I see that "Tom" actually replied to this.

He really _does_ think I read his articles.

On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid
wrote:

On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid
wrote:

On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid
wrote:

[delete]

I see that "Sarchasm" is jabbering at me again. Don't know .
why He knows I don't read his shit posts .

shrug> Like all trolls, he just doesn't realize that rational
adults do not read posts from people who consistently display
ignorance, malice, dishonesty, stupidity, hypocrisy, cowardice,
and repulsiveness.

He just doesn't realize that he has no credibility with anyone
worth talking to and thus his words are powerless and a waste
of time.

I don't have to read his posts because I know that he knows
nothing worth knowing and is completely harmless.

The pathology of trolls is a very interesting subject.
Fortunately, one does not have to read their garbage to study
it.


Sid

! D 200 30:[Evergreen ] Re: Don't Feel Guilty About Ranting 2!
- 200 32:[Alrah ] `-

So I am talking about the psycho-pathology of trolls and this
guy with a throw-away alias shows up and tacks two lines on my
article for a reply.

I smell the stink of troll here.

The article has been dumped.

I'll never know what this mental case said and it won't harm me
in the least.


So the idiot troll changes its name again.

All posts from "Kate" dumped.

Get a life, you pathetic loser.


11 D 66:[aine ] `-
12 D 21:[Tom ] `-
13 D 26:[aine ] `-
14 D 50:[Tom ] `-
15 D 79:[aine ] `-
16 D 67:[Tom ] `-
17 D 81:[aine ] `-
18 D 94:[Tom ] `-
-> D 12:[Alrah ] `-


That's all the responses to this article.

Dumped. Tom is a Scientific Materialism fanatic, which is one of
the ugliest religions, and nothing aine has to say will penetrate
his thick skull. Boring.


1 D 90:[aine ] | `-
3 D 164:[Tom ] +-
4 D 22:[aine ] | `-
5 D 7:[Tom ] +-
6 D 24:[Tom ] `-
7 D 35:[Alrah ] `-

And there's all the responses to the above article, dumped.

"Tom" and "Alrah" just don't get it: They are not allowed to
use the Usenet to communicate with me.

When they are in my space they are required to keep their
sewer mouths shut.

Anyone who takes them seriously is a stupid loser that couldn't
possibly have anything to say worth reading and couldn't possibly
harm me in any way. Just like them.


1! - 200 101:[Evergreen ] Re: Don't Feel Guilty About Ranting
2! D 200 115:[Alrah ] +-
3! D 100 105:[Tom ] | `-
4! D 200 6:[Tom ] `-

There. Scoring reinstated. The 200 tells me that the article is
a direct response to my post. The 100 tells me something else.

I'm pretty sure that both of these obnoxious idiots (I'm feeling
generous) actually believe that I read their articles. And that
credible people take them seriously.

snicker

On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:
On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid
wrote:

On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid
wrote:

On alt.religion.wicca, Evergreen <sidneylambe at (no spam) nospam.invalid
wrote:

[delete]

I see that "Sarchasm" is jabbering at me again. Don't know .
why He knows I don't read his shit posts .

shrug> Like all trolls, he just doesn't realize that rational
adults do not read posts from people who consistently display
ignorance, malice, dishonesty, stupidity, hypocrisy, cowardice,
and repulsiveness.

He just doesn't realize that he has no credibility with anyone
worth talking to and thus his words are powerless and a waste
of time.

I don't have to read his posts because I know that he knows
nothing worth knowing and is completely harmless.

The pathology of trolls is a very interesting subject.
Fortunately, one does not have to read their garbage to study
it.


Sid

! D 200 30:[Evergreen ] Re: Don't Feel Guilty About Ranting 2!
- 200 32:[Alrah ] `-

So I am talking about the psycho-pathology of trolls and this
guy with a throw-away alias shows up and tacks two lines on my
article for a reply.

I smell the stink of troll here.

The article has been dumped.

I'll never know what this mental case said and it won't harm me
in the least.


