Main Page | Report this Page
Religion Forum Index  »  Druid Forum  »  Has anyone read this book?...
Page 4 of 6    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Has anyone read this book?...

Author Message
1X2Willows...
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:39 pm
Guest
Elaine Stutt wrote:
Quote:
"1X2Willows" writes:

I don't need to, as the premise there could be such a correlation is
already flawed. Mind, I'm talking so-called Celtic spirtuality up
until 400 to 450 CE the latest. Whatever came afterwards is useless
anyway since it cannot be counted as uncorrupted anymore.

Well hey, you've got an opinion.

Yep, and a strong one at that, because it's based on all available hard
evidence *and* other sources, some even of an UPG-ish nature.

Quote:
For myself, I'm suspicious of the idea of pure, uncorrupted anything.
The Celts, that multifaceted group would have also dealt with all
sorts of "corrupting" influences pre 450 CE. AFAICT

Uncorrupted in the sense of Greco-Roman notions re: their anthropomorph
pantheon which was inhabited by stewards of their respective realm, quasi,
instead of the realms directly being viewed as sacred by the tribe and its
people. The latter was the 'Celtic way', at least in the region where I come
from, proven. No representatives/intermediaries/place-holders required.
The forest, the well, the river *was* the entity to be honored.

I can guarantee you nobody there "worshipped a Celtic deity named
Cernunnos" (and others) as modern claims often go. You'd think there
would have to be evidence in form of votives, statues and the like to
support this claim, left over from 15 or so centuries of inhabitation, but
there are none. What we have is all Romano-Gallic (after the conquest)
or then from fringe locations which were heavily exposed to acculturation
such as the South side of the Alps and into the Po valley.

- and yes, even the Gundestrup, pretty as it is as a testament to
contemporary workmanship, is not Celtic but "Thracian native style
manufactured in northern Italy and depicting Gaulish themes -- the word
"style" being confused for "subject" (as is common even today)."
as Mr. Hooker had put it so eloquently. Yup.
 
Dana...
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:32 pm
Guest
"1X2Willows" <nospam at (no spam) least.invalid> wrote in message
news:h8rsvf$t93$1 at (no spam) news.albasani.net...
Quote:
Elaine Stutt wrote:
"1X2Willows" writes:

I don't need to, as the premise there could be such a correlation is
already flawed. Mind, I'm talking so-called Celtic spirtuality up
until 400 to 450 CE the latest. Whatever came afterwards is useless
anyway since it cannot be counted as uncorrupted anymore.

Well hey, you've got an opinion.

Yep, and a strong one at that, because it's based on all available hard
evidence *and* other sources, some even of an UPG-ish nature.

For myself, I'm suspicious of the idea of pure, uncorrupted anything.
The Celts, that multifaceted group would have also dealt with all
sorts of "corrupting" influences pre 450 CE. AFAICT

Uncorrupted in the sense of Greco-Roman notions re: their anthropomorph
pantheon which was inhabited by stewards of their respective realm, quasi,
instead of the realms directly being viewed as sacred by the tribe and its
people. The latter was the 'Celtic way', at least in the region where I
come
from, proven. No representatives/intermediaries/place-holders required.
The forest, the well, the river *was* the entity to be honored.

Even Greek spiritual practice was originally far more complex and
animistically based (according to people I've talked to over the years who
have studied this area extensively), with the smaller, local familial and
geographical deities morphing into something they originally weren't due to
conquest and/or absorption by larger kingdoms and city-states. People don't
realize this because they're really only viewing Greek religious practices
through the lens of Rome, which adopted them and then morphed them into
something even stranger.
 
Akins of that Ilk...
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:38 pm
Guest
On Sep 18, 12:09 am, "1X2Willows" <nos... at (no spam) least.invalid> wrote:
Quote:
Akins of that Ilk wrote:



Many places in Ireland bear the names of gods. Even Cerne Abbas in
England may be a place named after the Horned God.

That's funny. I can come up with about three hundred alleged
"gods" from the Continent which are really place names.

You mean place-names like Lugdunum (Lyon) in France or Luguvalium (now
Carlisle) in England - both named for the Celtic deity, Lugh?
 
1X2Willows...
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:30 pm
Guest
noinden wrote:
Quote:
Ok you do get that that reference is for a place not a God right?

Naahp, he only sees "Bull" and thinks
Oh look! I've got a job to do!
 
