Main Page | Report this Page
Politics Forum Index  »  Democrats Politics Forum  »  PHYSICAL PROOF of the 9/11 INSIDE JOB...
Page 4 of 8    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

PHYSICAL PROOF of the 9/11 INSIDE JOB...

Author Message
slika...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:20 pm
Guest
"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
Quote:
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

You're not too bright, eh Pat?
 
BDK...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:52 pm
Guest
In article <cf5f938e-d781-400a-b53d-1f9326e56b19
at (no spam) j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, chinagreenelvis at (no spam) gmail.com says...
Quote:
On Oct 27, 1:22 pm, BDK <TopSh... at (no spam) sanity.com> wrote:
In article <51213ef3-0e8e-4881-9edb-c60c3a1fa015
at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, chinagreenel... at (no spam) gmail.com says...



On Oct 26, 8:04 pm, BDK <TopSh... at (no spam) sanity.com> wrote:

BWHAHAHAHA! Neutral observer?

That's hilariously ironic.

Ridicule is better than you deserve.
--

BDK..

I'm the neutral observer... FF was quoting my post. Unfortunately, it
was a copy and paste job so it made it look as if he was saying it
himself.

That's what he does, most of the time. I'm kind of disappointed, as I
thought maybe he had "appropriated" some new material.
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

So, anywho, I still don't get it.

Really?

Quote:
The lot of you who are so quick to
tell FF what a nutter he is, why do you frequent this forum?

Because the kooks are funny as hell!

Quote:
Are you all genuinely interested in fringe conspiracy theories that have no
outlet but a dark corner of an outdated internet technology (I know I
come here because I get a kick out of them), or do you hang out here
for target practice?

Most of the "theories" raved about by the kooks have web pages that gave
them the "proof" they claim about 911, Chemtrails, Jews, and on and on.
To be honest, many of the kooks of the past tower over the present crop,
both in level of insanity, and original content. But any kook is fun to
play with. That's why I'm here, kooks have always cracked be up, From
the first time I talked to mental patients at the hospital my best
friend's dad worked at at about 8 years old, to over 40 years later,
here on usenet, and once in a while on the phone at work.


Quote:
What do you guys do for a living and does that
have any bearing on your activity here?


I'm a partner in a real estate business, and I do tech support for extra
money. Both have nothing to do with playing with kooks, unfortunately. I
would love to get paid to play with kooks, it would be my dream job.
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.
 
BDK...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:54 pm
Guest
In article <4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org>, slika at (no spam) hotmail.com says...
Quote:

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

You're not too bright, eh Pat?






And you appear to be so dim you actually suck the light out of a room.
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.
 
george...
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:37 am
Guest
On Oct 30, 7:21 am, "Patrick Keenan" <t... at (no spam) dev.null> wrote:

Quote:
Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved
in a conspiracy to smuggle explosives into the WTC and install them, none
whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.



You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Try asking your parents to explain my post for you.

Like some-one would admit to being its parent......
 
Patrick Keenan...
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:21 pm
Guest
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...
Quote:

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net
wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed
responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of
conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved
in a conspiracy to smuggle explosives into the WTC and install them, none
whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.


Quote:

You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Try asking your parents to explain my post for you.

Hope this helps.
-pk
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:25 am
Guest
On Oct 30, 3:10 pm, sprocket kook <georgesp... at (no spam) I am toast.net> wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com
wrote:

Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal",

Sorry but I already have.


Quote:
... you serve your master Cheeeeeeney ...

Yes, I cry out for my satanic idol when I have nothing else.

Yep.
 
rocket scientist...
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:10 pm
Guest
In article <hbt0m2$tk8$1 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>,
"Freedom Man" <liberty at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Quote:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13049
Global Research, April 3, 2009

Below is the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusions of this important and
carefully researched article. The complete article can be downloaded (pdf)

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe

pp.7-31 (25)
Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R.Ryan,
Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R.Gourley, Bradley
R. Larsen

The Open Chemical Physics Journal
Volume 2
ISSN: 1874-4125
doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007

Complete Article
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TO
CPJ.SGM

Abstract:

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we
have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World
Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from
separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show
marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a
Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second
WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The
properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy,
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive
spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The
red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are
largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like
structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone
demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and
aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a
DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at
approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for
conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed
in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray
chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted
thermitic material and highly energetic.

Global Research Editor's Note
The definition of thermitic material:

A trademark used for a welding and incendiary mixture of fine aluminum
powder with a metallic oxide, usually iron, that when ignited yields an
intense heat.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2003.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of a metal powder and a metal
oxide, which produces an aluminothermic reaction known as a thermite
reaction. (Wikipedia)

What we are dealing with is the melting/ burning of metal structures.

"Metals are capable of burning under the right conditions, similarly
to the combustion process of wood or gasoline. ... A thermite reaction
is a process in which the correct mixture of metallic fuels are
combined and ignited. Ignition itself requires extremely high
temperatures."

Readers can reach their own conclusions as to the far-reaching
implications of these findings.

