 |
|
| Politics Forum Index » Economic Politics Forum » Is libertarianism just one of many a... |
|
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Jerry Okamura... |
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7ljnjkF3ctab7U1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
Quote: Jerry Okamura wrote
Mark M. <mark at (no spam) ztech.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really
simple. Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Libertarians are terminal fuckwits.
Libertarians believe in freedom. If that makes them "terminal
fuckwits", then I would be proud to be called a libertarian..
Libertarianism is consumerism wearing a powdered wig and knee breeches.
If you are free, you get to choose what you want or need.
Wrong when things are setup very badly so you cant get to choose an
appropriate way to deal with
a serious medical problem when you are incapable of working due to that
serious medical problem.
Yep, that person is just a "victim" who had no control over what happens.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rod Speed... |
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jerry Okamura wrote
Quote: Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really
simple. Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Libertarians are terminal fuckwits.
Libertarians believe in freedom.
Libertarians wouldnt know what real freedom was if it bit them on their lard arses.
No, you got it backwards.
Nope, you have.
Quote: Democrats don't give a damn about our freedoms, or they would not be trying to "force" everyone to have health
insurance.
It aint just democrats that force everyone to have liability insurance with their cars.
Quote: Most obviously when their dreaded 'big govt' delivered real freedom for MILLIONS in WW2.
Ah, and Bush delivered real freedom for MILLIONS, when he went to war with Iraq.
No one but a fool ever claimed anything like that.
Quote: Are you saying that he made the right decision?
Nope, I have said repeatedly that he didnt.
Separate matter entirely to whether your dreaded 'big
govt' delivered real freedom to MILLIONS in WW2.
Quote: And completely eliminated world wars as well.
That is a downright silly statement.
Nope.
Quote: No one can ELIMINATE world wars.
Its just happened, with your dreaded 'big govt' delivering nukes.
And your dreaded 'big govt' delivered the 'green revolution' that
delivered real freedom from starvation for countless millions in spades.
Quote: Thats REAL freedom, fuckwit.
Yep. we fought to give other people freedom, while at home we are doing eveything we can to take away our freedoms.
That last is only your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasyland.
Quote: If that makes them "terminal fuckwits", then I would be proud to be called a libertarian..
No surprises there.
If wanting our citizens to be free,
They have been for a hell of a long time now, fool.
Quote: is being a "terminal fuckwit",
You're a terminal fuckwit if you havent even noticed that they have been free for a long time now.
Quote: I would be more than happy to be among those who will fight for our freedoms.
You never ever do anything even remotely resembling anything like that, just
mindlessly and pig ignorantly bay at the moon with no effect what so ever. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tim... |
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 5, 4:19 pm, Michael Gordge <mikegor... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> As far as I understand ---- well at least we won't be going far. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rod Speed... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Quote: Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
You may be born free, but you are not free for very long, if governement takes away your freedom.
Hence, freedom can only ever be violated / taken away, never granted.
Wrong, as always.
The allies granted real freedom to hordes as a result of WW2, fool. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Zinnic... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 1, 4:21 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 28, 1:55 am, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really simple.
Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Nope, you are born free and what you believe doesn't change that fact.
Get real Gordgeous! You are not born free. You are born dependent on
others. Whatever you believe as a political adult does'nt change the
fact that mammalian offspring restrict the freedom of their parents.
To deny this is to deny a fundamental of biology.
PS Do not bother to ask how "political' before 'adult' changes the
meaning of adult. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Michael Gordge... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 5:38 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: The allies granted real freedom to hordes as a result of WW2, fool.
Ewe fucking idiot, their freedom had been removed violated and it was
restored, the restoration of freedom is NOT granting freedom, freedom
can never be granted by anyone but a dishonest moronic leftist thug.
Returning man to his natural state is not granting that man anything,
freedom can only ever be violated and never granted.
MG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Michael Gordge... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 11:23 pm, Zinnic <zeenr... at (no spam) gate.net> wrote:
Quote: To deny this is to deny a fundamental of biology.
You are in denial of your fundamental biological natural state, an
ability as a human being to think and act for yourself, to think
independently, its the ability that your parents were meant to hold in
trust for you while your body grew and your mind matured, they were
morally obliged as rational beings to nurture and to encourage your
natural state, and never to take total control manipulate and violate
it, as has obviously happened in yours and every other brain dead
socialist's case.
MG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jerry Okamura... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7ljufvF3dn4ptU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
Quote: Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really
simple. Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Libertarians are terminal fuckwits.
