As all honest people would have expected, irrational expectations from
me to furnish many of my back-up assertions or claims are futile. I
can only provide that which is there, not when it is not there
anymore. I can provide what Einstein quotes, but how can I show you
with back-up claims say eg..I saw Angels flying in the Indoor Stadiums
during one of the Christian meetings held in Singapore?

How the Demons, came in spirit forms doing their wicked deeds, and how
I watch them run away from my presence? How can I show you, sight and
sounds of those 40s Thai folks, possessed by devils cobbled in a room
waiting for deliverance, yakking and fiercely looking?

Thank God for Youtube, and many deliverance ministries could project
that, sight and sound.

These are Einstein quotes many had requested, and I present it to you:

In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human
mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no
God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the
support of such views.

"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God
is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share
the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is
mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of
religious indoctrination received in youth."Unquote.

The belief and our approach to Faith in God is a childlike one, just
as Einstein said, holds true and consistent with what Jesus teaches.”
Unless you are converted to be like a child, you shall in no wise
enter God’s Kingdom.

Einstein admiration for Jesus, and this part of history no one can
deny or gain-say, ever, because he made it clear to all by saying,’
Jesus is no myth’.

As for the catalog of miracles and divine interventions from God and
Angel’s activities, the iron-clad proof, many Churches have abundance
of it; because many millions saw and had those miracles in themselves.
These studies for the proof of God, His existence and divine miracles
had now reached gigantic proportions, and unfortunately some still
were not privilege to glimpse the glory of God.

Many excellent presentations by scholars and Theologians on God and
His creations, reasoning with intellectuals were more common, and
unfortunately only the humble and objective fellow would be able to be
enlightened.

Some folks prefer to have verifiable, repeatable, and testable on the
existence of God. The word of God, the Bible is there for them to
verify and study.The Bible never run away.

This piece of evidence is one of the proofs. Communications with God
and getting your prayers answered is repeatable daily, where the
Supernatural touches on the natural. Some prefer to have a lab to test
God, but God’s wisdom in revelations does not confine to a lab, but to
the entire world’s people and universe. God’s lab is so big, not
confined in one place, or person otherwise God would become minuscule.

Just like so many demanded me to given them moons and suns, according
to their fancies, otherwise,they say Frankie’s message is not
credible. They have raised so high expectation on me, but I feel those
who asked me to perform miracles in the name of Jesus for their
cancers, Aids or crippled condition to be healed more reasonable. In
my entire life I only raised one dead woman to life, of course in
Jesus name.

Who would buy that, assuming that I must write like PhD English,
making scientist-words and technical terms so as to sound credible? I
don’t play such games of deceits.

Sarah Palin was a journalist and Joybehar describe that she could not
construct one sentence properly. How to teach monkeys to climb a tree?
Sarah is good in English,so don't teach her again.

Ann Coulter found out Richard Dawkings deceits on the computer
simulation of the eye,pg208 godless.

Because Dawk could mumble profound English so he is very
educated,clever and so he must be right? The godless people of our
world may appreciate his nonsense, but for the honest folks, that is,
no, no.

What is the point of attacking my messages with insults and
incoherence? Does it not give more credence to it? The battle is
Truths against deception and lies; good versus evil. Why show yourself
as vulgar, making nonsensical comments and silly words?

It is the colours of evil and unrighteousness versus the Righteous,
the bottom-line where sane people look for to decide which is which,
or who is more credible. As the matters are very serious about our
eternity,which hangs on the balance, we sure do not want to die,
leaving this earth for not knowing what the gates of death is, and
what after-life is.

Does the known sufferings of our world carries on forever, say the
agony and anguish of our minds, or the pain in our stomach; heated-up
continually like in a Sauna, where there is no exit doors, and it is
forever? Or does the suffering is likening to being locked in a car-
boot, and stays there in the same condition, a tiny space, forever?

Or a tooth-ache where the pain never goes away? Or like a prison cell,
one stays there for eternity.

