline from sap (Charles and Phillip):
abbreviations:
LCA = Last Common Ancestor (with Pan)
PA = PaleoAnthropology
~ = about
mya = million years ago
kya = thousand years ago (this in preference to using BC)
HN = Homo Neanderthal...
hss = us, modern humans
225 mya = evolution of mammals during the Triassic
65.5 mya = the K-T boundary... extinction of dinosaurs, Cf. the Chicxulub
structure on the Yucatan
~16 mya = pongoids split into orangutangs/hominoids (gorilla, pan, homo)
~10 mya = gorilla/pan-homo split
~ 8 mya = pan/homo split (ie, our LCA was 5-9 mya)
4.5 mya = Ramidus (an intermediate??)
3.5 mya = early afarensis (Lucy) (apiths)
2.5 - 1.8 mya, = homo erectus (currently believed to be in our line)
~600 kya = Neanderthal/Homo sapien split (or 230 kya)
400 kya - various African erectoids.
~120 kya = something happens to make us "more human". (this date
fluctuates between 200 kya and 70 kya).*
60 kya = presumed that humans used a boat to arrive in Australia
40 kya = "explosion" into Hss...Cro-Magnon cultures expand
~30 kya = Neanderthals extinct.**
~25 kya = remnant erectoids of Austro-Asia go extinct
14.5 kya = Clovis culture Native Americans enter North America.
10 kya = invention of writing (this took until 7 kya to solidify)
4.5 kya = pyramids built
* one could say that between 180 kya and 120 kya, "a predisposition for
human culture distinct from other hominoids evolved." --Phillip D.
** the first presumed entry of modern humans into Europe, then the domain
of the Neanderthal, was about 43kya. The last known HN fossils are from
Vindija in Croatia dated between 28-29 kya.
and this little snippett about the K-T extinction from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous-Tertiary_extinction_event
"Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters appear to have survived quite
well. It is worth noting that at the end of the Cretaceous there seem to
have been no purely vegetarian or carnivorius mammals. Many mammals, and
the birds which survived the extinction, fed on insects, larvae, worms,
snails etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. So they survived the
collapse of plant-based food chains because they lived in "detritus-based"
food chains."
"No land animal larger than a cat survived."
Any strong disagreements about this data?
The birds that made it may have been sea birds. The land birds seem to have
had a feature not found in living birds.
Quote:
By the way, I think it of some interest that as far back as 16 mya, our
"line" was into some sort of nest-building, since the gorilla build a nest
every night & we share that trait.
--chap
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| deowll |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:33 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Chapstick" <chapstick@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45b57b76$0$16966$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote: http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey/timeline.swf
oh dammit
the above is a quite-beautiful lil' map. enjoy!
now if we can just figure out the preceding 64 million years....
The time line in The America's should cause a few fights.
There were humans outside of Africa and the data I've read leaves me in
little doubt that some of their DNA is still around. I'm not even talking
fossils here. I'm talking biology.
Have fun. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Day Brown |
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:26 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sorting this out is going to be impossible. The current Issue of
Playboy, in an article on spermatazoa, makes mention of modern hominds
who are not XX or XY, but XXY; there is no *moment of conception*.
Sometimes more than one sperm gets in. If both are XX or XY, no biggie,
the result is a baby with either XX or XY; but XXY is the obvious cause
of hermaphroditism, and its a lot more common than people think. Many
who are XXY look normal.
Adding the complexity enormously is the realization that the sperm
which get into an egg need not be from the same donor. Moreover, it was
realized that DNA does not join together like a new zipper, but like an
old jacket, may have teeth missing with loops that hang out... that
then get joined with whatever other strands of the Y chromosome mite be
floating around. Thus, the fact that the Neanderthals had different
chromosomes dont matter; snippets of HNS code can still be passed on.
Since hominids may have more than one father, tracing the line now
entails which sections of DNA came from which donor. I dont see any way
to sort that out. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Day Brown |
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jan 22, 11:33 pm, "deowll" <deo...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Quote: There were humans outside of Africa and the data I've read leaves me in
little doubt that some of their DNA is still around. I'm not even talking
fossils here. I'm talking biology.
Agreed. Seems like I read that some Homo Erectus DNA still exists in SE
Asian gene pools.
Dont try to tell me that men would not fuck something as ugly as a Homo
Erectus.
When I was young, My and my wife ran a group home. The retarded would
ride the bus downtown to the sheltered workshop.
