Conclusion
There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the
objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world is
really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we do
have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the world.

Where are all the human fossils?
By Ken Ham, Jonathan Sarfati and Carl Wieland, Ed. Don Batten

Where are all the human fossils?

How the carbon clock works
By Ken Ham, Jonathan Sarfati, and Carl Wieland, Ed. Don Batten

Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.
====================================

Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

Conclusion
There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the
objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world is
really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we
do
have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the
world.

Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

Conclusion
There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the
objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world is
really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we
do
have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the
world.

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:22:03 -0500, "ROCK" <no@email.com> had the
following opinion:

Conclusion
There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the
objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world is
really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we do
have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the world.

Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

Also if you reply be sure to to make sense. "safe yourself the trouble of
replying"

hahahaha LoL

"W. Syme" <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

"W. Syme" <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:ce7a268cb2f1ac4f6e8bdd106da11309@news.1usenet.com...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:22:03 -0500, "ROCK" <no@email.com> had the
following opinion:

Conclusion
There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the
objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world
is
really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we
do
have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the
world.

Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
To send email, remove superstitions.

And yes I know I wrote "to" twice. LoL
It was intentional.

"ROCK" <no@email.com> wrote in message
news:qaudnej1jIqvI_XdRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Also if you reply be sure to to make sense. "safe yourself the trouble of
replying"

hahahaha LoL
"W. Syme" <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

"W. Syme" <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:ce7a268cb2f1ac4f6e8bdd106da11309@news.1usenet.com...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:22:03 -0500, "ROCK" <no@email.com> had the
following opinion:

Conclusion
There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the
objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world
is
really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we
do
have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the
world.

Tip to other a.a. regulars: Always first read the last paragraph. If
it contains the word "god", you can safely assume the previous is full
of bs and safe yourself the trouble of replying.

--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
To send email, remove superstitions.

Where are all the human fossils?

Okay the question is. Where are all the human fossils?
Where are all the transitional fossils for both human and animal?
I just want to know.
GBU
Before we can begin to answer your questions, you need to learn a few

Okay the question is. Where are all the human fossils?
Where are all the transitional fossils for both human and animal?
I just want to know.
GBU
Before we can begin to answer your questions, you need to learn a few

Sounds like a dodge there. All I asked was where are all the transitional
fossils.
Starting with humans first please.
GBU

"graham" <stratman@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:P35ac.45158$R27.2059@pd7tw2no...

"ROCK" <no@email.com> wrote in message
news:baadna66fOPkWfXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
Okay the question is. Where are all the human fossils?
Where are all the transitional fossils for both human and animal?
I just want to know.
GBU
Before we can begin to answer your questions, you need to learn a few
basics. Therefore, take a few courses in geology and palaeontology.