Libertarians believe in freedom.
Libertarians wouldnt know what real freedom was if it bit them on their
lard arses.
No, you got it backwards.
Nope, you have.
Democrats don't give a damn about our freedoms, or they would not be
trying to "force" everyone to have health insurance.
It aint just democrats that force everyone to have liability insurance
with their cars.
That is a true statement, that does not mean they are right.
Quote:
Most obviously when their dreaded 'big govt' delivered real freedom for
MILLIONS in WW2.
Ah, and Bush delivered real freedom for MILLIONS, when he went to war
with Iraq.
No one but a fool ever claimed anything like that.
Once again you got it backwards. The Iraqi people were not free when Saddam
was in control of that country. As a result of our actions, the peole have
a chance to be free. Now, what they will do about that chance is still an
unknwon, but you cannot argue that they have not been given the chance, that
they did not have when Saddam was in control of that country.
Quote:
Are you saying that he made the right decision?
Nope, I have said repeatedly that he didnt.
Obama is making the wrong decision?
Quote:
Separate matter entirely to whether your dreaded 'big
govt' delivered real freedom to MILLIONS in WW2.
And completely eliminated world wars as well.
That is a downright silly statement.
Nope.
No one can ELIMINATE world wars.
Its just happened, with your dreaded 'big govt' delivering nukes.
Which means what?
Quote:
And your dreaded 'big govt' delivered the 'green revolution' that
delivered real freedom from starvation for countless millions in spades.
At the cost of the "freedom" of someone else?
Quote:
Thats REAL freedom, fuckwit.
No REAL freedom is when EVERYONE is free, not some with more FREEDOM and
some with less FREEDOM.
Quote:
Yep. we fought to give other people freedom, while at home we are doing
eveything we can to take away our freedoms.
That last is only your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasyland.
When government is about to "force" everyone to have health insurance, how
can that be giving people more freedom? Insurance IS making people less
free, not more free. When you buy insurance you are depeding on someone
else to provide you with a little more safety, at the price of your freedom.
Who is the ignorant one, you or me? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Michael Gordge... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 5:50 pm, Tim <tbees... at (no spam) aci.on.ca> wrote:
Quote: ---- well at least..............
Context dropping cockhead, both left and right wing politics sanction
and demand violations of the human individual's liberty, in which case
there is no fundamental difference between them.
MG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Michael Gordge... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 6, 7:59 am, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Quote: That is really a silly statement. When anyone wants people to be free, that
does not mean that you can do anything you want to do with that freedom.
What the fuck are you on about? Responsibility is the flip side of
freedom, they are the two sides of the same coin, they come stuck fast
together whether you want it / like it or not. Your natural state is
freedom and that means you have no choice but to learn the
consequences of your own ideas / actions, that process is called
learning your responsibilities, not to others but to yourself.
Quote: Independence and freedom are not necessarily the same thing.
Thinking means to think independently, no-one can think for you, just
as no-one can digest your food or breath for you.
Yes yes I know, both leftist and right wing retards, (thats all of
them) do insist a human being's body be shackled and their minds
indoctrinated by their parents and or the state and that no thinking
(independence / freedom ) be involved.
MG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rod Speed... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jerry Okamura wrote
Quote: Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really
simple. Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Libertarians are terminal fuckwits.
Libertarians believe in freedom.
Libertarians wouldnt know what real freedom was if it bit them on their lard arses.
No, you got it backwards.
Nope, you have.
Democrats don't give a damn about our freedoms, or they would not be trying to "force" everyone to have health
insurance.
It aint just democrats that force everyone to have liability insurance with their cars.
That is a true statement, that does not mean they are right.
You get no say what so ever on what is right, EVER.
Quote: Most obviously when their dreaded 'big govt' delivered real freedom for MILLIONS in WW2.
Ah, and Bush delivered real freedom for MILLIONS, when he went to war with Iraq.
No one but a fool ever claimed anything like that.
Once again you got it backwards.
You're lying, as always.
Quote: The Iraqi people were not free when Saddam was in control of that country.
They aint free NOW, fuckwit.
Quote: As a result of our actions, the peole have a chance to be free.
They always did, they could have overthrown Saddam, fuckwit.
Quote: Now, what they will do about that chance is still an unknwon,
Like hell it is, we already know that they told americans to fuck off out of their country.
Quote: but you cannot argue that they have not been given the chance,
Corse I can when their personal circumstances ended
up MUCH LESS FREE as a result of the stupid invasion.