One woman, as ugly as any Homo Erectus, with a similar IQ, about 55,
got picked up from time to time off the bus, and wouldnt show up till a
couple days later. She had five kids before they tied her tubes. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chapstick |
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Day Brown" <daybrown@hughes.net> wrote in message
news:1169622875.380525.100670@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Jan 22, 11:33 pm, "deowll" <deo...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
There were humans outside of Africa and the data I've read leaves me in
little doubt that some of their DNA is still around. I'm not even talking
fossils here. I'm talking biology.
Agreed. Seems like I read that some Homo Erectus DNA still exists in SE
Asian gene pools.
Dont try to tell me that men would not fuck something as ugly as a Homo
Erectus.
<smile> Who sez' that they were ugly! <smile>
no, really, they were certainly beautiful to each other, and may have also
met all the current "standards" for beauty. The women probably also had
that proportion that all modern men love.
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/biology/b103/f01/web1/ekanayake.html
and a dissenter:
http://www.bartleby.com/24/2/304.html
I would like to hear your opinion about the effect of sexual selection
on our species.... a "list" of those characteristics that you believe to be
so selected....
Quote: When I was young, My and my wife ran a group home. The retarded would
ride the bus downtown to the sheltered workshop.
One woman, as ugly as any Homo Erectus, with a similar IQ, about 55,
got picked up from time to time off the bus, and wouldnt show up till a
couple days later. She had five kids before they tied her tubes.
I dunno'. This is treading some dangerous PC ground here. At any rate, I
am disinclined to believe this (that h.e. genes persist in our line) since
the Multiregional Hypothesis is largely a bye-gone thing.
Of more interest, IMHO, is the concept that H.N. genes persist and
caused our so-called racial differences to increase. However, even if I am
interested in that being a possiblility, the evidence thus far does not
support it.
dowell... yes, i agree that the older numbers for the N.A. settlement
are going to raise hackles. I tend to be a "clovis-first" guy myself, but
am open to solid evidence, naturally...
--chap |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Day Brown |
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jan 24, 6:22 pm, "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
Quote: I would like to hear your opinion about the effect of sexual selection
on our species.... a "list" of those characteristics that you believe to be
so selected....
Hominids lived in a lotta different ecosystems, and since the agrarian
revolution in the Eolithic, a lotta different lifestyles.
But yes, I agree that while a Homo Erectus mite seem ugly to us, here
anyway, well educated honkies, as I noted before, other men are not so
gifted, nor so fussy. I recall a few times when I was young that I did
not take the chance to get laid because of perceived repercussions. But
then, I didnt get the clap.
All of the estimates I've seen of the hominid population in early times
are extremely low. We think of the warrior class, but much of the time,
over the vast emptiness early hominids faced, inter-tribal warfare
would have made no sense. They *needed* the genetic diversity. As
hominids moved into the colder regions from the lower latitudes,
territory was up the yin/yang. I've read that old man Winter in the ice
age committed genocide several times, wiping out the megafaurna that
depended on grass not ice, and thus the hominids that relied on them.
I find the "Golden Age of Peace" entirely credible. We have the example
of the Little Big Horn, where it'd been a good year after a mild
winter, and the plains tribes that normally were bitter enemies were
having a barbi when Custer crashed the party.
Then too, IIRC, it was Sass, in "The Substance of Civilization" who
calculated that when agronomy came in, the amount of land needed to
support a community shrank by a factor of *500*. We have the example
of 19th Century Ireland, where before the potato blight, a mere 1/20th
of an acre was sufficient to support a person. Altho- not sustainably.
In Northern Euorpe and China, women would have preferred not aggressive
warriors, but *farmers* with the foresight to put up enough food and
firewood to survive the winter. A lotta warriors lacking that skill,
but snowed in, didnt make it. Their personalities also have immense
problems with cabin fever. There is an evident increased power of Women
in the Native European tradition. Nowhere is this spelled out more
clearly to me than a report written by someone coming across a cabin
the American Wilderness.
In the yard was the grave of the man's wife. Inside the cabin was his
dead body. No wife, no family, no purpose. Europe had, and indeed still
has, vast tracts of forest; this pioneer lifestyle goes all the way
back to the development of the bronze axe 7000 years ago.
I've seen some facial reconstructions from skulls of yeoman farmers.
Ugly mugs, both men & women. Then too, we have the paintings of the
Dutch peasants; I dont think they were exaggerating that much. I've
read that DNA reveals that Native Europeans descended from villages of
150-300 people. That aint a lotta mates to choose from. Women werent
looking for "Mr. Wright", but "Mr. Yule Dew".
