 |
|
| Religion Forum Index » Christian Forum - General Discussion » God and the godless.1... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| FRANKIE LEE... |
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
To believe in Atheism, which mean there is no God, or believing in
wrong gods or goddesses, or worst to believe in fallible–man’s theory,
anchoring your Faith upon them, these are all tragic tales of humanity
beyond the scope of known sufferings.
How then are we to know which is the true Lord? What solid iron-clad
evidence can we have on something which is spiritual?
Atheisms are religion in itself, telling others that there is no God
in existence, hiding under the pretext of so-called supporting
scientific evidences of how human were evolved from apes, and man was
not created by God.
Despite history of Atheism’s logic which spanned hundreds of years,
which can be seen in Communisms, their brutalities towards fellow
human race, nothing seem to convince them of their follies. At the
height of Communisms, all religious people were persecuted and
tortured most insanely and cruelly. The logics that man’s death would
be like matter, where there is no soul or an after life to account,
actually accounts for such inhumane and wicked deeds.
This is the simplest rationale for all who embraced Atheisms, where
moralities are thrown into garbage can. If we are only accountable to
this span of life, we must do what we want, appreciate all that is
around us, things or nature; and being a moral person is absolutely
nonsensical, to the point of being an idiot.
Shall we not become liars? Shall we not keep secrets? Shall we not do
dark deeds, where the possibilities of being uncovered are nil, where
there is no higher power watching us? If the nature and human common
sense could aid us to become a good person, are we not reverting to
the survival of the fittest, the Aryan concept of Hitler, and the
Maoist ideologue of government?
It should be’ each man to himself’.Atheistic beliefs had been the most
dangerous and wicked forms and modes ever known to humankind. Without
any clear goals governing moralities; history of Communism show us
what evil can be sprouted from those sets of thinking. Try to take out
laws in any country and left it to its own devices, shall we not see
anarchist to grand scales?
This simple experiment doesn’t seem to sink in to so-called rational
folks.
Religions also had harmed our world, just as much Atheism was.
Religion that taught us having sex with a 9 year old girl and the
after-life utopia if one were to fly into World Trade Center killing
innocents would show our religious faith as sound, and that deeds
please the god; and ultimately in Heaven, God will give us 70s
virgins: these are serious perversion known to be very disgusting and
despicable.
Mutilating woman’s genital and oppression of women should be the
practice in Religion, only goes to show evident that such religion is
absolutely untenable, and those who participate in it must have
serious mental disorders.
Torturing others, like the Inquisitions should also enlighten us of
such barbarities cannot be of sane religion, nor credibility be
ascribe to their beliefs.
Praying to images and idols, which were made by human hands supposing
the arts of man to be of higher intelligent forces other than
themselves, in itself very incredible.
The cults of Religion which teaches us evil is good, and good is evil,
of course it reveals to discerning Individuals that something is
seriously wrong, and our antenna should be up.
What should be even more scary and terrifying in our days were,
moralities were seen as subjective, and we should see rights or wrongs
in relative fashion, moral relatives and moral equivalences. Plainly
it meant there are nothing absolutes, and many things are not clear-
cut, and there are many gray areas. In other words, there is no
standard or final authority on morals, and the human behaviors can be
anything, like all apes.
The UN labored over the terms as to what is a Terrorist, or what
terrorism meant; it was so tortured by definitions and we saw no
answers; does it not then show a new form of evil rising in our days?
The Bible speaks of religion to mean as: reaching out to the orphans,
helping widows and the less fortunate of our society. Why would
selfish people want to follow up such religion of benevolence to
others and society? If they refuse to do such noble deeds, like Bill
Gates at least they shouldn’t attack the Bible, isn’t it?
The stories of atrocities in the Bible don’t mean we should do
atrocities. The instructions from the Bible mean we must do its
advice. As a whole, the major instructions of the bible, the overall
message, and the summary of it all,the core, then what is it?