They werent even free to go down the market without a severe risk of getting killed, fuckwit.
Quote: that they did not have when Saddam was in control of that country.
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.
Quote: Are you saying that he made the right decision?
Nope, I have said repeatedly that he didnt.
Obama is making the wrong decision?
He hasnt made any decision that matters except to continue what the shrub did on the bailouts etc.
Quote: Separate matter entirely to whether your dreaded 'big
govt' delivered real freedom to MILLIONS in WW2.
And completely eliminated world wars as well.
That is a downright silly statement.
Nope.
No one can ELIMINATE world wars.
Its just happened, with your dreaded 'big govt' delivering nukes.
Which means what?
That nukes completely eliminated any possibility of another world war.
No one like the Japs or the krauts will ever be stupid enough to try it again.
Quote: And your dreaded 'big govt' delivered the 'green revolution' that
delivered real freedom from starvation for countless millions in spades.
At the cost of the "freedom" of someone else?
Nope, most who were free to starve were free to not starve, fuckwit.
Quote: Thats REAL freedom, fuckwit.
No REAL freedom is when EVERYONE is free, not some with more FREEDOM and some with less FREEDOM.
You aint established that anyone had less FREEDOM as a result of that particular big govt activity, fuckwit.
You aint established that anyone had less FREEDOM as
a result of big govt completely eliminating smallpox from
the wild either except in the peurile sense that you are
no long free to contract smallpox and die of it anymore.
And if you object to that loss of FREEDOM, you are indeed a terminal fuckwit.
Quote: Yep. we fought to give other people freedom, while at home we are doing eveything we can to take away our freedoms.
That last is only your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasyland.
When government is about to "force" everyone to have health
insurance, how can that be giving people more freedom?
They have the freedom to stop working when their medical condition makes that undesirable,
because they dont lose their health insurance when they stop working, fuckwit.
Quote: Insurance IS making people less free, not more free.
Wrong, as always.
Quote: When you buy insurance you are depeding on someone else to provide you with a little more safety, at the price of your
freedom.
Wrong, as always. You are always free to not bother with the insurance, fuckwit.
And free to choose whether you use insurance too.
Quote: Who is the ignorant one, you or me?
You, as always. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jerry Okamura... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7lm4svF3eij9sU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
Quote: Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really
simple. Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Libertarians are terminal fuckwits.
Libertarians believe in freedom.
Libertarians wouldnt know what real freedom was if it bit them on
their lard arses.
No, you got it backwards.
Nope, you have.
Democrats don't give a damn about our freedoms, or they would not be
trying to "force" everyone to have health insurance.
It aint just democrats that force everyone to have liability insurance
with their cars.
That is a true statement, that does not mean they are right.
You get no say what so ever on what is right, EVER.
Don't approve of the First Amendment to the Constitution?
Quote:
Most obviously when their dreaded 'big govt' delivered real freedom
for MILLIONS in WW2.
Ah, and Bush delivered real freedom for MILLIONS, when he went to war
with Iraq.
No one but a fool ever claimed anything like that.
Once again you got it backwards.
You're lying, as always.
The Iraqi people were not free when Saddam was in control of that
country.
They aint free NOW, fuckwit.
That is a lie. They have a whole lot more freedom than the citizens of Iran
or North Korea, to name two countries where the people have less freedom.
Quote:
As a result of our actions, the peole have a chance to be free.
They always did, they could have overthrown Saddam, fuckwit.
Meaningless statement. The fact is, they DID NOT overthrow Saddam
Quote:
Now, what they will do about that chance is still an unknwon,
Like hell it is, we already know that they told americans to fuck off out
of their country.
Free people can do what they want for their own country.
Quote:
but you cannot argue that they have not been given the chance,
Corse I can when their personal circumstances ended
up MUCH LESS FREE as a result of the stupid invasion.
Ignorance is bliss.
Quote:
They werent even free to go down the market without a severe risk of
getting killed, fuckwit.
Freedom does not guarantee safety. In order to be both free and safe, you
have to fight for your freedoms.
Quote:
that they did not have when Saddam was in control of that country.
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.
Huh? Did they have more freedom when Saddam was in power, or do they have
more freedom now?
Quote:
Are you saying that he made the right decision?
Nope, I have said repeatedly that he didnt.
Obama is making the wrong decision?
He hasnt made any decision that matters except to continue what the shrub
did on the bailouts etc.
