On 2009-11-03 12:49:24 -0500, "Syd M." <pdwright42 at (no spam) yahoo.com> said:

On Nov 3, 12:26?am, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <seb... at (no spam) infionline.net> wrote in message

news:3ef8a852-b0cb-4e10-9981-015a69b34809 at (no spam) r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

On Nov 2, 10:22 pm, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the
referendum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government.

That would be people like you.

It's time for America to show
the world that we are truly a democracy.

You do not want to face the fact that equal rights should NEVER be
subject to the will of the people, or they are not rights, and the
people are not equal.

Do you realize how you just contradicted yourself ? It is you who wants
government to dictate the law to the people. Fanatical liberals have beco
me
the very thing that they used to detest.



You misspelled 'fascist republicans.'

PDW

REMEMBER THE MAINE!

On Nov 4, 11:33?am, Jimbo <ckdbig... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 4, 9:03?am, LeRoy Blue <leroyb... at (no spam) pillon.net> wrote:

On 2009-11-03 09:19:58 -0500, Jimbo <ckdbig... at (no spam) gmail.com> said:

On Nov 3, 6:39?am, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:49:40 -0800 (PST), Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionline.n
et
wrote:

On Nov 2, 10:22?pm, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the referen
dum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government.

That would be people like you.

It's time for America to show
the world that we are truly a democracy.

You do not want to face the fact that equal rights should NEVER be
subject to the will of the people, or they are not rights, and the
people are not equal.

The queers ARE equal. ?They want special rights.

Absolute nonsense.

Not according to a majority of Americans.

Civil Rights are not decided by mob rule.

1964

On Nov 4, 2:11 pm, Bibon <bi... at (no spam) semper-gumby.org> wrote:
On 2009-11-03 09:21:03 -0500, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)
www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x... at (no spam) m.com> said:

  As for the people in Maine, and marriage

They have clearly stated "FUCK OFF HOMOS"

Not really. It is more like, "wait for a few more years and try
again. Let the right get even more discredited, and the truth become
plainer."

Mark Sebree

--
Semper Gumby

On 11/4/09 9:03 AM, * LeRoy Blue wrote:
On 2009-11-03 09:19:58 -0500, Jimbo <ckdbigtoe at (no spam) gmail.com> said:

On Nov 3, 6:39 am, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:49:40 -0800 (PST), Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionline.n
et
wrote:

On Nov 2, 10:22 pm, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the referen
dum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government.

That would be people like you.

It's time for America to show
the world that we are truly a democracy.

You do not want to face the fact that equal rights should NEVER be
subject to the will of the people, or they are not rights, and the
people are not equal.

The queers ARE equal. They want special rights.


Absolute nonsense.


Not according to a majority of Americans. Your thinking that it's
absolute nonsense is mostly confined to a small section of liberalism
that is confined to sparsely inhabited states in the frozen Northeast
where the thinking is still circa 1800s.

Maybe you can answer the question "What special rights are same-sex
couples demanding?" then.

On Nov 4, 9:22 am, BE-VA <blackwater-evangel... at (no spam) testland.org> wrote:
On 2009-11-03 19:29:54 -0500, Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionline.net> said:





On Nov 3, 6:39 am, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:49:40 -0800 (PST), Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionlin
e.n
et
wrote:

On Nov 2, 10:22 pm, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the refer
en
dum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government.

That would be people like you.

It's time for America to show
the world that we are truly a democracy.

You do not want to face the fact that equal rights should NEVER be
subject to the will of the people, or they are not rights, and the
people are not equal.

The queers ARE equal.

Not last time I checked.  If you think that homosexuals are ACTUALLY
equal, then show that homosexual couples can get married anywhere in
the USA, and have their marriages recognized anywhere in the country.
Show that homosexual couples that are married have access to the same
federal rights under law that heterosexual married couples have.  Sho
w
that homosexuals who are serving in the US Armed Forces can be open
about their sexuality without fear that they will be discharged just
because they are homosexual.

Rights, benefits and privileges are not based on who you like to fuck.

This isn't an issue about who people like to fuck. Try getting your
head out of other people asses.

On Nov 4, 1:57 pm, Bibon <bi... at (no spam) semper-gumby.org> wrote:
On 2009-11-04 06:54:18 -0500, Jimbo <ckdbig... at (no spam) gmail.com> said:





On Nov 3, 10:02 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr... at (no spam) io.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:39:48 -0600, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:49:40 -0800 (PST), Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionli
ne
.net
wrote:

On Nov 2, 10:22?pm, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the refe
re
ndum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government.

That would be people like you.

It's time for America to show
the world that we are truly a democracy.

You do not want to face the fact that equal rights should NEVER be
subject to the will of the people, or they are not rights, and the
people are not equal.

The queers ARE equal.  They want special rights.

