 |
|
| Religion Forum Index » Scientology Forum » Quiz (SPs) |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Gerry Armstrong |
 Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SPs for 800, Alex.
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i5738
I'm trying to find out if Mormonism sells IQ increases by the hour
like Scientology does?
A point per hour of Mormonism could explain why it's the intelligence
community's preferred religion. Ken Jennings is their poster genius.
Does anyone know if the Mormons run an IQ-increasing scam like the
Scientologists?
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Spacetraveler |
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 2:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Gerry Armstrong |
| Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 19 Jul 2004 01:14:57 -0700, spacetraveler2000@hotmail.com
(Spacetraveler) wrote:
Quote: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in message news:<7imlf0pj6oecbq7ui0ac04tvfb6us9se1u@4ax.com>...
SPs for 800, Alex.
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i5738
I'm trying to find out if Mormonism sells IQ increases by the hour
like Scientology does?
A point per hour of Mormonism could explain why it's the intelligence
community's preferred religion. Ken Jennings is their poster genius.
Does anyone know if the Mormons run an IQ-increasing scam like the
Scientologists?
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
Gerry,
Please follow up! Live up to your own words: "I have hoped a long
time to have a conversation with a Scientologist on this basis."
Yes, I see where you've said that. Good on the TR-3. Here's my
response, also posted elsewhere:
The basis was what you implied in your statement to which I was
responding. You implied with your assertion about an "unfinished
communication" that you were seeking what in Scientology is known as a
"communication cycle" with me. So, e.g. I would originate a
communication to you, you would receive it, originate an answer or
acknowledgement back to me, and thus end the cycle. A finished
communication.
Such a comm cycle, that finishes communications, would require on your
part duplication and understanding.
Instead, you pretended non-duplication and non-understanding. There
isn't any big deal about that, because it is the way Scientologists
and their ops have communicated to and about me me for more than two
decades. You implied that unlike all other Scientologists you were
going to be different, that you were going to duplicate and
understand, and thus finish communications. And I gave you the benefit
of the doubt and responded that I have hoped a long time to have a
conversation with a Scientologist on this basis.
Here's an example from the communication cycle you're pestering me to
finish:
[Quote]
Quote: I'd like you to quote ALL of Hubbard's lies. That would be very useful
in this discussion of honesty relating to Scientology.
In my opinion it is dishonest to quote the 1967 fair game issue & the
21 Oct 1968 issue, but not the 21 July 1968 issue, nor the the 6 Oct
1970 issue, sorry. At least in writing as these issues lay out, the
practice of fair gaiming was cancelled. I said at least IN WRITING.
May be as you say they continued with it any way, but this is a
different matter. So treat them differently. Tell about both these
sides. If you don't mention them and people will find out about them
later on (and I have been throwing these issues in peoples faces
lately), they will start being critcal about what you have to say
elsewhere.
[End Quote]
What you've done here is a diversion tactic. You demonstrably did not
want or provide actual communication cycles, so it makes little sense
to waste much time trying to give you what you don't want.
Quote:
Show us that you have really understood scientology procedures.
I understand, e.g., the "Suppressive Person" doctrine. See my
understanding here: http://www.suppressiveperson.org/
Now it's your turn to show us that you really understand this very
basic Scientology concept.
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:27 am
|
|