Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)

Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)

Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.

Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.

Muhammad's listing can be seen here:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!

Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)

Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)

Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.

Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.

Muhammad's listing can be seen here:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!

Sky King wrote:

Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)

Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)

Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.

Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.

Muhammad's listing can be seen here:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!

Congrats to Muhammad.
I wonder who else here would qualify for such prestigious
recognition?...*cough*...jason...

"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> wrote in message
news:DKc2f.1200$647.1159@news01.roc.ny...

Sky King wrote:


Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)

Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)

Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.

Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.

Muhammad's listing can be seen here:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!

Congrats to Muhammad.
I wonder who else here would qualify for such prestigious
recognition?...*cough*...jason...


Jason was long ago recognised and takes pride in the fact that his site
earned a "crankier" rating. Apparently he thinks that's a good thing - no
surprise there, of course.

Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)

Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)

Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.

Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.

Muhammad's listing can be seen here:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!

Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)

Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)

Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.

Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.

Muhammad's listing can be seen here:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!

For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

MuhammadColumbo wrote:

For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?

What's the big deal about a " sequential order " ( sic ) btw ?

"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message
de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...


MuhammadColumbo wrote:

For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?

I listen all relevant information.

"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message
de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...


MuhammadColumbo wrote:


For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?


I listen all relevant information.


What's the big deal about a " sequential order " ( sic ) btw ?


The deal is easy if you think a litlle bit : Four teams in four planes can
not make four hijacks sequentially! Sequentially means, one plane at a time.
When one plane ends its flight the following plane starts the hijack. That's
how it happened on 9/11/2001 with four flights. And that's impossible. Also,
there is no reason to them doing the hijacks sequentially, ...

But if ONE team must hijack four planes, the lone way to do it is in
sequential order as it happened on 9/11/2001.

MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le me
ssage
de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...


MuhammadColumbo wrote:

For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?

I listen all relevant information.

This is now the only relevant information as far as your debunked
scenario goes, Muhammad Columbo:

http://www.crank.net/911.html

MuhammadColumbo wrote:

"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le
message de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...


MuhammadColumbo wrote:


For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?


I listen all relevant information.


What's the big deal about a " sequential order " ( sic ) btw ?


The deal is easy if you think a litlle bit : Four teams in four planes
can not make four hijacks sequentially! Sequentially means, one plane at
a time. When one plane ends its flight the following plane starts the
hijack. That's how it happened on 9/11/2001 with four flights. And that's
impossible. Also, there is no reason to them doing the hijacks
sequentially, ...

But if ONE team must hijack four planes, the lone way to do it is in
sequential order as it happened on 9/11/2001.

It wasn't sequential

8:14 a.m. - Flight 11 hijacked
8:45 a.m. - Flight 175 hijacked Right time is 8:42
8:46 a.m. - Flight 11 crashes
8:54 a.m. - Flight 77 is hijacked
9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 crashes
9:28 a.m. - Flight 93 is hijacked Right time is 9:35
9:37 a.m. - Flight 77 crashes
10:03 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes

"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le
message
de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...


MuhammadColumbo wrote:

For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?

I listen all relevant information.

"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128891892.813976.60250@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le
message
de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...


MuhammadColumbo wrote:

For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.

No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?

I listen all relevant information.

*This is now the only relevant information as far as your debunked
*scenario goes, Muhammad Columbo:

*http://www.crank.net/911.html

When people who defend USA's official version of 9/11 don't break down any
research, they rename it as "crank". They are really big propagandist
people. They are big LIARS. And the most important, they are serial killers.