| |
 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Science Skeptics Forum » Muhammad Columbo's Paper Wins Prestigious Award. Congratulat |
|
Page 6 of 6 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| MuhammadColumbo |
 Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
2sfdl19u3r5u6h47tf9g11c2ia2inbsi21@4ax.com...
[quote:dfbbf5c886]On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:11:20 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
And why it that important?
Do you imagine any important inquiry about the 2003 Iraq invasion where
the
start date will not be given!!! Any professionnal journalist, or a justice
court report, will write something like "And on day dd/mm/yyyy at hh:mm
the
fisrt bomb has been lounched from an american F117 plane". That's for the
same reason.
And the date and time for the hijackings have been shown to you to
have been given in the 9/11 Commission report. So your point is?
[/quote:dfbbf5c886]
Easy, but you don't understand : As the coimmission has the radar tracks of
all planes, they know the precise time on deviation from their route. Why
they don't given precise time? They just given a period of 3-4 minutes for
some planes!
They avoided the precision when it is problematic.
[quote:dfbbf5c886]You are totally closed to the facts. We can imagine two planes distant at
several hundreds of km may accidentally crash and deviate at the same
time.
But when you have four planes involved and in all cases it happen in the
same way, we can not more speak about accidental coincidence!!! That was
made in that way and they succeded in their goal.
Very good, Muhammed the idiot, muslim apologist. You are exactly
right. It was no coincidence. It was caused by the concerted effort
of 4 teams of Arabic men who hijacked and crashed the planes.
[/quote:dfbbf5c886]
If you agree on that sequential hijacks (that's what I explained here up "We
can imagine two planes distant at several hundreds of km may accidentally
crash and deviate at the same time. But when you have four planes involved
....") and you claim that 4 teams of arabs did them, please explain us WHY
and HOW that four teams synchronised the crash time of a plane and the
deviation time of an other?
[quote:dfbbf5c886]That kind of hijacks can never be the goal of 4 different teams. That kind
of hijacks can never been done by 4 different teams.
But they were.
[/quote:dfbbf5c886]
THEY WEREN'T!! The lone proof that you have is LIAR reports from US
administration.
[quote:dfbbf5c886]If you are not agree with that, you must show what can be the goal of
those
teams and how they succeeded to make the hijacks in that sequential
manner.
Their goal was to hijack the airliner that they were on and crash it
into a designated building.
[/quote:dfbbf5c886]
The sequential manner of that hijacks can NOT be accidental! So it must be
explained. If you can't, that means your inquiry and report is meaningless.
Even your commission report is meaningless.
[quote:dfbbf5c886]I changed nothing. You can see it is still in my web site.
Yes you did. You changed your theory from the flights being
individually taken over only after the previous one crashed to begin
taken over "near the end of the prior aircraft's flight".
That change nothing on the facts.
Like you've ever presented any facts. But thanks for admitting that
you changed your theory.
[/quote:dfbbf5c886]
Begin by answering to the comments here up. Then you can claim that I
changed less than 10 insignificant words. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:14 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:05:51 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:8c7f05917d]
agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
2sfdl19u3r5u6h47tf9g11c2ia2inbsi21@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:11:20 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
And why it that important?
Do you imagine any important inquiry about the 2003 Iraq invasion where
the
start date will not be given!!! Any professionnal journalist, or a justice
court report, will write something like "And on day dd/mm/yyyy at hh:mm
the
fisrt bomb has been lounched from an american F117 plane". That's for the
same reason.
And the date and time for the hijackings have been shown to you to
have been given in the 9/11 Commission report. So your point is?
Easy, but you don't understand : As the coimmission has the radar tracks of
all planes, they know the precise time on deviation from their route.
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
Which occurred sometime after they were hijacked. The deviation time
is not relevant.
[quote:8c7f05917d]Why they don't given precise time?
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
In many cases, they gave the precise time that the planes turned away
from their normal course.
For Flight 11:
" Although the Boston Center air traffic controller realized at an
early stage that there was something wrong with American 11, he did
not immediately interpret the plane's failure to respond as a sign
that it had been hijacked. At 8:14, when the flight failed to heed his
instruction to climb to 35,000 feet, the controller repeatedly tried
to raise the flight. He reached out to the pilot on the emergency
frequency. Though there was no response, he kept trying to contact the
aircraft.
