 |
|
| Politics Forum Index » Reform Politics Forum » Ed and Elaine Brown: Response to U.S. Attorney’s... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Raymond Karczewski... |
 Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Ed and Elaine Brown: Response to U.S. Attorney’s Objection to
Interview
May 27, 2009 UCC-1#20070029134K
009821
To: Michael J. Gunnison
Acting U.S. Attorney
Terry L. Ollila
Asst. U.S. Attorney
55 Pleasant St.
Concord, N.H. [03301]
From: Edward-Lewis:Brown©, Creditor
Elaine-Alice-Brown©, Creditor
c/o 266 County Farm Rd.
Dover, N.H. [03820]
Re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN
Case #09-CR-00030-01/02-GZS
Response to U.S. Attorney’s Objection to Interview
For years the government has been using the media to demonize us to
the public. The U.S. Attorney’s statement that we will be unduly
influencing the public before trial shows that he feels it is
acceptable for the government to influence the public, but not for the
accused to do so. Again this only shows an unlevel playing field
where the U.S. Attorney’s uses the court in collusion to suppress any
truth or fact. The court’s system is adversarial rather than seeking
the truth.
The U.S. Attorney assumes to know the motivations behind the request
for the interview. The history of us shows that for years we have
been outspoken about the truth; he thus has no basis for his
statement.
The U.S. Attorney states that we waited until this late hour to
request an interview. He assumes we have not done so previously. We
have.
The U.S. Attorney falsely assumes we have not publicized anything
prior to the open letter. We have.
The U.S. Attorney uses the main stream media to publicize negative
articles about us and other victims, while we are not able to access
the same, as he knows sensationalism sells.
The U.S. Attorney seems disturbed by the article printed in the New
Hampshire Free Press, which has a very small circulation, while all
articles about us appearing in main stream media with huge
circulations, have all been negative.
The U.S. Attorney wrongly presumes to know our motivations, which he
claims is to influence the jury, while our motivation is only to
inform the public of the truth.
a. The U.S. Attorney refers to the 6th Amendment; he must know that
we have been denied “Assistance of Counsel” as guaranteed by this
amendment, which does not state that said Counsel must be bar
attorneys.
b. The U.S. Attorney must also be aware that we were not allowed our
witnesses in our first trial, from which this trial stems.
c. The U.S. Attorney must also be aware that we were not
allowed our evidence in the first trial, from which this trial stems.
The U.S. Attorney must also be aware of the jury tampering done in the
first trial when the jury was told by the Judge McAuliffe that our
testimony was our opinion of the law, and he would tell them what the
law, when in fact our entire defense was the fact and application of
lawful and legal law.
The U.S. Attorney is aware that we never received a fair trial in
2007, and it appears we are not receiving lawful due process
considerations in these current allegations against our legal
fictions.
The U.S. Attorney should be aware that either constitution does not
confer rights, as all rights come from God. The constitutions only
guarantees rights conferred by God.
The U.S. Attorney should be aware that the constitution was written to
tell the government what they cannot do to the people. Do you
understand, Counselor?
The U.S. Attorney, in view of the above statements, appears to be
trying to keep us in a position of impossibility by trying to
over-control every aspect of all sides, and using the court to achieve
his purposes. The U.S. Attorney should go back to his canons, and
conduct himself in an ethical and fair manner.
The U.S. Attorney wants it both ways; he wants to allow the years of
negative reporting about us, yet disallow a small bit of possibly
positive reporting about two heads-up Americans. (How does he know it
would be positive? To date any interview with main stream media has
been turned around by the media to be negative and sensational. We
have never been able to get positive legitimate reporting with them).
Why do you all fear the truth?
The U.S. Attorney states that “although litigants do not surrender
their first amendment rights at the courthouse door, those rights may
be subordinate to other interests that arise” (emphasis added). What
interests could supersede the God-given rights protected by the
constitution? Could it possibly be that the interests that are
subordinating a right is a private Illuminated agenda of a government
out of control? Of course it is!
