Main Page | Report this Page
Religion Forum Index  »  Christian Orthodox Forum  »  ObamaCare Provides Free Cell Phones to Da Po' Folks...
Page 1 of 1    

ObamaCare Provides Free Cell Phones to Da Po' Folks...
Author Message
---agg---...
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:22 pm
Guest
Read the Message below, then click on the LINK below to see for yourself. It
is unbelievable!!! This will blow your mind. Please pass this on for
everyone to see.

[message posted on another forum]

I had a former employee call me earlier today inquiring about a job, and at
the end of the conversation he gave me his phone number. I asked the former
employee if this was a new cell phone number and he told me yes this was his
"Obama phone." I asked him what an "Obama phone" was and he went on to say
that welfare recipients are now eligible to receive (1) a FREE new phone and
(2) approx 70 minutes of FREE minutes every month. I was a little skeptical
so I Googled it and low and behold he was telling the truth. TAX PAYER MONEY
IS BEING REDISTRIBUTED TO WELFARE RECIPIENTS FOR FREE CELL PHONES. This
program was started earlier this year.

Enough is enough, the ship is sinking and it's sinking fast. The very
foundations that this country was built on are being shaken. The age old
concepts of God, family, and hard work have flown out the window and are
being replaced with "Hope and Change" and "Change we can believe in." You
can click on the link below to read more about the "Obama phone".just have a
barf bag ready.

https://www.safelinkwireless.com/EnrollmentPublic/Home.aspx
Back to top  
---AGG...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:38 pm
Guest
"Stephen Adams" <adamst at (no spam) no.spam> wrote in message
news:hcli2n02uao at (no spam) news7.newsguy.com...
Quote:
---agg--- <aggreen at (no spam) echoes.net> writes:

On 11/1/2009 7:25 AM, Stephen Adams wrote:
"---agg---"<Northern.Territory at (no spam) Pacific-Rim.nt.au> writes:

Read the Message below, then click on the LINK below to see for
yourself. It
is unbelievable!!! This will blow your mind. Please pass this on for
everyone to see.

https://www.safelinkwireless.com/EnrollmentPublic/Home.aspx

Just wait. The UN is working on making broadband internet access a
'basic human right' - and I can see the Obama crowd signing it. And
thus forcing the taxpayers to foot the bill...rather than the individual
user.

-Stephen

***Stupid fools. This was implemented last year, not by Obama. The
SafeLink Wireless service was launched by TracFone in Tennessee in
August 2008 and in Florida in September 2008. The program is in place so
that the very poor can reach out, and be reached, in case of emergencies.

***Reign in your paranoia and anger, Libertoidian hippie.

Moron. What *I* wrote was about the UN. Not about the cellphone
program. There is nothing paranoid about the denigration of REAL
rights by BS like this. It's no wonder nobody of import takes the
UN seriously.

-Stephen


***Thanks for recognizing that my imposter, who posts using a now phony
email address, is a moron.
Back to top  
---AGG...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:39 pm
Guest
"Alexander Arnakis" <invalid at (no spam) invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:eb6se59oeru67csvcpr6f33resdb8a9emc at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:53:47 -0500, "---agg---"
Northern.Territory at (no spam) Pacific-Rim.nt.au> wrote:

***Er...all the polls say the conservative coalition is growing strong
with
an overwhelming majority of Americans leaning to right of center.

Then how come self-identified Republicans are down to about 20% of the
electorate?

As Newt Gingrich says. you can have a "movement" with 20%. You can't
win elections.


***It's ideological, not party. Americans are realizing that there's too
many liberal Republicans.
Back to top  
Alexander Arnakis...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:00 pm
Guest
On 2 Nov 2009 03:02:58 GMT, Stephen Adams <adamst at (no spam) no.spam> wrote:
Quote:

The point is, IT IS NOT A RIGHT. We diminish our rights by claiming
that such trivialities are 'rights' and waste billions trying to protect
these mythical 'rights.'

If it's good policy, who cares if it's a "right"? Both rationales end

up taking you to the same place.

If a "right" is expressed in positive terms (that is, a right *to*
something), there's no problem making the policy argument for it,
either independently or in tandem with the "rights" rhetoric.

The same is not true if the "right" is expressed negatively, such as a
right *from* something. That's where the rights rhetoric takes
precedence over the policy argument.
Back to top  
Alexander Arnakis...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:19 pm
Guest
On 2 Nov 2009 03:01:43 GMT, Stephen Adams <adamst at (no spam) no.spam> wrote:
Quote:

Moron. What *I* wrote was about the UN. Not about the cellphone
program. There is nothing paranoid about the denigration of REAL
rights by BS like this. It's no wonder nobody of import takes the
UN seriously.

Everybody knows that the UN is a debating society and public relations

forum. That being the case, the real issue is how, as a country, to
make use of this opportunity most effectively.

When UN action goes beyond debate, such as in the various peacekeeping
operations, what's really happening is that the UN is providing
political cover for a Metternichian "concert of nations" situation, in
which the Great Powers do what is in their collective self-interest.

If the Great Powers don't agree, the UN does nothing. It was intended
to be that way, and that's the way it has always worked (except for
the one time that the Russians blundered and boycotted a Security
Council session that ended up authorizing intervention in Korea).

It's a myth that a bunch of Third-World countries are ganging up and
calling the shots through the UN. At most, the UN provides a safety
valve for Third-World dictators so that they can post their dissidents
and untrustworthy relatives as diplomats to the UN (as a sort of
benign exile). This just gives *us* the opportunity to recruit the
dissidents as future agents.
Back to top  
Alexander Arnakis...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:38 pm
Guest
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:39:32 -0500, "---AGG"
<Australian_Capital_Territory at (no spam) Pacific-Rim.act.au> wrote:
Quote:

***It's ideological, not party. Americans are realizing that there's too
many liberal Republicans.

Where *are* these "liberal Republicans"? You call Sens. Snowe and
Collins "liberal"? Gimme a break!
Back to top  
 
    Display posts from previous:  
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:50 am
Religion Forum Index
 

Powered by phpBB & ML | Privacy Policy / Disclaimer



Contact Us