 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Science Skeptics Forum » Muhammad Columbo's Paper Wins Prestigious Award. Congratulat |
|
Page 2 of 6 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| george |
 Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:41d9027e00]"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
cDf2f.1210$647.787@news01.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le
message de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.
No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?
I listen all relevant information.
What's the big deal about a " sequential order " ( sic ) btw ?
The deal is easy if you think a litlle bit : Four teams in four planes
can not make four hijacks sequentially! Sequentially means, one plane at
a time. When one plane ends its flight the following plane starts the
hijack. That's how it happened on 9/11/2001 with four flights. And that's
impossible. Also, there is no reason to them doing the hijacks
sequentially, ...
But if ONE team must hijack four planes, the lone way to do it is in
sequential order as it happened on 9/11/2001.
It wasn't sequential
8:14 a.m. - Flight 11 hijacked
8:45 a.m. - Flight 175 hijacked Right time is 8:42
8:46 a.m. - Flight 11 crashes
8:54 a.m. - Flight 77 is hijacked
9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 crashes
9:28 a.m. - Flight 93 is hijacked Right time is 9:35
9:37 a.m. - Flight 77 crashes
10:03 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes
That is sequential hijack with a special charateristic : The following plane
deviates from its route some minutes before the precedent one's crash. hat
means the team ended its job just before the crash. That also means the
plane was able to reach its target without intervention of the team. That
means it has an automatic guiding system.
[/quote:41d9027e00]
The 'guidance system' was mad muslims bent on suicide..
Muhammad Columbo's just an apologist for insane Islamists |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Frank Dwyer |
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:3c7976256c]"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
cDf2f.1210$647.787@news01.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le
message de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.
No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?
I listen all relevant information.
What's the big deal about a " sequential order " ( sic ) btw ?
The deal is easy if you think a litlle bit : Four teams in four planes
can not make four hijacks sequentially! Sequentially means, one plane at
a time. When one plane ends its flight the following plane starts the
hijack. That's how it happened on 9/11/2001 with four flights. And that's
impossible. Also, there is no reason to them doing the hijacks
sequentially, ...
But if ONE team must hijack four planes, the lone way to do it is in
sequential order as it happened on 9/11/2001.
It wasn't sequential
8:14 a.m. - Flight 11 hijacked
8:45 a.m. - Flight 175 hijacked Right time is 8:42
8:46 a.m. - Flight 11 crashes
8:54 a.m. - Flight 77 is hijacked
9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 crashes
9:28 a.m. - Flight 93 is hijacked Right time is 9:35
9:37 a.m. - Flight 77 crashes
10:03 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes
That is sequential hijack with a special charateristic : The following plane
deviates from its route some minutes before the precedent one's crash.
[/quote:3c7976256c]
Your claim was "When one plane ends its flight the following plane
starts the hijack."
[quote:3c7976256c]That
means the team ended its job just before the crash. That also means the
plane was able to reach its target without intervention of the team. That
means it has an automatic guiding system.
[/quote:3c7976256c]
lol! Yeah, ok. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
george wrote:
[quote:41bbcc9a7b]Sky King wrote:
Muhammad Columbo, infamous but influential member of the 9/11 Denial
Movement, has just won one of the Internet's most prestigious awards,
for his paper, "How September 11, 2001 strikes were made?"
(http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm.)
Muhammad Columbo was honored by the highly respected website Crank Dot
Net. Crank Dot Net is devoted to presenting Web sites by and about
cranks, crankism, crankishness, and crankosity. All cranks, all the
time. Websites are ranked from most rational (Anti-crank)to most
irrational (Illucid.)
Muhammad Columbo earned the prestigious award for second-most
irrational (Crankiest) in the 9/11 Conspiracy category, an honor well
deserved by one of the most irrational members of the 9/11 Denial
Movement.
Muhammad shares listing in 9/11 Conspiracy category with another
familiar 9/11 Denial Movement member, Jason Christie.
Muhammad's listing can be seen here:
http://www.crank.net/911.html
Congartulations, Muhammad Columbo!
Wow. All the way up to one of the best kook lists eh.