The U.S. Attorney mentions that a fair trial must be maintained at all
costs; we have yet to see anything close to a fair trial in our cases.
The U.S. Attorney must be aware, as he has received several Affidavits
of Truth, and has not responded to a single one to date, that there is
no way that we could anticipate a fair trial. An affidavit not
rebutted stands as truth, yet no rebuttals have been forthcoming; he
is now in dishonor and in default, and by law must depart, yet he has
been allowed by the court to continue. Collusion!
The U.S. Attorney claims that he and the courts are trying “to protect
the interests of the public through the fair administration of
criminal justice.” We claim that the public has not been damaged, the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has not been damaged, as there is no law
requiring us to pay an income tax on our earnings, from which these
allegations arise. The best way to protect the interests of the
public is to publicize the truth; this is supposed to be the main goal
of the U.S. Attorney’s office and the court. But that is not the
case, is it?
The U.S. Attorney refers to pre-trial publicity; so far any such
publicity we have seen has been in the Concord Monitor, the Union
Leader, and WMUR-TV, stemming from the U.S. Attorney’s office. Is
this not tainting? Collusion!
The U.S. Attorney should be aware in regards to the jury venire as
being biased by one party or another, that the U.S. Attorney
absolutely biased the Grand Jury and the judges bias the petit jury in
any way they decide.
Justice Edna Jones of the third circuit appellate court stated, in a
presentation to the students at Harvard Law School, that we no longer
have any courts; they are all corrupt. Thus we have no confidence or
faith in this court or the U. S. Attorney’s office/DOJ any longer.
As the U.S. Attorney is aware of the business that is being
orchestrated by the courts/U.S. Attorney/county attorney, underwritten
by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UBS FINANCIAL GROUP by the issuance
of bonds with each civil and criminal case, he can not deny that the
courts et al are operating in commerce. Thus all cases, as so stated
in 27CFR72.11, are commercial crimes. Therefore, all fall under
Uniform Commercial Code. Collusion!
The U.S. Attorney is aware that all juries must be fully informed;
however, the judges continuously mis-inform the jurors as to what
their powers are. The jury is to decide on both facts and law; the
judge tells the jury that they will find on fact and he will find on
law. He is not supposed to enter the case; he is merely there as an
arbiter. The judge’s manual of jury instructions states that the
judge is not to tell the jurors that they have the power to judge the
law; however, the judges go too far by telling the jurors that they
cannot judge the law. Collusion!
The U.S. Attorney is aware that Mr. Muirhead cannot enter the
“defendant’s” box, or the prosecutor’s; however, Magistrate Muirhead
took the defendants’ position, he pled “not guilty.” Thus Mr.
Muirhead is the responsible party to your claim of arraignment.
Collusion!
The U.S. Attorney should be aware that we reluctantly submit to doing
any kind of interview with any media, as they have almost always taken
everything we say out of context in order to show us in the worst
possible light – sensationalism sells.
The U.S. Attorney is aware that “defendants” are fictional STRAWMAN by
the court’s own description, and cannot speak or do anything else in a
real world. He uses the word ‘defendant’ like confetti. His legal
fiction interpretation of who we are is not appreciated, is noted, and
is also copyrighted.
To quote Martin Luther, “Every institution in which men are not
unceasingly occupied with the word of God, must become corrupt.” God
has not been in these courtrooms for many years. (Note missing
Bible, which was the reason for standing when the judge entered the
courtroom with the Bible under his arm.)
The U.S. Attorney’s objection should be denied.
God bless.
By Order of: EDWARD BROWN© By Order of: ELAINE BROWN©
___________________________ __________________________
By: Edward-Lewis:Brown©, Creditor By: Elaine-Alice:Brown©,
Creditor
*********************************************
"No other man but I in the recorded History of
mankind, including JESUS CHRIST, has directly
revealed to the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to
enslave mankind -- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"
Raymond Ronald Karczewski© http://www.arkenterprises.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:29 am
|
|