Dana...
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:38 pm
Guest
"1X2Willows" <nospam at (no spam) least.invalid> wrote in message
news:h8up0g$4l7$1 at (no spam) news.albasani.net...
Quote:
Elaine Stutt wrote:

Just a few things to comment on here for me.....

[snippage]

Quote:

-the well is seen as home of a somewhat transcendant entity, not
limited to simply being the water, which will respond to a
gift/respect.

later on again, yes, when polytheist ideas started to sink in as the
new thing to do. Needless to say, the effect wasn't quite the same
anymore. Anyhow, let's not forget the "my god/entity/protector is
more powerful than yours"-mentality of the day. When wars were lost
and people lost their independence as the result of it, a certain
voluntary
shift to the conqueror's religion is attested by all evidence in history.

Happened to the people of Ur, Egyptians, the Etruscans, the Celts, the
Romans themselves later on, the "Indians" of South America, Inuit, "Abos"
of Australia, Maoris in NZ, Samoans, Hawaiians, Pacific Island-hoppers in
general, Khmer, Asian folk that I can't even put my finger on and last not
least, Native American tribes of the Northern continent.

Notable exception: Tibetan Buddhism (so far; let's hope).

Unfortunately there's a significant shift here as well. The Chinese
government have installed a number of puppet lamas who support the Communist
party line and there is a certain percentage (25-40%? Not sure without
looking it up) of the population who accept them.

[more snippage]

Quote:

Vocabulary controls thought and as long as we are slaves to
poly- and monotheist terminology, we'll never get to the bottom
of the kind of spirituality our ancestors lived in their everyday lives.

I have no problem with going down to the river in front of my house
right now, 'talk' to it, interact with it, do a "ritual", leave an
offering,
what-have-you.

Just don't try to tell me his name is Danu or any other name of a river
somewhere else (and yes, this one is a "he") whatever that means.
Definite male energy. Maybe it's the dam which holds 'him' back.

And yet.....I'd say the spirit of the waterfall --or maybe our little
"millrace" around our side of the island--is female. I hear her voice in my
head everytime I get my feet in the water there.

[more snippage]
Quote:

Novacula Occami. I always find it astonishing how the evidence which
does indeed exist, goes to support what I'm trying to convey, once
this fairly little paradigm-shift from an entirely assumed
polytheism to clearly identifiable remnants of pantheist animism is
being
applied to the whole picture.

Yeah but can't a pantheist animism sometimes drift into a form
of polytheism?

only by outside definition

The Catholic church is monotheistic but their priests
are freqently horrified to see their parrishoners treating the saints
like deities. Why couldn't various Celtic tribes come up with their
own native polytheism? The shamens/spiritual leaders might not like
it that wouldn't stop it. I'd be surprised if some of the tribes
didn't have some degree of polytheism of their own devise.


Problem is, this assumes that *any* spiritual authority will be trying to
enforce its teachings from the top down as a matter of course. Yes,
Catholicism does this (although in spite of 2000-odd years at it, they've
still failed to eradicate all vestiges of folk practices in Europe), but
there's plenty of evidence that pre-Roman Celtic spirituality was from the
bottom up. Ancient tribal and ancestral practices were at the root of
historical Druidic thinking and though the Druids became increasingly
sophisticated over time--through building on successive generations'
knowledge and insights along with exposure and exploration of the practices
of neighboring cultures--the root practices were never lost sight of because
they were critical to the cultural identity and would represent the
unthinkable repudiation of the ancestors.

The problem here is not the subject but the approach to it. Western
scholarship is only beginning to emerge from the imperialistic
Judeo-Christian mindset that *all* "sophisicated" cultures' spirituality
*must* conform to the Greco-Roman model by definition or be dismissed as
"primitive." It's a fascinating although not always comfortable process to
watch and be a part of, but I fully expect there to be a completely new
paradigm in place in around 20 years.

[more snippage]
 
1X2Willows...
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:09 pm
Guest
Akins of that Ilk wrote:
Quote:

Many places in Ireland bear the names of gods. Even Cerne Abbas in
England may be a place named after the Horned God.

That's funny. I can come up with about three hundred alleged
"gods" from the Continent which are really place names.
 
1X2Willows...
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:17 am
Guest
Akins of that Bilk wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 18, 12:09 am, "1X2Willows" wrote:
Akins of that Ilk wrote:

Many places in Ireland bear the names of gods. Even Cerne Abbas in
England may be a place named after the Horned God.

