On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole
? ??? ? <usenetlegends00... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:





x-no-archive:
On Oct 16, 2:25 am, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:27:54 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole

----->???? <usenetlegends00... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
x-no-archive:

4s00th wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:21:10 -0700, ne... at (no spam) millions.com wrote:

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT), David
farookd... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

Re: Finding the truth and abandoning the fairy tale taboos put into
place by the Godhead priests
This is a message of hope for children and enlightened individuals
everywhere.

If you'll examine both beastiality and necrophilia you will find that
besides the antiquated taboos associated with participation they are
totally victimless crimes. You cannot insult the dead can you? The
body is only a shell, what is wrong with expressing your love in that
manner? The world is full of hate and war, we must allow our minds to
expand and accept new concepts.

When my father passed away {god rest his soul} I had a fantasy of
fondling his scrotum. I was able to make this fantasy a reality and
it
was good, really good!!! The orgasm I achieved was earth shattering
and like none I have experienced since. There's nothing wrong with
expressing your love in such a manner, just as there's nothing wrong
with expressing your love with a non human entity such as a K-9.
Society makes it dirty or wrong with it's unfounded taboos. Sadly,
only egalitarian intellectuals like myself can see through the
centuries of deception made possible by the priests of Godhead.

In some parts of the world incest is considered to be a normal part
of
the child's sex education. Any harm arises from a power imbalance
between the instigator and the other party. More harm is caused by
the
intervention of social workers and police than is caused by incest.
If
force or coercion is involved then it is rape and sexual abuse. That
is never all right.

Teenagers can be responsible but Age Of Consent laws take away that
responsibility and substitute fear of getting caught. This forces the
problem into hiding. It should be brought out into the light and
looked at calmly and rationally without all the hysteria displayed by
you, and your idiot fellow haters, as you attempt to disrupt support
groups with your hatred of differences between people and the
attempts
of some to solve what they perceive as a problem.

I want to free children from the tyranny of externally imposed
celibacy. It is about giving children the right to choose with whom
they will have sex.

Dog gone it, David, you're just another asshole.

DCI

You ought to be aware that this post was NOT made by David but by a
jackass who has been posting such nonsense continuously lately. I
don't always agree with David -- but I've never seen him endorse
necrophilia or zoophilia.

If he finds children sexually attractive then nothing would surprise
me
about david the pervert. If he'll fuck a child why wouldn't he fuck a
corpse? It takes a bona-fide deviant to find either one sexually
appealing.

He does seem to like incest and pedophilia,
and that is where we generally disagree as I don't care what
consenting adults do, but messing with minors is off limits! And, ftr,
I have never seen any evidence that David has done so -- just that he
doesn't see it as such an absolute no-no the way that I do.

-- 4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com

Everything posted lately falls in line with david simpsons line of
thought.
Of course a fucking pedophile like 4s00th would attempt a smokescreen

Of course a fucking liar like the bo0b would perpetuate a lie.

Go fuck yerself, you stinking deviant. You KNOW simpson is a fucking
deviant, you said so yourself. Now you let your hate for yours truly
stand in the way and you lie. Nothing ever changes with you, does it
pedophile? Right down to the post editing we can expect from you
EVERY time. Yer a predictable little slug and as always the
seconds
it takes to correct yer censprship is worth it to prove to you that
yer
wasting yer time. Got it?

Aw, did I hurt his little feelings?

Get over it.

David may be a deviant,

but then he's no more deviant than you --

maybe even less so. At least he doesn't blindly hate people he's never
met and accuse them of doing things he couldn't possibly know whether
they did or not.

And he certainly doesn't deserve you perpetuating those lies posted by
a remarkably stupid forger.

I seem to recall you getting whacked out
every time we mention those alleged forgeries about you wanting to
suck dick and share your wife's shaved, squirting cunt!

So why is it
funny when someone forges 1 person, but not funny when someone forges
you?

Oh, that's right -- you're the great hero of Usenet -- still doing
nothing more than impotently calling people names and making rude
remarks.

Oh, and it's exceptionally easy to get rid of the cross-posts -- I
just set my newsreader to ONLY reply to the group in which I am
reading!

going to anymore! But I guess that's something you goo-goo idiots
can't do, not actually using anything so sophisticated as a
newsreader.

