 |
|
| Politics Forum Index » British Politics Forum » Article 48 of Lisbon treaty... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Mustapha Allah... |
 Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
1. The Treaties may be amended in accordance with an ordinary revision
procedure. They may also be amended in accordance with simplified
revision procedures.
Ordinary revision procedure
2. The Government of any Member State, the European Parliament or the
Commission may submit to the Council proposals for the amendment of
the Treaties. These proposals may, inter alia, serve either to
increase or to reduce the competences conferred on the Union in the
Treaties. These proposals shall be submitted to the European Council
by the Council and the national Parliaments shall be notified.
3. If the European Council, after consulting the European Parliament
and the Commission, adopts by a simple majority a decision in favour
of examining the proposed amendments, the President of the European
Council shall convene a Convention composed of representatives of the
national Parliaments, of the Heads of State or Government of the
Member States, of the European Parliament and of the Commission. The
European Central Bank shall also be consulted in the case of
institutional changes in the monetary area. The Convention shall
examine the proposals for amendments and shall adopt by consensus a
recommendation to a conference of representatives of the governments
of the Member States as provided for in paragraph 4.
The European Council may decide by a simple majority, after obtaining
the consent of the European Parliament, not to convene a Convention
should this not be justified by the extent of the proposed amendments.
In the latter case, the European Council shall define the terms of
reference for a conference of representatives of the governments of
the Member States. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Anthropy... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:48:57 -0800 (PST), Mustapha Allah
<adrianbonni at (no spam) postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
Shut up you racist fool |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mustapha Allah... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 4 Nov, 22:07, Anthropy <flub... at (no spam) bogus.com> wrote:
Quote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:48:57 -0800 (PST), Mustapha Allah
adrianbo... at (no spam) postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
Shut up you racist fool
What racist in wanting a England like we had in 1950's where crime was
virtually non existant?
Why should we be in Europe and adopt Human Rights Act etc. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Anthropy... |
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:14:11 -0800 (PST), Mustapha Allah
<adrianbonni at (no spam) postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: On 4 Nov, 22:07, Anthropy <flub... at (no spam) bogus.com> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:48:57 -0800 (PST), Mustapha Allah
adrianbo... at (no spam) postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
Shut up you racist fool
What racist in wanting a England like we had in 1950's where crime was
virtually non existant?
Why should we be in Europe and adopt Human Rights Act etc
LOL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Harry Merrick... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Anthropy wrote:
Quote: On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:14:11 -0800 (PST), Mustapha Allah
adrianbonni at (no spam) postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
On 4 Nov, 22:07, Anthropy <flub... at (no spam) bogus.com> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:48:57 -0800 (PST), Mustapha Allah
adrianbo... at (no spam) postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
Shut up you racist fool
What racist in wanting a England like we had in 1950's where crime
was virtually non existant?
Why should we be in Europe and adopt Human Rights Act etc
LOL
Eeermm! Why is that so funny? It seems that many people feel exactly so. It
is certainly not racist.
--
Harry Merrick. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Dec 12, 2009 3:43 am
|
|