| |
 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Science Skeptics Forum » Muhammad Columbo's Paper Wins Prestigious Award. Congratulat |
|
Page 4 of 6 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Phil Miller |
 Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 4:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:25:10 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:d385290924]I answered to all your questions. Now, it's time for you.
USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
[/quote:d385290924]
You keep on repeating this nonsense. People keep asking you why it is
impossible. You keep ignoring this question. Why is it impossible?
[quote:d385290924]Begin to unsewer to that in a logical manner, then we can consider your
lies.
[/quote:d385290924]
The answers (what the hell is an unsewer) you do give, such as they are,
are illogical.
Why couldn't 4 independent teams act in any time frame they decide?
Sequential? Simultaneous? Other? What does it matter? Timing any
sequence among the teams would only require 4 wrist watches.
Phil
--
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space
'cause there's bugger all down here on Earth.
Monty Python's "Galaxy Song" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:10 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:5e457646eb]I answered to all your questions.
[/quote:5e457646eb]
We all can see you have not answered my questions about YOUR scenario.
There is no need to keep telling us that you are evading the question,
Muhammad. You know that for your scenario to be true in any way, you
would be able to answer my questions with facts and evidence right
away.
So, be an adult and just answer the question, Muhammad Columbo. If you
can't answer the question, just say you do not know the answer. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
cksvk15svavffjql9utlii37dbd5n4jr9u@4ax.com...
[quote:b9810231b7]On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:12:33 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL
was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
I just remembered the most importants.
And the excuses keep flowing. To the families of the people who died
in each of the above events, I doubt that any of them were not "the
most importants".
In any case, there were too much less than now.
None of the above example took place in a war zone. None of the
victims were active combatants in a war.
Ther was no bombs on London, nor on Madrid!!!!
Oh, really? So what caused the big "booms"? And let's not forget the
video of the bombs in Madrid going off.
[/quote:b9810231b7]
Crazy people! We were speaking about terrorist attacks of Al Qaeda BEFORE
9/11. There was no bomb attacks on Madrid and London before 9/11.
[quote:b9810231b7]And the targets were every
time military or official representations.
The subway in London and the passenger trains in Madred were military
targets?
[/quote:b9810231b7]
Before 9/11 ther was no civil targets.
[quote:b9810231b7]There were no civil targets.
Only targets filled with civilians....
And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi.
The WTC, the embassies, and the Cole were in Saudi Arabia?
The WTC is excluded of that list. Enbassies and Cole are official
representaion or military targets.
Who was talking about military targets? Your statement was:
"And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi."
How do you target the army in Saudi Arabia by attacking people in the
WTC, a port in Yemen, or embassies in other countries?
[/quote:b9810231b7]
They were attacking US interests. Mainly military or representatives. The
deal can be discussed. But the first problem was US invasion, US attack
against WHOLE world.
[quote:b9810231b7]Now, there are hundreds per day in Iraq and in whole world.
Hundreds? You need to learn how to count, muslim apologist. And most
of the victims in Iraq are other Muslims. How do you explain that?
You don't know, you don't heard, but there are hundreds of actions in
Iraq,
from the smallest to the biggest action!
So how do you know about them? Are you getting your daily action
reports from al Quida? And why do you ignore the fact that most of
the "actions" are resulting in the deaths of innocent fellow muslims?
I have my own informations.
So you are getting daily action reports from al Quida? Maybe it's
time to turn you in to the authorities.
[/quote:b9810231b7]
Not at all. But Al Qaeda is not the lone information source. Also, I have
doubts on Al Qaeda for that.
[quote:b9810231b7]All muslim countries are mixings of ethnies, lungages, beliefs, ...
There
are also several muslim branches in all counties. USA is favorising some
people against others, than you have inter iraqui fightings?
So who is the US favoring in Iraq? Have any of the ethnic groups been
prevented from taking part in the democratic process by the United
States?
Democratie was requested in South america during sixties and seventies.
There USA made all necessary to avoid the democratie. In Iraq, people has
more respectful life way that makes them possible to live mixed with
several
beliefs and langages. They did not need democratie that will turn their
country to a cold war regime.
What has South America got to do with the questions? Can't you answer
the questions?
[/quote:b9810231b7]
Easy : You are promoting democratie in arab world, while you destroyed
democratie fom South America. So democratic slogans are just a justification
for war. In other words, You are not sincere with your democratic dealing.
[quote:b9810231b7]USA is favorising Kurds and Shias in Iraq.
Proof? Of course not.
[/quote:b9810231b7]
The division of Iraq in three parts separated by parallels, Kurds on teh
North, Shias in the South were supporting Kurds and Shias. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I answered to all your questions. Now, it's time for you.
USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
Begin to unsewer to that in a logical manner, then we can consider your
lies.
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129374659.398206.107060@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[quote:704b14e2f1]
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
I answered to all your questions.
We all can see you have not answered my questions about YOUR scenario.
