 |
|
| Religion Forum Index » Christian Roman Catholic Forum » Research Shows Abortion-Breast Cancer Link... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| J... |
 Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Ladies, don't let radical pro-abortionists convince you to commit an act so
depraved that it can lead to depression, drug addiction, perhaps suicide,
and also can have devasting physical consequences. Chief amongst them is the
high risk for breast cancer. Research has shown over and over again the
direct link between abortion and breast cancer. Don't let liberal rhetoric
about the evils of 'pro-lifers' fool you; we are dedicated to the interests
of both mother and child. Trust us.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat5550.html
Komen for the Cure Races as Research Shows Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- With October as breast cancer awareness
month, Komen for the Cure is sponsoring races and events across the country
to raise awareness of the potentially fatal disease. However, Komen isn't
providing women with information on a way to help prevent breast cancer by
not having an abortion.
Although abortion advocates, and Komen, dismiss the research, experts have
clearly shown an abortion-breast cancer link.
The upshot? Having an abortion increases a woman's risk of having breast
cancer while carrying a pregnancy to term lowers it.
A July study done on women in Turkey who had abortions found a 66 percent
increased risk of contracting breast cancer as a result.
Dr. Vahit Ozmen and his colleagues at the Istanbul Medical Faculty at
Istanbul University and Magee-Women's hospital in Pittsburgh conducted the
new retrospective study.
They published their findings in the April 2009 issue of the World Journal
of Surgical Oncology and examined women who, between January 2000 and
December 2006, were admitted to clinics of Istanbul Medical Faculty for
examination.
The researchers said that their findings showed abortion was "significantly
associated with increased breast cancer risk."
"Breast cancer risk was found to be increased in women with ... induced
abortion (95% confidence interval)" and an age above 35 years-old at the
time of a first live birth.
"Our study revealed that spontaneous abortion was associated with the
decreased risk of breast cancer in univariate analysis whereas induced
abortion was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both univariate
and multivariable analyses," they wrote.
In 2007, a study published in the Journal of American Physicians and
Surgeons found abortion is the best predictor of whether women will contract
breast cancer.
Patrick Carroll of the Pension and Population Research Institute in London
conducted this new study and showed that countries with higher abortion
rates, such as England & Wales, could expect a substantial increase in
breast cancer incidence.
"Induced abortion is found to be the best predictor, and fertility is also a
useful predictor," he writes. "The increase in breast cancer incidence
appears to be best explained by an increase in abortion rates, especially
nulliparous abortions, and lower fertility."
Komen is also not telling women that, when they have an unplanned pregnancy,
having a baby lowers the breast cancer risk.
A study by Harvard University researchers in April 2007 contained
confirmation that carrying a pregnancy to term helps reduce a woman's risk.
The researchers affirmed previous studies showing that a full-term pregnancy
before age 35 reduces the long-term risk of developing breast cancer.
They said the fact was well-established and that their own research renewed
the evidence for it.
Karin Michels of Brigham and Women's Hospital, who headed the study, said
that someone who has had an abortion "misses out on the potential benefit
she would have had if she had a full-term pregnancy."
Also, researchers at the German Cancer Research Center found a woman's risk
of contracting breast cancer is lowered and the decrease is more substantial
the more pregnancies a woman has had.
Dr. Janet Daling, who considers herself pro-abortion, brought the
abortion-breast cancer link into the mainstream when her 1994 research found
that among women who had been pregnant at least once experienced a 50
percent increase in breast cancer risk when having an included abortion.
Other subgroups found that women who had a family history of breast cancer
experienced an 80 percent increased risk when having an abortion and
teenagers saw their risk doubled if having an abortion before the age of
18 -- with all teens with a family history and an abortion getting breast
cancer.
The later statistic should be considered a big public health issue because
30,000-50,000 teenagers every year with a family history of breast cancer
have an abortion and all of them are likely contracting breast cancer in
later years as a result.
Citation: Ozmen et al. Breast cancer risk factors in Turkish women - a
university hospital-based nested case control study. World J Surg Onc
2009;7:37.
Related web sites:
Abstract of the Turkey study - http://wjso.com/content/7/1/37
Carroll study - http://www.jpands.org/vol12no3/carroll.pdf
--
J Young
Jvisions at (no spam) live.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ray Fischer... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
J <Jvisions at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Quote: Ladies, don't let radical pro-abortionists
As opposed to you terrorist nazi turds?
This is what the medical experts have to say:
In February 2003, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened a
workshop of over 100 of the world's leading experts who study
pregnancy and breast cancer risk. Workshop participants reviewed
existing population-based, clinical, and animal studies on the
relationship between pregnancy and breast cancer risk, including
studies of induced and spontaneous abortions. They concluded that
having an abortion or miscarriage does not increase a woman's
subsequent risk of developing breast cancer.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer at (no spam) sonic.net |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:47:30 -0400,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" <Jvisions at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Quote: Research Shows Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
Bullcrap!!!
But even if there *were* a MINISCULE link, it would be NOTHING
in comparison to the LOSS of the countless future opportunities that
intelligent and sensible girls and women AVOID by accessing the
REMEDY of abortion.
