Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Agriculture - Poultry Forum  »  Composting manure
Page 2 of 4    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
0tterbot
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:54 am
Guest
"Farm1" <please@askifyouwannaknow> wrote in message
news:45a9cf04$0$27933$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Quote:
I'm satisfied that any claim that the E. coli was IN the spinach is
not true.

lol, me too :-)

however, it's rather amazing how many otherwise-sensible people think e.
coli is not present at all in soil or on the surface of plants or in fact
anywhere at all unless bad poo-poo practices put it there. as e. coli is
indeed present in the guts of mammals to aid digestion, it therefore follows
e. coli is on every surface people or animals or their by-products touch, to
some degree. (degree will obviously vary Wink.

even our Dear Jackie said not to put grey water on root crops, lest the evil
small traces of e. coli in shower water get "in" your root crops. it's the
only dumb thing i've ever known her to say so far, but really. it's
tickety-boo to put horse manure all over your root crops for the worms to
drag down, but god forbid the shower water goes on them Wink e. coli can't
survive in a carrot for months, for heaven's sake.
kylie
enigma
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:34 am
Guest
"0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in
news:bvpqh.953$u8.542@news-server.bigpond.net.au:

Quote:
"Mary Fisher" <mary.fisher@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45aa1824$0$758$4c56ba96@master.news.zetnet.net...
It seems like an over-reaction - but where do the
legislators draw the line? It's a very difficult decision.

drawing the line exactly is always difficult.

it would be easier if legislators talked to veterinarians &
other livestock experts, rather than throwing up their hands &
bowing to an uninformed media/public pressure to "just do
*something*", when that something isn't applicable to all
species it is enacted to cover.
Quote:

however, one thing about legislation is that if it's too
extreme or illogical, people just flaunt it entirely. i can
only assume that the u.k. is full of people giving kitchen
scraps (possibly including cooked meat or bones) to their
chooks. and i'm wondering why they shouldn't. after all, if
the chook's going to get f&m, so would the humans, so it's
a considered action Wink er, unless people can't get f&m,
and in fact i don't know if chooks do either - if neither
species can get it, i must admit to wondering then why the
legislation has to be so extreme at all. certainly nobody
wants a bunch of dead livestock for anyone - but then if
they thought it was from pigs eating meat, the line would
appear to me to have been drawn in quite the wrong way.
(??)

i was wondering how one keeps free ranging chooks out of the
compost pile. i may not directly feed the chickens anything
from the kitchen, but they certainly do help themselves to
scratching through the compost bins. i don't see a reason to
fence off the bins...

Quote:
As it happens I wouldn't feed waste from any other source
than our own kitchen, if it isn't fit for us to eat it's
not fit for our pets. - or anything we're going to eat.

but presumably you might buy veggies FOR the chickens just
as you might buy veggies for yourself.

i do, sort of. i buy the roosters alfalfa hay & lettuce
because they're penned. i feel bad that they can't go eat
grass & scratch in the compost with the hens (but they're too
rough with the girls if they're all out together)
i also buy lettuce for my tortoises...

Quote:
But I must stress that this law is nothing to do with BSE,
that condition resulted in other legislation.

did people there feel that with rolling outbreaks of
horrible diseases, there might be something wrong? with
farming practices, i mean.

like overcrowding & feedlots?

lee
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
0tterbot
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:43 am
Guest
"Mary Fisher" <mary.fisher@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45aa0858$0$765$4c56ba96@master.news.zetnet.net...
Quote:

"0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in message
news:sZnqh.913$u8.813@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

even our Dear Jackie

Who?

jackie french, gardener extraordinaire.

Quote:
said not to put grey water on root crops, lest the evil small traces of
e. coli in shower water get "in" your root crops. it's the only dumb
thing i've ever known her to say so far, but really. it's tickety-boo to
put horse manure all over your root crops for the worms to drag down, but
god forbid the shower water goes on them Wink e. coli can't survive in a
carrot for months, for heaven's sake.
kylie

It sounds as though Dear Jackie is a politican. They're politicans because
they have no specialist ideas as a rule. If they had they'd be earning
honest money.

ya, but she's not one :-)

i've noticed in gardening that sometimes otherwise sensible people (even
me!! Wink will sincerely believe something that's actually completely
illogical and maybe even nuts. noticed the same thing concerning animals &
livestock a lot too. well, in fact, it's probably across the board of human
endeavours <g>. BUT because gardening (and livestock) involves food (often),
some people get a bit carried away with their weirdities at times & feel
obliged to say illogical things that probably if it wasn't food-related,
they'd not bother saying or thinking about. i don't know.