There is no need to keep telling us that you are evading the question,
Muhammad. You know that for your scenario to be true in any way, you
would be able to answer my questions with facts and evidence right
away.
So, be an adult and just answer the question, Muhammad Columbo. If you
can't answer the question, just say you do not know the answer.
[/quote:704b14e2f1] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:a8157ce488]I answered to all your questions.
[/quote:a8157ce488]
Obviously you have none of my questions. We all can see you have not
answered my questions about YOUR scenario.
There is no need to keep telling us that you are evading the question,
Muhammad. You know that for your scenario to be true in any way, you
would be able to answer my questions with facts and evidence right
away.
So we can see that you are scared to death, Muhammad Columbo, that you
are not able to answer my necessary questions |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Vandar |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:f710f65b6f]agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
cksvk15svavffjql9utlii37dbd5n4jr9u@4ax.com...
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:12:33 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL
was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
I just remembered the most importants.
And the excuses keep flowing. To the families of the people who died
in each of the above events, I doubt that any of them were not "the
most importants".
In any case, there were too much less than now.
None of the above example took place in a war zone. None of the
victims were active combatants in a war.
Ther was no bombs on London, nor on Madrid!!!!
Oh, really? So what caused the big "booms"? And let's not forget the
video of the bombs in Madrid going off.
Crazy people! We were speaking about terrorist attacks of Al Qaeda BEFORE
9/11. There was no bomb attacks on Madrid and London before 9/11.
And the targets were every
time military or official representations.
The subway in London and the passenger trains in Madred were military
targets?
Before 9/11 ther was no civil targets.
[/quote:f710f65b6f]
9/11 was the second attack on the WTC. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| george |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo is an apologist for the mad muslims who murdered nearly
3000 innocent civilains on 9/11.
He thinks that his 'page' proves that the US government was involved..
Anything to take the heat off the insanity of islamist extremists..
Throughout the world all the recent extremist actions have been carried
out by fanatical muslims against unarmed civilians.
Bali, a holiday destination for many. Many Balinese used to work in the
tourist industry now a shadow of its former self and with the latest
bombing unemployment is rife. The madmen have cost their fellow Muslims
their living...
London, ordinary people going to work when fellow Britains who were
also mad muslims destroyed their lives...
Spain, again a civilian train, civilians murdered by mad muslims..
MuhammadColumbo heaps insult upon injury as he pushes his demented
view.
The question is:
Does he have some connection with these maniacs ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129405132.352579.296590@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
[quote:ac626c85ab]
MuhammadColumbo is an apologist for the mad muslims who murdered nearly
3000 innocent civilains on 9/11.
He thinks that his 'page' proves that the US government was involved..
Anything to take the heat off the insanity of islamist extremists..
[/quote:ac626c85ab]
My work proofs that 4 different teams can not make that strikes as they
happened. And when we consider how USA administration can do that? All facts
correspond to that. So we can conlude USA administration did 9/11 strikes.
That don't mean muslim extremists did nothing! Not at all.
[quote:ac626c85ab]Throughout the world all the recent extremist actions have been carried
out by fanatical muslims against unarmed civilians.
Bali, a holiday destination for many. Many Balinese used to work in the
tourist industry now a shadow of its former self and with the latest
bombing unemployment is rife. The madmen have cost their fellow Muslims
their living...
London, ordinary people going to work when fellow Britains who were
also mad muslims destroyed their lives...
Spain, again a civilian train, civilians murdered by mad muslims..
[/quote:ac626c85ab]
All those actions are a consequence of 9/11. I consider them all made by
muslim extremists.
[quote:ac626c85ab]MuhammadColumbo heaps insult upon injury as he pushes his demented
view.
The question is:
Does he have some connection with these maniacs ?
[/quote:ac626c85ab]
The answer is simple : Not at all. If I had any coonection with those
people, I will never write here any sentence. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
ANc4f.9931$cg.3584@news02.roc.ny...
[quote:b3a3eaaa86]MuhammadColumbo wrote:
Before 9/11 ther was no civil targets.
9/11 was the second attack on the WTC.
[/quote:b3a3eaaa86]
Even if the first one was made by muslim extremists, that don't proof the
second is also made by muslims.
And that don't means the first one was commanded by muslims. I do not made
any inquiry on that. So I don't decide about that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 4:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:621367caf2]"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
ANc4f.9931$cg.3584@news02.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
Before 9/11 ther was no civil targets.
9/11 was the second attack on the WTC.
Even if the first one was made by muslim extremists, that don't proof the
second is also made by muslims.
And that don't means the first one was commanded by muslims. I do not made
any inquiry on that. So I don't decide about that.
[/quote:621367caf2]
You have not made any inquiries into the evidence that 19 Arab
hijackers are known to have independently hijacked 4 airlines and
crashed them on 9/11/2001.