I was born on a Minnesota farm in 1939, and have lived most of the last
30 years in the Ozarks. Looks just dont cut it. Women know who the men
are, which family lines produce the hard working honest responsible men
to raise a family with, and which are the drunks. They party with the
latter in high school, but when its time to settle down, only the
stupid airheads marry the drunks. We'd all do lots better to supply
these future welfare queens with better sperm donation. It'd pay to pay
them to raise kids. Their maternal instincts are still perfectly
adequate, even more so if given progeny that were of better character
and more talented.
19th century records provide abundant examples of successful,
honorable, talented men who were not raised by their mothers, but some
ignorant slave or servant girl, who they regard with great affection
later on in life.
Lastly, "matchmakers" used to be relied on, who knew the community and
the bloodlines. They had better results. The girls mite not have been
that happy with the choices, but I dont see that they are all that
happy today with the choices they made either. That institution of
midwife/matchmaker had very different criteria that what we perceive
now as stud muffins. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| nickname |
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Chap,
Toba: see tiger bottleneck also.
Homo & All great apes construct "woven" nests, no lesser apes do, nor
do any monkeys or other primates AFAIK.
Hominoid Nest building may have originated with reed bundle floating
(either mobile rafts or immobile reed mounds) in wetlands, single-use
(due to water absorption) continued when they became more arboreal,
discarding nightly tree-nests.
Hominids (pre-Homo and Homo esp.) may have been constructing watercraft
(dug-outs) from downed river trees, with or without fire, in
association with hand-axes (found mainly at waterside and near
quarries), for a million+ years. Oldest known dug-out wood
evidence:9kya Korean.
Most reptiles have spherical eggs (normal for fish, amphibs too.), most
birds have ovoid eggs, this indicates that birds went through a
cliff-dwelling bottleneck as round eggs roll off cliffs, ovoid eggs
usually won't, natural selection resulted in modern tree-dwelling birds
laying ovoid eggs in nests.
Chap, (or anyone), ever do any duck-hunting with a dog and a boat?
See AAT for more info.
DD
On Jan 22, 6:47 pm, "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
Quote: "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote in messagenews:45b570fd$0$28102$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
my own snippett from an earlier thread:
"To summarize what I am trying to think... I am interested in a sort of
coherent, complex & dynamic, timeline of human development. I think we
all want that. How did we become this thinking being? and not just
another
chimp? Does the chimp "think?" and etc."
and this timeline from sap (Charles and Phillip):
abbreviations:
LCA = Last Common Ancestor (with Pan)
PA = PaleoAnthropology
~ = about
mya = million years ago
kya = thousand years ago (this in preference to using BC)
HN = Homo Neanderthal...
hss = us, modern humans
225 mya = evolution of mammals during the Triassic
65.5 mya = the K-T boundary... extinction of dinosaurs, Cf. the Chicxulub
structure on the Yucatan
~16 mya = pongoids split into orangutangs/hominoids (gorilla, pan, homo)
~10 mya = gorilla/pan-homo split
~ 8 mya = pan/homo split (ie, our LCA was 5-9 mya)
4.5 mya = Ramidus (an intermediate??)
3.5 mya = early afarensis (Lucy) (apiths)
2.5 - 1.8 mya, = homo erectus (currently believed to be in our line)
~600 kya = Neanderthal/Homo sapien split (or 230 kya)
400 kya - various African erectoids.
~120 kya = something happens to make us "more human". (this date
fluctuates between 200 kya and 70 kya).*
60 kya = presumed that humans used a boat to arrive in Australia
40 kya = "explosion" into Hss...Cro-Magnon cultures expand
~30 kya = Neanderthals extinct.**
~25 kya = remnant erectoids of Austro-Asia go extinct
14.5 kya = Clovis culture Native Americans enter North America.
10 kya = invention of writing (this took until 7 kya to solidify)
4.5 kya = pyramids built
* one could say that between 180 kya and 120 kya, "a predisposition for
human culture distinct from other hominoids evolved." --Phillip D.
** the first presumed entry of modern humans into Europe, then the domain
of the Neanderthal, was about 43kya. The last known HN fossils are from
Vindija in Croatia dated between 28-29 kya.
and this little snippett about the K-T extinction from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous-Tertiary_extinction_event
"Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters appear to have survived quite
well. It is worth noting that at the end of the Cretaceous there seem to
have been no purely vegetarian or carnivorius mammals. Many mammals, and
the birds which survived the extinction, fed on insects, larvae, worms,
snails etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. So they survived the
collapse of plant-based food chains because they lived in "detritus-based"
food chains."
