|
Religion Forum Index » Ásatrú Forum » I have a blog....
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
 Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 5, 6:01 pm, Attuarii <chatten... at (no spam) germania.sup> wrote:
Looks to be more a collection of crackpottery, worthy of no further
examination. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 5, 6:28 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote: scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Behold:
http://up-ship.com/blog/
Every bit as useful and important as just about any other blog out
there...
A blog is only as important as the people who read it.
*I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Attuarii... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
You call *that* a "blog". This is a fucking blog!
http://vehme.blogspot.com/
--
"It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses
or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not
change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
Giordano Bruno |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dirk Bruere at NeoPax... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
A blog is only as important as the people who read it.
FFF
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 5, 9:27 pm, robert bowman <bow... at (no spam) montana.com> wrote:
Quote: scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
*I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined.
I doubt Kos will be feeling the competition anytime soon.
I'm not trying to compete for "looniest Leftie hangout." Kos and DU
can fight it out for that one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| robert bowman... |
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Quote: *I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined.
I doubt Kos will be feeling the competition anytime soon. Nice cat, though. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 6, 4:42 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote: scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 6:28 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Behold:
http://up-ship.com/blog/
Every bit as useful and important as just about any other blog out
there...
A blog is only as important as the people who read it.
*I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined.
That's common to *all* authors.
Yup. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dirk Bruere at NeoPax... |
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Quote: On Jun 5, 6:28 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Behold:
http://up-ship.com/blog/
Every bit as useful and important as just about any other blog out
there...
A blog is only as important as the people who read it.
*I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined.
That's common to *all* authors.
FFF
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Attuarii... |
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:41 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Quote: On Jun 5, 6:28 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Behold:
http://up-ship.com/blog/
Every bit as useful and important as just about any other blog out
there...
A blog is only as important as the people who read it.
*I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined.
So what does an airplane do if the front 1/3 of the fuselage breaks off.
a) continues to fly normally,
b) ascends several thousand feet until it finally stalls, or
c) immediately begins to tumble out of control and plummet from the sky?
--
"It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses
or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not
change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
Giordano Bruno |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 7:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 6, 8:30 pm, robert bowman <bow... at (no spam) montana.com> wrote:
Quote: Attuarii wrote:
So what does an airplane do if the front 1/3 of the fuselage breaks off.
a) continues to fly normally,
b) ascends several thousand feet until it finally stalls, or
c) immediately begins to tumble out of control and plummet from the sky?
A Cessna 150 or something with where the front 1/3 doesn't include the
power? I'd go for b, assuming the control surfaces were left in a more
or less neutral position.
Losing the front portion ot the fuselage is a dandy way to both shed
weight *and* pitch the remaining aircraft upwards. It's basic
physics... an immediate aft-shift in CG with weight loss equals
climb.
Happened a few times in WWII, as memory serves...a B-17 or B-24 takes
a flak shell right to the cockpit and BLAM the nose goes away. Often
the plane immediately would go buggo... but sometimes, if the shock
didn't tear the rest of the plane to flinders or upset the controls,
the plane would launch itself skywards. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| robert bowman... |
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Attuarii wrote:
Quote: So what does an airplane do if the front 1/3 of the fuselage breaks off.
a) continues to fly normally,
b) ascends several thousand feet until it finally stalls, or
c) immediately begins to tumble out of control and plummet from the sky?
A Cessna 150 or something with where the front 1/3 doesn't include the
power? I'd go for b, assuming the control surfaces were left in a more
or less neutral position. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Attuarii... |
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Quote: scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 6:28 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Behold:
http://up-ship.com/blog/
Every bit as useful and important as just about any other blog out
there...
A blog is only as important as the people who read it.
*I* read it, therefore making it more important than a bagrillion
other blogs combined.
That's common to *all* authors.
I actually get a fair amount of traffic on my blog, and I filter out the
robots before I count.
--
"It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses
or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not
change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
Giordano Bruno |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com... |
| Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 7, 7:13 am, Attuarii <chatten... at (no spam) germania.sup> wrote:
Quote: scottlowt... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 8:30 pm, robert bowman <bow... at (no spam) montana.com> wrote:
Attuarii wrote:
So what does an airplane do if the front 1/3 of the fuselage breaks
off.
a) continues to fly normally,
b) ascends several thousand feet until it finally stalls, or
c) immediately begins to tumble out of control and plummet from the
sky?
A Cessna 150 or something with where the front 1/3 doesn't include the
power? I'd go for b, assuming the control surfaces were left in a more
or less neutral position.
Losing the front portion ot the fuselage is a dandy way to both shed
weight *and* pitch the remaining aircraft upwards. It's basic
physics... an immediate aft-shift in CG with weight loss equals
climb.
Happened a few times in WWII, as memory serves...a B-17 or B-24 takes
a flak shell right to the cockpit and BLAM the nose goes away. Often
the plane immediately would go buggo... but sometimes, if the shock
didn't tear the rest of the plane to flinders or upset the controls,
the plane would launch itself skywards.
Sure. Care to provide one shred of actual evidence?
Yes. There was a jetliner a few years back that lost the forward
section after a fuel tank exploded. It climbed some distance before
finally tumbling out of control.
I know for a fact that
Quote: a plane is completely unstable with the CG that far from the CL.
The "CL?" The Center Line? The blow the nose off an airplane, the CG
will remain on the center line. You'd have to drop an engine off the
wing - or drop the wing itself - for the CG to shif *sideways* off the
center line.
Big f'ing
Quote: hint: the horizontal stabilizer is not shaped as an airfoil.
That would come as a surprise to any aircraft designer. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Attuarii... |
| Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
scottlowther at (no spam) ix.netcom.com wrote:
Quote: On Jun 6, 8:30 pm, robert bowman <bow... at (no spam) montana.com> wrote:
Attuarii wrote:
So what does an airplane do if the front 1/3 of the fuselage breaks
off.
a) continues to fly normally,
b) ascends several thousand feet until it finally stalls, or
c) immediately begins to tumble out of control and plummet from the
sky?
A Cessna 150 or something with where the front 1/3 doesn't include the
power? I'd go for b, assuming the control surfaces were left in a more
or less neutral position.
Losing the front portion ot the fuselage is a dandy way to both shed
weight *and* pitch the remaining aircraft upwards. It's basic
physics... an immediate aft-shift in CG with weight loss equals
climb.
Happened a few times in WWII, as memory serves...a B-17 or B-24 takes
a flak shell right to the cockpit and BLAM the nose goes away. Often
the plane immediately would go buggo... but sometimes, if the shock
didn't tear the rest of the plane to flinders or upset the controls,
the plane would launch itself skywards.
Sure. Care to provide one shred of actual evidence? I know for a fact that
a plane is completely unstable with the CG that far from the CL. Big f'ing
hint: the horizontal stabilizer is not shaped as an airfoil.
--
"It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses
or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not
change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
Giordano Bruno |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
