On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:21 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:

Stevie Nichts wrote:
On Oct 29, 12:09�pm, "5259 Dead, 392 since 1/20/09"
ze... at (no spam) finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Stevie
Nichts
nix2nic... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Wait, what? Last year, Afghanistan was a "war of
necessity."
Liberals insisted that we should cut and run from
Iraq -- that
Afghanistan is where the action is. Whatever became
of that?

Still lying your ass off, trying to pretend we approve
of the
occupation of Afghanistan, Nicky?

Who's "we," cupcake? You don't speak for the left, let
alone
warmongers like Dianne Feinstein or Arianna HuffPo or
the NY Times.
Speaking of lying, during the campaign the Dems were all
over
Obama's "the good war" schtick. Of course, once The One
got
elected, they could stop pretending.

"The One" = KOOKER "tell" words

Yeah, Nicky is pretty much a right wing crackpot.

OK, Nicky--show me any of the liberals in these groups
that approve of
the occupation of Afghanistan.

Bammer can't send any more troops to help the ones already
there.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:21 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:
Stevie Nichts wrote:
On Oct 29, 12:09�pm, "5259 Dead, 392 since 1/20/09"
ze... at (no spam) finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Stevie Nichts
nix2nic... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Wait, what? Last year, Afghanistan was a "war of necessity."
Liberals insisted that we should cut and run from Iraq -- that
Afghanistan is where the action is. Whatever became of that?

Still lying your ass off, trying to pretend we approve of the
occupation of Afghanistan, Nicky?

Who's "we," cupcake? You don't speak for the left, let alone warmongers
like Dianne Feinstein or Arianna HuffPo or the NY Times. Speaking of
lying, during the campaign the Dems were all over Obama's "the good
war" schtick. Of course, once The One got elected, they could stop
pretending.

"The One" = KOOKER "tell" words

Yeah, Nicky is pretty much a right wing crackpot.

OK, Nicky--show me any of the liberals in these groups that approve of
the occupation of Afghanistan.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:45:42 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:
5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09 wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:21 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:

Stevie Nichts wrote:
On Oct 29, 12:09�pm, "5259 Dead, 392 since 1/20/09"
ze... at (no spam) finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Stevie Nichts
nix2nic... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Wait, what? Last year, Afghanistan was a "war of necessity."
Liberals insisted that we should cut and run from Iraq -- that
Afghanistan is where the action is. Whatever became of that?

Still lying your ass off, trying to pretend we approve of the
occupation of Afghanistan, Nicky?

Who's "we," cupcake? You don't speak for the left, let alone
warmongers like Dianne Feinstein or Arianna HuffPo or the NY Times.
Speaking of lying, during the campaign the Dems were all over
Obama's "the good war" schtick. Of course, once The One got
elected, they could stop pretending.

"The One" = KOOKER "tell" words

Yeah, Nicky is pretty much a right wing crackpot.

OK, Nicky--show me any of the liberals in these groups that approve of
the occupation of Afghanistan.

Predicted response: <CRICKETS

Sure.  He's a liar from the right.  Notice how he tried to pretend that
Huffington Post favored the occupation, or that the NY Times is liberal.  
He is also trying to pretend that Obama -- or anyone -- called the
occupation a "good war".

Kurt Nicklas wrote:

is. Whatever became of that?



Bammer can't send any more troops to help the ones already
there.

Who is Bammer?

5258 Dead, 391 since 1/20/09 wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:21 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:

Stevie Nichts wrote:
On Oct 29, 12:09�pm, "5259 Dead, 392 since 1/20/09"
ze... at (no spam) finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Stevie Nichts
nix2nic... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Wait, what? Last year, Afghanistan was a "war of necessity."
Liberals insisted that we should cut and run from Iraq -- that
Afghanistan is where the action is. Whatever became of that?

Still lying your ass off, trying to pretend we approve of the
occupation of Afghanistan, Nicky?

Who's "we," cupcake? You don't speak for the left, let alone
warmongers like Dianne Feinstein or Arianna HuffPo or the NY Times.
Speaking of lying, during the campaign the Dems were all over
Obama's "the good war" schtick. Of course, once The One got
elected, they could stop pretending.

"The One" = KOOKER "tell" words

Yeah, Nicky is pretty much a right wing crackpot.

OK, Nicky--show me any of the liberals in these groups that approve of
the occupation of Afghanistan.

Predicted response: <CRICKETS

Kurt Nicklas wrote:
is. Whatever became of that?

Bammer can't send any more troops to help the ones already there.

Who is Bammer?

On Oct 29, 3:46 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans... at (no spam) EvilWatcher.com> wrote:
Kurt Nicklas wrote:

is. Whatever became of that?



Bammer can't send any more troops to help the ones
already
there.

Who is Bammer?

Guess, cretin.

On Oct 29, 11:27?am, Foxtrot <foxt... at (no spam) null.com> wrote:
"FOX News is For Wingnuts" <NBC O... at (no spam) Bush.net> wrote:

This is a wonderful change from the Bush years, and I am so thankful for
it!
Remember when photos of soldiers' caskets were verboten during Bush's
term?
The twirp would never have paid the dead soldiers any honor--yet he
started
the war that killed them. On false pretenses, too.

Those soldiers died long AFTER General Obama could have ended
the war. No false pretenses about how he prolonged that war under "false
pretenses".

Wait, what? Last year, Afghanistan was a "war of necessity."
Liberals insistedthat we should cut and run from Iraq -- that
Afghanistan is where the action is. Whatever became of that?