The Chief Instigator wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:22:01 -0600, Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:30:02 -0500, Free Lunch <lunch at (no spam) nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On 26 Sep 2009 18:23:27 GMT, The Chief Instigator <patrick at (no spam) io.com> wrote
in alt.atheism:

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:36:01 -0600, Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:20:07 -0600, Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:
gb bragged here about his free fire war crimes.
When
DIE.
SOP: No obedience to "Alex DeLarge".
Alex is pathetic. I hope he apoligized when he sobers up.
Alex? Sober?
Minor-leaguer? Off drugs? Unlikely.

Cer

Shaddup.

All about how he likes to take his pets out back and put a .22 through
their heads.

rfischer at (no spam) sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:


Even the Bible says that those are not God's words.
You lie and then admit that you lie.

"Inspired" by is not the same as the actual words of God, puke.

But you listen to satan.

You damn yourself by repeting such lies.

It's pretty clear what you're working for.

Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:
All about how he likes to take his pets out back and put a .22 through
their heads.

How about the way you want ot see people die, terrorist.

Yes, I DO want to see terrorists die, thanks.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:48:19 -0400, "Dan Listermann"
dan at (no spam) listermann.com> wrote:


"gb" <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> wrote in message
news:gkq4c556bhs0oomrgcu3fpiaadv40coqmb at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:06:29 -0400, "Dan Listermann"
dan at (no spam) listermann.com> wrote:

Come to Indiana and look at the license plates that are everywhere.

Why would I want to be in Indiana at all, much less for so silly a
purpose? Save for attending the Indy 500 a couple of times, it's not
that interesting a place.

Good point, but most of their license plates say "In God we Trust,"

Hard to tell. IN has many other license plates that don't.

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:55:05 -0400, "Dan Listermann"

d... at (no spam) listermann.com> wrote:

"gb" <g... at (no spam) amusenet.com> wrote in message
news:fgd7c5lm62koj1ksb3mt8lco4850h4bb2t at (no spam) 4ax.com...
I've already given you the meaning that I ascribe to the IN license
plates.  I find them mildly humorous.

And meaningless.

I find them offensive.

Then do whatchagodda do to get them eliminated.

Though I must caution you -- the fact that You are offended by them
isn't going to be received as a terribly good argument for eliminating
them.

You have no particular Right to be unoffended.

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:11:19 -0700, gb <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id

Your Constitutional Rights aren't violated at all. You aren't injured
in any particular way because someone wants to put an essentially
meaningless slogan on a license plate.

It is not meaningless to some fools

...and there is never an excuse not
to fight that which is perceived as encroachment upon rights.

"gb" <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> wrote in message
news:lku9c5dsph63kk94ro0qbibv18i1jbt5rl at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:16:48 -0400, "Dan Listermann"
dan at (no spam) listermann.com> wrote:


You don't think that "God Trust" is meaningless

I do indeed believe that it's a meaningless phrase, and the matter has
been legally settled long since.

Have you addressed the font differences?

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:32:39 -0700, gb <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id

It is not at all clear that it is done "using taxpayer money" either.
Nearly as I can tell, auto owners pay the cost of the plates
voluntarily. Please make the case that the plates are sold at a loss
to taxpayers.

As I understand it this is on all plates there and no option is
offered.

"gb" <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> wrote in message > Now -- if the phrase on the
license plate were to say Jesus Saves --
that probably Would violate the Establishment Clause, because it
refers to a specific superstitious belief. But the IGWT phrase does
not according to the settlement of the matter. It is more general, to
the degree that it is essentially meaningless.


Perhaps you can argue that it is meaningless if the font was the same for
all the words like its use on money, but the font is very different for "God
Trust" and "In We." The effective reading, especially from a distance is
"God Trust" which does not enjoy "civil deism" protection.

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:32:39 -0700, gb <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
ifp9c51b7njh8g4o4b1sn0th8d0rrp5v3u at (no spam) 4ax.com> wrote:

It is not at all clear that it is done "using taxpayer money" either.
Nearly as I can tell, auto owners pay the cost of the plates
voluntarily. Please make the case that the plates are sold at a loss
to taxpayers.

As I understand it this is on all plates there and no option is
offered.

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:26:20 -0400, "Dan Listermann"
dan at (no spam) listermann.com> wrote:


"gb" <gb at (no spam) amusenet.com> wrote in message
news:ifp9c51b7njh8g4o4b1sn0th8d0rrp5v3u at (no spam) 4ax.com...

Perhaps you can bother to describe what you would see as a violation of the
Establishment Clause - aside from the obvious like declaring that the nation
was Southern Baptist or something. How about what on a license plate would
bother you - at taxpayers expense?

Nearly as I've been able to winkle out, by going to various state
motor vehicle bureaus, no slogan on a license plate is at taxpayer
expense. Auto owners pay the entire cost of the plates, plus a tad
more.

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:10:38 -0600, Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> in
alt.abortion with message-id
ha3ges$e6j$45 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org> wrote:

The Chief Instigator wrote:
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:16:12 -0600, Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Alex DeLarge <korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:
gb is a sociopath who executes his own pets.
"Alex" is a lunatic who wants to kill people.

Nah, God will handle that, deal.
...which means you're right out of luck, as there's no credible proof
of such a critter.

I have faith.


Meaningless and irrelevant.

You use the term as if it actually
exists.

•R.L.Measures wrote:
In article <ha3fbu$e6j$14 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>, Alex DeLarge
korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:

•R.L.Measures wrote:
In article <ha2n0k$u6f$6 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>, Alex DeLarge
korova at (no spam) milk.bar> wrote:

gb is a sociopath who executes his own pets.
• Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

You find that unique kink boring?

• he uses it repeatedly.

Agreed, he's a serial pet-murder...very sick.

gb is a pet-killer.