To whom shall we anchor our Faith, our belief and our Trust once we
are plunge into eternity? Did not Jesus says,” All liars, immoral
persons, adulterers, fornicators, homo, cowards, idolaters, godless
and slanderers shall have their part in the lake of fires? Where there
is weeping and gnashing of teeth, forever?

If you possess Drugs here, you will be hanged. Was it an intimidation,
a warning or does it threaten you to become Foreigners, and not a
Singaporean?( By the way, don’t argue like a fool and say, what drugs
am I alluding,etc etc.)

John wrote,’ For God so love the world that He gave His only Begotten
Son and whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but shall have
everlasting life”.

This is John’s witness, and his message for the world. Take it or
leave it.

Frankie Lee wrote, on 09-10-31 10:26 PM:



On Nov 1, 8:35 am, Cory Albrecht<coryalbre... at (no spam) hotmail.com>  wrote:
Frankie Lee wrote, on 09-10-30 05:28 AM:

On Oct 30, 9:50 am, Richo<m.richardso... at (no spam) gmail.com>    wrote:
sarcasm
Obviously I am not humble and objective enough.

**Me: I am sure when you are humble and objective,unlike crooks here
howling(evident of their blindness)otherwise they would make
reasonable noise,not monkey noises.

Frankie, you hypocrite, you're the *last* person to be talking about
objectivity.

You've already said that the reason you don't accept an old Earth or
evolutionary theory is because you simply don't believe it.

Not because you can actually back up your claims of fossilization or
radiometric dating being hoaxes, but that your disbelief is based purely
on the fallacious argument from incredulity.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn how radiometric dating works - you've shown that you don't
know how it works.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn how fossilization happens - you've shown that you don't
know how how it happens.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn why a vapour canopy is impossible - you've shown that you
don't know why it can't be.

And objective person, Frankie, would have gone an learned about science
and not be as appallingly ignorant as you are.

Frankie - do you think that God rewards lies and ignorance?

***There are many,who had posted and show why Fossilisations does not
work.I had shown quite a few objections objectively,pls check for
yourself.

No, you have not shown any objections to fossilization other than
argument from incredulity and an unsupported claim that fossils are hoaxes.



I had explained why Old earth is a false assumption.You want me to go
over it again?

Again, no you have not explained anything as you never give any evidence
for your claims and rely upon fallacious argument from incredulity.

At best, the only thing you have shown is your ignorance.

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:26:20 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
leeahk... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:



On Nov 1, 8:35 am, Cory Albrecht <coryalbre... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Frankie Lee wrote, on 09-10-30 05:28 AM:

On Oct 30, 9:50 am, Richo<m.richardso... at (no spam) gmail.com>  wrote:
sarcasm
Obviously I am not humble and objective enough.

**Me: I am sure when you are humble and objective,unlike crooks here
howling(evident of their blindness)otherwise they would make
reasonable noise,not monkey noises.

Frankie, you hypocrite, you're the *last* person to be talking about
objectivity.

You've already said that the reason you don't accept an old Earth or
evolutionary theory is because you simply don't believe it.

Not because you can actually back up your claims of fossilization or
radiometric dating being hoaxes, but that your disbelief is based purely
on the fallacious argument from incredulity.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn how radiometric dating works - you've shown that you don't
know how it works.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn how fossilization happens - you've shown that you don't
know how how it happens.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn why a vapour canopy is impossible - you've shown that you
don't know why it can't be.

And objective person, Frankie, would have gone an learned about science
and not be as appallingly ignorant as you are.

Frankie - do you think that God rewards lies and ignorance?

***There are many,who had posted and show why Fossilisations does not
work.I had shown quite a few objections objectively,pls check for
yourself.

I had explained why Old earth is a false assumption.You want me to go
over it again?

No, you have merely lied about the scientific evidence. You have made no
explanations.