(i suppose it's one of those subjects where, once a person has had a sincere
belief for a thousand years, it's hard for them to realise it might be
illogical after all.)

one good example pertaining to this group might be: the (apparent[?] ... do
correct me if i'm wrong) ban in the u.k. on chickens eating cooked meat
which isn't even a chicken and isn't anything's brain either. it's not
logical. but it involves food, so hey. ban it.
kylie
Mary Fisher
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:46 am
Guest
Quote:

even our Dear Jackie

Who?

jackie french, gardener extraordinaire.

Oh, thanks.
Quote:


It sounds as though Dear Jackie is a politician. They're politicians
because they have no specialist ideas as a rule. If they had they'd be
earning honest money.

ya, but she's not one Smile

LOL! they're not unique.
Quote:

i've noticed in gardening that sometimes otherwise sensible people (even
me!! Wink will sincerely believe something that's actually completely
illogical and maybe even nuts. noticed the same thing concerning animals &
livestock a lot too. well, in fact, it's probably across the board of
human endeavours <g>. BUT because gardening (and livestock) involves food
(often), some people get a bit carried away with their weirdities at times
& feel obliged to say illogical things that probably if it wasn't
food-related, they'd not bother saying or thinking about. i don't know.

True.
Quote:

(i suppose it's one of those subjects where, once a person has had a
sincere belief for a thousand years, it's hard for them to realise it
might be illogical after all.)

Indeed.
Quote:

one good example pertaining to this group might be: the (apparent[?] ...
do correct me if i'm wrong) ban in the u.k. on chickens eating cooked meat
which isn't even a chicken and isn't anything's brain either. it's not
logical. but it involves food, so hey. ban it.

It's true but it's nothing to do with brain or nerve material, that would be
linked to BSE.

A couple of years ago we had a terrible outbreak of foot and mouth disease,
resulting in very many animals being killed and burnt and a lot of farmers
being put out of business or even committing suicide. It was awful.

The thinking is that it was caused by feeding pigs on infected meat. There
are some countries where F&M is endemic and we're not supposed to import
meat from those places - the same is true, I suspect, in your country. It's
a sensible precaution.

In an attempt to prevent a future outbreak of this dreadful disease it was
decided to ban any feeding of meat or kitchen waste to any animal or bird
which was normally part of the human food chain, even if that animal or bird
was a pet. So it's illegal to feed our pet chickens (which we might eat and
we certainly eat their eggs) with anything which originates in our kitchen
or other catering establishment. That includes anything, even carrot
peelings.

It seems like an over-reaction - but where do the legislators draw the line?
It's a very difficult decision.

As it happens I wouldn't feed waste from any other source than our own
kitchen, if it isn't fit for us to eat it's not fit for our pets. - or
anything we're going to eat.

But I must stress that this law is nothing to do with BSE, that condition
resulted in other legislation.

Mary


Quote:
kylie
0tterbot
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:38 am
Guest
"Mary Fisher" <mary.fisher@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45aa1824$0$758$4c56ba96@master.news.zetnet.net...

Quote:
ya, but she's not one :-)

LOL! they're not unique.

i hasten to add that in general - she's excellent & would never recommend
anything she didn't try herself. and she has some non-mainstream ideas, but
then she goes & shows they work at her place. :-)

(the problem of course with her over-caution - at least in print - about
grey water is that she'd never be able to prove she didn't get an e. coli
infection because she didn't use grey water on the carrots <g>)

Quote:
one good example pertaining to this group might be: the (apparent[?] ...
do correct me if i'm wrong) ban in the u.k. on chickens eating cooked
meat >> which isn't even a chicken and isn't anything's brain either.
it's not logical. but it involves food, so hey. ban it.

It's true but it's nothing to do with brain or nerve material, that would
be linked to BSE.

A couple of years ago we had a terrible outbreak of foot and mouth
disease, resulting in very many animals being killed and burnt and a lot
of farmers being put out of business or even committing suicide. It was
awful.

pardon my ignorance - but we don't have f&m here (there you are!!), but i
thought it was soil-borne(?)