Although the authors do not address the broader issue of the 9/11
attacks, their findings have a direct bearing on the likely causes of
the collapse of the WTC buildings on September 11, 2001. The findings
also question the validity of the official report of the 911 Commission.

Below are selected excerpts of the article. Readers can also link to
the complete text, by clicking the link

Complete Article
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TO
CPJ.SGM

EXCERPTS

INTRODUCTION

The destruction of three skyscrapers (WTC 1, 2 and 7) on September 11,
2001 was an immensely tragic catastrophe that not only impacted
thousands of people and families directly, due to injury and loss of
life, but also provided the motivation for numerous expensive and
radical changes in domestic and foreign policy. For these and other
reasons, knowing what really happened that fateful day is of grave
importance.

A great deal of effort has been put forth by various
government-sponsored and -funded investigations, which led, in large
part, to the reports released by FEMA [1] and NIST [2]. Other studies
of the destruction have been less well publicized but are no less
important to the outstanding obligation that remains to the victims of
that tragedy, to determine the whole truth of the events of that day
[3-10]. A number of these studies have appropriately focused
attention on the remaining physical material, and on available
photographs and video footage, as sources of evidence still in public
hands, relating to the method of destruction of the three
skyscrapers.

CONCLUSIONS

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in significant numbers
in dust associated with the World Trade Center destruction. We have
applied SEM/XEDS and other methods to characterize the small-scale
structure and chemical signature of these chips, especially of their
red component. The red material is most interesting and has the
following characteristics:

1. It is composed of aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicon and carbon.
Lesser amounts of other potentially reactive elements are sometimes
present, such as potassium, sulfur, lead, barium and copper.

2. The primary elements (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) are typically all present
in particles at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers, and
detailed XEDS mapping shows intimate mixing.

3. On treatment with methyl ethyl ketone solvent, some segregation of
components occurred. Elemental aluminum became sufficiently
concentrated to be clearly identified in the pre-ignition material.

4. Iron oxide appears in faceted grains roughly 100 nm across whereas
the aluminum appears in thin platelike structures. The small size of
the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as
nanothermite or super-thermite.

5. Analysis shows that iron and oxygen are present in a ratio
consistent with Fe2O3. The red material in all four WTC dust samples
was similar in this way. Iron oxide was found in the pre-ignition
material whereas elemental iron was not.

6. From the presence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in the red
material, we conclude that it contains the ingredients of thermite.

7. As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts vigorously
at a temperature of approximately 430 °C, with a rather narrow
exotherm, matching fairly closely an independent observation on a
known super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition and the
presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material
is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900
°C) but very likely a form of super-thermite.

8. After igniting several red/gray chips in a DSC run to 700 °C, we
found numerous iron-rich spheres and spheroids in the residue,
indicating that a very high temperature reaction had occurred, since
the iron-rich product clearly must have been molten to form these
shapes. In several spheres, elemental iron was verified since the iron
content significantly exceeded the oxygen content. We conclude that a
high-temperature reduction-oxidation reaction has occurred in the
heated chips, namely, the thermite reaction.

9. The spheroids produced by the DSC tests and by the flame test have
an XEDS signature (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) which is depleted in carbon and
aluminum relative to the original red material. This chemical
signature strikingly matches the chemical signature of the spheroids
produced by igniting commercial thermite, and also matches the
signatures of many of the microspheres found in the WTC dust [5].

10. The carbon content of the red material indicates that an organic
substance is present. This would be expected for super-thermite
formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and
thus make them explosive. The nature of the organic material in these
chips merits further exploration. We note that it is likely also an
energetic material, in that the total energy release sometimes
observed in DSC tests exceeds the theoretical maximum energy of the
classic thermite reaction.

Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the
red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted
thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly
energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
(emphasis added)

Complete Article

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TO
CPJ.SGM

Study: Scientists Discover Active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust by
researcher
Friday Apr 3rd, 2009 7:30 PM

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Victoria Ashley, STJ911 committee member
Site: www.STJ911.org
Email: stj911 at (no spam) gmail.com
Study: Scientists Discover Active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust

Berkeley, CA, April 3, 2009 -- A new study by independent scientists
and researchers suggests the cause behind the catastrophic destruction
of World Trade Center Towers on September 11th can be seen in the dust
itself: active thermitic material, a highly engineered explosive.

The study, published today in The Open Chemical Physics Journal,
describes a finding of "red/gray bi-layered chips" in samples of dust
taken from vicinity of the World Trade Center following its
destruction. Using tools such as a scanning electron microscope (SEM)
and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) to analyze the
material, the study authors concluded that, "the red portion of these
chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly
energetic."

The study's finding lends new support to the demolition theory put
forth by critics of the official reports.

At a time when the American public is finding it difficult to
understand the full story behind the current economic crisis, findings
of a demolition raise new questions about how the 'War on Terror' --
an enormous source of recent American spending -- was started.

Officials with the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST), charged with establishing the cause of the buildings'
destruction, have stated that they "did not test for the residue of
these compounds in the steel," and that thermite, "or another
incendiary compound," would be too difficult to have placed in the
buildings without notice.

