 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Science Skeptics Forum » Muhammad Columbo's Paper Wins Prestigious Award. Congratulat |
|
Page 3 of 6 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Phil Miller |
 Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 5:10 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:42:41 +0200, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
[quote:f56e089121]
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434c1845$0$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128975263.971155.87070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
*You cannot accept the truth that suicide bombers are murdering their
*fellow Muslims because a mad mullah tells them to !
I can easily accept that. I know they do that, they are able to do that,
but
only when they are agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility to
defend themself.
Please explain how the British citizens who blew up three tube trains and a
bus in London were being "agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility
to defend themself." They had every advantage a UK citizen has, they were
not oppressed, their freedom of worship was guaranteed, they were protected
by the full extent of English law and had full access to the democratic
process.
[/quote:f56e089121]
I'd like to know how someone, who has been "killed without any
possibility to defend themself" can go on to be a suicide bomber?
Once a suicide bomber, always a suicide bomber, I guess?
Phil
--
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space
'cause there's bugger all down here on Earth.
Monty Python's "Galaxy Song" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tw |
| Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 5:29 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Phil Miller" <philmil@REMOVEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:2lrpk11t0gp3p9c56g7qsmnmaqb5pgek8o@4ax.com...
[quote:d632842c8c]On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:42:41 +0200, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434c1845$0$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128975263.971155.87070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
*You cannot accept the truth that suicide bombers are murdering their
*fellow Muslims because a mad mullah tells them to !
I can easily accept that. I know they do that, they are able to do
that,
but
only when they are agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility
to
defend themself.
Please explain how the British citizens who blew up three tube trains and
a
bus in London were being "agressed, attacked, killed without any
possibility
to defend themself." They had every advantage a UK citizen has, they were
not oppressed, their freedom of worship was guaranteed, they were
protected
by the full extent of English law and had full access to the democratic
process.
I'd like to know how someone, who has been "killed without any
possibility to defend themself" can go on to be a suicide bomber?
Once a suicide bomber, always a suicide bomber, I guess?
[/quote:d632842c8c]
Must be! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
[quote:cbf4b40990]
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434c1845$0$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128975263.971155.87070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
*You cannot accept the truth that suicide bombers are murdering their
*fellow Muslims because a mad mullah tells them to !
I can easily accept that. I know they do that, they are able to do that,
but
only when they are agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility to
defend themself.
Please explain how the British citizens who blew up three tube trains and
a
bus in London were being "agressed, attacked, killed without any
possibility
to defend themself." They had every advantage a UK citizen has, they were
not oppressed, their freedom of worship was guaranteed, they were
protected
by the full extent of English law and had full access to the democratic
process.
[/quote:cbf4b40990]
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was making
one strike each 3-4 years. With 9/11, USA begin neverending wars against
muslims. And muslims reacted bad by comitting more strikes and defend
themself with their means. Doing that, they comitted bombing strikes against
the countries who invaded them. That actions were mainly against countries
who invaded Iraq. But for Afghanistan, there was not too much actions. Why?
Because the implication of OBL in 9/11 is a little bit believed by muslims.
But the invasion of Iraq is totally unjustified. Then muslism understood
that they are agressed without justification. And that is the main reason of
the bombing in London and in Madrid.
That's what I believe without being involved nor in communication with any
group who comitted that. But I can understand things like that. That don't
means I support that bombings!!! Not at all. The best action to fight that
unjustices is political like Ghandi. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tw |
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434d654b$0$10969$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
[quote:eb94789cce]
"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434c1845$0$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128975263.971155.87070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
*You cannot accept the truth that suicide bombers are murdering their
*fellow Muslims because a mad mullah tells them to !
I can easily accept that. I know they do that, they are able to do
that,
but
only when they are agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility
to
defend themself.
Please explain how the British citizens who blew up three tube trains
and
a
bus in London were being "agressed, attacked, killed without any
possibility
to defend themself." They had every advantage a UK citizen has, they
were
not oppressed, their freedom of worship was guaranteed, they were
protected
by the full extent of English law and had full access to the democratic
process.
You must consider all facts from the beginning.