We shouldn’t be selective. So here it is:
To love God and to love one another, for this hang all the laws and
the prophet’s instruction.
How then to know this God of the Bible is true? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 12:24 am, FRANKIE LEE <leeahk... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: To believe in Atheism, which mean there is no God,
BZZZT! Wrong answer!
Since you've now made it obvious you have no idea as to what atheism
actually *is*, the rest of your pathetic screed is irrelevant.
snip
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Uncle Vic... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, "Alex W." <ingilt at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:15:43 -0500, Uncle Vic wrote:
One fine day in alt.atheism, "Alex W." <ingilt at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:04:17 -0400, Brian E. Clark wrote:
In article <73d85d99-cee6-48fa-a5bb-f15e5d98c480 at (no spam)
2g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, leeahkwee at (no spam) yahoo.com says...
***Obviously you are describing yourself as inane,for you could not
even show one credible logic to support your assertions.
It's apparent you haven't mastered English syntax yet. I
hope that means you aren't a native speaker of the
language.
Don't blame him; it is clear to me that babelfish hasn't mastered
English sentence structures yet.
I didn't know that Bablefish could translate Moronese.
I know of a redneck translator, so why not?
I'll have to google that up. LOL!
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
your face when you push them down the stairs. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Frankie Lee... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 31, 1:56 am, Roger Pearse <roger.pea... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 28, 11:40 pm, SkyEyes <skyey... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2:16 pm, FRANKIE LEE <leeahk... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
2. "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life" is a phrase borrowed (like
most of the rest of christianity) from other "savior" religions. It
isn't unique to christianity.
Me: Jesus Christ is the only person who have said these words,
Actually, no. Go study up on the following saviors: Mithra; Horus;
Attis; Krishna. There are other more obscure ones, but those will
keep you busy for a while.
***No,no.Jesus is the Person who had said those words.
Quote:
This is most strange. Are you claiming to have "studied up" on all
this? As opposed to doing a google search and repeating what seemed
convenient? Because I'm sorry to tell you that these words are NOT
found in any other myth.
Attis, a Greek savior-god
***You are wrong.
Quote:
Is he? According to which ancient source? The point about Attis is
that he chopped his willy off. That doesn't sound much like salvation
to me.
(and probably the one St. Paul modeled Christ after),
***There is something wrong the way you dissect stories.
Quote:
??? Any evidence for your claim? I don't know of any, but of course
if you do, you will produce it?
In repeating hearsay, you're repeating some very crude lies. Do you
feel like defending lies? If so, why, for heavens' sake?
was also born on December 25. And he was crucified.
***Jesus was not born in 25.
If you suppose all your references were accurate,then you already
concede that Jesus Christ and his words are true.AD/BC
timeline,remember?If you cannot grasp the deep rationales of Ad/BC,you
wouldn't get it anyway.
---------------------------
Quote:
Not in any ancient tex he wasn't (on either account).
And he rose from the dead.
No he didn't. That was the point of his myth; that father Zeus would
not resurrect him, disapproving of castration as a remedy for
adultery. Whoever you copied clearly knew no ancient Greek mythology
whatever.
He predated Jesus by quite a bit.
Did he? Do you know this, or merely suppose it?
Oh! And *do* read up onMithra. His cult gave us the imagery of
being "washed in the blood." Because followers ofMithraactually
*did* bathe in the blood of sacrifical animals.
If you took your own advice, insolently given as it is, you would
discover that the taurobolium is attributed to Mithras in no ancient
source.
Yup, christianity is one big syncretic hoax.
Should you have evidence for this, documented from ancient sources and
backed by leading scholars, it could be discussed, but I fear you have
no idea and assert it merely as a convenient jeer.
Have fun finding it out.
Pride goes before a fall, it seems...
Is this atheism, to you? To profess knowledge that you do not
possess, learning on subjects where you repeat only hearsay? If so,
atheism is not for any intelligent person.
Good luck with it, and be more sceptical next time.
All the best,
Roger Pearse |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:29 pm
|
|