"No land animal larger than a cat survived."
Any strong disagreements about this data?
By the way, I think it of some interest that as far back as 16 mya, our
"line" was into some sort of nest-building, since the gorilla build a nest
every night & we share that trait.
--chapThese dates are rather significant too, Re: the Toba eruption 74 kya.http://j.dollan.home.bresnan.net/TLU01.html
80,000 BP: The ancestors of all non-African peoples are believed to
have migrated from Africa as a single population. October 25, 2005
74,000 BP: The Toba Caldera erupts in its most recent explosion,
spewing out 2,800 cubic kilometers of material, and thus forming the Young
Toba Tuff. This eruption is believed to have caused a genetic bottleneck in
Humans, due to the resulting extreme climatic conditions. October 25, 2005
71,000 BP: The documented time of the Human genetic bottleneck,
believed to have been caused by the Toba eruption. The Human population in
the world is thought to have fallen to as few as 15,000 individuals. In
short, Humans nearly became extinct. October 25, 2005 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Marc Verhaegen |
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"nickname" <alas_my_loves@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1169753750.258866.38560@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote: Homo & All great apes construct "woven" nests, no lesser apes do, nor
do any monkeys or other primates AFAIK.
Hominoid Nest building may have originated with reed bundle floating
(either mobile rafts or immobile reed mounds) in wetlands, single-use
(due to water absorption) continued when they became more arboreal,
discarding nightly tree-nests.
Interesting view.
Do you know whether hylobatids construct nests, DD?
Great/lesser ape split ~20-16 Ma?
Quote: Hominids (pre-Homo and Homo esp.) may have been constructing watercraft
(dug-outs) from downed river trees, with or without fire, in
association with hand-axes (found mainly at waterside and near
quarries), for a million+ years. Oldest known dug-out wood
evidence:9kya Korean.
Most reptiles have spherical eggs (normal for fish, amphibs too.), most
birds have ovoid eggs, this indicates that birds went through a
cliff-dwelling bottleneck as round eggs roll off cliffs, ovoid eggs
usually won't, natural selection resulted in modern tree-dwelling birds
laying ovoid eggs in nests.
Chap, (or anyone), ever do any duck-hunting with a dog and a boat?
See AAT for more info.
DD
--Marc |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chapstick |
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Day Brown" <daybrown@hughes.net> wrote in message
news:1169691716.222380.286320@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Jan 24, 6:22 pm, "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
I would like to hear your opinion about the effect of sexual
selection
on our species.... a "list" of those characteristics that you believe to
be
so selected....
Hominids lived in a lotta different ecosystems, and since the agrarian
revolution in the Eolithic, a lotta different lifestyles.
But yes, I agree that while a Homo Erectus mite seem ugly to us, here
anyway, well educated honkies, as I noted before, other men are not so
gifted, nor so fussy. I recall a few times when I was young that I did
not take the chance to get laid because of perceived repercussions. But
then, I didnt get the clap.
All of the estimates I've seen of the hominid population in early times
are extremely low. We think of the warrior class, but much of the time,
over the vast emptiness early hominids faced, inter-tribal warfare
would have made no sense. They *needed* the genetic diversity. As
hominids moved into the colder regions from the lower latitudes,
territory was up the yin/yang. I've read that old man Winter in the ice
age committed genocide several times, wiping out the megafaurna that
depended on grass not ice, and thus the hominids that relied on them.
I find the "Golden Age of Peace" entirely credible. We have the example
of the Little Big Horn, where it'd been a good year after a mild
winter, and the plains tribes that normally were bitter enemies were
having a barbi when Custer crashed the party.
yes, a long period of peaceful co-existence with "ourselves" is credible to
me, too. I don't necessarily buy the argument that since mankind has always
been warlike then we always will be warlike... we may have had a few million
years without war! however, the NA's certainly did have lotsa' warfare, but
on a different scale before 1492. so your data ref'ed below may be in
effect.
Quote:
Then too, IIRC, it was Sass, in "The Substance of Civilization" who
calculated that when agronomy came in, the amount of land needed to
support a community shrank by a factor of *500*. We have the example
of 19th Century Ireland, where before the potato blight, a mere 1/20th
of an acre was sufficient to support a person. Altho- not sustainably.
In Northern Euorpe and China, women would have preferred not aggressive
warriors, but *farmers* with the foresight to put up enough food and
firewood to survive the winter. A lotta warriors lacking that skill,
but snowed in, didnt make it. Their personalities also have immense
problems with cabin fever. There is an evident increased power of Women
in the Native European tradition. Nowhere is this spelled out more
clearly to me than a report written by someone coming across a cabin
the American Wilderness.