[/quote:eb94789cce]
I am. Who was "aggressing" against, attacking or killing (without any
possibility to defend themselves) the British citizens who blew up three
tube trains and a bus? The answer is no-one. I can understand the
frustrations of e.g. the Palestinians, or even Iraqi insurgents, but he
London bombers were just dim, suicidal psycopaths. Do you know how many
muslims they killed and wounded? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Vandar |
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:d521086599]"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434c1845$0$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128975263.971155.87070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
*You cannot accept the truth that suicide bombers are murdering their
*fellow Muslims because a mad mullah tells them to !
I can easily accept that. I know they do that, they are able to do that,
but
only when they are agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility to
defend themself.
Please explain how the British citizens who blew up three tube trains and
a
bus in London were being "agressed, attacked, killed without any
possibility
to defend themself." They had every advantage a UK citizen has, they were
not oppressed, their freedom of worship was guaranteed, they were
protected
by the full extent of English law and had full access to the democratic
process.
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was making
one strike each 3-4 years.
[/quote:d521086599]
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
[quote:d521086599]With 9/11, USA begin neverending wars against
muslims. And muslims reacted bad by comitting more strikes and defend
themself with their means. Doing that, they comitted bombing strikes against
the countries who invaded them. That actions were mainly against countries
who invaded Iraq. But for Afghanistan, there was not too much actions. Why?
Because the implication of OBL in 9/11 is a little bit believed by muslims.
But the invasion of Iraq is totally unjustified.
[/quote:d521086599]
It's misunderstood.
[quote:d521086599]Then muslism understood
that they are agressed without justification. And that is the main reason of
the bombing in London and in Madrid.
That's what I believe without being involved nor in communication with any
group who comitted that. But I can understand things like that. That don't
means I support that bombings!!! Not at all. The best action to fight that
unjustices is political like Ghandi.
[/quote:d521086599]
We don't negotiate with those who arbitrarily murder thousands of our
citizens, sorry. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Bkt3f.9718$cg.4906@news02.roc.ny...
[quote:774a25efc3]MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
[/quote:774a25efc3]
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year. Now, there are hundreds per day in
Iraq and in whole world.
[quote:774a25efc3]With 9/11, USA begin neverending wars against muslims. And muslims
reacted bad by comitting more strikes and defend themself with their
means. Doing that, they comitted bombing strikes against the countries
who invaded them. That actions were mainly against countries who invaded
Iraq. But for Afghanistan, there was not too much actions. Why? Because
the implication of OBL in 9/11 is a little bit believed by muslims. But
the invasion of Iraq is totally unjustified.
It's misunderstood.
[/quote:774a25efc3]
You don't understand at all.
[quote:774a25efc3]Then muslism understood that they are agressed without justification. And
that is the main reason of the bombing in London and in Madrid.
That's what I believe without being involved nor in communication with
any group who comitted that. But I can understand things like that. That
don't means I support that bombings!!! Not at all. The best action to
fight that unjustices is political like Ghandi.
We don't negotiate with those who arbitrarily murder thousands of our
citizens, sorry.
[/quote:774a25efc3]
You don't negociate with murderers of thousands : You just make them
PRESIDENTS. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Muhammad Columbo knows he can't support his "scenario" with any facts
or evidence and refuses to answer questions about it.
He's shown that he is full of nonsense and silly lies. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:56:45 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:f163dda765]
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Bkt3f.9718$cg.4906@news02.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
[/quote:f163dda765]
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
[quote:f163dda765]Now, there are hundreds per day in Iraq and in whole world.
[/quote:f163dda765]
Hundreds? You need to learn how to count, muslim apologist. And most
of the victims in Iraq are other Muslims. How do you explain that? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
i9ttk1dt9515l4csqq7e3igcceo0m3lo8d@4ax.com...
[quote:95922bdd14]On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:56:45 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Bkt3f.9718$cg.4906@news02.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
[/quote:95922bdd14]
I just remembered the most importants. In any case, there were too much less
than now. And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi.
[quote:95922bdd14]Now, there are hundreds per day in Iraq and in whole world.
Hundreds? You need to learn how to count, muslim apologist. And most
of the victims in Iraq are other Muslims. How do you explain that?
[/quote:95922bdd14]
You don't know, you don't heard, but there are hundreds of actions in Iraq,
from the smallest to the biggest action!