Pure Duke bullshit, as usual...heterosexuals can marry the consenting
non-related adult of his/her choice, but in at least 46 states in this
country, the homosexuals can't.  They're not asking for special righ
ts,
 you
brain-damaged bastard, they're asking for equal rights.  Quit whinin
g
because the slaves got their freedom 144 years ago.

Duke is an idiot.  He keeps repeating that "special rights" mantra
that his church feeds him, but so far has been unable to define those
rights, or why they are "special rights".    earl will repeat any l
ie
his pedophile loving church feeds him.

Your post is a classic example of

Truth, thanks!

Mark Sebree
Former US Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class, AT2 (1991 - 1997)

Word for word from the Big Book of Homosexual Dogma (BBHD).

On 2009-11-03 00:54:20 -0500, "W.T.S." <m14m at (no spam) earthlink.net> said:

"J" <Jvisions at (no spam) live.com> wrote in message
news:38kt7h.ol8.19.1 at (no spam) news.alt.net...
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the referendum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government. It's time for America to
show the world that we are truly a democracy.
http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000011370.cfm
And many would still vote for segregation if given the chance. Many did
vote amendments to state constitutions during the civil rights movement to
continue segregation. Civil rights and liberties aren't for the ballot box.
They were designed to protect minorities from majority oppression.

But not one of them is based on sexual orientation or who you like to
fuck. Get real, BOY! Blacks and women are not such by choice -- YOU
ARE!

Bibon <bibon at (no spam) semper-gumby.org> wrote:
On 2009-11-03 00:54:20 -0500, "W.T.S." <m14m at (no spam) earthlink.net> said:

"J" <Jvisions at (no spam) live.com> wrote in message
news:38kt7h.ol8.19.1 at (no spam) news.alt.net...
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the referendum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government. It's time for America to
show the world that we are truly a democracy.
http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000011370.cfm
And many would still vote for segregation if given the chance. Many did
vote amendments to state constitutions during the civil rights movement to
continue segregation. Civil rights and liberties aren't for the ballot box.
They were designed to protect minorities from majority oppression.
But not one of them is based on sexual orientation or who you like to
fuck. Get real, BOY! Blacks and women are not such by choice -- YOU
ARE!

Actual scientific research indicates that you're wrong.

But you bigots cannot handle the truth so you make up lies.

I do wonder if maybe he is right and speaking about his own feelings.
I'd not expect him to have read much in the way of scientific papers
or anything so he's obviously only speaking from his own
self-knowledge.

In this case I think he DOES

Except of course for those times when he's out in town, drinks a little
too much on his
own and he's off down cottaging,

On 2009-11-04 09:07:14 -0500, IAAH <no at (no spam) email.exist> said:

On 11/4/09 9:03 AM, * LeRoy Blue wrote:
On 2009-11-03 09:19:58 -0500, Jimbo <ckdbigtoe at (no spam) gmail.com> said:

On Nov 3, 6:39 am, duke <duckgumb... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:49:40 -0800 (PST), Mark Sebree
seb... at (no spam) infionline.n
et
wrote:

On Nov 2, 10:22 pm, "J" <Jvisi... at (no spam) live.com> wrote:
Let the will of the people be law, whatever the results of the
referen
dum
are. Fanatics want the will of the government.

That would be people like you.

It's time for America to show
the world that we are truly a democracy.

You do not want to face the fact that equal rights should NEVER be
subject to the will of the people, or they are not rights, and the
people are not equal.

The queers ARE equal. They want special rights.


Absolute nonsense.


Not according to a majority of Americans. Your thinking that it's
absolute nonsense is mostly confined to a small section of liberalism
that is confined to sparsely inhabited states in the frozen Northeast
where the thinking is still circa 1800s.

Maybe you can answer the question "What special rights are same-sex
couples demanding?" then.

Of course, 'What the voters in Maine didn't give them.'

martin, ye fly-covered cursed drab, thoe are not worth another word,
else I'd call you knave, ye declared:

I do wonder if maybe he is right and speaking about his own feelings.
I'd not expect him to have read much in the way of scientific papers
or anything so he's obviously only speaking from his own
self-knowledge.

Let's get this right, hey. You cannot prove that his private life meets your
expectations therefore your denigration of him is valid, yes?

In this case I think he DOES

So, you still can't prove anything about his personal life,

Kadaitcha Man <anon at (no spam) no.email> wrote:

On Nov 4, 7:38 pm, BE-VA <blackwater-evangel... at (no spam) testland.org> wrote:
On 2009-11-04 17:37:38 -0500, Mark Sebree <seb... at (no spam) infionline.net> said:

Mark Sebree
Former US Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class, AT2 (1991 - 1997)

What else but a "Tweety Bird."

At least I joined and served during during a declared war.

And I have never heard that "nick".

I see that you could not actually try to refute anything I said.

Mark Sebree