Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation.  The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence.  If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture.  Why then should we wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and professionally
in Western countries.  By the same token, I would not thrive in a Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity.  These are are negative
traits to the Western mind that are valued in Negro cultures.
Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western countries
all too often involves violence and aggression winning out over logic
and rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind response
is to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to
succeed and let him live naturally in his native habitat.  It has
nothing to do with hate that I wish to seem them removed and everything
to do with compassion.

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation.  The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence.  If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture.  Why then should we wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation.

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation. The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence. If IQ
tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture. Why then should we wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and professionally
in Western countries. By the same token, I would not thrive in a Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity. These are are negative
traits to the Western mind that are valued in Negro cultures.
Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western countries all
too often involves violence and aggression winning out over logic and
rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind response is
to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to succeed
and let him live naturally in his native habitat. It has nothing to do
with hate that I wish to seem them removed and everything to do with
compassion.

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost
fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation. The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence. If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture. Why then should we
wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and
professionally
in Western countries. By the same token, I would not thrive in a Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity. These are are
negative
traits to the Western mind that are valued in Negro cultures.
Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western countries
all too often involves violence and aggression winning out over logic
and rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind response
is to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to
succeed and let him live naturally in his native habitat. It has
nothing to do with hate that I wish to seem them removed and everything
to do with compassion.

White Spirit <wspirit at (no spam) homechoice.co.uk> wrote in news:hcmvdt$pes$1
at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost
fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation. The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence. If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture. Why then should we
wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and
professionally
in Western countries. By the same token, I would not thrive in a Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity. These are are
negative
traits to the Western mind that are valued in Negro cultures.
Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western countries
all too often involves violence and aggression winning out over logic
and rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind response
is to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to
succeed and let him live naturally in his native habitat. It has
nothing to do with hate that I wish to seem them removed and everything
to do with compassion.


Truly there is a wealth of evidence that blacks are not as smart as
whites. That's why they're so underrepresented in the really useful and
intellectual fields like math, physics, and engineering.

http://www.jbhe.com/news_views/50_black_doctoraldegrees.html

But the corporate media is paid by the globalists not to talk about this.
They want us to think all races are the same so we won't object when they
institute a world govt.

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there are in
Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard over and over
again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand things easily), if
you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100, that's
the way these things work.

Don't fucking argue until you have looked it up and understood.

"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2001 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9CB76ABA35594riemann1850yahoocom at (no spam) 216.168.3.70...
White Spirit <wspirit at (no spam) homechoice.co.uk> wrote in news:hcmvdt$pes$1
at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost
fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation. The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence. If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture. Why then should we
wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and
professionally
in Western countries. By the same token, I would not thrive in a Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity. These are are
negative
traits to the Western mind that are valued in Negro cultures.
Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western countries
all too often involves violence and aggression winning out over logic
and rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind response
is to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to
succeed and let him live naturally in his native habitat. It has
nothing to do with hate that I wish to seem them removed and everything
to do with compassion.


Truly there is a wealth of evidence that blacks are not as smart as
whites. That's why they're so underrepresented in the really useful and
intellectual fields like math, physics, and engineering.

http://www.jbhe.com/news_views/50_black_doctoraldegrees.html

But the corporate media is paid by the globalists not to talk about this.
They want us to think all races are the same so we won't object when they
institute a world govt.

From what I have noticed, those "blacks" that are able to achieve better
than the above also happen to have at least one white ancestor. If such a
premise were true, it needs to be factored into further studies.

Certain historical facts may support the contention. The blacks are mainly
those who stayed behind in Africa, doing the same-old-thing for centuries.
The whites and Asians are those who migrated out and had to adjust to
different environments, and thus needed more brain power to adapt.

Where are the world's LASTING great advanced civilizations: Europe and
Asia mainly. There's some evidence in the Americas, but those
civilizations died off. In Africa, only Egypt - the gateway to the rest of
the world, is the only lasting civilization. Even now, much of Africa
remains tribal.

I don't know if the above statement is actually true or simply meant to be
a racist comment. However, there are sufficient facts to draw a hypothesis
that could indicate that it may be true. A study with EQUAL education to
eliminate much of any bias should be done.

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there are in
Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard over and over
again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand things easily), if
you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100, that's
the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....
but it is good to see you are still squirming...

one day maybe you will bypass your fragile ego and choose instead
to learn

Don't fucking argue until you have looked it up and understood.