Quote:
The thinking is that it was caused by feeding pigs on infected meat. There
are some countries where F&M is endemic and we're not supposed to import
meat from those places - the same is true, I suspect, in your country.
It's a sensible precaution.

i am all for sensible precautions. where i object is to non-sensible
precautions :-)

Quote:
In an attempt to prevent a future outbreak of this dreadful disease it was
decided to ban any feeding of meat or kitchen waste to any animal or bird
which was normally part of the human food chain, even if that animal or
bird was a pet. So it's illegal to feed our pet chickens (which we might
eat and we certainly eat their eggs) with anything which originates in our
kitchen or other catering establishment. That includes anything, even
carrot peelings.

!!!

Quote:
It seems like an over-reaction - but where do the legislators draw the
line? It's a very difficult decision.

drawing the line exactly is always difficult.

however, one thing about legislation is that if it's too extreme or
illogical, people just flaunt it entirely. i can only assume that the u.k.
is full of people giving kitchen scraps (possibly including cooked meat or
bones) to their chooks. and i'm wondering why they shouldn't. after all, if
the chook's going to get f&m, so would the humans, so it's a considered
action Wink er, unless people can't get f&m, and in fact i don't know if
chooks do either - if neither species can get it, i must admit to wondering
then why the legislation has to be so extreme at all. certainly nobody wants
a bunch of dead livestock for anyone - but then if they thought it was from
pigs eating meat, the line would appear to me to have been drawn in quite
the wrong way. (??)

Quote:
As it happens I wouldn't feed waste from any other source than our own
kitchen, if it isn't fit for us to eat it's not fit for our pets. - or
anything we're going to eat.

but presumably you might buy veggies FOR the chickens just as you might buy
veggies for yourself.

Quote:
But I must stress that this law is nothing to do with BSE, that condition
resulted in other legislation.

did people there feel that with rolling outbreaks of horrible diseases,
there might be something wrong? with farming practices, i mean.
kylie
Jacob Johnston
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:03 pm
Guest
"Farm1" <please@askifyouwannaknow> wrote in message
news:45a9cf04$0$27933$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Quote:
The best sirte I could find was this one:
http://www.dmaonline.org/fppublic/connect73.html
Where the nearest comment to e. coli actually being "in the spinach",
is as follows:
Quote, "the FDA issued an advisory warning consumers throughout the
country not to eat any bagged spinach products. Frozen and canned
spinach were not affected by the advisory, because these products
receive processing treatment that would destroy bacteria. FDA
officials also noted that washing spinach would not be an effective
step in making it safe, because bacteria could get inside the leaves."
end quote.

While I'm quite skeptical of how E. Coli could remain a problem on the
inside of a plant even if it got there, this does say that washing wasn't an
effective treatment of the product in question because the bacteria could
get inside the leaves.
Amy Blankenship
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:36 pm
Guest
"Farm1" <please@askifyouwannaknow> wrote in message
news:45a9cf04$0$27933$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Quote:
"diddy" <diddy@nospam.diddy.net> wrote in message
in thread news:CY1qh.428$u8.233@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
"0tterbot"

you are, of course, aware that soil contains a great many things
you
probably wouldn't want to eat in large quantities, e-coli being
just
one of them.

e-coli tainted food doesn't get that way during the _growing_
process,
fertilisers or no. otherwise we'd be eating all sorts!!
kylie

Actually, in the case of the spinach it did. The fertilizer was
overapplied
and the E-Coli was IN the spinach and didn't wash off.

I was fascinated by this claim as I've never heard of any claim that
E. coli could actually be INSIDE a plant and I've gardened and been an
avid reader of all things gardening for more years than I care to
remember.

E. coli is a normal resident of the gut flora of mammals, and, since
vegetable don't have guts then how could it be possible for E.coli to
be found IN a vegetable???? It may be ON a vegetable but IN
it??????????? I thought this was such a truly weird claim that I just
had to do some googling.

I checked a lot of US sites including the CDC (sloppy writers - why is
the art of clear, unambiguous writing so rare these days!) that site
mentions e. coli in "bagged spinach" which of course is not the same
as "in the spinach". It implies a contamination of the bagged product
with E. coli. Later mention is made of how E. coli has previously
been a problem on lettuce but it goes on to mention that washed
lettuce, where the bag records that it is washed, would be OK. No
help at the CDC site, so I moved on.