It compassionately RE-SETS those future opportunities for 57 million
girls and women per year, worldwide, and REVERSES completely the
pathology of UN-wanted pregnancy. It makes it as though the ill-timed
pregnancies had never happened, and thus is the closest thing to a
problem-solving time machine that exists in medical science for so many
people.
Thankfully, hateful and ignorant DOLTS like you will ALWAYS LOSE,
"IBen." You and your ilk are laughingstocks. And very appropriately so.
Members of your own church, despite its being the world's largest
and most dogmatic cult, have a higher percentage of those who sensi-
bly access the remedy of abortion (and give the finger to Pope Benedict
Arnold in the process) than the general population. THAT should tell
you just how MUCH you are tilting impotently at windmills while making
total fools of yourselves.
-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <xanadu222 at (no spam) mchsi.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://spifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion, just like aspirin, is nothing more than a valuable
REMEDY for an unwanted medical condition. Folks who are
Pro-Choice are not "pro-abortion" any more than there are any
such people as those who are "pro-aspirin." People who are
Pro-Choice regarding abortion defend the right of all girls and
women to have ready, unfettered, and legal ACCESS to that
remedy. And they would defend the right of girls and women
to have no impairments to ACCESS to the right to full gestation,
if *that* were their choice -- if there were any loons running
around seeking to deprive them of that option. Thus, Pro-
Choicers are sometimes misperceived as favoring one option
over the other. They do not. They support both options
EQUALLY. The misperception happens because the remedy of
abortion is the *only* one of the two options that has a crowd
of hateful, screeching, and ignorant bigots opposing it.
ANTI-Choice louts irrationally seek to impose immense
hardship upon more than a million girls and women per year,
in the USA, by again FORCING them to gestate to term,
against their will, as was the case in the Pre-Roe vs. Wade
Dark Ages. A very real, 9-month-long form of RAPE. Such
a scenario would cause the loss of HUGE ranges of future
opportunities to those girls and women, unless they were
able to afford travel to FREE locations where abortion was
still safe, legal and unfettered. ANTI-Choicers are sociopaths,
and are totally without excuse. (And to date, NO Anti-Choicer
or RRR Cultist (usually the same people) has ever yet been
able to refute ANY of the points made in this article. Which
shows how*monumentally* morally-bankrupt they truly are.)
To see the grave and long-term DANGER that threatened
America, if McCain had won the 2008 election, please read these;
We were VERY lucky!! in each case the components of the URLS
follow, in case one or both get shortened in posting.) ---
http://apifar.blogspot.com/2007/11/vital-warning-unseen-unheeded-now.html
http://
apifar.blogspot.com/
2007/11/vital-warning-unseen-unheeded-now.html
http://apifar.blogspot.com/2007/12/surreal-alternate-reality-if-democrats.html
http://
apifar.blogspot.com/
2007/12/surreal-alternate-reality-if-democrats.html
Abortions obtained by girls and women terminate three of
the four of the reproductive-process entities (RPEs): zygotes,
embryoes & fetuses, up until the 7th month** of gestation)
which have ALL of these characteristics in common with the
first stage -- gametes (sperm and ova):
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness*
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend the later three stages of the reproductive
process but NOT the Stage One entities (gametes).
** (AFTER the 7th month of gestation begins, conscious
awareness may be possible, but all the other of the above-
listed attributes still apply. (But by then, the ONLY abortions
being performed are for medical emergencies.) In fact, the
procedure that Anti-Choicers LYINGLY call "partial-birth
abortion" NEVER was. It is the MID-term procedure whose
REAL name is ID&E: intact Dilation and Extraction. Which
was almost always done around 4-1/2 MONTHS *before*
birth typically occurs. Anti-Choicers are almost universally
DEVOID of honest. And usually, too, of much in the way
of intelligence.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans; 83% of them:
-- In NO way condemns abortion.
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion.
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of RPEs as people.
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That it regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by it's immense emphasis on the import-
ance it ascribes to BIRTH order, BIRTHrights. and
first-BORNS.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths.
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization.
-- Thus making gametes (the Stage One RPEs) *equal*
in worth to the other three stages.
-- More than a QUADRILLION gametes are electively
aborted DAILY, worldwide... by *men.* All of
which had been *potential* and unique people.
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately.
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels.
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision.
-- Most women have NO regrets afterward.
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities to
PRE-ill-timed pregnancy levels. Immediately!
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy.
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16.
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term.
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later.
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out,
and those losing the chance to pursue many of the
future opportunities that they formerly had had.
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation.
-- Avoid bringing a child into a less-loving home.
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment.
-- Wait until timing is better before having children.
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved.
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home.
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods.
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals.
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful.
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions.
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973.
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them.
-- Between 1973 and 2008, 45 million abortions have been done.
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better .
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 had reached 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the 21st century to date,
in the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic
period of time for any nation in the entire history of the
world, despite temporary fluctuations.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is normally QUITE strong, and will be again, once the current and
temporary worldwide recession has run its course. And a strong
U.S. economy benefits the entire world.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:25 pm
|
|