Lou Ravi wrote:

White Spirit wrote:

Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'?

No, John, the 'Negro'.

How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there are in
Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc?

How many there are is irrelevant.

As I said to Abelard over and over
again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand things easily), if
you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100, that's
the way these things work.

If what you're trying to say is that IQ results are normalised then you
should be aware that the disparity arises when comparing the results
before normalisation occurs.

Don't fucking argue until you have looked it up and understood.

I suggest that you, in fact, look at the studies and try to understand.

a black person with a much higher IQ than you

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:53:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there
are in Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard
over and over again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand
things easily), if you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100,
that's the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....

No I don't little one and you damn well know it but are too
pigheaded to admit it. I've already posted several references to
this fact (average IQ=100 in any group) and there are probably
hundreds of others on the net, yet you, idiot that you are, cannot
accept it, thinking (god knows by what strange process) that the
entire world is wrong and little Abe is right.

you remain incorrect

There are numerous characteristics that distinguish the various human
sub-species which are best defined in middle of the geographic areas
which the sub-species tend to occupy. For example one might compare
the
differing leg:body length ratios between polynesians and europeans,
the shape of the polynesian lower jaw compared with others, flat as
opposed to round hair, skull shape and of course the most distinctive
feature, skin colour. Because the groups are sub-species rather than
species they can interbreed and, at the boundaries of the areas of
geographic sub-speciation the sub-species interbreed and the
characteristics are mixed. If one is prepared to accept that the
indicators of sub-species are real why should it be necessary to
insist that intelligence, or rather the ability to pass intelligence
tests, is not also a characteristic of sub-species? Of course it is.
Just because intelligence in each sub-species broadly fits a normal
distribution curve and that these distribution curves overlap it
cannot be argued, rationally, that the average intelligence of the
different sub-species must not differ. It does differ and we should
not be surprised that it does. To demand that it does not required a
quasi religious belief. The mechanism by which this came about you
have described above. Those that travelled furthest needed to be a
bit smarter, in order to survive, than those that loafed around in
Africa feeding on jungle fruits!

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:53:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there
are in Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard
over and over again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand
things easily), if you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100,
that's the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....

No I don't little one and you damn well know it but are too
pigheaded to admit it. I've already posted several references to
this fact (average IQ=100 in any group) and there are probably
hundreds of others on the net, yet you, idiot that you are, cannot
accept it, thinking (god knows by what strange process) that the
entire world is wrong and little Abe is right.

you remain incorrect

Yes dear, lack of any counter-proof noted.

On 3 Nov, 12:06, White Spirit <wspi... at (no spam) homechoice.co.uk> wrote:
Ste wrote:

 And let's not forget their own role in
the slave trade.

Indeed, let's not forget. But that hardly justifies it. There are
plenty of white men who would sell their own people for money.

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:41:52 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:53:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there
are in Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard
over and over again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand
things easily), if you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100,
that's the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....

No I don't little one and you damn well know it but are too
pigheaded to admit it. I've already posted several references to
this fact (average IQ=100 in any group) and there are probably
hundreds of others on the net, yet you, idiot that you are, cannot
accept it, thinking (god knows by what strange process) that the
entire world is wrong and little Abe is right.

you remain incorrect

Yes dear, lack of any counter-proof noted.

my impression is that you're not educated/bright enough
to understand why you are incorrect...

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:41:52 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:53:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there
are in Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard
over and over again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand
things easily), if you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100,
that's the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....

No I don't little one and you damn well know it but are too
pigheaded to admit it. I've already posted several references to
this fact (average IQ=100 in any group) and there are probably
hundreds of others on the net, yet you, idiot that you are, cannot
accept it, thinking (god knows by what strange process) that the
entire world is wrong and little Abe is right.

you remain incorrect

Yes dear, lack of any counter-proof noted.

my impression is that you're not educated/bright enough
to understand why you are incorrect...

I don't need to dearie because I am not incorrect, as a quick tour of
Google will show you a hundredfold. The average IQ of any group tested
is always 100, that's the way this (rather silly) system works.

