Main Page | Report this Page
Politics Forum Index  »  Economic Politics Forum  »  Scotch hands go ever deeper into English pockets...
Page 1 of 1    

Scotch hands go ever deeper into English pockets...

Author Message
Robert Henderson...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:19 am
Guest
TELEGRAPH 4.11.09
1. 0 Every family in the country is now facing a tax liability of 0 to prop up Britain0 the biggest bail-out in history.

By Robert Winnett, Edmund Conway and Harry Wallop

The Chancellor confirmed that the Government would pump an extra
0 the only way to keep the business alive.

Taxpayers have poured a total of 0 the 0 that was set aside as insurance against further trouble in the future.

In total, the Government has put 0 the banks, including RBS, Lloyds and HBOS, since the start of the
financial crisis last year.
Note: Utterly mad. The taxpayer takes on heroically dangerous
obligations without exercising meaningful control over the banks, both
those they have a stake in and the rest who are hiding behind the
assurances of the British state. The only clean way of dealing with the
situation is to nationalise the lot, not just temporarily, but as a
matter of policy so that the state regains control of the money supply.
The nationalised banks would have to be placed under strict legally
enforceable restrictions on what they could do to prevent politicians
corrupting their behaviour for electoral advantage and to ensure the
extension of loans to business and individuals where it was objectively
reasonable to do so, for example, a mortgage based on 3 times earnings
with a 15% deposit.

Nationalising the banks would not mean that companies could not raise
money privately. They could do this through such vehicles as rights
issues and bonds. There would also be a place for private capital
lenders who took deposits and loaned out only the money deposited with
them. RH
--
Robert Henderson
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk
 
GM...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:19 am
Guest
On 4 Nov, 12:19, Robert Henderson <phi... at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
TELEGRAPH                                       4.11.09
1. 0 Every family in the country is now facing a tax liability of 0 to prop up Britain0 the biggest bail-out in history.

                By Robert Winnett, Edmund Conway and Harry Wallop

The Chancellor confirmed that the Government would pump an extra
0 the only way to keep the business alive.

Taxpayers have poured a total of 0 the 0 that was set aside as insurance against further trouble in the future.

In total, the Government has put 0 the banks, including RBS, Lloyds and HBOS, since the start of the
financial crisis last year.
Note:  Utterly mad. The taxpayer takes on heroically dangerous
obligations without exercising meaningful control over the banks, both
those they have a stake in and the rest who are hiding behind the
assurances of the British state.  The only clean way of dealing with the
situation is to nationalise  the lot, not just temporarily, but as a
matter of policy so that the state regains control of the money supply.
The nationalised banks would have to be placed under strict legally
enforceable restrictions on what they could do to prevent politicians
corrupting their behaviour for electoral advantage and to ensure the
extension of loans to business and individuals where it was objectively
reasonable to do so, for example, a mortgage based on 3 times earnings
with a 15% deposit.

Nationalising the banks would not mean that companies could not raise
money privately. They could do this through such vehicles as rights
issues and bonds. There would also be a place for private capital
lenders who took deposits and loaned out only the money deposited with
them. RH
--
Robert Henderson


LOL - Robert's education limitations show once again.

GMc
 
MCP...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:32 am
Guest
"Robert Henderson" <philip at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:DfnBJZaTFX8KFwi7 at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk...
Quote:



TELEGRAPH 4.11.09
1. 0 Every family in the country is now facing a tax liability of 0 to
prop up Britain0 the biggest bail-out in history.

By Robert Winnett, Edmund Conway and Harry Wallop

The Chancellor confirmed that the Government would pump an extra
0 the only way to keep the business alive.

Taxpayers have poured a total of 0 the 0 that was set aside as insurance
against further trouble in the future.

In total, the Government has put 0 the banks, including RBS, Lloyds and
HBOS, since the start of the
financial crisis last year.
Note: Utterly mad. The taxpayer takes on heroically dangerous
obligations without exercising meaningful control over the banks, both
those they have a stake in and the rest who are hiding behind the
assurances of the British state. The only clean way of dealing with the
situation is to nationalise the lot, not just temporarily, but as a
matter of policy so that the state regains control of the money supply.
The nationalised banks would have to be placed under strict legally
enforceable restrictions on what they could do to prevent politicians
corrupting their behaviour for electoral advantage and to ensure the
extension of loans to business and individuals where it was objectively
reasonable to do so, for example, a mortgage based on 3 times earnings
with a 15% deposit.