That's funny. I can come up with about three hundred alleged
"gods" from the Continent which are really place names.

You mean place-names like Lugdunum (Lyon) in France or Luguvalium (now
Carlisle) in England - both named for the Celtic deity, Lugh?

Don't forget Brighton. That's pretty shiny too.
There's also a whole Bolivian island named El Sol which you might consider.
No wait... how could I overlook... LUXOR!

Aaah finally we know where those funky white robes and headdresses come from











oh, and by the way...

LIAR!
 
Elaine Stutt...
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:35 am
Guest
"Dana" (spambucket at (no spam) euro-celts.dot.com) writes:
Quote:
"1X2Willows" <nospam at (no spam) least.invalid>news:h8up0g$4l7$1 at (no spam) news.albasani.net...
Elaine Stutt wrote:

Just a few things to comment on here for me.....

[snippage] snip again
more powerful than yours"-mentality of the day. When wars were lost
and people lost their independence as the result of it, a certain
voluntary
shift to the conqueror's religion is attested by all evidence in history.

Happened to the people of Ur, Egyptians, the Etruscans, the Celts, the
Romans themselves later on, the "Indians" of South America, Inuit, "Abos"
of Australia, Maoris in NZ, Samoans, Hawaiians, Pacific Island-hoppers in
general, Khmer, Asian folk that I can't even put my finger on and last not
least, Native American tribes of the Northern continent.

Notable exception: Tibetan Buddhism (so far; let's hope).

Unfortunately there's a significant shift here as well. The Chinese
government have installed a number of puppet lamas who support the Communist
party line and there is a certain percentage (25-40%? Not sure without
looking it up) of the population who accept them.

Tibetan Buddhism also had characteristics within it that made
change, when encountering modernism, pretty inevitable, even had
the Chinese government not been involved.

For one thing not even considering the sects, it, in a way, is more
than one religion. The people more into ritual and some aspects
of shamenism and the monks more into Buddhist philosophy. The
monasteries were very top heavy. And the monasteries were land owners
and landlords, extractors of rent. The Dalai Lama has said change needed
to happen there. Also that he didn't like seeing the institution of
the DL being involved in politics and government. Which is not to
say that the people didn't love their institutions even with the
warts. The Chinese proaganda machine, who decry and exagerate every
fault of the Tibetans, don't mention that China itself had equally
nasty traits usually more extensive. Um, and I doubt that the
education of the child Lamas would past muster in a modern world,
a little too rigorous.

The Tibetan monks, incidently spend a lot of time preaching hellfire.
Yes, in books anyway. Do any wrong action and you can be reborn in hell,
for several eons. But admittedly it did serve as entertainment and the
horror films of the day. And just because I find it tedious, doesn't mean
it isn't the fave of many Tibetans.

There's certainly something very authentic about Tibetan Buddhism.
Who knows what will survive. ( Should any of us survive the
climate change etc etc )

Quote:
[more snippage] ditto
The Catholic church is monotheistic but their priests
are freqently horrified to see their parrishoners treating the saints
like deities. Why couldn't various Celtic tribes come up with their
own native polytheism? The shamens/spiritual leaders might not like
it that wouldn't stop it. I'd be surprised if some of the tribes
didn't have some degree of polytheism of their own devise.

Problem is, this assumes that *any* spiritual authority will be trying to
enforce its teachings from the top down as a matter of course.

Maybe. Why not bottom up polytheism? I don't see it as necessarily
opposed to "ancestral practices", assuming it was developed in the
culture and not imposed on it. Again, just theoretrical. I'm
not assuming polytheism means pantheon - serial monotheism ? :)

Yes,
Quote:
Catholicism does this (although in spite of 2000-odd years at it, they've
still failed to eradicate all vestiges of folk practices in Europe), but
there's plenty of evidence that pre-Roman Celtic spirituality was from the
bottom up. Ancient tribal and ancestral practices were at the root of
historical Druidic thinking and though the Druids became increasingly
sophisticated over time--through building on successive generations'
knowledge and insights along with exposure and exploration of the practices
of neighboring cultures--the root practices were never lost sight of because
they were critical to the cultural identity and would represent the
unthinkable repudiation of the ancestors.

