 |
|
| Religion Forum Index » New Age Forum » Discernment VS Projection... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Edmond Wollmann... |
 Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.meditation/msg/05a26d35cbe9a241?hl=en
Analytical discernment as opposed to projection is the determination of
the momentum and bias of a belief system and its reinforcing logic,
without becoming caught up in the belief system in question. This can
only be achieved in degrees through self knowledge. Any imbalance in the
perceptive faculties of an empowered and integral person will be
reflected in the overemphasis upon either the empirical perspective
(Virgo) or the surrendering and "faith" perspective (Pisces) and it is
the efficiency with which the identity deals with information that
determines this level of discernment (Gemini/Sagittarius-information
axis) and their belief in knowingness and trust of self. Awareness and
integrity are ALWAYS the keys. A word to the wise is sufficient. The
lines are fine and there are many.
"The recognition and taking to heart of the subjective determination of
knowledge in general, and of psychological knowledge in particular, are
basic conditions for the scientific and impartial evaluation of a psyche
different from that of the observing subject. These conditions are
fulfilled only when the observer is sufficiently informed about the
nature and scope of his own personality. He can, however, be
sufficiently informed only when he has in large measure freed himself
from the levelling influence of collective opinions and thereby arrived
at a clear conception of his own individuality . . . "The collective
attitude hinders the recognition and evaluation of a psychology
different from the subject's, because the mind that is collectively
oriented is quite incapable of thinking and feeling in any other way
than by projection." Carl G. Jung
"The most beautiful and most profound emotion we can experience is the
sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to
whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt
in awe, is as good as dead. To know what is impenetrable to us really
exists, manifesting itself as highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty
which our dull falculties can comprehend only in their most primitive
forms-this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of true
religiousness." Albert Einstein
"According to general relativity, the concept of space detached from any
physical content does not exist. The physical reality of space is
represented by a field whose components are continuous functions of four
independent variables-the coordinates of space and time. It is just this
particular kind of dependence that expresses the spatial character of
physical reality.
Since the theory of general relativity implies the representation of
physical reality by a continuous field, the concept of particles or
material points cannot play a fundamental part, nor can the concept of
motion."
"Just as Maxwell and Faraday assumed that a magnet creates certain
properties in surrounding space, so Einstein concluded that stars,
moons, and other celestial objects individually determine the properties
of the space around them. And just as the movement of a piece of iron in
a magnetic field is guided by the structure of the field, so is the path
of any body in a gravitational field is determined by the geometry of
that field." Lincoln Barnett in "The Universe and Dr. Einstein"
"A final word about science"
Bem P. Allen
Western Illinois University "Personality Theories" pg 15 introduction,
1994 Simon & Schuster
"All this talk of science should not leave you with the impression that
it is good and other approaches are bad.
It is neither good nor necessarily better than other orientations;
science just is...
Some covered theories (in this text) will meet the scientific criteria
better than others.
Theories that fail to meet criteria well will be subjected to
appropriate criticism-so will more scientific theories that are flawed
in other ways. But no theories will be dismissed soley on the basis of
failure to meet scientific criteria. There are good reasons to include
theories that do not meet scientific criteria well. In fact, strengths
in the non-scientific realm may make these theories more valuable than
some more scientific theories.
Sometimes a well thought-out philosophical position, although it is too
abstract to be tested scientifically, can have more merit than a 'hard
science' point of view."
53,937,075,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
-5.393707075 x 10 58th- Is greater than the population of a
million earths, but the smallest possible number of astrological factor
combinations, and from that like any other data you can infer what you
wish. If a client of mine is suffering from self efficacy concerns, and
through astrological and psychological awareness finds levels of stress
factors associated with it that interfere with developmental growth
diminished, and understanding and efficacy enhanced, neither the number
above, nor studies a mile long, would create sufficient developmental
tension for either of us to attempt to fix something that isn't broken,
only so persons so needing this evidence in order to make the same
progress, can supposedly let go of these strictures and live their lives
with as much trust as those of us who realize the futility of such
numbers. Skeptics will not regardless of "factors" anyway because it is
a
matter of belief. It would therefore be foolish to ignore sure results
experienced with such clients in order to chase the obviously futile and
speculative arguments with skeptical minds. Analytical discernment begs
for efficiency. I therefore respectfully beg to differ with the cynical
view and offer sincere success in your future search for truths. There
is no one truth EXCEPT that THE truth is the composition of all truths.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence-it may be a difference in
root assumptions.
My particular "Universes of inquiry" are psychology and astrology, I
respect all inquiry and the paradigms that articulate them.
Paradigms form from sets of beliefs and assumptions. To clarify the idea
of paradigms here is a quote from experimentation in abnormal psychology
taken from Thomas Kuhn's veiw, author of the widely acknowledged "The
Structure Of Scientific Revolutions";
"We believe every effort should be made to study abnormal behavior
according to scientific principles. It should be clear at this point
however, that science is NOT a completely objective and certain
enterprise. Rather, as we can infer by the comment from Kuhn, subjective
factors, as well as limitations in our perspective on the universe,
enter into the conduct of scientific enquiry. Central to any application
of scientific principles, in Kuhn's veiw, is the concept of a paradigm,
a conceptual framework or approach within which a scientist works. A
paradigm according to Kuhn, is a set of basic assumptions that outline
the PARTICULAR UNIVERSE OF SCIENTIFIC ENQUIRY..." (my emphasis)
University of Southern California", State University of New York"
Davidson and Neale, 6th edition, 1996. Wiley and sons publishers.
So do not give so much power to belief systems. They are just ideas, and
the Multiverse is full of the infinite expression of them-forever.
"Therefore recognize that in physical reality one primary belief will
always extend itself to create a seeming system of beliefs with which it
becomes surrounded and supported so that the primary belief can have an
existence in physical reality. No belief will exist unto itself in a
void; every belief brings with it a complete and total entourage, a set
of props, backdrop and stage, and a complete and total audience
receptive to that particular play." Bashar- Life works when you let it.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Anonymous Remailer (austria)... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AD3F47D.75D1 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
URL fixed, screed flushed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 12, 10:31 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
Quote: "Therefore recognize that in physical reality
Edmo doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground concerning
fair use under the DMCA.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Counter_Notice.html
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 12, 10:31 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
"Therefore recognize that in physical reality
Edmo doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground concerning
fair use under the DMCA.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Counteotice.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Right. Covad is in trouble for passing the hot potato to Burnette, who
then dug himself deeper.
Remember kiddies: Rule #1, When you are in a hole, stop digging.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VB3-43FWCC5-7&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1056894887&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=49ae2cc10925c2977238178e38c749e3
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) added a safe harbor
provision shielding an Internet service provider (ISP) from liability
for copyright infringement under certain circumstances. The
effectiveness of the safe harbor defence depends on what the ISP does
upon receipt of notification of copyright infringing activity from a
copyright owner. In a recent Court of Appeals decision (ALS Scan Inc. v
RemarQ Communities Inc. (Case No. 00-1351, United States Court of
Appeals, 4th Circuit, 6 February 2001)), one ISP learned that a failure
to respond properly and expeditiously to even an imperfect DMCA
notification is at the ISP’s peril. Alan Wernick reports on the decision
and its implications.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:17 am
|
|