| |
 |
|
|
Religion Forum Index » Bahai Forum » NOT GOING AWAY: Bahai Spy Ring in India Busted...
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
|
| Author |
Message |
| ... |
 Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: Nima got his information in his usual way: from Agent Mulder via his
implanted chip. That's why he doesn't need to bother with evidence.
V.
just to get in the spirit of things I believe that your post
represents an UNEQUIVOCAL, UNASSAILABLE admission that the IT comittee
have secretly implanted a device inside his head. Get out of that
lying Bahaim scum etc...
Damn...forgot to squeeze in prima facea.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Sock-Puppet'ullah... |
| Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
See *Bahais In My Backyard*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU
BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge [of the given issue] by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer
[i.e. shoot the messenger]
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin
attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the
bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Sock-Puppet'ullah... |
| Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
IT committee clown, Paul Andrew Hammond, spun:
Quote: I quite like the article from the HINDU that you kindly quoted there
too - which suggested that the arrest of the trust and management of
the Lotus Temple had been stayed.
Pending the next _hearing_! The selective quotations and
misdirections of the bahaim IT committee knows no bounds.
http://www.hindu.com/2006/08/19/stories/2006081914800400.htm
Justice A K Sikri directed the Economic Offence Wing(EOW) of the Delhi
Police not to arrest the trustees and management committee members of
the Lotus temple, founded by the Bahai faith, till the next date of
hearing."
Quote: It seems like there wasn't *that* much of a clear cut case against
them.
Apparently there was that the High Court of India ruled a press black-
out on the submissions of the Attorney General, not to mention that
Susan Maniac was wheeled out here to offer manufactured news items.
W |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| PaulHammond... |
| Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sock-Puppet'ullah wrote:
Quote: IT committee clown, Paul Andrew Hammond, spun:
I quite like the article from the HINDU that you kindly quoted there
too - which suggested that the arrest of the trust and management of
the Lotus Temple had been stayed.
Pending the next _hearing_!
When do you think the next hearing will be, Nima?
Hopefully, before 2012!
Quote: The selective quotations and
misdirections of the bahaim IT committee knows no bounds.
When are you going to give us the evidence you have on the operations
of this "IT Committee"?
Quote: http://www.hindu.com/2006/08/19/stories/2006081914800400.htm
Justice A K Sikri directed the Economic Offence Wing(EOW) of the Delhi
Police not to arrest the trustees and management committee members of
the Lotus temple, founded by the Bahai faith, till the next date of
hearing."
It seems like there wasn't *that* much of a clear cut case against
them.
Apparently there was that the High Court of India ruled a press black-
out on the submissions of the Attorney General, not to mention that
Susan Maniac was wheeled out here to offer manufactured news items.
She posted an article that pretty much has the same facts in it as the
ones that you are pushing - yet hers are "bad" articles and yours are
"good" articles.
If you have nothing but stale old links to 2006, why are you serving
us up these warmed-over left-overs?
Nothing has happened - which strongly suggests to me that either the
hearing dismissed the case due to lack of evidence, or acquited them.
Else there would have been a story about prison sentences or fines
which you would have been singing and dancing about for two years.
You're just a sad old bullshiter, aren't you Holy Chickenhead? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mلirseلil Rي Laoise... |
| Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Sock-Puppet'ullah" <wahidazal66 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c848490b-81f4-4ba5-8b80-14f4d55fa802 at (no spam) r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Quote: Apparently there was that the High Court of India ruled a press black-
out on the submissions of the Attorney General,
Such rulings of the Court are normally reported. Where is your evidence? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع... |
| Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 14, 12:46 am, PaulHammond <pahamm... at (no spam) onetel.net.uk> wrote:
Quote: Sock-Puppet'ullah wrote:
IT committee clown, Paul Andrew Hammond, spun:
I quite like the article from the HINDU that you kindly quoted there
too - which suggested that the arrest of the trust and management of
the Lotus Temple had been stayed.
Pending the next _hearing_!