In the yard was the grave of the man's wife. Inside the cabin was his
dead body. No wife, no family, no purpose. Europe had, and indeed still
has, vast tracts of forest; this pioneer lifestyle goes all the way
back to the development of the bronze axe 7000 years ago.
I've seen some facial reconstructions from skulls of yeoman farmers.
Ugly mugs, both men & women. Then too, we have the paintings of the
Dutch peasants; I dont think they were exaggerating that much. I've
read that DNA reveals that Native Europeans descended from villages of
150-300 people. That aint a lotta mates to choose from. Women werent
looking for "Mr. Wright", but "Mr. Yule Dew".
while i *do* agree with what you are saying here, this concerns a difference
between what we might call "romantic love" versus a sort of utilitarian
existence that is the lot of most people.
meanwhile, the sexual selection that I was asking about is more along
what darwin said about the Peacock. or, that he said that sexual selection
could "rapidly" bring about the exaggeration of some feature or another that
had no other survival function. Some persons on this forum (sap) have
debated whether or not sexual selection is true or not... that maybe darwin
came up with it when no other concept met the need. IMHO, sexual selection
MIGHT explain a plethora of hss traits: "naked" skin, breasts, large penis,
face shape, exaggerated buttocks, large hips in the female, etc. etc. One
question that immediately comes to mind for our species is "who is selecting
who." Well, at any rate, that is our constant debate on sap... what on
earth caused us to look and act the way that we do...
--chap
Quote:
I was born on a Minnesota farm in 1939, and have lived most of the last
30 years in the Ozarks. Looks just dont cut it. Women know who the men
are, which family lines produce the hard working honest responsible men
to raise a family with, and which are the drunks. They party with the
latter in high school, but when its time to settle down, only the
stupid airheads marry the drunks. We'd all do lots better to supply
these future welfare queens with better sperm donation. It'd pay to pay
them to raise kids. Their maternal instincts are still perfectly
adequate, even more so if given progeny that were of better character
and more talented.
19th century records provide abundant examples of successful,
honorable, talented men who were not raised by their mothers, but some
ignorant slave or servant girl, who they regard with great affection
later on in life.
Lastly, "matchmakers" used to be relied on, who knew the community and
the bloodlines. They had better results. The girls mite not have been
that happy with the choices, but I dont see that they are all that
happy today with the choices they made either. That institution of
midwife/matchmaker had very different criteria that what we perceive
now as stud muffins.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chapstick |
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"nickname" <alas_my_loves@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1169753750.258866.38560@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote: Chap,
Toba: see tiger bottleneck also.
thx... have been reading a bit on that now...
Quote:
Homo & All great apes construct "woven" nests, no lesser apes do, nor
do any monkeys or other primates AFAIK.
Hominoid Nest building may have originated with reed bundle floating
(either mobile rafts or immobile reed mounds) in wetlands, single-use
(due to water absorption) continued when they became more arboreal,
discarding nightly tree-nests.
perhaps. but then wouldn't we find more hss characteristics in gorilla and
pan? that is, if the significant hss characteristics were shaped from
contact with water. (i have no strong opinion on that one way or the
other... rather... i am still open to what the evidence reveals.)
whatever the cause, that nest building is what leads directly to our
building of dwellings in this day and age.
chimps, by the way, do not poop in their nests but will poop over the
edge (Re: Jane Goodall) except when severely ill.
when i have encountered bundles of reeds at the water's edge, they have
tended to be rather on the stinky side, and have a bit of flies and gnats
working it. however, there were also crabs, too. But this is a good
idea... good thinking!... and I would like to hear more about what you
beleive about the beginning of nest building. thanks...
Quote:
Hominids (pre-Homo and Homo esp.) may have been constructing watercraft
(dug-outs) from downed river trees, with or without fire, in
association with hand-axes (found mainly at waterside and near
quarries), for a million+ years. Oldest known dug-out wood
evidence:9kya Korean.
Most reptiles have spherical eggs (normal for fish, amphibs too.), most
birds have ovoid eggs, this indicates that birds went through a
cliff-dwelling bottleneck as round eggs roll off cliffs, ovoid eggs
usually won't, natural selection resulted in modern tree-dwelling birds
laying ovoid eggs in nests.
I think that ovoid eggs predate the K-T boundary and were laid by some
dinosaurs? ... and nope, i haven't done any hunting with dogs and a boat.