The best sirte I could find was this one:
http://www.dmaonline.org/fppublic/connect73.html
Where the nearest comment to e. coli actually being "in the spinach",
is as follows:
Quote, "the FDA issued an advisory warning consumers throughout the
country not to eat any bagged spinach products. Frozen and canned
spinach were not affected by the advisory, because these products
receive processing treatment that would destroy bacteria. FDA
officials also noted that washing spinach would not be an effective
step in making it safe, because bacteria could get inside the leaves."
end quote.

I did a lot of research on this trying to convince my county extension agent
that it is perfectly safe and even beneficial to allow chickens to clean up
fallen blueberries during blueberry season. I found this

http://aem.asm.org/cgi/reprint/69/7/3687.pdf

that indicates clearly (p 4 left hand column, 4th paragraph or so) that
salmonella can be taken into the flesh of fruit. However, given the
differences between e.coli and salmonella elaborated in the article, it
seems less likely that internal e.coli contamination will occur. Also,
given the thoroughness of the article, I'd have expected that they would
have mentioned it if it was at all likely.

Hint for the future: Scholar.google.com is probably the best place to look
for this type of information.

-Amy
Mary Fisher
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:58 pm
Guest
"0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in message
news:bvpqh.953$u8.542@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

....
Quote:

A couple of years ago we had a terrible outbreak of foot and mouth
disease, resulting in very many animals being killed and burnt and a lot
of farmers being put out of business or even committing suicide. It was
awful.

pardon my ignorance - but we don't have f&m here (there you are!!), but i
thought it was soil-borne(?)

It isn't and you're VERY fortunate to have strict import regulations which
are enforced. We don't - or haven't in the past. I'd like to think it's
changed ...
Quote:

The thinking is that it was caused by feeding pigs on infected meat.
There are some countries where F&M is endemic and we're not supposed to
import meat from those places - the same is true, I suspect, in your
country. It's a sensible precaution.

i am all for sensible precautions. where i object is to non-sensible
precautions Smile

I agree.
Quote:

In an attempt to prevent a future outbreak of this dreadful disease it
was decided to ban any feeding of meat or kitchen waste to any animal or
bird which was normally part of the human food chain, even if that animal
or bird was a pet. So it's illegal to feed our pet chickens (which we
might eat and we certainly eat their eggs) with anything which originates
in our kitchen or other catering establishment. That includes anything,
even carrot peelings.

!!!

I know - and yet ...
Quote:

It seems like an over-reaction - but where do the legislators draw the
line? It's a very difficult decision.

drawing the line exactly is always difficult.

Quite.
Quote:

however, one thing about legislation is that if it's too extreme or
illogical, people just flaunt it entirely. i can only assume that the u.k.
is full of people giving kitchen scraps (possibly including cooked meat or
bones) to their chooks. and i'm wondering why they shouldn't. after all,
if the chook's going to get f&m,

Chickens wouldn't.

Quote:
so would the humans,

Nor would they.

Quote:
so it's a considered action Wink er, unless people can't get f&m, and in
fact i don't know if chooks do either - if neither species can get it, i
must admit to wondering then why the legislation has to be so extreme at
all.

Because there are some rogues who'd claim that they fed such and such to
their hens which then went into the pig sty (for instance. Or that a chicken
died on a farm and was thrown onto a muck heap and was eaten by a pig. You
really have to try to cover all contingencies.

.. certainly nobody wants
Quote:
a bunch of dead livestock for anyone - but then if they thought it was
from pigs eating meat, the line would appear to me to have been drawn in
quite the wrong way. (??)

Not at all. F&M is airborne and spreads to porcine, ovine, bovine, caprione
and possibly other animals which are kept as pets.
Quote:

As it happens I wouldn't feed waste from any other source than our own
kitchen, if it isn't fit for us to eat it's not fit for our pets. - or
anything we're going to eat.

but presumably you might buy veggies FOR the chickens just as you might
buy veggies for yourself.

I might but then it isn't kitchen waste. I wouldn't buy kitchen waste. As it
happens our poultry graze in the garden, I grow things for them and wouldn't
confess to giving them kitchen or table scraps. Today I pulled up some poor
cabbage plants to make room for something else and gave the chickens that,
that's legal because it hasn't been in the kitchen. Yes, I KNOW it's daft
but the results of F&M weren't daft, they were tragic.
Quote:

But I must stress that this law is nothing to do with BSE, that condition
resulted in other legislation.

did people there feel that with rolling outbreaks of horrible diseases,
there might be something wrong? with farming practices, i mean.