When do you think the next hearing will be, Nima?
There's been several already. Why don't you go ask your masters in
Haifa, Zionistan, to explain to you why Payam Shoghi still has not
been able to remove himself from India?
<bs snip>
Quote: She posted an article that pretty much has the same facts in it as the
ones that you are pushing - yet hers are "bad" articles and yours are
"good" articles.
Then post the link and the verifiable archive which goes with the
story she put up. Why is that so hard to do? The editors of the
Hindustan Times are on record claiming that the item Susan Maneck
published here was never published by them. The Economic Offenses Wing
of the Delhi Police is on record to eight different people, that the
case is still ongoing. Obviously they aren't the ones lying here, you
all are trying to cover-up and misdirect from the international
political imbroglio your organization was caught in.
Quote: If you have nothing but stale old links to 2006, why are you serving
us up these warmed-over left-overs?
Blow it out your backside, lying hack. Two years is nothing. The
online archives for the two subsequent stories after the initial
Hindustan Times article is still available. Archives of published
material don't go stale after only two years. Again, Susan Maniac
published a fraudulent item claiming it was the last published word on
the subject. Prove it is genuine! You cannot because it is a fake!!
CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
See *Bahais In My Backyard*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU
BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge [of the given issue] by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer
[i.e. shoot the messenger]
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin
attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the
bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| PaulHammond... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع مخلوقاته القديم
الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء wrote:
Quote: On Aug 14, 12:46 am, PaulHammond <pahamm... at (no spam) onetel.net.uk> wrote:
Sock-Puppet'ullah wrote:
IT committee clown, Paul Andrew Hammond, spun:
I quite like the article from the HINDU that you kindly quoted there
too - which suggested that the arrest of the trust and management of
the Lotus Temple had been stayed.
Pending the next _hearing_!
When do you think the next hearing will be, Nima?
There's been several already.
When were these hearings, and what were their outcomes?
Quote: Why don't you go ask your masters in
Haifa, Zionistan, to explain to you why Payam Shoghi still has not
been able to remove himself from India?
bs snip
She posted an article that pretty much has the same facts in it as the
ones that you are pushing - yet hers are "bad" articles and yours are
"good" articles.
Then post the link and the verifiable archive which goes with the
story she put up.
You're not denying that Susan's article has pretty much the same facts
as yours in it.
Quote: Why is that so hard to do?
I'M not the one bringing up 2 year old stories as "recent news".
If you don't know why it's difficult to bring up an archive story from
an Indian newspaper of something that is only of relatively marginal
interest to me by this stage, then you must be stupid.
Oh, well, I already knew that!
Quote: The editors of the
Hindustan Times are on record claiming that the item Susan Maneck
published here was never published by them.
And I'M on record as saying that I think it's suspicious that you have
reported that email to us with the header and the name of the person
it's from xxxx-ed out.
I think it's more likely that you made up that email than that Susan
made up an article, which basically reports the same facts as the
articles that YOU posted about the issue.
That the arrests of the accused Baha'is were stayed in 2006, and that
no-one has seen any news reports of any convictions for any criminal
charge since that date.
These Baha'is aren't still on remand, now are they?
Quote: The Economic Offenses Wing
of the Delhi Police is on record to eight different people, that the
case is still ongoing.
This is the first I've heard of it! Of course, you can provide with
the evidence about this - and there's a good reason why you haven't
mentioned this before?
Quote: Obviously they aren't the ones lying here,
Well, I haven't seen their words. You could well be lying - it's
something of a habit with you.
Quote:
If you have nothing but stale old links to 2006, why are you serving
us up these warmed-over left-overs?
Blow it out your backside, lying hack. Two years is nothing.
It's a bloody long time for a case which was meant to come to trial in
September 2006!
You clearly HAVE got nothing more recent, else you WOULDN'T be serving
us up old, old articles and rumours of things that official people
might or might not have said to un-named third parties.