All muslim countries are mixings of ethnies, lungages, beliefs, ... There
are also several muslim branches in all counties. USA is favorising some
people against others, than you have inter iraqui fightings? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
Begin to unsewer to that in a logical manner, then we can consider your
lies.
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129240220.413255.304850@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[quote:64bdcc3f6c]Muhammad Columbo knows he can't support his "scenario" with any facts
or evidence and refuses to answer questions about it.
He's shown that he is full of nonsense and silly lies.
[/quote:64bdcc3f6c] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:32 am |
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:28:22 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:95e86dc797]
agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
i9ttk1dt9515l4csqq7e3igcceo0m3lo8d@4ax.com...
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:56:45 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Bkt3f.9718$cg.4906@news02.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
diilqh$v31$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
I just remembered the most importants.
[/quote:95e86dc797]
And the excuses keep flowing. To the families of the people who died
in each of the above events, I doubt that any of them were not "the
most importants".
[quote:95e86dc797]In any case, there were too much less than now.
[/quote:95e86dc797]
None of the above example took place in a war zone. None of the
victims were active combatants in a war.
[quote:95e86dc797]And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi.
[/quote:95e86dc797]
The WTC, the embassies, and the Cole were in Saudi Arabia?
[quote:95e86dc797]Now, there are hundreds per day in Iraq and in whole world.
Hundreds? You need to learn how to count, muslim apologist. And most
of the victims in Iraq are other Muslims. How do you explain that?
You don't know, you don't heard, but there are hundreds of actions in Iraq,
from the smallest to the biggest action!
[/quote:95e86dc797]
So how do you know about them? Are you getting your daily action
reports from al Quida? And why do you ignore the fact that most of
the "actions" are resulting in the deaths of innocent fellow muslims?
[quote:95e86dc797]All muslim countries are mixings of ethnies, lungages, beliefs, ... There
are also several muslim branches in all counties. USA is favorising some
people against others, than you have inter iraqui fightings?
[/quote:95e86dc797]
So who is the US favoring in Iraq? Have any of the ethnic groups been
prevented from taking part in the democratic process by the United
States? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
eijvk1l0c5bmls1i61mcco0cnds70hnfd0@4ax.com...
[quote:e770b35b2a]On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:28:22 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
I just remembered the most importants.
And the excuses keep flowing. To the families of the people who died
in each of the above events, I doubt that any of them were not "the
most importants".
In any case, there were too much less than now.
None of the above example took place in a war zone. None of the
victims were active combatants in a war.
[/quote:e770b35b2a]
Ther was no bombs on London, nor on Madrid!!!! And the targets were every
time military or official representations. There were no civil targets.
[quote:e770b35b2a]And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi.
The WTC, the embassies, and the Cole were in Saudi Arabia?
[/quote:e770b35b2a]
The WTC is excluded of that list. Enbassies and Cole are official
representaion or military targets.
[quote:e770b35b2a]Now, there are hundreds per day in Iraq and in whole world.
Hundreds? You need to learn how to count, muslim apologist. And most
of the victims in Iraq are other Muslims. How do you explain that?
You don't know, you don't heard, but there are hundreds of actions in
Iraq,
from the smallest to the biggest action!
So how do you know about them? Are you getting your daily action
reports from al Quida? And why do you ignore the fact that most of
the "actions" are resulting in the deaths of innocent fellow muslims?
[/quote:e770b35b2a]
I have my own informations. But if you have 5 big action per day, that means
you have too much more small actions.
[quote:e770b35b2a]All muslim countries are mixings of ethnies, lungages, beliefs, ... There
are also several muslim branches in all counties. USA is favorising some
people against others, than you have inter iraqui fightings?
So who is the US favoring in Iraq? Have any of the ethnic groups been
prevented from taking part in the democratic process by the United
States?
[/quote:e770b35b2a]
Democratie was requested in South america during sixties and seventies.
There USA made all necessary to avoid the democratie. In Iraq, people has
more respectful life way that makes them possible to live mixed with several
beliefs and langages. They did not need democratie that will turn their
country to a cold war regime.
USA is favorising Kurds and Shias in Iraq. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:07 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:12:33 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:43854b08e9]
agent86@justicespammail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
eijvk1l0c5bmls1i61mcco0cnds70hnfd0@4ax.com...
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:28:22 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
You must consider all facts from the beginning. Before 9/11, before
Bush
presidency, muslims and americans were speaking a little, and OBL was
making one strike each 3-4 years.