The problem here is not the subject but the approach to it. Western
scholarship is only beginning to emerge from the imperialistic
Judeo-Christian mindset that *all* "sophisicated" cultures' spirituality
*must* conform to the Greco-Roman model by definition or be dismissed as
"primitive." It's a fascinating although not always comfortable process to
watch and be a part of, but I fully expect there to be a completely new
paradigm in place in around 20 years.

Although unfortunately a lot of evidence was deliberately destroyed.
But there's many areas where a non-biased approach would help.

Elaine
 
An Coibhi Drui...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:59 pm
Guest
On Sep 14, 8:28 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 14, 9:10 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:





On Sep 4, 4:46 pm, Wyvren <baron_samh... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 9:33 am, Noinden <noin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry but this fails Ockham's razor.

With out proof (the manuscript) it can not be accepted.

Nonesense, things are "accepted" all the time without any
documentation whatsoever. This is why millions believe George
Washington had wooden teeth and the the Civil War was fought to end
slavery. It is why the Gorsedd of the Bards ended up being a part of
the Welsh National Eisteddfod, and why the Ancient Order of Druids
gathered at Stonehenge every midsummer for decades.

Not since 1988 when they were kicked out by the people.

Ps Ive decided to buy the Lebor Feasa Rúnda , and have a good read as
it is definitely Interesting.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Me too, I simply love reading Heretical Texts, Books on the Index etc
- thhe Forbidden Fruit !
 
An Coibhi Drui...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:11 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 3:59 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 14, 8:28 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:





On Sep 14, 9:10 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 4:46 pm, Wyvren <baron_samh... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 9:33 am, Noinden <noin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry but this fails Ockham's razor.

With out proof (the manuscript) it can not be accepted.

Nonesense, things are "accepted" all the time without any
documentation whatsoever. This is why millions believe George
Washington had wooden teeth and the the Civil War was fought to end
slavery. It is why the Gorsedd of the Bards ended up being a part of
the Welsh National Eisteddfod, and why the Ancient Order of Druids
gathered at Stonehenge every midsummer for decades.

Not since 1988 when they were kicked out by the people.

Ps Ive decided to buy the Lebor Feasa Rúnda , and have a good read as
it is definitely Interesting.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Me too, I simply love reading Heretical Texts, Books on the Index etc
- thhe Forbidden Fruit !- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I remember reading " Fanny Hill " under the bedclothes with a torch
when I was fourteen - my father was strict about things like that,
lucky he never caught me, there's a certain thrill in reading a
forbidden book outsiide of the reading of the book at all !

I reckon that fools here have sold dozens of copies of Akins book for
him, heh heh heh .

If they're not careful, Lebor Feasa Runda could become a cult
classic :-)

Cheers,
Michael .

Cheers,
Michael .
 
An Coibhi Drui...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:16 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 4:11 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 3, 3:59 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:





On Sep 14, 8:28 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:10 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 4:46 pm, Wyvren <baron_samh... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 9:33 am, Noinden <noin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry but this fails Ockham's razor.

With out proof (the manuscript) it can not be accepted.

Nonesense, things are "accepted" all the time without any
documentation whatsoever. This is why millions believe George
Washington had wooden teeth and the the Civil War was fought to end
slavery. It is why the Gorsedd of the Bards ended up being a part of
the Welsh National Eisteddfod, and why the Ancient Order of Druids
gathered at Stonehenge every midsummer for decades.

Not since 1988 when they were kicked out by the people.

Ps Ive decided to buy the Lebor Feasa Rúnda , and have a good read as
it is definitely Interesting.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Me too, I simply love reading Heretical Texts, Books on the Index etc
- thhe Forbidden Fruit !- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 I remember reading " Fanny Hill " under the bedclothes with a torch
when I was fourteen - my father was strict about things like that,
lucky he never caught me, there's a certain thrill in reading a
forbidden book outsiide of the reading of the book at all !

 I reckon that fools here have sold dozens of copies of Akins book for
him, heh heh heh .

If they're not careful, Lebor Feasa Runda could become a cult
classic :-)

Cheers,
Michael .

Cheers,
Michael .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I hope the clowns here likewise demolish my two books when they come
out, get a chain reaction going across the Internet, make a rich man
out of me - like Akins who is laughing his way to the Bank :--)

My advice : Akins should have his agent give Hollywood a buzz !!!

Michael .
 