Yep, and therefore, he agrees that Bush did the right thing?
Quote:
Separate matter entirely to whether your dreaded 'big
govt' delivered real freedom to MILLIONS in WW2.
And completely eliminated world wars as well.
That is a downright silly statement.
Nope.
No one can ELIMINATE world wars.
Its just happened, with your dreaded 'big govt' delivering nukes.
Relevance to what I said?
Quote:
Which means what?
That nukes completely eliminated any possibility of another world war.
Reading tea leaves again?
Quote:
No one like the Japs or the krauts will ever be stupid enough to try it
again.
First of all, by using those words, you have proven to everyone who reads
your posting that you are a racist. Second, obviously they Japanese and
Germans would not start another war, why should they, as a result of having
been defeated, they were given a chance to be free, and as a result they
used that right to make their country prosper.
Quote:
And your dreaded 'big govt' delivered the 'green revolution' that
delivered real freedom from starvation for countless millions in spades.
At the cost of the "freedom" of someone else?
Nope, most who were free to starve were free to not starve, fuckwit.
How many Americans are not going to starve as a result of the green
revolution? What has the green revolution done to prevent people from
starving?
Quote:
Thats REAL freedom, fuckwit.
No REAL freedom is when EVERYONE is free, not some with more FREEDOM and
some with less FREEDOM.
You aint established that anyone had less FREEDOM as a result of that
particular big govt activity, fuckwit.
Do I really have to establish that? Big government, menas more government
programs, and more spending. What government programs gives us more
freedoms, and what government program gives us less freedom. If the
government "confiscates" our money to feed the beast, do we have more
freedom or less freedom?
Quote:
You aint established that anyone had less FREEDOM as
a result of big govt completely eliminating smallpox from
the wild either except in the peurile sense that you are
no long free to contract smallpox and die of it anymore.
Ignorance is bliss |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rod Speed... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jerry Okamura wrote
Quote: Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
Jerry Okamura wrote
Michael Gordge <mikegordge at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote
Jerry Okamura <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote
Too much thinking and too little common sense. It is really
simple. Libertairans believe that people should be free.
Libertarians are terminal fuckwits.
Libertarians believe in freedom.
Libertarians wouldnt know what real freedom was if it bit them on their lard arses.
No, you got it backwards.
Nope, you have.
Democrats don't give a damn about our freedoms, or they would not be trying to "force" everyone to have health
insurance.
It aint just democrats that force everyone to have liability insurance with their cars.
That is a true statement, that does not mean they are right.
You get no say what so ever on what is right, EVER.
Don't approve of the First Amendment to the Constitution?
That doesnt give you a say on what is right, fool.
Just lets you make a fool of yourself mindlessly
and brainless raving on about FREEDOM.
Quote: Most obviously when their dreaded 'big govt' delivered real freedom for MILLIONS in WW2.
Ah, and Bush delivered real freedom for MILLIONS, when he went to war with Iraq.
No one but a fool ever claimed anything like that.
Once again you got it backwards.
You're lying, as always.
The Iraqi people were not free when Saddam was in control of that country.
They aint free NOW, fuckwit.
That is a lie.
Nope, its a fact. They aint even free to go down the market and not end up dead in the process.
Quote: They have a whole lot more freedom than the citizens of Iran or North Korea,
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever have a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.
Those are much freer to go down the market without risking ending up dead, fuckwit.
Quote: to name two countries where the people have less freedom.
Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasyland.
They had much more freedom to not end up DEAD before the invasion.
Quote: As a result of our actions, the peole have a chance to be free.
They always did, they could have overthrown Saddam, fuckwit.
Meaningless statement. The fact is, they DID NOT overthrow Saddam
Because not enough cared about doing that, fuckwit.
Quote: Now, what they will do about that chance is still an unknwon,
Like hell it is, we already know that they told americans to fuck off out of their country.
Free people can do what they want for their own country.
They arent even free to go down the market and not end up dead, fool.
Quote: but you cannot argue that they have not been given the chance,
Corse I can when their personal circumstances ended
up MUCH LESS FREE as a result of the stupid invasion.
Ignorance is bliss.
A rolling stone gathers no moss.
Quote: They werent even free to go down the market without a severe risk of getting killed, fuckwit.
Freedom does not guarantee safety.
The invasion drastically reduced their safety, fool.
Quote: In order to be both free and safe, you have to fight for your freedoms.
I'm both and I didnt need to fight for a damned thing to get both.
