In article <ha569m$1u1$13 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>, Alex DeLarge
korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:

•R.L.Measures wrote:
In article <ha3fbu$e6j$14 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>, Alex DeLarge
korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:

•R.L.Measures wrote:
In article <ha2n0k$u6f$6 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>, Alex DeLarge
korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:

gb is a sociopath who executes his own pets.
• Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

You find that unique kink boring?
• he uses it repeatedly.

Agreed, he's a serial pet-murder...very sick.

• now there's a new one.

True though, just ask him.

In article <ha5evs$hmh$2 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>, Alex DeLarge
korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:

gb is a pet-killer.

• if he confesses to a priest, no problem.

How about if he repeats it and brags about it?

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:29:45 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38 at (no spam) NOcornell.edu> wrote:

duke wrote:

-snip-

Our God is a living God.

Not according to Nietzsche.

Was he a center for the Green Bay Packers back in the '60's?

Why does it need to 'come' from any where?

"clw" <c... at (no spam) ohsu.gov> wrote in message

news:clw-69A8B9.17213806102009 at (no spam) sn-ip.us.supernews.com...

In article <u79nc5pf8msii9d3jirb8kji2f1bnq0... at (no spam) 4ax.com>,
duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:

Where did the universe come from?

From nothing.

Or, if you believe in god it would HAVE to come from god - to put it
another
way, everything would have to be part of god.

Not necessarily. Depends on the belief system you subscribe to. A
polytheistic belief system would me that everything is not part of any
single deity, for example.

In article
e491576b-a5d4-45c3-8c0e-b385bb02d... at (no spam) g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionline.net> wrote:

On Oct 8, 3:07 pm, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
That's what happened to Adam and Eve.

Who did not exist. It is a classic myth of the type found in
virtually every mythology.

Actually, there are paleontologists who do hypothesize an "Eve" from
studies on DNA progressions. Probably in Ethiopia around 300,000 years
ago.

Bill Shatzer <wws38 at (no spam) NOcornell.edu> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 07 Oct 2009 03:10:29 GMT, rfischer at (no spam) sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

-snip-

Religions are shrinking, puke. People are turning away from cults
that promote hate.

Mine well promotes love of God.

Wouldn't it be better if it promoted the love of mankind?

That's #2. Love of God is #1.

"Mark Sebree" <seb... at (no spam) infionline.net> wrote in message

news:61ef1799-56ad-419b-ab44-d6b36f44b7bd at (no spam) s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 8, 6:30 pm, clw <c... at (no spam) ohsu.gov> wrote:

In article
e491576b-a5d4-45c3-8c0e-b385bb02d... at (no spam) g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionline.net> wrote:

On Oct 8, 3:07 pm, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
That's what happened to Adam and Eve.

Who did not exist. It is a classic myth of the type found in
virtually every mythology.

Actually, there are paleontologists who do hypothesize an "Eve" from
studies on DNA progressions. Probably in Ethiopia around 300,000 years
ago.

True. Paleontologists estimate that the number of effective females
prior to the migration out of Africa was less than 5000, based on
Mitochondrial DNA. By the way, the time frame is estimated to be 150K
to 200K years ago.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

However, unlike the Genesis myth, there was no single female from
which humanity originated, no single male, and neither of them were
created by an unknown intelligence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

If there were an 'unknown intelligence', you'd be the Last to Know.

On 07 Oct 2009 21:57:42 GMT, The Chief Instigator <patrick at (no spam) io.com> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:44:01 -0400, Attila <> wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32 at (no spam) cox.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id
icjpc51upktlk7qkf0o78ibrd06kif1ofa at (no spam) 4ax.com> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:21:46 -0700 (PDT), Mark Sebree <sebree at (no spam) infionline.net
wrote:

Where did the universe come from? ?

One of the biggest advantages of science is that it can admit that the
answer is currently not known.

It can admit which method God used, but not that it isn't creation.


Until you prove a god even exists any comments involving one are a
demonstration in futility.

Dook *is* a demonstration of futility.

Especially for you intelligence-challenged.

On 09 Oct 2009 04:06:01 GMT, rfischer at (no spam) sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

duke <duckgumbo32 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Bill Shatzer <wws38 at (no spam) NOcornell.edu> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 07 Oct 2009 03:10:29 GMT, rfischer at (no spam) sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

-snip-

Religions are shrinking, puke. People are turning away from cults
that promote hate.

Mine well promotes love of God.

Wouldn't it be better if it promoted the love of mankind?

That's #2. Love of God is #1.

You're 0 for 2. And no, molesting children doesn't count.

That's exactly the way they're quoted in Holy Script, something you know
nothing about.

On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:16:26 -0700, Bill Shatzer <wws38 at (no spam) NOcornell.edu> wrote:

duke wrote:

Existence demands creation.

No it doesn't.

Then you're no brighter than sebree.

On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:32:42 -0700, clw <clw at (no spam) ohsu.gov> wrote:

There has been a rash of crap from the creationists since the recent
news about the examination of the Ardiopethicus skeleton. Including
the usual shit about a 6000 year old earth.


There is no such thing as a 6000 year old earth.

Bill Shatzer wrote:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill Shatzer wrote:

And over 4,000 Americans have paid with their lives for that little
adventure. Plus a half a trillion dollars in national treasure
You might compare that with the number of lives lost on 9-11. Or the
economic injury incurred from that event.
It would have been cheaper in both lives and money to just suffer
another 9-11 every six or seven years.,,,

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:57:13 -0700, r at (no spam) somis.org (•R.L.Measures) wrote:

In article <a0l3d51d9qs2khehl4ip20mgg2tdtasq64 at (no spam) 4ax.com>, duke
duckgumbo32 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:44:31 -0700, r at (no spam) somis.org (•R.L.Measures) wrote:

Are you denying he died on the cross after first begging his Father to
take the cup from him, not his will but his Father's will?

• Men who co-habit with men - not that there's anything wrong with that!
®Seinfeld - had the manuscripts in their possession for over a millennium
before they were published, so virtually anything is possible Duke.

What manuscripts?

• for the gospels according to Matthew, John, Thomas, Mark, and Luke.

What was published and canonized went into rapid reproduction using
painstaking
hand lettering by religious folks, rl.

Thomas didn't make the cut.

The
great divide between the teaching of the rabbi who called himself the Son
of man and the teaching of the Church of Rome is that he said the heavenly
Father forgives our trespasses as we for give others,

Right, but to pray is to ask, not to tell.

• there is nothing below about having to ask or having to pray or having
to go to some human go-between.

To pray is to ask.

Our Father, who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name.
Thy Kingdom come,
thy will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
Amen.

To pray is to ask. We don't tell God how we see things. He tells us what he
sees.

... ... ...
• Is it likely that a church which keeps on holy men who stumble children
is God's Holy Church?

All man, every man is a sinner, rl, in our own faults, in our thoughts and in
our words, in what we do and what we don't do.

...

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:39:46 -0700, r at (no spam) somis.org (•R.L.Measures) in
alt.abortion with message-id <r-1810090239460001 at (no spam) 10.0.1.7> wrote:



• "In matters of faith never trust your own judgment, but always humbly
submit to the decisions of the Holy Church."
(page 77, *A Full Catechism of the Catholic Religion*, Fr. Joseph De
Harbe, S.J.)

Yet another reason not to be infected by that particular illness.

• being exposed to RC inculcation/thought-control during childhood is a