--chap
Quote:
Chap, (or anyone), ever do any duck-hunting with a dog and a boat?
See AAT for more info.
DD
On Jan 22, 6:47 pm, "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
"Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote in
messagenews:45b570fd$0$28102$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
my own snippett from an earlier thread:
"To summarize what I am trying to think... I am interested in a sort of
coherent, complex & dynamic, timeline of human development. I think we
all want that. How did we become this thinking being? and not just
another
chimp? Does the chimp "think?" and etc."
and this timeline from sap (Charles and Phillip):
abbreviations:
LCA = Last Common Ancestor (with Pan)
PA = PaleoAnthropology
~ = about
mya = million years ago
kya = thousand years ago (this in preference to using BC)
HN = Homo Neanderthal...
hss = us, modern humans
225 mya = evolution of mammals during the Triassic
65.5 mya = the K-T boundary... extinction of dinosaurs, Cf. the
Chicxulub
structure on the Yucatan
~16 mya = pongoids split into orangutangs/hominoids (gorilla, pan,
homo)
~10 mya = gorilla/pan-homo split
~ 8 mya = pan/homo split (ie, our LCA was 5-9 mya)
4.5 mya = Ramidus (an intermediate??)
3.5 mya = early afarensis (Lucy) (apiths)
2.5 - 1.8 mya, = homo erectus (currently believed to be in our line)
~600 kya = Neanderthal/Homo sapien split (or 230 kya)
400 kya - various African erectoids.
~120 kya = something happens to make us "more human". (this date
fluctuates between 200 kya and 70 kya).*
60 kya = presumed that humans used a boat to arrive in Australia
40 kya = "explosion" into Hss...Cro-Magnon cultures expand
~30 kya = Neanderthals extinct.**
~25 kya = remnant erectoids of Austro-Asia go extinct
14.5 kya = Clovis culture Native Americans enter North America.
10 kya = invention of writing (this took until 7 kya to solidify)
4.5 kya = pyramids built
* one could say that between 180 kya and 120 kya, "a predisposition for
human culture distinct from other hominoids evolved." --Phillip D.
** the first presumed entry of modern humans into Europe, then the
domain
of the Neanderthal, was about 43kya. The last known HN fossils are from
Vindija in Croatia dated between 28-29 kya.
and this little snippett about the K-T extinction from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous-Tertiary_extinction_event
"Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters appear to have survived
quite
well. It is worth noting that at the end of the Cretaceous there seem
to
have been no purely vegetarian or carnivorius mammals. Many mammals,
and
the birds which survived the extinction, fed on insects, larvae, worms,
snails etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. So they survived
the
collapse of plant-based food chains because they lived in
"detritus-based"
food chains."
"No land animal larger than a cat survived."
Any strong disagreements about this data?
By the way, I think it of some interest that as far back as 16 mya, our
"line" was into some sort of nest-building, since the gorilla build a
nest
every night & we share that trait.
--chapThese dates are rather significant too, Re: the Toba eruption 74
kya.http://j.dollan.home.bresnan.net/TLU01.html
80,000 BP: The ancestors of all non-African peoples are believed to
have migrated from Africa as a single population. October 25, 2005
74,000 BP: The Toba Caldera erupts in its most recent explosion,
spewing out 2,800 cubic kilometers of material, and thus forming the
Young
Toba Tuff. This eruption is believed to have caused a genetic bottleneck
in
Humans, due to the resulting extreme climatic conditions. October 25,
2005
71,000 BP: The documented time of the Human genetic bottleneck,
believed to have been caused by the Toba eruption. The Human population
in
the world is thought to have fallen to as few as 15,000 individuals. In
short, Humans nearly became extinct. October 25, 2005
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| nickname |
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jan 29, 5:25 pm, "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
Quote: "nickname" <alas_my_lo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1169753750.258866.38560@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...> Chap,
Toba: see tiger bottleneck also.
thx... have been reading a bit on that now...
Homo & All great apes construct "woven" nests, no lesser apes do, nor
do any monkeys or other primates AFAIK.
Hominoid Nest building may have originated with reed bundle floating
(either mobile rafts or immobile reed mounds) in wetlands, single-use
(due to water absorption) continued when they became more arboreal,
discarding nightly tree-nests.
perhaps. but then wouldn't we find more hss characteristics in gorilla and
pan?