"abelard" <abelard3 at (no spam) abelard.org> wrote in message
news:o8oue5d6616qficcdt6iojk87euekgkbdo at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:44:06 -0000, "True Blue" <garybaggers at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:

"abelard" <abelard3 at (no spam) abelard.org> wrote in message
news:gtmue5dbp1mur8vckgf7i77ub4c7hlqvdt at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think there are in
Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said to Abelard over and over
again (he's extremely thick and doesn't understand things easily), if
you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100, that's
the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....
but it is good to see you are still squirming...

one day maybe you will bypass your fragile ego and choose instead
to learn

Don't fucking argue until you have looked it up and understood.

I can't remember killfiling Murphy, but his post has only come up in
yours.
He is the gift that keeps on giving. What an ignorant twat he is.

he has his amusing side....i like the way he maintains his self-belief
however often and however many howlers he posts....

he's like a civilised version of abdul....they make an interesting
compare and contrast...
i blame it on over-indulgent mummies...


One of my favourite Murphy posts;

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/browse_frm/thread/71c479cb790e41e?hl=en&q=water+push+author%3AJohn+author%3Aof+author%3AAix&

I call it Murphy's Law (of hydrodynamics). Start reading at post number 96
of the thread for the best of the archetypal "I-know-everything-and-nothing"
Murphy genius.

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:24:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:41:52 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:53:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think
there are in Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said
to Abelard over and over again (he's extremely thick and
doesn't understand things easily), if you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100,
that's the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....

No I don't little one and you damn well know it but are too
pigheaded to admit it. I've already posted several references to
this fact (average IQ=100 in any group) and there are probably
hundreds of others on the net, yet you, idiot that you are,
cannot accept it, thinking (god knows by what strange process)
that the entire world is wrong and little Abe is right.

you remain incorrect

Yes dear, lack of any counter-proof noted.

my impression is that you're not educated/bright enough
to understand why you are incorrect...

I don't need to dearie because I am not incorrect, as a quick tour of
Google will show you a hundredfold. The average IQ of any group
tested is always 100, that's the way this (rather silly) system
works.

no it isn't
you don't even understand what you read

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:24:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:41:52 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:53:31 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

abelard wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:25 +0100, "Lou Ravi"
j.murphy at (no spam) libertysurf.fr> wrote:

White Spirit wrote:
Given that the average IQ of a Negro is 85,

The 'negro'? How many fucking people (negroes) do you think
there are in Africa, in the USA and in Brasil etc? As I said
to Abelard over and over again (he's extremely thick and
doesn't understand things easily), if you
measure the IQ of ANY group the average is ALWAYS, ALWAYS 100,
that's the way these things work.

you continue to incorrect....

No I don't little one and you damn well know it but are too
pigheaded to admit it. I've already posted several references to
this fact (average IQ=100 in any group) and there are probably
hundreds of others on the net, yet you, idiot that you are,
cannot accept it, thinking (god knows by what strange process)
that the entire world is wrong and little Abe is right.

you remain incorrect

Yes dear, lack of any counter-proof noted.

my impression is that you're not educated/bright enough
to understand why you are incorrect...

I don't need to dearie because I am not incorrect, as a quick tour of
Google will show you a hundredfold. The average IQ of any group
tested is always 100, that's the way this (rather silly) system
works.

no it isn't
you don't even understand what you read

Keep digging little one.

On Nov 3, 5:13 pm, White Spirit <wspi... at (no spam) homechoice.co.uk> wrote:

Nick 'my dad (correction) didnt fly spitfires' Griffin wrote:

a black person with a much higher IQ than you

Prove it.

disprove it.

Uncle Dave wrote:
Are you trying to get in the Guinness Book of Records for the most
ironic posting?

My IQ tested well above average.

Why can't you just say "I don't like black people"?

On 4 Nov, 17:23, Uncle Dave <davidco... at (no spam) t-online.de> wrote:
Why can't you just say "I don't like black people"?

One does wonder.