I don't suppose he's aware of the levels of acknowledged stupidity he
had to rise to to get there
[/quote:41bbcc9a7b]
No, he's not, despite all of our concerted efforts to help Muhammad
Columbo see the truth.
Now he's hit rock bottom and is still in denial. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Pooh Bear |
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sky King wrote:
[quote:d104016b35]MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128891892.813976.60250@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le
message
de news: 434972B4.EDAC0395@hotmail.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
For example, NOBODY can explain how and why four independent teams
hijacked
four planes in a sequential order.
No ? Haven't you been been listening to *anything* ?
I listen all relevant information.
*This is now the only relevant information as far as your debunked
*scenario goes, Muhammad Columbo:
*http://www.crank.net/911.html
When people who defend USA's official version of 9/11 don't break down any
research, they rename it as "crank". They are really big propagandist
people. They are big LIARS. And the most important, they are serial killers.
You forgot why you got your well-deserved award, Muhammad.
You are unable to break down ANY of the evidence of what happened on
9/11.
Not only are you UNABLE to break it down, you demonstrtated over the
last months that you are UNWILLING to break it down.
You REFUSED to address the evidence presented in the 9/11 Commission's
PUBLIC report; you refused to breakdown the evidence presented in the
NIST, ASCE, and FEMA reports.
You REFUSED to provide evidence from ANY of the people who handled the
wreakage of the Pentagon.
YOu REFUSE to answer ALL questions that you find inconvenient.
Now, Muhammad, WHY do you think YOUR scenario is listed on Crank Dot
Net, the site expsosing the IRRATIONAL cranks, kooks, and loons of the
Internet?
TELL US in your own words why you DO NOT understand what we have all
been telling you for months, Muhammad?
[/quote:d104016b35]
Maybe the real truth ( not his crazy fictional 'truth' ) is simply too difficult
for him to come to terms with ?
Some Moslems aren't prepared to accept that their 'brothers' could actually be so
evil. Denial amongst Moslems is commonplace.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
All what Sky Confusor told is LIES, insults, ... There is nothing truth.
USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
Begin to unsewer to that in a logical manner, then we can consider your
lies.
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128898942.357476.48230@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:4bab49c077]All what Sky Confusor told is LIES, insults, ... There is nothing truth.
[/quote:4bab49c077]
That you won the award of CRANKIEST on Crank Dot Net's website of
cranks, loon, and kooks on the internet is there for all to see:
http://www.crank.net/911.html
You forgot why you got your well-deserved award, Muhammad.
You are unable to break down ANY of the evidence of what happened on
9/11.
Not only are you UNABLE to break it down, you demonstrtated over the
last months that you are UNWILLING to break it down.
You REFUSED to address the evidence presented in the 9/11 Commission's
PUBLIC report; you refused to breakdown the evidence presented in the
NIST, ASCE, and FEMA reports.
You REFUSED to provide evidence from ANY of the people who handled the
wreakage of the Pentagon.
YOu REFUSE to answer ALL questions that you find inconvenient.
Now, Muhammad, WHY do you think YOUR scenario is listed on Crank Dot
Net, the site expsosing the IRRATIONAL cranks, kooks, and loons of the
Internet?
TELL US in your own words why you DO NOT understand what we have all
been telling you for months, Muhammad? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128905711.237099.214240@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[quote:8dbfb520df]
Wow. All the way up to one of the best kook lists eh.
I don't suppose he's aware of the levels of acknowledged stupidity he
had to rise to to get there
No, he's not, despite all of our concerted efforts to help Muhammad
Columbo see the truth.
[/quote:8dbfb520df]
You are unable to show one evidence. All your efforts are just trying to
descredit me. You are just personally agressing myself while you give no
reliable argument against my work.
If you want to do any thing for me, begin by unswering that question : HOW
and WHY four independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order?
[quote:8dbfb520df]Now he's hit rock bottom and is still in denial.
[/quote:8dbfb520df]
Don't worry for me : I am very away from bottom. I just see several people
who are unable to think a little bit to understand clear evidences. They
feel themself good while they think muslims kill non muslims in the name of
Allah. But in reality, their own government and religion are the lones who
makes this kind of murdering. Yes, the truth is hard to see in front. It is
easier to put it on others.