No, Hss didn't exist at that time. AFAICT, The last common ancestor of
the gibbon, siamang, gorilla, orang, chimp, human, apiths, myocene
apes was a part-time climbing/ part-time floating/wading wetlands
dweller, somewhat like a macaque, nesting in simply woven/ bundled
reed nests, possibly using large water bird nests and adding more
reeds around the circumference, providing insulation, camouflage and
floating protection from large crocs and cats. Was it tidal, seasonal
flooding or neither? Mainly tidal, around estuarine areas AFAICT.
that is, if the significant hss characteristics were shaped from
Quote: contact with water. (i have no strong opinion on that one way or the
other... rather... i am still open to what the evidence reveals.)
whatever the cause, that nest building is what leads directly to our
building of dwellings in this day and age.
chimps, by the way, do not poop in their nests but will poop over the
edge (Re: Jane Goodall) except when severely ill.
when i have encountered bundles of reeds at the water's edge, they have
tended to be rather on the stinky side, and have a bit of flies and gnats
working it. however, there were also crabs, too. But this is a good
idea... good thinking!... and I would like to hear more about what you
beleive about the beginning of nest building. thanks...
Hominids (pre-Homo and Homo esp.) may have been constructing watercraft
(dug-outs) from downed river trees, with or without fire, in
association with hand-axes (found mainly at waterside and near
quarries), for a million+ years. Oldest known dug-out wood
evidence:9kya Korean.
Most reptiles have spherical eggs (normal for fish, amphibs too.), most
birds have ovoid eggs, this indicates that birds went through a
cliff-dwelling bottleneck as round eggs roll off cliffs, ovoid eggs
usually won't, natural selection resulted in modern tree-dwelling birds
laying ovoid eggs in nests.
I think that ovoid eggs predate the K-T boundary and were laid by some
dinosaurs? ... and nope, i haven't done any hunting with dogs and a boat.
--chap
The dinos with ovoid eggs were cliff nesters and some became the first
birds. A brontasurus would not have ovoid eggs IMO.
I wrote a good brief article on nests, eggs and K-T here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT/message/39209
Dug-outs, ducks, decoys, bola-nets, retrieving sighthound swimming
hairless mohawk dogs, and pre-Inca coastal Peruvians fit a pattern of
hunting & gathering. Kinda neat.
DDeden
Quote:
Chap, (or anyone), ever do any duck-hunting with a dog and a boat?
See AAT for more info.
DD
On Jan 22, 6:47 pm, "Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
"Chapstick" <chapst...@nc.rr.com> wrote in
messagenews:45b570fd$0$28102$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
my own snippett from an earlier thread:
"To summarize what I am trying to think... I am interested in a sort of
coherent, complex & dynamic, timeline of human development. I think we
all want that. How did we become this thinking being? and not just
another
chimp? Does the chimp "think?" and etc."
and this timeline from sap (Charles and Phillip):
abbreviations:
LCA = Last Common Ancestor (with Pan)
PA = PaleoAnthropology
~ = about
mya = million years ago
kya = thousand years ago (this in preference to using BC)
HN = Homo Neanderthal...
hss = us, modern humans
225 mya = evolution of mammals during the Triassic
65.5 mya = the K-T boundary... extinction of dinosaurs, Cf. the
Chicxulub
structure on the Yucatan
~16 mya = pongoids split into orangutangs/hominoids (gorilla, pan,
homo)
~10 mya = gorilla/pan-homo split
~ 8 mya = pan/homo split (ie, our LCA was 5-9 mya)
4.5 mya = Ramidus (an intermediate??)
3.5 mya = early afarensis (Lucy) (apiths)
2.5 - 1.8 mya, = homo erectus (currently believed to be in our line)
~600 kya = Neanderthal/Homo sapien split (or 230 kya)
400 kya - various African erectoids.
~120 kya = something happens to make us "more human". (this date
fluctuates between 200 kya and 70 kya).*
60 kya = presumed that humans used a boat to arrive in Australia
40 kya = "explosion" into Hss...Cro-Magnon cultures expand
~30 kya = Neanderthals extinct.**
~25 kya = remnant erectoids of Austro-Asia go extinct
14.5 kya = Clovis culture Native Americans enter North America.
10 kya = invention of writing (this took until 7 kya to solidify)
4.5 kya = pyramids built
* one could say that between 180 kya and 120 kya, "a predisposition for
human culture distinct from other hominoids evolved." --Phillip D.