So the idiot troll changes its name again.

All posts from "Kate" dumped.

Get a life, you pathetic loser.


11 D 66:[aine ] `-
12 D 21:[Tom ] `-
13 D 26:[aine ] `-
14 D 50:[Tom ] `-
15 D 79:[aine ] `-
16 D 67:[Tom ] `-
17 D 81:[aine ] `-
18 D 94:[Tom ] `-
-> D 12:[Alrah ] `-


That's all the responses to this article.

Dumped. Tom is a Scientific Materialism fanatic, which is one of
the ugliest religions, and nothing aine has to say will penetrate
his thick skull. Boring.


1 D 90:[aine ] | `-
3 D 164:[Tom ] +-
4 D 22:[aine ] | `-
5 D 7:[Tom ] +-
6 D 24:[Tom ] `-
7 D 35:[Alrah ] `-

And there's all the responses to the above article, dumped.

"Tom" and "Alrah" just don't get it: They are not allowed to
use the Usenet to communicate with me.

When they are in my space they are required to keep their
sewer mouths shut.

Anyone who takes them seriously is a stupid loser that couldn't
possibly have anything to say worth reading and couldn't possibly
harm me in any way. Just like them.


1! - 200 101:[Evergreen ] Re: Don't Feel Guilty About Ranting
2! D 200 115:[Alrah ] +-
3! D 100 105:[Tom ] | `-
4! D 200 6:[Tom ] `-

There. Scoring reinstated. The 200 tells me that the article is
a direct response to my post. The 100 tells me something else.

I'm pretty sure that both of these obnoxious idiots (I'm feeling
generous) actually believe that I read their articles. And that
credible people take them seriously.

snicker


I see that "Tom" actually replied to this.

He really _does_ think I read his articles.

ROTFLMAO!

All trolls do. They can't killfile anyone so they
think no one can killfile them.

Which makes them idiots.

Why read the posts of idiots?

He responded to _this_ post too!

Alrah wrote:
 
Sidney Lambe
Wiccan Priest and Apprentice Magician

Lol.  What did I do?  lol.

Fed the Troll!!!!!!!!!!!!

A.r.w. has had a year long troll fest!  There's so much trolling and
throwing troll cookies around here, trolls attacking other trolls, and
people slumming with trollery on a weekend, that the place has become
the troll red light area of usenet.

*whoooowoooooo*

I am the ghost of Mithras Past!

Seriously though, since a.r.w is always cross linked to a.m. these
days, it would be interesting to read an 'a.r.w best of' - threads
that the regulars think exemplify the most interesting material that's
been discussed on a.r.w. in the past.

That would be your fantasy, Allan Ray Adams of Emporia, Kansas.

lol.

On 18 Oct, 22:44, Evergreen <sidneyla... at (no spam) nospam.invalid> wrote:

lol.

On 17 Oct, 04:53, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
laddie'o'lugh at (no spam) gall's.org> wrote:
Alrah wrote:

Sidney Lambe
Wiccan Priest and Apprentice Magician

Lol.  What did I do?  lol.

Fed the Troll!!!!!!!!!!!!

A.r.w. has had a year long troll fest!  There's so much trolling and
throwing troll cookies around here, trolls attacking other trolls, and
people slumming with trollery on a weekend, that the place has become
the troll red light area of usenet.

*whoooowoooooo*

I am the ghost of Mithras Past!

Seriously though, since a.r.w is always cross linked to a.m. these
days, it would be interesting to read an 'a.r.w best of' - threads
that the regulars think exemplify the most interesting material that's
been discussed on a.r.w. in the past.

 

Yes, Martha, idiots can operate computers. Whoodathunit?

Sid is living Proof

 

--
Sidney Lambe
Wiccan Priest and Apprentice Magician
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444  (at) gmail (dot) com

Are you really so far gone that you actually believe I read your
garbage posts?

If not, then what's the point in responding to articles at all?

No one worth talking to pays a pinheaded ideological thug