At 8:21, American 11 turned off its transponder, immediately degrading
the information available about the aircraft. The controller told his
supervisor that he thought something was seriously wrong with the
plane, although neither suspected a hijacking. The supervisor
instructed the controller to follow standard procedures for handling a
"no radio" aircraft.
The controller checked to see if American Airlines could establish
communication with American 11. He became even more concerned as its
route changed, moving into another sector's airspace. Controllers
immediately began to move aircraft out of its path, and asked other
aircraft in the vicinity to look for American 11."
For Flight 175:
"The first operational evidence that something was abnormal on United
175 came at 8:47, when the aircraft changed beacon codes twice within
a minute. At 8:51, the flight deviated from its assigned altitude, and
a minute later New York air traffic controllers began repeatedly and
unsuccessfully trying to contact it."
For Flight 77:
"At 8:54, the aircraft deviated from its assigned course, turning
south."
For Flight 93:
"At 9:32, a hijacker, probably Jarrah, made or attempted to make the
following announcement to the passengers of Flight 93:"Ladies and
Gentlemen: Here the captain, please sit down keep remaining sitting.
We have a bomb on board. So, sit." The flight data recorder (also
recovered) indicates that Jarrah then instructed the plane's autopilot
to turn the aircraft around and head east."
[quote:8c7f05917d]They just given a period of 3-4 minutes for
some planes!
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
For when the hijacking actually occurred.
[quote:8c7f05917d]They avoided the precision when it is problematic.
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
No, unlike you, they avoid precision when they can't pinpoint the
facts precisely.
[quote:8c7f05917d]You are totally closed to the facts. We can imagine two planes distant at
several hundreds of km may accidentally crash and deviate at the same
time.
But when you have four planes involved and in all cases it happen in the
same way, we can not more speak about accidental coincidence!!! That was
made in that way and they succeded in their goal.
Very good, Muhammed the idiot, muslim apologist. You are exactly
right. It was no coincidence. It was caused by the concerted effort
of 4 teams of Arabic men who hijacked and crashed the planes.
If you agree on that sequential hijacks (that's what I explained here up "We
can imagine two planes distant at several hundreds of km may accidentally
crash and deviate at the same time. But when you have four planes involved
...") and you claim that 4 teams of arabs did them, please explain us WHY
and HOW that four teams synchronised the crash time of a plane and the
deviation time of an other?
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
The "synchronization" of time is a product of your imagination.
[quote:8c7f05917d]That kind of hijacks can never be the goal of 4 different teams. That kind
of hijacks can never been done by 4 different teams.
But they were.
THEY WEREN'T!! The lone proof that you have is LIAR reports from US
administration.
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
And the reality of radar and voice tapes from the planes.
[quote:8c7f05917d]If you are not agree with that, you must show what can be the goal of
those
teams and how they succeeded to make the hijacks in that sequential
manner.
Their goal was to hijack the airliner that they were on and crash it
into a designated building.
The sequential manner of that hijacks can NOT be accidental!
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
Why not?
[quote:8c7f05917d]So it must be
explained. If you can't, that means your inquiry and report is meaningless.
Even your commission report is meaningless.
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
So you say. But you have yet to produce the first fact that disputes
it.
[quote:8c7f05917d]I changed nothing. You can see it is still in my web site.
Yes you did. You changed your theory from the flights being
individually taken over only after the previous one crashed to begin
taken over "near the end of the prior aircraft's flight".
That change nothing on the facts.
Like you've ever presented any facts. But thanks for admitting that
you changed your theory.
Begin by answering to the comments here up. Then you can claim that I
changed less than 10 insignificant words.
[/quote:8c7f05917d]
Changing from a plane was hijacked after the previous one crashed to
your current position is not exactly insignificant. Especially when
you only did so when it was pointed out to you that your previous
"theory" was impossible. Demonstrating that you really don't have a
clue. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:28a662c2a2]USA administration, and all their personnal are unab.....
No, as you know, Muhammad, facts are your enemy. They are your BIG
enemy. Your fictional scenario demonstrates that. And so does your[/quote:28a662c2a2]
intentional evasion of the facts that you did not consider.
You remember that you could not tell us about AA77 when asked.
Repeatedly.
Your scenario remains what it has always been: a fictional account. It
is worth nothing.
Remember why you got this deserving award, Muhammad Columbo:
http://www.crank.net/911.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:28 am
|
|