** the first presumed entry of modern humans into Europe, then the
domain
of the Neanderthal, was about 43kya. The last known HN fossils are from
Vindija in Croatia dated between 28-29 kya.
and this little snippett about the K-T extinction from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous-Tertiary_extinction_event
"Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters appear to have survived
quite
well. It is worth noting that at the end of the Cretaceous there seem
to
have been no purely vegetarian or carnivorius mammals. Many mammals,
and
the birds which survived the extinction, fed on insects, larvae, worms,
snails etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. So they survived
the
collapse of plant-based food chains because they lived in
"detritus-based"
food chains."
"No land animal larger than a cat survived."
Any strong disagreements about this data?
By the way, I think it of some interest that as far back as 16 mya, our
"line" was into some sort of nest-building, since the gorilla build a
nest
every night & we share that trait.
--chapThese dates are rather significant too, Re: the Toba eruption 74
kya.http://j.dollan.home.bresnan.net/TLU01.html
80,000 BP: The ancestors of all non-African peoples are believed to
have migrated from Africa as a single population. October 25, 2005
74,000 BP: The Toba Caldera erupts in its most recent explosion,
spewing out 2,800 cubic kilometers of material, and thus forming the
Young
Toba Tuff. This eruption is believed to have caused a genetic bottleneck
in
Humans, due to the resulting extreme climatic conditions. October 25,
2005
71,000 BP: The documented time of the Human genetic bottleneck,
believed to have been caused by the Toba eruption. The Human population
in
the world is thought to have fallen to as few as 15,000 individuals. In
short, Humans nearly became extinct. October 25, 2005 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| nickname |
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jan 26, 3:23 pm, "Marc Verhaegen" <fa204...@skynet.be> wrote:
Quote: "nickname" <alas_my_lo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1169753750.258866.38560@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Homo & All great apes construct "woven" nests, no lesser apes do, nor
do any monkeys or other primates AFAIK.
Hominoid Nest building may have originated with reed bundle floating
(either mobile rafts or immobile reed mounds) in wetlands, single-use
(due to water absorption) continued when they became more arboreal,
discarding nightly tree-nests.
Interesting view.
Do you know whether hylobatids construct nests, DD?
Great/lesser ape split ~20-16 Ma?
(I couldn't post here for some reason, so I posted at AAT)
Apes developed enlarged laryngeal air sacs, for both flotation (semi-
vertical head-up tail-down (vestigial)) and vocalization (longer
louder call) during the wet Miocene, when scent became less useful
communication and sound became more so. 16-20ma maybe.
Extant Hylobatids (siamang, gibbon spp.) don't make nests AFAIK. I
think they split off during the period of bird-nest stealing, as a
wading/floating semi-vertical wetlands forager seeking Aquatic
Herbaceous Vegetation, small prey and bird eggs. Gibbons still eat
bird eggs now in addition to fruit, but live in upland forests, while
other extant apes and Homo also eat bird eggs, as ALL of our mammalian
ancestors have done, being omnivorous, with varying degrees of
herbivory, granivory, carnivory, frugivory, mollucivory, piscivory
etc.
The great apes remained there (part-time in wetland, part-time in
forest) gradually improving nest construction techniques, while
gibbons went to upland forests and lost both the nesting behaviour and
the enlarged air sacs (no more selection for flotation) but remained
tail-less due to the habitual head-up orientation from the past semi-
vertical float-wading. Other early apes also went inland, but when
drought came they stayed near inland wetlands and forest swamps, where
they adapted the tree nest or ground nest.
The early Human branch didn't typically nest in forest trees, rather
they reverted to the more primitive reptile-style of sunny beaches in
dry sand pockets of reeds/seaweed/palm fronds woven nests, with the
noisy agile adolescents in coconut palm nests and mangroves as
predator alerts.
The laryngeal air sac was lost in humans due to a change in food
foraging, from semi-vertical bpal wading-floating (which kept the
nostrils upwards) to diving and backfloating in saline waters with
further development of a diving cycle (ARC), which selected for
downward pointing covered nostrils like sea otters.
DD
Quote: Hominids (pre-Homo and Homo esp.) may have been constructing watercraft
(dug-outs) from downed river trees, with or without fire, in
association with hand-axes (found mainly at waterside and near
quarries), for a million+ years. Oldest known dug-out wood
evidence:9kya Korean.
Most reptiles have spherical eggs (normal for fish, amphibs too.), most
birds have ovoid eggs, this indicates that birds went through a
cliff-dwelling bottleneck as round eggs roll off cliffs, ovoid eggs
usually won't, natural selection resulted in modern tree-dwelling birds
laying ovoid eggs in nests.
Chap, (or anyone), ever do any duck-hunting with a dog and a boat?
See AAT for more info.
DD
--Marc |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:02 pm
|
|