Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Ha

Main Page | Report this Page

Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Ha

Page 1 of 1

Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Ha

Author

Message

Helmut Wabnig

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:33 am

Guest

On 29 Sep 2006 21:40:14 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com>
wrote:

Quote:

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.

"is regarded" By whom? Where? When?
By you? By the Great Unwashed?

Why do you care at all?

w.

AJAY SHARMA

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:57 am

Guest

Helmut Wabnig wrote:

Quote:

On 29 Sep 2006 21:40:14 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com
wrote:

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.

"is regarded" By whom? Where? When?
By you? By the Great Unwashed?

Why do you care at all?

w.
------------------------------------

I mean doscovery of E=mc2 is credited to Einstein only. Whereas there
are others who did work on the topic and paved way for Einstein.
AJAY SHARMA

Helmut Wabnig

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:44 am

Guest

On 29 Sep 2006 23:57:24 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA"
<physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Helmut Wabnig wrote:
On 29 Sep 2006 21:40:14 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com
wrote:

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.

"is regarded" By whom? Where? When?
By you? By the Great Unwashed?

Why do you care at all?

w.
------------------------------------

I mean doscovery of E=mc2 is credited to Einstein only.
What makes you believe that. It is simply not true.

Having read just -one- newspaper article does not
qualify you to give such fundamental statements.
A million newspaper articles do not make up a worthful
data base, as newspapers are asswipes only.

Quote:

Whereas there
are others who did work on the topic and paved way for Einstein.
AJAY SHARMA
Do you really believe that is your original discovery?

Do you think nobody else before you noticed that?
Your efforts are superfluous, too little, and 100 years too late..

w.

AJAY SHARMA

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:18 am

Guest

Helmut Wabnig wrote:

Quote:

On 29 Sep 2006 23:57:24 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA"
physics.einstein@gmail.com> wrote:

Helmut Wabnig wrote:
On 29 Sep 2006 21:40:14 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" <devianju@gmail.com
wrote:

Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein.

"is regarded" By whom? Where? When?
By you? By the Great Unwashed?

Why do you care at all?

w.
------------------------------------

I mean doscovery of E=mc2 is credited to Einstein only.
What makes you believe that. It is simply not true.
Having read just -one- newspaper article does not
qualify you to give such fundamental statements.
A million newspaper articles do not make up a worthful
data base, as newspapers are asswipes only.

Whereas there
are others who did work on the topic and paved way for Einstein.
AJAY SHARMA
Do you really believe that is your original discovery?
Do you think nobody else before you noticed that?
Your efforts are superfluous, too little, and 100 years too late..

w.
------------------

---------AJAY SHARMA responds to Webnig--------------
Well it is in literature. I have quoted the facts in research papers
and book.
I have given all references.
In my book

100 Years of E=mc2.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554

I have discussed all aspects of E=mc2.
When it was derived?
Which is the most original paper?
The answer to his question is
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Under what conditions E=mc2 was derived ?
What are limitations of the derivation ?
What could be next form of E=mc2?
All these things are discussed . With availability of INTERNET, all
things became easier.

People are realising the truths now.
AJAY SHARMA

Page 1 of 1

All times are GMT - 5 Hours The time now is Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:29 pm Science Forum Index