Nationalising the banks would not mean that companies could not raise
money privately. They could do this through such vehicles as rights
issues and bonds. There would also be a place for private capital
lenders who took deposits and loaned out only the money deposited with
them. RH
--
Robert Henderson
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk

LMFAO what's with all the 0000000s, Rabbie you uneducated twat.
 
True Blue...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:34 am
Guest
"Robert Henderson" <philip at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:DfnBJZaTFX8KFwi7 at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk...
Quote:



TELEGRAPH 4.11.09
1. 0 Every family in the country is now facing a tax liability of 0 to
prop up Britain0 the biggest bail-out in history.

By Robert Winnett, Edmund Conway and Harry Wallop

The Chancellor confirmed that the Government would pump an extra
0 the only way to keep the business alive.

Taxpayers have poured a total of 0 the 0 that was set aside as insurance
against further trouble in the future.

In total, the Government has put 0 the banks, including RBS, Lloyds and
HBOS, since the start of the
financial crisis last year.
Note: Utterly mad. The taxpayer takes on heroically dangerous
obligations without exercising meaningful control over the banks, both
those they have a stake in and the rest who are hiding behind the
assurances of the British state. The only clean way of dealing with the
situation is to nationalise the lot, not just temporarily, but as a
matter of policy so that the state regains control of the money supply.


Barking.
 
naebad...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:46 am
Guest
On Nov 5, 1:19 am, Robert Henderson <phi... at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
Quote:
TELEGRAPH                                       4.11.09
1. 0 Every family in the country is now facing a tax liability of 0 to prop up Britain0 the biggest bail-out in history.

                By Robert Winnett, Edmund Conway and Harry Wallop

The Chancellor confirmed that the Government would pump an extra
0 the only way to keep the business alive.

Taxpayers have poured a total of 0 the 0 that was set aside as insurance against further trouble in the future.


The benefits of an *nglish education no doubt! A total of 0 eh? wow!
You *nglish should be worried.
 
HardySpicer...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:52 pm
Guest
On Nov 4, 4:19 am, Robert Henderson <phi... at (no spam) anywhere.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
Quote:
TELEGRAPH                                       4.11.09

I think poof Hendarse wands Scotsh hands in his pockets?? You'd like
that wouldn't you?


Hardy
 
Robert Henderson...
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:40 am
Guest
In message <zveIm.11751$yW6.690 at (no spam) newsfe11.ams2>, MCP
<gf010w5035 at (no spam) blueyonder.co.uk> writes
Quote:
them. RH
--
Robert Henderson
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk

LMFAO what's with all the 0000000s, Rabbie you uneducated twat.

Blame the ISP/Usenet software not me. It left this end with the figures

intact. Here it is again:



TELEGRAPH 4.11.09
1. £4,350 per family to bail out Britain's banks Every family in the
country is now facing a tax liability of ?4,350 to prop up Britain's
banking system after Alistair Darling announced the biggest bail-out in
history.

By Robert Winnett, Edmund Conway and Harry Wallop

The Chancellor confirmed that the Government would pump an extra £25.5
billion into Royal Bank of Scotland, and declared that it was the only
way to keep the business alive.

Taxpayers have poured a total of £53.5 billion into RBS, including the
?20 billion part-nationalisation last year and another £8 billion that
was set aside as insurance against further trouble in the future.

In total, the Government has put ?74 billion of taxpayers' money into
the banks, including RBS, Lloyds and HBOS, since the start of the
financial crisis last year.

The Conservatives claimed the latest bail-out equated to an extra tax
liability of £2,000 for every one of the 17 million families in the
country. This comes on top of the £2,350 to which every household is
already exposed as a result of previous attempts to prop up the
financial system.

--
Robert Henderson
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:42 am