On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:22:05 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole





???? <usenetlegends0... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
x-no-archive:
On Oct 17, 1:12 am, pedophile Steven Hylton 4s00th
4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole
? ??? ? <usenetlegends00... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

x-no-archive:
On Oct 16, 2:25 am, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:27:54 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole

----->???? <usenetlegends00... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
x-no-archive:

4s00th wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:21:10 -0700, ne... at (no spam) millions.com wrote:

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT), David
farookd... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

Re: Finding the truth and abandoning the fairy tale taboos put into
place by the Godhead priests
This is a message of hope for children and enlightened individuals
everywhere.

If you'll examine both beastiality and necrophilia you will find that
besides the antiquated taboos associated with participation they are
totally victimless crimes. You cannot insult the dead can you? The
body is only a shell, what is wrong with expressing your love in that
manner? The world is full of hate and war, we must allow our minds to
expand and accept new concepts.

When my father passed away {god rest his soul} I had a fantasy of
fondling his scrotum. I was able to make this fantasy a reality and
it
was good, really good!!! The orgasm I achieved was earth shattering
and like none I have experienced since.  There's nothing wrong with
expressing your love in such a manner,  just as there's nothing wrong
with expressing your love with a non human entity such as a K-9.
Society makes it dirty or wrong with it's unfounded taboos. Sadly,
only egalitarian intellectuals like myself can see through the
centuries of deception made possible by the priests of Godhead..

In some parts of the world incest is considered to be a normal part
of
the child's sex education. Any harm arises from a power imbalance
between the instigator and the other party. More harm is caused by
the
intervention of social workers and police than is caused by incest.
If
force or coercion is involved then it is rape and sexual abuse.. That
is never all right.

Teenagers can be responsible but Age Of Consent laws take away that
responsibility and substitute fear of getting caught. This forces the
problem into hiding. It should be brought out into the light and
looked at calmly and rationally without all the hysteria displayed by
you, and your idiot fellow haters, as you attempt to disrupt support
groups with your hatred of differences between people and the
attempts
of some to solve what they perceive as a problem.

I want to free children from the tyranny of externally imposed
celibacy.  It is about giving children the right to choose with whom
they will have sex.

Dog gone it, David, you're just another asshole.

DCI

You ought to be aware that this post was NOT made by David but by a
jackass who has been posting such nonsense continuously lately. I
don't always agree with David -- but I've never seen him endorse
necrophilia or zoophilia.

If he finds children sexually attractive then nothing would surprise
me
about david the pervert. If he'll fuck a child why wouldn't he fuck a
corpse? It takes a bona-fide deviant to find either one sexually
appealing.

 He does seem to like incest and pedophilia,
and that is where we generally disagree as I don't care what
consenting adults do, but messing with minors is off limits! And, ftr,
I have never seen any evidence that David has done so -- just that he
doesn't see it as such an absolute no-no the way that I do.

-- 4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com

Everything posted lately falls in line with david simpsons line of
thought.
Of course a fucking pedophile like 4s00th would attempt a smokescreen

Of course a fucking liar like the bo0b would perpetuate a lie.

Go fuck yerself, you stinking deviant. You KNOW simpson is a fucking
deviant, you said so yourself. Now you let your hate for yours truly
stand in the way and you lie. Nothing ever changes with you, does it
pedophile? Right down to the post editing we can expect from you
EVERY time.  Yer a predictable little slug and as always the
seconds
it takes to correct yer censprship is worth it to prove to you that
yer
wasting yer time. Got it?

Aw, did I hurt his little feelings?

LOL!!  *that* is impossible for you to do, pedophile.

Funny, you sure are acting like someone with hurt feelings!

Get over it.

David may be a deviant,

There's no "may be" to it, it's IS ...

but then he's no more deviant than you --

Now you'll post yer cites ..  :-)

You mean all the citations of your deviant prejudices against pretty
much anyone who is not Caucasian, heterosexual, Christian and
American?

maybe even less so. At least he doesn't blindly hate people he's never
met and accuse them of doing things he couldn't possibly know whether
they did or not.

Typical pedofuck revisionism. Despising predators isn't bigotry any
more than
an aversion to sticking sharp object in your eye is. It's normal,
natural, and
healthy. Likewise fer pedofuck apologists. Collectively they're teh
single
most loathsome group on teh planet, and deserve all teh derision they
can be subject to.

Ah, but it isn't just predators that you are prejudiced against, now
is it? You've never been able to prove that _I_ am a predator, but you
hate me without even knowing me because of the things you assume about
pedophiles -- and that is the definition of prejudice. Now, do you
really want to provide the citations of all the other prejudices
you've demonstrated on Usenet over the years?