Quote: that they did not have when Saddam was in control of that country.
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.
Huh? Did they have more freedom when Saddam was in power,
They certainly had the freedom to go down the market and not end up dead.
Quote: or do they have more freedom now?
They certainly have more freedom to end up dead in a bigger variety of ways.
Quote: Are you saying that he made the right decision?
Nope, I have said repeatedly that he didnt.
Obama is making the wrong decision?
He hasnt made any decision that matters except to continue what the shrub did on the bailouts etc.
Yep, and therefore, he agrees that Bush did the right thing?
Corse he does on the stimulus and bailouts, but not on the invasion of Iraq.
Even someone as stupid as you should have noticed that he pulled out of Iraq
with his tail between his legs, just like the US did out of Vietnam the same way.
And will do so with Afghanistan too, you watch.
Quote: Separate matter entirely to whether your dreaded 'big
govt' delivered real freedom to MILLIONS in WW2.
And completely eliminated world wars as well.
That is a downright silly statement.
Nope.
No one can ELIMINATE world wars.
Its just happened, with your dreaded 'big govt' delivering nukes.
Relevance to what I said?
Thats how they eliminated world wars, fool.
Quote: Which means what?
That nukes completely eliminated any possibility of another world war.
Reading tea leaves again?
Even someone as stupid as you should have noticed that we aint had one in quite a while.
Quote: No one like the Japs or the krauts will ever be stupid enough to try it again.
First of all, by using those words, you have proven to everyone who reads your posting that you are a racist.
You're a silly little pathological liar. Thats no more racist than calling americans yanks, fuckwit.
Quote: Second, obviously they Japanese and Germans would not start another war, why should they, as a result of having been
defeated, they were given a chance to be free, and as a result they used that right to make their country prosper.
Try telling that to Adolf. Dont be TOO surprised when he just laughs
in your stupid pig ignorant face, just like everyone else does.
Quote: And your dreaded 'big govt' delivered the 'green revolution' that
delivered real freedom from starvation for countless millions in spades.
At the cost of the "freedom" of someone else?
Nope, most who were free to starve were free to not starve, fuckwit.
How many Americans are not going to starve as a result of the green revolution?
Americans are completely irrelevant to that.
Quote: What has the green revolution done to prevent people from starving?
By producing enough food so they dont starve, fuckwit.
Quote: Thats REAL freedom, fuckwit.
No REAL freedom is when EVERYONE is free, not some with more FREEDOM and some with less FREEDOM.
You aint established that anyone had less FREEDOM as a result of that particular big govt activity, fuckwit.
Do I really have to establish that?
YOU made that stupid claim about less freedom.
So yes, you do have to establish that.
Quote: Big government, menas more government programs, and more spending.
You quite sure you aint one of those rocket scientist terminal fuckwits ?
Quote: What government programs gives us more freedoms,
WW2, the green revolution, great swathes of scientific
research, a decent military that ensures that the country
cant be invades and so lose your freedom that way, the
freedom to not get smallpox etc etc etc.
Quote: and what government program gives us less freedom.
Not very many, just a few that ensure that terrorists
cant do another 9/11 or even just hijack an aircraft etc.
Quote: If the government "confiscates" our money to feed the beast,
It doesnt do that. The voters decide what they want govt to do and
what taxes will be raised to do what they decide they want govt to do.
Quote: do we have more freedom or less freedom?
It aint that binary. You are free to see if you can
find enough who prefer smaller govt to get that done.
Quote: You aint established that anyone had less FREEDOM as
a result of big govt completely eliminating smallpox from
the wild either except in the peurile sense that you are
no long free to contract smallpox and die of it anymore.
Ignorance is bliss
Your sig is supposed ot have a line with just -- on it in front of it, fool. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Poetic Justice... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael Gordge wrote:
Quote: On Nov 6, 7:59 am, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj... at (no spam) hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
That is really a silly statement. When anyone wants people to be free, that
does not mean that you can do anything you want to do with that freedom.
Sure, what would freedom be if people actually used it.
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Michael Gordge... |
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 7, 5:38 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: The allies granted real freedom to hordes as a result of WW2, fool.
Waiting for ewe to reply to the simple fact that restoring what was
taken / violated is NOT granting man his freedom, ewe fucking commie
brain dead knuckle-dragging jackass.
If your husband was taken against his will and you found away to get
him free - have ewe granted him his freedom or have ewe given back
what he had? Answer the question ewe fucking retard.
MG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:10 pm
|
|