"abelard" <abelard3 at (no spam) abelard.org> wrote in message
news:gtmue5dbp1mur8vckgf7i77ub4c7hlqvdt at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there are in
Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard over and over
again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand things easily), if
you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100, that's
the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....
but it is good to see you are still squirming...

one day maybe you will bypass your fragile ego and choose instead
to learn

Don't fucking argue until you have looked it up and understood.

I can't remember killfiling Murphy, but his post has only come up in yours.
He is the gift that keeps on giving. What an ignorant twat he is.

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation.  The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence.  If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture.

Why then should we wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and professionally
in Western countries.  By the same token, I would not thrive in a Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity.

 These are are negative
traits to the Western mind

that are valued in Negro cultures.

Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western countries
all too often involves violence and aggression winning out over logic
and rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind response
is to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to
succeed and let him live naturally in his native habitat.

 It has
nothing to do with hate that I wish to seem them removed and everything
to do with compassion.

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:47:18 -0800, "D. Stussy"
spam+newsgroups at (no spam) bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote:
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2001 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9CB76ABA35594riemann1850yahoocom at (no spam) 216.168.3.70...
White Spirit <wspirit at (no spam) homechoice.co.uk> wrote in news:hcmvdt$pes$1
at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85, this means that almost
fifty
percent of them have an IQ score that fulfils the IQ requirement for
clinical retardation. The liberal view, however, is that IQ tests
are
culturally biased and therefore not a fair measure of intelligence.
If
IQ tests are culturally biased then it stands to reason that they
are a
measure of a person's ability to apply logic and rationale within a
framework considered normal in Western culture. Why then should we
wish
to accept immigrants who are demonstrably poor in the mental
abilities
required by our civilisation?

It's no wonder that Negroes underachieve academically and
professionally
in Western countries. By the same token, I would not thrive in a
Negro
country because I do not demonstrate the same ability to be
dishonest,
aggressive and violent in the face of adversity. These are are
negative
traits to the Western mind that are valued in Negro cultures.
Unfortunately, the culture clash being played out in Western
countries
all too often involves violence and aggression winning out over
logic
and rationale.

That being said, the logical, rational and - above all - kind
response
is to remove the Negro from a country in which he is less likely to
succeed and let him live naturally in his native habitat. It has
nothing to do with hate that I wish to seem them removed and
everything
to do with compassion.


Truly there is a wealth of evidence that blacks are not as smart as
whites. That's why they're so underrepresented in the really useful
and
intellectual fields like math, physics, and engineering.

http://www.jbhe.com/news_views/50_black_doctoraldegrees.html

But the corporate media is paid by the globalists not to talk about
this.
They want us to think all races are the same so we won't object when
they
institute a world govt.

From what I have noticed, those "blacks" that are able to achieve better
than the above also happen to have at least one white ancestor. If such
a
premise were true, it needs to be factored into further studies.

do you really believe that has not long been examined!!

Certain historical facts may support the contention. The blacks are
mainly
those who stayed behind in Africa, doing the same-old-thing for
centuries.
The whites and Asians are those who migrated out and had to adjust to
different environments, and thus needed more brain power to adapt.

Where are the world's LASTING great advanced civilizations: Europe and
Asia mainly. There's some evidence in the Americas, but those
civilizations died off. In Africa, only Egypt - the gateway to the rest
of
the world, is the only lasting civilization. Even now, much of Africa
remains tribal.

I don't know if the above statement is actually true or simply meant to
be
a racist comment. However, there are sufficient facts to draw a
hypothesis
that could indicate that it may be true. A study with EQUAL education
to
eliminate much of any bias should be done.

it is done...

http://www.abelard.org/iqedfran/iqedfran.htm#en1a

Actually, yes. There are many blacks in North America descendant from
slaves that have NOT traced their ancestry, and so they don't know that
they have a white ancestor. Records of such parentage were not commonly
kept, and some may have been destroyed by various events, including but not
limited to the U.S. Civil War. Some ancestries may be wrong - thinking
that the black spouse was the father when one of the white owners or
overseers had stepped in and is the actual biological father. As a result
of this missing factor, these blacks may think they are 100% black, and
thus skew the results of the average to the high side, when in fact their
higher scores are due to their mixed ancestry.

http://www.abelard.org/iqedfran/iqedfran.htm#en1a

It needs to be repeated and the results repeatable without fail.