And he certainly doesn't deserve you perpetuating those lies posted by
a remarkably stupid forger.

LOL!!!   According to YOU nopne of these deviants and rapists deserve
punishment for their bezarre and dangerous fetishes and crimes.

I seem to recall you getting  whacked out
every time we mention those alleged forgeries about you wanting to
suck dick and share your wife's shaved, squirting cunt!

I merely proved the posts in question were forgeries, something david
simpson
is apparently not able to do ...As far as getting "whacked
out"...you're wrong as
usual. It's nothing but an amusement to see these freaks flailing
about dancing
for my entertainment!

Ah, I see. So you really don't care that someone posts forgeries about
your desire to suck cock and share your wife's shaved squirting pussy?
You've never expressed any anger about such forgeries or the
references people have made to them? You've never used those as the
reason to attack other people?

So why is it
funny when someone forges 1 person, but not funny when someone forges
you?

See above, Jethro

Oh, that's right -- you're the great hero of Usenet -- still doing
nothing more than impotently calling people names and making rude
remarks.

Has yer brother got his letter yet??   LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't know -- he hasn't mentioned it if he has. The bigger question,
in my mind -- since I warned him that you claimed you had the letter
ready -- was whether you were brave enough to actually use your own
real name and address or whether you took the pussy way out and sent
it "anonymously." I suspect the latter -- assuming you had the guts to
write in the first place.

Oh, and it's exceptionally easy to get rid of the cross-posts -- I
just set my newsreader to ONLY reply to the group in which I am
reading!

Did yer nose grow on that lie?

Nope -- all I had to do was set the software to reply only to the
group from which I read the message. Software is really an amazing
thing. You should try it sometimes.

Anyway, it takes 3.3 seconds to replace the froups line. Yer
SOOOOOO effective ain't cha? :-)

It doesn't take me any time to remove them -- since the software does
it for me automatically, so I guess that shows just how "effective"
you are!

I don't even see what all groups your messages are actually
going to anymore! But I guess that's something you goo-goo idiots
can't do, not actually using anything so sophisticated as a
newsreader.

Once a liar, ALWAYS a liar ...right Steve? And besides everytime you
pay fer yer newsreader you can think about me posting fer free and
about how I'm twice as effective as you and yer pay newsreader. This
froup is toast and it wuz done wit a google newsreader, Ya gotta luv
it.

Itz not teh size of the newsreader, itz teh majic of the user ....

The funny thing about this is that anyone who actually knows how to
use a computer is laughing at your silly ass right now!

ought to know what the hell you're talking about before you post your
ignorance so widely! I've used goo-goo to read groups before, and it
sucks big time compared to actually using a dedicated newsreader!

And
why do you think I actually "pay" for the newsreader? There are quite
a few out there that can run circles around goo-goo available for
free!

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!!   Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

Usenet Legends bobandcarole இஇஇ wrote:



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text ->  x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!!   Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

On Oct 24, 7:41 am, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Legends bobandcarole இஇஇ wrote:



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -> x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

I'd still post it there.

Doc Dice wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:41 am, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Legends bobandcarole இஇஇ wrote:

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text ->  x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!!   Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

I'd still post it there.

You'll not be warned again.

On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:22:05 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole





???? <usenetlegends0... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
x-no-archive:
On Oct 17, 1:12 am, pedophile Steven Hylton 4s00th
4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole
? ??? ? <usenetlegends00... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

x-no-archive:
On Oct 16, 2:25 am, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:27:54 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole

----->???? <usenetlegends00... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
x-no-archive:

4s00th wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:21:10 -0700, ne... at (no spam) millions.com wrote:

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT), David
farookd... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

Re: Finding the truth and abandoning the fairy tale taboos put into
place by the Godhead priests
This is a message of hope for children and enlightened individuals
everywhere.

If you'll examine both beastiality and necrophilia you will find that
besides the antiquated taboos associated with participation they are
totally victimless crimes. You cannot insult the dead can you? The
body is only a shell, what is wrong with expressing your love in that
manner? The world is full of hate and war, we must allow our minds to
expand and accept new concepts.

