| Politics Forum Index » General Politics Forum » Money Back Guarantee Amendment for Retroactive Fiscal... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Bret Cahill... |
 Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
If a presidunce's own party don't want to discuss him after his term
is up then his fiscal policy and appointees to the bench should be
reversed retroactively.
Since rightards don't want to discuss Dumbya's legacy then apparently
he has none and his tax cuts for the rich should be reversed
retroactively and his corp shills removed from the bench.
Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| squirltok... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
whofan wrote:
Quote: Bret Cahill wrote:
If a presidunce's own party don't want to discuss him after his term
is up then his fiscal policy and appointees to the bench should be
reversed retroactively.
Could I offer you a tissue?
Loss means nothing to Republicans. Typical of total losers. Too bad it
didn't only affect you, we sure as fuck don't need your political
loser shit affecting our well being. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bret Cahill... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: If a presidunce's own party don't want to discuss him after his term
is up then his fiscal policy and appointees to the bench should be
reversed retroactively.
Since rightards don't want to discuss Dumbya's legacy then apparently
he has none and his tax cuts for the rich should be reversed
retroactively and his corp shills removed from the bench.
Quote: Could I offer you a tissue?
I'm not hearing the ol rightard "yeehaaa!"
Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| whofan... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
Quote: If a presidunce's own party don't want to discuss him after his term
is up then his fiscal policy and appointees to the bench should be
reversed retroactively.
Could I offer you a tissue? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| whofan... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
squirltok wrote:
Quote:
whofan wrote:
Bret Cahill wrote:
If a presidunce's own party don't want to discuss him after his term
is up then his fiscal policy and appointees to the bench should be
reversed retroactively.
Could I offer you a tissue?
Loss means nothing to Republicans.
Nonsense.
True - republicans are used to winning, as having a republican president
for 20 of the past 28 years makes winning seem almost automatic for the GOP.
Occasionally a demmie will win - but they usually overplay their hand
and get kicked out after a short one term stint.
Obama has been so indecisive and ineffective so far that he is moving
into "lame duck" territory.
Quote: Typical of total losers.
Well, except for the results in NJ and VA tonight ;^D
Too bad it
Quote: didn't only affect you, we sure as fuck don't need your political
loser shit affecting our well being.
Tonights election results combined with the 2010 results will pretty
obviously affect your "well being".
Obama got his arse handed to him tonight with those election results.
Is it too early to start referring to your Messiah as "Lame Duck Obama"? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