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:10:44 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
leeahk... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:



On Oct 30, 3:08 pm, "Syd M." <pdwrigh... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 7:51 pm, Frankie Lee <leeahk... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Oct 30, 7:31 am, Free Lunch <lu... at (no spam) nofreelunch.us> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:20:45 -0700 (PDT), in alt.talk.creationism
Frankie Lee <leeahk... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
5686a1b8-fe78-495b-b012-1d1a3abfb... at (no spam) s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>:

As all honest people would have expected, irrational expectations from
me to furnish many of my back-up assertions or claims are futile. I
can only provide that which is there, not when it is not there
anymore. I can provide what Einstein quotes, but how can I show you
with back-up claims say eg..I saw Angels flying in the Indoor Stadiums
during one of the Christian meetings held in Singapore?

How the Demons, came in spirit forms doing their wicked deeds, and how
I watch them run away from my presence? How can I show you, sight and
sounds of those 40s Thai folks, possessed by devils cobbled in a room
waiting for deliverance, yakking and fiercely looking?

Thank God for Youtube, and many deliverance ministries could project
that, sight and sound.

These are Einstein quotes many had requested, and I present it to you:

In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human
mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no
God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the
support of such views.

"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God
is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share
the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is
mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of
religious indoctrination received in youth."Unquote.

The belief and our approach to Faith in God is a childlike one, just
as Einstein said, holds true and consistent with what Jesus teaches.”
Unless you are converted to be like a child, you shall in no wise
enter God’s Kingdom.

As you are pointing out, Einstein rejects the doctrine of God.

Einstein admiration for Jesus, and this part of history no one can
deny or gain-say, ever, because he made it clear to all by saying,’
Jesus is no myth’.

He does not accept Him as part of the Godhead.

As for the catalog of miracles and divine interventions from God and
Angel’s activities, the iron-clad proof, many Churches have abundance
of it; because many millions saw and had those miracles in themselves.
These studies for the proof of God, His existence and divine miracles
had now reached gigantic proportions, and unfortunately some still
were not privilege to glimpse the glory of God.

They offer unsubstantiated claims, not evidence. We're still waiting for
you to present evidence. So far, you have shown us that you were wrong
about Einstein.

...

***Where was I wrong about Einstein?Back up your claims with prove or
you are a liar.You have been playing the role of a false accuser,a
slanderer.
You know yourself, your own mischief.

Any reader here can see that.
I provide evidence,

Just claiming you did will not help you.
Cough up this 'evidence,' or shut up.

PDW

***You mean u still have not seen it?

You never presented any, you reprobate.

On Nov 1, 8:35 am, Cory Albrecht <coryalbre... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Frankie Lee wrote, on 09-10-30 05:28 AM:

On Oct 30, 9:50 am, Richo<m.richardso... at (no spam) gmail.com>  wrote:
sarcasm
Obviously I am not humble and objective enough.

**Me: I am sure when you are humble and objective,unlike crooks here
howling(evident of their blindness)otherwise they would make
reasonable noise,not monkey noises.

Frankie, you hypocrite, you're the *last* person to be talking about
objectivity.

You've already said that the reason you don't accept an old Earth or
evolutionary theory is because you simply don't believe it.

Not because you can actually back up your claims of fossilization or
radiometric dating being hoaxes, but that your disbelief is based purely
on the fallacious argument from incredulity.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn how radiometric dating works - you've shown that you don't
know how it works.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn how fossilization happens - you've shown that you don't
know how how it happens.

A person who was truly objective on the subject, Frankie, would actually
go and learn why a vapour canopy is impossible - you've shown that you
don't know why it can't be.

And objective person, Frankie, would have gone an learned about science
and not be as appallingly ignorant as you are.

Frankie - do you think that God rewards lies and ignorance?

***There are many,who had posted and show why Fossilisations does not
work.I had shown quite a few objections objectively,pls check for
yourself.

I had explained why Old earth is a false assumption.You want me to go
over it again?