Yes. So did caring farmers. It wasn't just farming practices either, it's
had a terrible knock on effect on transporting animals (although not
chickens - yet - but avian flu might affect that) and on slaughterhouses.

I once transported two Hebridean lambs from here to a daughter's farm in the
back of our car. That wouldn't be allowed now and even proper transport is
highly regulated. She's an organic farmer and used to take her animals to a
local slaughterhouse to save travelling stress for them, that's been closed
and she now has to take them much further.

There are also strict regulations about butchering meat. If she has a cow
killed she can butcher it herself at home but only if she eats the carcase
herself, she's not allowed to sell or give me any and her partner isn't
allowed to eat it.

Officially.

It's a minefield.

But how would you devise regulations to ensure safety for animals and
humans? I couldn't.

Mary
Mary Fisher
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:01 pm
Guest
"enigma" <enigma@evil.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98B87FE162FE7enigmaempirenet@199.125.85.9...
Quote:

i was wondering how one keeps free ranging chooks out of the
compost pile. i may not directly feed the chickens anything
from the kitchen, but they certainly do help themselves to
scratching through the compost bins. i don't see a reason to
fence off the bins...

Our compost is put into a bin with a lid.
Quote:

As it happens I wouldn't feed waste from any other source
than our own kitchen, if it isn't fit for us to eat it's
not fit for our pets. - or anything we're going to eat.

but presumably you might buy veggies FOR the chickens just
as you might buy veggies for yourself.

i do, sort of. i buy the roosters alfalfa hay & lettuce
because they're penned. i feel bad that they can't go eat
grass & scratch in the compost with the hens (but they're too
rough with the girls if they're all out together)

That's a welfare problem which you have to sort out yourself. We only have
one cockerel and he's free with our hens. We ate his brother.

Quote:
i also buy lettuce for my tortoises...

Tortoises aren't normally part of the human food chain.
Quote:

But I must stress that this law is nothing to do with BSE,
that condition resulted in other legislation.

did people there feel that with rolling outbreaks of
horrible diseases, there might be something wrong? with
farming practices, i mean.

like overcrowding & feedlots?

That's a welfare problem too, but I've never seen that in bovine (or other)
holdings except in USA.
Mary Fisher
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:02 pm
Guest
"Jacob Johnston" <aracauna@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RrCdnZQw_sfVyTfYnZ2dnUVZ_v-tnZ2d@trueband.net...
Quote:



While I'm quite skeptical of how E. Coli could remain a problem on the
inside of a plant even if it got there, this does say that washing wasn't
an effective treatment of the product in question because the bacteria
could get inside the leaves.

How?
Quote:

Jill
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:22 pm
Guest
enigma wrote:

Quote:

i was wondering how one keeps free ranging chooks out of the
compost pile. i may not directly feed the chickens anything
from the kitchen, but they certainly do help themselves to
scratching through the compost bins. i don't see a reason to
fence off the bins...

Botulism is a very good reason
Rotting food is not good for any animal

--

regards
Jill Bowis

Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk
Farm1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:11 pm
Guest
"Mary Fisher" <mary.fisher@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
Quote:
"0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in message

even our Dear Jackie

Who?

Jackie French - an Australian garden writer that Otterbot and I both
admire. She doesn't reiterate all the old gardening crud but actually
does some research for herself and reports on her own experieinces. A
lot of the garden law that applies/applied in the old world is simply
not applicable or even useful in Oz and much of it would not even
still apply in the old world if more gardeners were willing to try new
things.
Farm1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:27 pm
Guest
"Jacob Johnston" <aracauna@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Quote:
"Farm1" <please@askifyouwannaknow> wrote in message

The best sirte I could find was this one:
http://www.dmaonline.org/fppublic/connect73.html
Where the nearest comment to e. coli actually being "in the
spinach",
is as follows:
Quote, "the FDA issued an advisory warning consumers throughout
the
country not to eat any bagged spinach products. Frozen and canned
spinach were not affected by the advisory, because these products
receive processing treatment that would destroy bacteria. FDA
officials also noted that washing spinach would not be an
effective
step in making it safe, because bacteria could get inside the
leaves."
end quote.

While I'm quite skeptical of how E. Coli could remain a problem on
the
inside of a plant even if it got there, this does say that washing
wasn't an
effective treatment of the product in question because the bacteria
could
get inside the leaves.

