|
Science Forum Index » Chemistry Forum » Genesis World Energy
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| constantine terss |
 Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Common Wisdom,
Anyone here heard anything of Genesis World Energy and their 'Edison
Device'?
Charlie
frcjt@msn.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Cary Kittrell |
| Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <BC237C44.3718%frconstantine@hotmail.com> constantine terss <frconstantine@hotmail.com> writes:
<
<Dear Common Wisdom,
<
<Anyone here heard anything of Genesis World Energy and their 'Edison
<Device'?
<
Heh. It's hard to find a whole lot of technical detail at their site,
isn't it? Fancy that.
Here's another site, one with a rather...um...skeptical take
on matters:
http://members.cox.net/john.lichtenstein/
-- cary |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Cary Kittrell |
| Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4jmLb.2377$6y6.62660@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> "Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> writes:
<
<"constantine terss" <frconstantine@hotmail.com> wrote in message
<news:BC237C44.3718%frconstantine@hotmail.com...
<> Dear Common Wisdom,
<>
<> Anyone here heard anything of Genesis World Energy and their 'Edison
<> Device'?
<
<It's hard to find much on the site but look at two items from the FAQ's
<Q: What makes the Genesis Project technology unique?
<A: The concept behind the Genesis Project is not new. Scientists have been
<experimenting with processes that can generate energy by separating the
<hydrogen and oxygen molecules contained in water for decades. The problem
<with these efforts was that they required more energy than they produced, or
<required specialized processes that were not commercially viable. The
<Genesis Project has achieved a technology breakthrough that can separate
<pure hydrogen and oxygen gases from ordinary water in a way that is
<scientifically efficient and economically practical.
<
< Q: What is the life expectancy of an Edison Device?
<A: Because the Edison Device has virtually no moving parts, the only parts
<that need routine replacement are inexpensive water filters. The life
<expectancy of the Edison Device is 20 years or more. Although each
<customer's energy needs are different, average all electric homes may use as
<little as 30 gallons of water over the device's expected 20-year life cycle.
<
< TANSTAAFL
<
<Besides, I don't need any water for my second generation PPM. This time I
<won't attach the output to the input until after I take pictures. But it
<made a nice fire.
<
Here's another ...somewhat...critical site:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2003/12/prweb93743.htm
Note especially the reference to a certain Hammacher Schlemmer product.
Most interesting.
-- cary |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mike Painter |
| Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 7:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"constantine terss" <frconstantine@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BC237C44.3718%frconstantine@hotmail.com...
Quote: Dear Common Wisdom,
Anyone here heard anything of Genesis World Energy and their 'Edison
Device'?
It's hard to find much on the site but look at two items from the FAQ's
Q: What makes the Genesis Project technology unique?
A: The concept behind the Genesis Project is not new. Scientists have been
experimenting with processes that can generate energy by separating the
hydrogen and oxygen molecules contained in water for decades. The problem
with these efforts was that they required more energy than they produced, or
required specialized processes that were not commercially viable. The
Genesis Project has achieved a technology breakthrough that can separate
pure hydrogen and oxygen gases from ordinary water in a way that is
scientifically efficient and economically practical.
Q: What is the life expectancy of an Edison Device?
A: Because the Edison Device has virtually no moving parts, the only parts
that need routine replacement are inexpensive water filters. The life
expectancy of the Edison Device is 20 years or more. Although each
customer's energy needs are different, average all electric homes may use as
little as 30 gallons of water over the device's expected 20-year life cycle.
TANSTAAFL
Besides, I don't need any water for my second generation PPM. This time I
won't attach the output to the input until after I take pictures. But it
made a nice fire. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