1993 WTC bombing
1995 Riyadh
1996 Khobar Towers
1998 Embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam
2000 U.S.S. Cole
2001 WTC/Pentagon
Proof : maximum strikes : 1 per year.
But your claim was 1 strike every 3 or 4 years. You've been proven
wrong again, muslim apologist.
I just remembered the most importants.
And the excuses keep flowing. To the families of the people who died
in each of the above events, I doubt that any of them were not "the
most importants".
In any case, there were too much less than now.
None of the above example took place in a war zone. None of the
victims were active combatants in a war.
Ther was no bombs on London, nor on Madrid!!!!
[/quote:43854b08e9]
Oh, really? So what caused the big "booms"? And let's not forget the
video of the bombs in Madrid going off.
[quote:43854b08e9]And the targets were every
time military or official representations.
[/quote:43854b08e9]
The subway in London and the passenger trains in Madred were military
targets?
[quote:43854b08e9]There were no civil targets.
[/quote:43854b08e9]
Only targets filled with civilians....
[quote:43854b08e9]And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi.
The WTC, the embassies, and the Cole were in Saudi Arabia?
The WTC is excluded of that list. Enbassies and Cole are official
representaion or military targets.
[/quote:43854b08e9]
Who was talking about military targets? Your statement was:
"And their target was the presence of US army in Saoudi."
How do you target the army in Saudi Arabia by attacking people in the
WTC, a port in Yemen, or embassies in other countries?
[quote:43854b08e9]Now, there are hundreds per day in Iraq and in whole world.
Hundreds? You need to learn how to count, muslim apologist. And most
of the victims in Iraq are other Muslims. How do you explain that?
You don't know, you don't heard, but there are hundreds of actions in
Iraq,
from the smallest to the biggest action!
So how do you know about them? Are you getting your daily action
reports from al Quida? And why do you ignore the fact that most of
the "actions" are resulting in the deaths of innocent fellow muslims?
I have my own informations.
[/quote:43854b08e9]
So you are getting daily action reports from al Quida? Maybe it's
time to turn you in to the authorities.
[quote:43854b08e9]All muslim countries are mixings of ethnies, lungages, beliefs, ... There
are also several muslim branches in all counties. USA is favorising some
people against others, than you have inter iraqui fightings?
So who is the US favoring in Iraq? Have any of the ethnic groups been
prevented from taking part in the democratic process by the United
States?
Democratie was requested in South america during sixties and seventies.
There USA made all necessary to avoid the democratie. In Iraq, people has
more respectful life way that makes them possible to live mixed with several
beliefs and langages. They did not need democratie that will turn their
country to a cold war regime.
[/quote:43854b08e9]
What has South America got to do with the questions? Can't you answer
the questions?
[quote:43854b08e9]USA is favorising Kurds and Shias in Iraq.
[/quote:43854b08e9]
Proof? Of course not. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:450b8bef22]USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to...
[/quote:450b8bef22]
There is no need to keep telling us that you are evading the question,
Muhammad. You know that for your scenario to be true in any way, you
would be able to answer my questions with facts and evidence right
away.
So, be an adult and just answer the question, Muhammad Columbo. If you
can't answer the question, just say you do not know the answer.
[quote:450b8bef22]"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129240220.413255.304850@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Muhammad Columbo knows he can't support his "scenario" with any facts
or evidence and refuses to answer questions about it.
He's shown that he is full of nonsense and silly lies.
[/quote:450b8bef22] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I answered to all your questions. Now, it's time for you.
USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
Begin to unsewer to that in a logical manner, then we can consider your
lies.
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129318453.061157.320670@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:f6b2839192]USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to...
[/quote:f6b2839192]
There is no need to keep telling us that you are evading the question,
Muhammad. You know that for your scenario to be true in any way, you
would be able to answer my questions with facts and evidence right
away.
So, be an adult and just answer the question, Muhammad Columbo. If you
can't answer the question, just say you do not know the answer.
[quote:f6b2839192]"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1129240220.413255.304850@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Muhammad Columbo knows he can't support his "scenario" with any facts
or evidence and refuses to answer questions about it.
He's shown that he is full of nonsense and silly lies.
[/quote:f6b2839192] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:13 pm
|
|