An Coibhi Drui...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:32 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 4:16 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 3, 4:11 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:





On Nov 3, 3:59 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:

On Sep 14, 8:28 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:10 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 4:46 pm, Wyvren <baron_samh... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sep 4, 9:33 am, Noinden <noin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry but this fails Ockham's razor.

With out proof (the manuscript) it can not be accepted.

Nonesense, things are "accepted" all the time without any
documentation whatsoever. This is why millions believe George
Washington had wooden teeth and the the Civil War was fought to end
slavery. It is why the Gorsedd of the Bards ended up being a part of
the Welsh National Eisteddfod, and why the Ancient Order of Druids
gathered at Stonehenge every midsummer for decades.

Not since 1988 when they were kicked out by the people.

Ps Ive decided to buy the Lebor Feasa Rúnda , and have a good read as
it is definitely Interesting.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Me too, I simply love reading Heretical Texts, Books on the Index etc
- thhe Forbidden Fruit !- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 I remember reading " Fanny Hill " under the bedclothes with a torch
when I was fourteen - my father was strict about things like that,
lucky he never caught me, there's a certain thrill in reading a
forbidden book outsiide of the reading of the book at all !

 I reckon that fools here have sold dozens of copies of Akins book for
him, heh heh heh .

If they're not careful, Lebor Feasa Runda could become a cult
classic :-)

Cheers,
Michael .

Cheers,
Michael .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I hope the clowns here likewise demolish my two books when they come
out, get a chain reaction going across the Internet, make a rich man
out of me - like Akins who is laughing his way to the Bank :--)

My advice : Akins should have his agent give Hollywood a buzz !!!

Michael .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They could do a " Raiders of the Lost Ark " job on it , with Harrison
Ford starring as ME, The Archdruid of Ireland, take in 60 million
dollars !!!

Heh heh heh

Michael .
 
Kent...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:41 pm
Guest
On Nov 2, 9:16 pm, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:

Quote:
I hope the clowns here likewise demolish my two books when they come
out, get a chain reaction going across the Internet, make a rich man
out of me - like Akins who is laughing his way to the Bank :--)

Awww...you know there will be no need for that. Your name and
reputation will kill any chance that even a moderately written book
would have had for success. I hear Kondratiev is still upset with his
publisher because of you...

So, who is going to give a review on the back of your books? You've
badmouthed everyone who might even lend it a shred of credibility.

Oh, you could always bail Arthur out of jail the next time he gets
locked up. I'm sure he'll review it for you then! Still might have to
grease him up with a few pints first.
 
An Coibhi Drui...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:00 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 4:41 am, Kent <kent... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 2, 9:16 pm, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:

I hope the clowns here likewise demolish my two books when they come
out, get a chain reaction going across the Internet, make a rich man
out of me - like Akins who is laughing his way to the Bank :--)

Awww...youknow there will be no need for that. Your name and
reputation will kill any chance that even a moderately written book
would have had for success. I hear Kondratiev is still upset with his
publisher because of you...

So, who is going to give a review on the back of your books? You've
badmouthed everyone who might even lend it a shred of credibility.

Oh, you could always bail Arthur out of jail the next time he gets
locked up. I'm sure he'll review it for you then! Still might have to
grease him up with a few pints first.

A great start with my publicity campaign, thanks Kent - now could you
get the other Ogres to join in ?

Cheers,
Michael .
 
An Coibhi Drui...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:01 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 5:00 am, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 3, 4:41 am, Kent <kent... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:





On Nov 2, 9:16 pm, An Coibhi Drui <photographerofkilke... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:

I hope the clowns here likewise demolish my two books when they come
out, get a chain reaction going across the Internet, make a rich man
out of me - like Akins who is laughing his way to the Bank :--)

Awww...youknowthere will be no need for that. Your name and
reputation will kill any chance that even a moderately written book
would have had for success. I hear Kondratiev is still upset with his
publisher because of you...

So, who is going to give a review on the back of your books? You've
badmouthed everyone who might even lend it a shred of credibility.

Oh, you could always bail Arthur out of jail the next time he gets
locked up. I'm sure he'll review it for you then! Still might have to
grease him up with a few pints first.

A great start with my publicity campaign, thanks Kent - now could you
get the other Ogres to join in ?

Cheers,
Michael .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I mean, they did it for Akins, why not for me ???
 
 
Page 4 of 6    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:29 am