The
Quote: online archives for the two subsequent stories after the initial
Hindustan Times article is still available. Archives of published
material don't go stale after only two years. Again, Susan Maniac
published a fraudulent item claiming it was the last published word on
the subject. Prove it is genuine! You cannot because it is a fake!!
PProve that your email is genuine! You cannot, because it is a fake. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع... |
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 15, 1:54 am, PaulHammond <pahamm... at (no spam) onetel.net.uk> wrote:
Quote: PProve that your email is genuine! You cannot, because it is a fake.
It is, and I am happy to provide you with all the email headers right
here on TRB, provided you show the archival link, date and journalist
for the piece Susan Maniac posted. You cannot, because the story is a
fake.
CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
See *Bahais In My Backyard*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU
BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge [of the given issue] by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer
[i.e. shoot the messenger]
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin
attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the
bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| %^%$##$ at (no spam) !... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Seon Ferguson" <seongf at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:488ee38c$0$8937$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Quote:
"Viv" <viv_jacobson at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:b46efe2a-b236-440b-98cd-a77f9e24328c at (no spam) i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Lol I knew he would come up with something like that if they were found
innocent. Nothing would have satasfied him unless there was a guilty
verdict. I just assumed this was breaking news.
That's what he would like to convey, Seon. As I said, honesty isn't
his strong point.
You will note that - as with so many of Nima's dramatic claims - there
is no URL to back up what he has typed in here.
V.
Yeah i figured that out when he said I was a Bahai and that the Bahai's
persecuted the followers of the Bab.
But yes I havnt seen him produce any evidence. I hope this proves I am
willing to look at any evidence he presents. But it will probally be bs
like this article.
You have been produced with irrefutable and unassailable evidence to that
effect time and again and again and again and again...That you are here
doing public fellatio to the Bahaim does not the change that fact one bit.
W |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| %^%$##$ at (no spam) !... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Seon Ferguson" <seongf at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:488ed308$0$8963$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Quote:
"Viv" <viv_jacobson at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:eaaa0b18-64fb-439e-9557-7bdf7a151086 at (no spam) a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Seon,
The story did in fact go away, because it turned out there was no
substance in it, it was got up by some disaffected former employees.
Nima knows that perfectly well, but he likes to keep rerunning the
original item - as you know, honesty isn't his strong point.
His explanation, BTW, for why the story didn't go anywhere, was that
the Baha'is had bribed the authorities, and Indians being so currupt,
that had sorted the matter out. Racism _is_ one of his strong points.
Viv.
Lol I knew he would come up with something like that if they were found
innocent. Nothing would have satasfied him unless there was a guilty
verdict. I just assumed this was breaking news.
Yet not a shred of credible evidence has been produced by these Bahaim to
date proving the case dismissed. Nada!
W |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Finnegan's Wake... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"%^%$##$ at (no spam) !" <nomail at (no spam) nomail.com> wrote in message
news:JDJFk.2957$sc2.485 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Quote:
"Seon Ferguson" <seongf at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:488ed308$0$8963$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
"Viv" <viv_jacobson at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:eaaa0b18-64fb-439e-9557-7bdf7a151086 at (no spam) a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Seon,
The story did in fact go away, because it turned out there was no
substance in it, it was got up by some disaffected former employees.
Nima knows that perfectly well, but he likes to keep rerunning the
original item - as you know, honesty isn't his strong point.
His explanation, BTW, for why the story didn't go anywhere, was that
the Baha'is had bribed the authorities, and Indians being so currupt,
that had sorted the matter out. Racism _is_ one of his strong points.
Viv.
Lol I knew he would come up with something like that if they were found
innocent. Nothing would have satasfied him unless there was a guilty
verdict. I just assumed this was breaking news.
Yet not a shred of credible evidence has been produced by these Bahaim to
date proving the case dismissed. Nada!
You're the one who has asserted this was a spy ring blah blah blah
Where's the evidence?
Until you produce it, I and just about every other sensible person will
assume you're just farting ... as usual! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:04 am
|
|