You'd better get to work to refute the evidence, Muhammad. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| george |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 4:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:eb6d1a7985]"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129405132.352579.296590@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
MuhammadColumbo is an apologist for the mad muslims who murdered nearly
3000 innocent civilains on 9/11.
He thinks that his 'page' proves that the US government was involved..
Anything to take the heat off the insanity of islamist extremists..
My work proofs that 4 different teams can not make that strikes as they
happened. And when we consider how USA administration can do that? All facts
correspond to that. So we can conlude USA administration did 9/11 strikes.
[/quote:eb6d1a7985]
See. He's so far into denial he's an Egyptian
[quote:eb6d1a7985]That don't mean muslim extremists did nothing! Not at all.
Throughout the world all the recent extremist actions have been carried
out by fanatical muslims against unarmed civilians.
Bali, a holiday destination for many. Many Balinese used to work in the
tourist industry now a shadow of its former self and with the latest
bombing unemployment is rife. The madmen have cost their fellow Muslims
their living...
London, ordinary people going to work when fellow Britains who were
also mad muslims destroyed their lives...
Spain, again a civilian train, civilians murdered by mad muslims..
All those actions are a consequence of 9/11. I consider them all made by
muslim extremists.
[/quote:eb6d1a7985]
What? Murdering 3000 innocent American civilians gave the madmen the
balls to murder people of their own faith in other countries ?
[quote:eb6d1a7985]MuhammadColumbo heaps insult upon injury as he pushes his demented
view.
The question is:
Does he have some connection with these maniacs ?
The answer is simple : Not at all. If I had any coonection with those
people, I will never write here any sentence.
[/quote:eb6d1a7985]
Yeah riiiight.
If it looks like a maniac, acts like a maniac and defends other maniacs
then it is a maniac ! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:56 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:09:57 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:ea343cb930]
agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
cksvk15svavffjql9utlii37dbd5n4jr9u@4ax.com...
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:12:33 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL
was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
I just remembered the most importants.
And the excuses keep flowing. To the families of the people who died
in each of the above events, I doubt that any of them were not "the
most importants".
In any case, there were too much less than now.
None of the above example took place in a war zone. None of the
victims were active combatants in a war.
Ther was no bombs on London, nor on Madrid!!!!
Oh, really? So what caused the big "booms"? And let's not forget the
video of the bombs in Madrid going off.
Crazy people! We were speaking about terrorist attacks of Al Qaeda BEFORE
9/11. There was no bomb attacks on Madrid and London before 9/11.
[/quote:ea343cb930]
Then why did you bring them up?
[quote:ea343cb930]And the targets were every
time military or official representations.
The subway in London and the passenger trains in Madred were military
targets?
Before 9/11 ther was no civil targets.
[/quote:ea343cb930]
WTC 1993 was certainly a civil target.
[quote:ea343cb930]There were no civil targets.
Only targets filled with civilians....
And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi.
The WTC, the embassies, and the Cole were in Saudi Arabia?
The WTC is excluded of that list. Enbassies and Cole are official
representaion or military targets.
Who was talking about military targets? Your statement was:
"And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi."
How do you target the army in Saudi Arabia by attacking people in the
WTC, a port in Yemen, or embassies in other countries?
They were attacking US interests. Mainly military or representatives.
[/quote:ea343cb930]
"Mainly"? What happened to "there were no civilian targets"? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Bertie the Bunyip" <nuny@fjukkin.bidness> a écrit dans le message de news:
Xns96F17C19A5901nunyfjukkinbidness@207.14.113.17...
[quote:3b0a66c6b0]"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in
news:434c1845$3$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be:
Ya know what th etruth is?
It's when you say something and your budy sez "ain't that the truth"
Sorry, I don't understand what you wan to tell.
should I repeat it in idiot for you?
[/quote:3b0a66c6b0]
Keep your insults for yourself. And learn to write two sentences correctly. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:099749cd9c]²"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129416968.114860.110360@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
My work proofs that 4 different teams can not make that strikes as they
happened. And when we consider how USA administration can do that? All
facts
correspond to that. So we can conlude USA administration did 9/11 strikes.
See. He's so far into denial he's an Egyptian
I am not egyptian.
I prooved how USA administration did 9/11. See
http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/
[/quote:099749cd9c]
No, you haven't proved any such thing, Muhammad. You claim it, but you
can't demonstrate the necessary conditions for your scenario to be
true.
By now, you should have easily answered all the questions I and others
have asked you, provided all the supporting evidence, and eliminated
ALL of your contradictions. If you had, there would be no argument.
You need to admit publicly that your scenario is nothing more than
fiction invented in your head, Muhammad, because there is absolutely no
reason for anyone to believe your "scenario."
And no one does. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:3ebc93d9cd]That's a LIE. Even in your commission report :
UA175 : Possibly takeover 8:42-8:46
AA11 : Crash 8:46:40
[/quote:3ebc93d9cd]
So, do you believe in the 9/11 Commission report now, Muhammad?
Why? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:14 pm
|
|