I know, you will answer nonesens totally away from that. Yo uare unable to
argue anything? You just repeat same nonesense. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:30 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:21:21 +0200, "MuhammadColumbo"
<muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote:
[quote:560bfbf7f5]
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
VBh2f.1225$647.1030@news01.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
It wasn't sequential
8:14 a.m. - Flight 11 hijacked
8:45 a.m. - Flight 175 hijacked Right time is 8:42
8:46 a.m. - Flight 11 crashes
8:54 a.m. - Flight 77 is hijacked
9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 crashes
9:28 a.m. - Flight 93 is hijacked Right time is 9:35
9:37 a.m. - Flight 77 crashes
10:03 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes
That is sequential hijack with a special charateristic : The following
plane deviates from its route some minutes before the precedent one's
crash.
Your claim was "When one plane ends its flight the following plane starts
the hijack."
You have right, I did a small mistake. I must tell :
"When one plane was about to end its flight the following plane starts the
hijack."
Or another possibility :
"When one plane was near to end its flight the following plane starts the
hijack."
[/quote:560bfbf7f5]
And muhamed idiot keeps changing his story. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:3719fcfdc3]"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128905711.237099.214240@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Wow. All the way up to one of the best kook lists eh.
I don't suppose he's aware of the levels of acknowledged stupidity he
had to rise to to get there
No, he's not, despite all of our concerted efforts to help Muhammad
Columbo see the truth.
You are unable to show one evidence.
[/quote:3719fcfdc3]
LOL. Boy are you ever stupid, Muhammad. YOU HAVE to support YOUR
scenario with evidence and facts. I have REPEATEDLY pointed out the
flaws and IMPOSSIBILITIES of your scenario and ask YOU to address them.
YOU refuse to support YOUR scenario every time. Do you understand that
it is YOUR resonsibility to support YOUR scenario with IRREFUTABLE
facts and evidence, Muhammad???????
WHY do you not understand this very BASIC concept?
[quote:3719fcfdc3]All your efforts are just trying to
descredit me. You are just personally agressing myself while you give no
reliable argument against my work.
[/quote:3719fcfdc3]
YOU have discredited yourself, Muhammad Columbo, and you know it. Until
you learn that it is YOUR responsibility to address ALL questions about
your scenario, you will be just another 9/11 conspiracy nut. Do you NOT
understand WHY you got listed on Crank Dot Net?
Are you BLIND, Muhammad Columbo?
Now, are you going to start addressing the falacies of your scenario or
not, Muhammad? It is YOUR responsibility to do so and you know it.
When will you start addressing the the falacies of your scenario,
Muhammad? And don't try to hide from THAT FACT anymore.
It is time for you to become an HONEST person and Muslim, Muhammad
Columbo.
Will you????? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
y4z2f.1319$647.1228@news01.roc.ny...
[quote:f27558830b]MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128900068.433432.29880@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
cDf2f.1210$647.787@news01.roc.ny...
But if ONE team must hijack four planes, the lone way to do it is in
sequential order as it happened on 9/11/2001.
It wasn't sequential
8:14 a.m. - Flight 11 hijacked
8:45 a.m. - Flight 175 hijacked Right time is 8:42
8:46 a.m. - Flight 11 crashes
8:54 a.m. - Flight 77 is hijacked
9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 crashes
9:28 a.m. - Flight 93 is hijacked Right time is 9:35
9:37 a.m. - Flight 77 crashes
10:03 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes
That is sequential hijack with a special charateristic : The following
plane
deviates from its route some minutes before the precedent one's crash.
hat
means the team ended its job just before the crash. That also means the
plane was able to reach its target without intervention of the team. That
means it has an automatic guiding system.
*The 'guidance system' was mad muslims bent on suicide..
In that case, the planes can not be hijacked in sequential order. Because
all planes had to be hijacked in the 10 to 30 minutes after take off.
That doesn't happen.
Please cite all instances of multiple hijackings involving the same group
for the same purpose, including relevant timelines, so they may be
compared to the events of 9/11.