When my father passed away {god rest his soul} I had a fantasy of
fondling his scrotum. I was able to make this fantasy a reality and
it
was good, really good!!! The orgasm I achieved was earth shattering
and like none I have experienced since.  There's nothing wrong with
expressing your love in such a manner,  just as there's nothing wrong
with expressing your love with a non human entity such as a K-9.
Society makes it dirty or wrong with it's unfounded taboos. Sadly,
only egalitarian intellectuals like myself can see through the
centuries of deception made possible by the priests of Godhead..

In some parts of the world incest is considered to be a normal part
of
the child's sex education. Any harm arises from a power imbalance
between the instigator and the other party. More harm is caused by
the
intervention of social workers and police than is caused by incest.
If
force or coercion is involved then it is rape and sexual abuse.. That
is never all right.

Teenagers can be responsible but Age Of Consent laws take away that
responsibility and substitute fear of getting caught. This forces the
problem into hiding. It should be brought out into the light and
looked at calmly and rationally without all the hysteria displayed by
you, and your idiot fellow haters, as you attempt to disrupt support
groups with your hatred of differences between people and the
attempts
of some to solve what they perceive as a problem.

I want to free children from the tyranny of externally imposed
celibacy.  It is about giving children the right to choose with whom
they will have sex.

Dog gone it, David, you're just another asshole.

DCI

You ought to be aware that this post was NOT made by David but by a
jackass who has been posting such nonsense continuously lately. I
don't always agree with David -- but I've never seen him endorse
necrophilia or zoophilia.

If he finds children sexually attractive then nothing would surprise
me
about david the pervert. If he'll fuck a child why wouldn't he fuck a
corpse? It takes a bona-fide deviant to find either one sexually
appealing.

 He does seem to like incest and pedophilia,
and that is where we generally disagree as I don't care what
consenting adults do, but messing with minors is off limits! And, ftr,
I have never seen any evidence that David has done so -- just that he
doesn't see it as such an absolute no-no the way that I do.

-- 4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com

Everything posted lately falls in line with david simpsons line of
thought.
Of course a fucking pedophile like 4s00th would attempt a smokescreen

Of course a fucking liar like the bo0b would perpetuate a lie.

Go fuck yerself, you stinking deviant. You KNOW simpson is a fucking
deviant, you said so yourself. Now you let your hate for yours truly
stand in the way and you lie. Nothing ever changes with you, does it
pedophile? Right down to the post editing we can expect from you
EVERY time.  Yer a predictable little slug and as always the
seconds
it takes to correct yer censprship is worth it to prove to you that
yer
wasting yer time. Got it?

Aw, did I hurt his little feelings?

LOL!!  *that* is impossible for you to do, pedophile.

Funny, you sure are acting like someone with hurt feelings!

Get over it.

David may be a deviant,

There's no "may be" to it, it's IS ...

but then he's no more deviant than you --

Now you'll post yer cites ..  :-)

You mean all the citations of your deviant prejudices against pretty
much anyone who is not Caucasian, heterosexual, Christian and
American?

maybe even less so. At least he doesn't blindly hate people he's never
met and accuse them of doing things he couldn't possibly know whether
they did or not.

Typical pedofuck revisionism. Despising predators isn't bigotry any
more than
an aversion to sticking sharp object in your eye is. It's normal,
natural, and
healthy. Likewise fer pedofuck apologists. Collectively they're teh
single
most loathsome group on teh planet, and deserve all teh derision they
can be subject to.

Ah, but it isn't just predators that you are prejudiced against, now
is it? You've never been able to prove that _I_ am a predator, but you
hate me without even knowing me because of the things you assume about
pedophiles -- and that is the definition of prejudice. Now, do you
really want to provide the citations of all the other prejudices
you've demonstrated on Usenet over the years?





And he certainly doesn't deserve you perpetuating those lies posted by
a remarkably stupid forger.

LOL!!!   According to YOU nopne of these deviants and rapists deserve
punishment for their bezarre and dangerous fetishes and crimes.

I seem to recall you getting  whacked out
every time we mention those alleged forgeries about you wanting to
suck dick and share your wife's shaved, squirting cunt!

I merely proved the posts in question were forgeries, something david
simpson
is apparently not able to do ...As far as getting "whacked
out"...you're wrong as
usual. It's nothing but an amusement to see these freaks flailing
about dancing
for my entertainment!

Ah, I see. So you really don't care that someone posts forgeries about
your desire to suck cock and share your wife's shaved squirting pussy?
You've never expressed any anger about such forgeries or the
references people have made to them? You've never used those as the
reason to attack other people?