Yes, that quote does say that it could get "inside the leaves" but
don't just read this quote without considering the quote about the
meat. If it can get "inside" the meat by the use of a fork by
breaking the surface of the meat, then it can similarly get inside the
spinach from damage that can happen to break the outer surface of the
spinach and this could easily happen in transit. However, having said
that, it is not "IN the spinach" and won't wash off in the sense that
"diddy" meant it.

Additonally, if you consider the meat quote (which you snipped) and
the recommendation to cook the meat till juices run clear, you know
what happens to this particular pathogen with the application of heat.
Obviously if meat was cooked till the juices run clear then the
pathogen would be destroyed. However, given that it only takes 10
cells of this particular pathogen to potentially infect someone and
obvioulsy needs heat to destroy it then the best advice for consuers
is not to eat the spinach. And most especially given that spinach is
best cooked tll just wilted over a low heat, (and many people just use
it fresh as a straight salad ingredient).
Farm1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:43 pm
Guest
"0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in message
Quote:
"Mary Fisher" <mary.fisher@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message

A couple of years ago we had a terrible outbreak of foot and mouth
disease, resulting in very many animals being killed and burnt and
a lot
of farmers being put out of business or even committing suicide.
It was
awful.

pardon my ignorance - but we don't have f&m here (there you are!!),
but i
thought it was soil-borne(?)

It's a virus and all cloven hoofed animals can get it.

Quote:
In an attempt to prevent a future outbreak of this dreadful
disease it was
decided to ban any feeding of meat or kitchen waste to any animal
or bird
which was normally part of the human food chain, even if that
animal or
bird was a pet. So it's illegal to feed our pet chickens (which we
might
eat and we certainly eat their eggs) with anything which
originates in our
kitchen or other catering establishment. That includes anything,
even
carrot peelings.

however, one thing about legislation is that if it's too extreme or
illogical, people just flaunt it entirely. i can only assume that
the u.k.
is full of people giving kitchen scraps (possibly including cooked
meat or
bones) to their chooks. and i'm wondering why they shouldn't.

The F&M outbreak in the UK was so appalling that it might interest you
to do wome reading on it. Imagine the consequences if it even got
into Oz? All cattle, sheep,goats, camels, alpacas, pigs etc could be
at risk.

As a cattle producer, the UK outbreak was enough to nearly make me
weep. So many good stock and gene lines just down the drain.

And, because the Brit govt paid compensation there were reports that
some unscrupulous farmers who actually cashed in on that and
deliberately infected their herds - imagine what that did to their
uninfected neighbours and to the social fabric of the neighbourhood?

Blanket laws, althoughh unreasonable in application to reasonable
people are the only way to go when there are unreasonable people
potentially involved.
Jill
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:54 am
Guest
Farm1 wrote:

Quote:
The F&M outbreak in the UK was so appalling that it might interest you
to do wome reading on it. Imagine the consequences if it even got
into Oz? All cattle, sheep,goats, camels, alpacas, pigs etc could be
at risk.

The Australians authorities are very aware of the impact on your economy and
livestock
Google "foot and mouth australia" for some interesting work
The outbreak was worse here due to the fact that is was handled appallingly
on the ground.
We are a very different kind of country to those who normally get FMD and we
had not had it for decades either.
In Scotland they hit it very hard with relatively efficient culling and a
lot of joined up thinking by all the authorities in the local area
Elsewhere in England it was basically let to do what it wanted for weeks
while the organisations pussy footed around. Once they got on with the job
"then" they got on top of it.

Our geography; our political [small p], social and livestock structures are
so completely different that strategies that might work in the vast plains
of South American where the virus is endemic [and probably the source of
many re-infections around the world.] would not work here. There simply is
not the space between uninfected places.
In continents like Australia these strategies would work -- the simple form
of the strategy would be to isolate the locality from the rest of the
continent by a vaccination fire break to protect the FMD free status of the
uninfected areas. But then the scale of everything is so different. If one
decent sized Australian holding was infected with one of the strains that
was pooly carried by air, the virus might never get to the next place before
it faded out.

If you are doing some homework it is vital to recognise that there are many
strains of FMD all have very varied transmission apth. Some hardly move in
the air and are a contact to contact virus, for some infected pigs can
spread vast plumes of the virus scores of miles from one unit but from other
species hardly at all.


--

regards
Jill Bowis

Pure bred utility chickens and ducks
Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts
Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery
Working Holidays in Scotland
http://www.kintaline.co.uk
 
Page 2 of 4    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:37 am