[/quote:f27558830b]
I leave you to cite that yourself. But do we need to compare uncomparable
events? Hijacking planes by using on board installed automatic guidance
systems is first with 9/11. Hijacking 4 planes in a time of less than 2
hours is also first with 9/11. ...
All that means, ONLY USA is able to do that strikes inside US teritories. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
Begin to unsewer to that in a logical manner, then we can consider your
lies.
"Sky King" <skyking@scientist.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128972596.182306.170470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
[quote:ab3c36c42b]
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
All what Sky Confusor told is LIES, insults, ... There is nothing truth.[/quote:ab3c36c42b] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| MuhammadColumbo |
| Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Bertie the Bunyip" <nuny@fjukkin.bidness> a écrit dans le message de news:
Xns96EC787832BD2nunyfjukkinbidness@207.14.113.17...
[quote:84b97f42e8]"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in
news:434ab32d$0$9763$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be:
All what Sky Confusor told is LIES, insults, ... There is nothing
truth.
Ya know what th etruth is?
It's when you say something and your budy sez "ain't that the truth"
Period.
Bertie
[/quote:84b97f42e8]
Sorry, I don't understand what you wan to tell. English is not my first
language. Please check spelling. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sky King |
| Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 2:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:862ce24d74]USA administration, and all their personnal are unable to explain HOW and
WHY 4 independent teams hijacked 4 planes in a sequential order. The reason
is simple : That is impossible.
[/quote:862ce24d74]
Stop wasting time, Muhammad Columbo. You have work to do:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/37779d314786e552 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Frank Dwyer |
| Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
[quote:eb010fbcdf]"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
y4z2f.1319$647.1228@news01.roc.ny...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128900068.433432.29880@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
MuhammadColumbo wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-=Citlink=-.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
cDf2f.1210$647.787@news01.roc.ny...
But if ONE team must hijack four planes, the lone way to do it is in
sequential order as it happened on 9/11/2001.
It wasn't sequential
8:14 a.m. - Flight 11 hijacked
8:45 a.m. - Flight 175 hijacked Right time is 8:42
8:46 a.m. - Flight 11 crashes
8:54 a.m. - Flight 77 is hijacked
9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 crashes
9:28 a.m. - Flight 93 is hijacked Right time is 9:35
9:37 a.m. - Flight 77 crashes
10:03 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes
That is sequential hijack with a special charateristic : The following
plane
deviates from its route some minutes before the precedent one's crash.
hat
means the team ended its job just before the crash. That also means the
plane was able to reach its target without intervention of the team. That
means it has an automatic guiding system.
*The 'guidance system' was mad muslims bent on suicide..
In that case, the planes can not be hijacked in sequential order. Because
all planes had to be hijacked in the 10 to 30 minutes after take off.
That doesn't happen.
Please cite all instances of multiple hijackings involving the same group
for the same purpose, including relevant timelines, so they may be
compared to the events of 9/11.
I leave you to cite that yourself. But do we need to compare uncomparable
events? Hijacking planes by using on board installed automatic guidance
systems is first with 9/11. Hijacking 4 planes in a time of less than 2
hours is also first with 9/11. ...
[/quote:eb010fbcdf]
Since you admit that 9/11 was a unique event, then you can not claim
that all planes being hijacked within 30 minutes of take off "doesn't
happen".
Due to the uniqueness of the event, it happens exactly like that 100% of
the time.
[quote:eb010fbcdf]All that means, ONLY USA is able to do that strikes inside US teritories.
[/quote:eb010fbcdf] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tw |
| Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"MuhammadColumbo" <muhammad.columbo@swing.be> wrote in message
news:434c1845$0$25588$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
[quote:99b28d6f2f]
"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1128975263.971155.87070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
*You cannot accept the truth that suicide bombers are murdering their
*fellow Muslims because a mad mullah tells them to !
I can easily accept that. I know they do that, they are able to do that,
but
only when they are agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility to
defend themself.
[/quote:99b28d6f2f]
Please explain how the British citizens who blew up three tube trains and a
bus in London were being "agressed, attacked, killed without any possibility
to defend themself." They had every advantage a UK citizen has, they were
not oppressed, their freedom of worship was guaranteed, they were protected
by the full extent of English law and had full access to the democratic
process. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:41 am
|
|