So why is it
funny when someone forges 1 person, but not funny when someone forges
you?

See above, Jethro

Oh, that's right -- you're the great hero of Usenet -- still doing
nothing more than impotently calling people names and making rude
remarks.

Has yer brother got his letter yet??   LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't know -- he hasn't mentioned it if he has. The bigger question,
in my mind -- since I warned him that you claimed you had the letter
ready -- was whether you were brave enough to actually use your own
real name and address or whether you took the pussy way out and sent
it "anonymously." I suspect the latter -- assuming you had the guts to
write in the first place.

Oh, and it's exceptionally easy to get rid of the cross-posts -- I
just set my newsreader to ONLY reply to the group in which I am
reading!

Did yer nose grow on that lie?

Nope -- all I had to do was set the software to reply only to the
group from which I read the message. Software is really an amazing
thing. You should try it sometimes.

Anyway, it takes 3.3 seconds to replace the froups line. Yer
SOOOOOO effective ain't cha? :-)

It doesn't take me any time to remove them -- since the software does
it for me automatically, so I guess that shows just how "effective"
you are!

I don't even see what all groups your messages are actually
going to anymore! But I guess that's something you goo-goo idiots
can't do, not actually using anything so sophisticated as a
newsreader.

Once a liar, ALWAYS a liar ...right Steve? And besides everytime you
pay fer yer newsreader you can think about me posting fer free and
about how I'm twice as effective as you and yer pay newsreader. This
froup is toast and it wuz done wit a google newsreader, Ya gotta luv
it.

Itz not teh size of the newsreader, itz teh majic of the user ....

The funny thing about this is that anyone who actually knows how to
use a computer is laughing at your silly ass right now! You really
ought to know what the hell you're talking about before you post your
ignorance so widely! I've used goo-goo to read groups before, and it
sucks big time compared to actually using a dedicated newsreader! And
why do you think I actually "pay" for the newsreader? There are quite
a few out there that can run circles around goo-goo available for
free!

Usenet Legends bobandcarole ♥ wrote:
x-no-archive:
On Nov 1, 11:56 pm, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Doc Dice wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:41 am, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Legends bobandcarole இஇஇ wrote:

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -> x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

I'd still post it there.

You'll not be warned again.

LOL!!!!!

Or what, you'll cry us a river or you'll file a ko0ks0ot?

This is your final warning. The clock is ticking . . . .

x-no-archive:
On Nov 1, 11:56 pm, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:



Doc Dice wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:41 am, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Legends bobandcarole இஇஇ wrote:

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -> x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

I'd still post it there.

You'll not be warned again.

LOL!!!!!

Or what, you'll cry us a river or you'll file a ko0ks0ot?

x-no-archive:
On Nov 1, 11:56 pm, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Doc Dice wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:41 am, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Legends bobandcarole இஇஇ wrote:

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -> x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

I'd still post it there.

You'll not be warned again.

LOL!!!!!

Or what, you'll cry us a river or you'll file a ko0ks0ot?

On Nov 2, 2:23 pm, Usenet Legends bobandcarole ? <usenetlegendbobandcarole at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
x-no-archive:
On Nov 1, 11:56 pm, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:



Doc Dice wrote:
On Oct 24, 7:41 am, ah <splifing... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Legends bobandcarole ??? wrote:

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -> x-no-archive:
On Oct 19, 7:33 am, David <farook... at (no spam) picknowl.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:57 -0400, 4s00th <4s0... at (no spam) hushmail.com> typed
furiously:

[...]

Agent 4.2 isn't free, unless you stole it. Did you?

There's always been a free version of Agent available. But they've
also always had reasonable prices and upgrade policies.

Not correct, 4s00th. Agent 4 onward has a trial period after which you
should pay for it. Best money you'll ever spend.

LOL!! Buying a b-rate newsreader is the "best money he'll ever
spend"
Don't buy a home or a vehicle, buy that newsreader .. :-}

See how fukkin easy it is?

WHy are you posting this in demon.local?

Maybe because the OP posted it there?

And if he walked into on-coming traffic . . . ?
--
ah

I'd still post it there.

You'll not be warned again.

LOL!!!!!

Or what, you'll cry us a river or you'll file a ko0ks0ot?

You will find that out this summer, Bob. People at 87.238.173.142 are quite helpful.
Safe to say you won't be such a mouth peice when I arrive at your doorstep this summer.