NIST has stated that such difficulties make demolition unlikely. They
concluded that aircraft impacts and the subsequent fires led to the
building failures.

Dr. Steven Jones, physicist and author on the paper, says that NIST
has refused to test the dust for thermite, super-thermite, or any
other accelerant or explosive.

"We've repeatedly asked them to follow standard investigative
procedure, to perform these tests and release the results. They
haven't."

Jones says such tests may be required by fire protection codes.

Kevin Ryan, chemist and co-author on the paper, explained why he
thinks NIST is wrong. "What we've discovered is not conventional
thermite -- which is what NIST continues to refer to -- but a highly
engineered thermitic material, or 'super thermite', probably designed
for just this type of application."

Pre-planned demolition, supporters say, is the 'best-fit' model for
the many unusual and unexplained characteristics of the building
failures, such as the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and the
extreme pulverization of the materials leading to clouds of
micron-sized dust particles, described in one insurance report as
behaving similar to a "volcanic eruption".

"One of the unusual features that piqued my interest," Jones said,
"was the pools of molten metal seen in all three rubble piles, WTC 1,
2 & 7."

NIST officials have published a response stating that the condition of
the steel was "irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse."

Jones, formerly a Professor of Physics with Brigham Young University
and known for his work in muon-catalyzed fusion, published in Nature,
Scientific American, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry, began
researching the 9/11/01 attacks in 2005.

Jones discovered the curious thermitic material in 2007, when he ran a
magnet over a dust sample given to him by a Manhattan resident
survivor of the attack, and found that some particles were attracted
to the magnet.

"That was very odd to me," he said.

Those particles turned out to be iron-rich microspheres, partially
described in a 2001 USGS study of the dust.

But to fully analyze, describe and report on the thermitic material
would take longer.

Jones was joined in that effort by several others including Dr. Niels
Harrit, a chemistry professor with the University of Copenhagen for
over 30 years and author of numerous research papers in journals such
as Nano Letters, the Journal of the American Chemistry Society, and
the Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Harrit says that he is frequently asked why he researches the
September 11th attack. and says has two answers.

"First, I am opposed to crime, and second, when my 6 grandchildren ask
me, 'Grandfather, which side were you on?' I will be able to answer
them, 'I was on your side'."

Co-author Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, a materials scientist and Director of
the TEM (Transmition Electron Microscopy) laboratory at BYU, says he
hopes the paper will "change the way the 9/11 truth movement is viewed
by the mainstream public and media."

And chemist and co-author Kevin Ryan, a former Underwriters
Laboratories manager, challenged the NIST report in public statements
in 2004, and was consequently fired.

"This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been
shown," says Jones. "We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the
dust because this isn't just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or
something -- this is a highly engineered material not readily
available to just anyone."

In a 2006 interview with Deseret News, Jones noted that commercial
explosives must contain tag elements for traceability, but that no law
requires tagging of advanced forms of thermitics.

In 2008, several of these authors published three articles challenging
the official reports in US scientific journals, The Open Civil
Engineering Journal, The Environmentalist, and The Journal of
Engineering Mechanics Dozens of other papers making similar challenges
have been published in the sister publication of the Scholars group,
The Journal of 9/11 Studies

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization of
over 700 independent researchers analyzing the September 11, 2001
attacks with a strong emphasis on the scientific method.

For information: http://www.stj911.com
http://stj911.org/press_releases/ActiveThe...

and;
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal", and you're too
weak to deal with reality.

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... master Cheeeeeeney ...

Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... we can have more laughs at

You're laughing at the 9/11 victims when you don't
mind at all that the real perpetrators get away with it.

Even the most servile bushworshipper can't dispute it:

In fact, his grandfather helped the Nazis kill Americans,
and his father was involved in Iran-Contra, among many
other things.

There is nothing whatsoever in Bush's personal or
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.

http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:00:41 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... a neocon... I ...

You don't seem to understand that your war criminal
idols wouldn't hesitate to murder Americans for their
fun and profit.

See also: "Operation Northwoods".

Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.

"Witnesses To WTC Explosives"

http://www.rense.com/general68/mreproof.htm


On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... I am afraid of reality.

You'd already made that obvious, but it's not about you.

It's about the victims/survivors of 9/11.

They deserve justice, no matter how much you hate them.

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...

You do that because you're afraid of reality.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... the Buch...

The what?

Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.

"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of
evils. Sympathy
for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary
common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation
the enmities of
the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and
wars of the latter
without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite
nation of privileges
denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the
concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by
exciting jealousy,
ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal
privileges are
withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who
devote themselves
to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of
their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with
the appearances of a
virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public
opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption,
or infatuation."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread121869/pg1

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... nutbag physically impossible theories...

You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... playing the useful idiot ...

You sure are.

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
...subservient...

You're doing just what your neocon masters want you to do.

http://www.stewwebb.com/9-11WTCBushCheneyTreason.html

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... rightard...
... delusional rightard fuckwad.
...being the useful idiot ...

No one had asked about you.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... rightard ...

No one had asked for you.

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.

Of course you have those problems.

You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
delusional kkkooker world view.

You can't comprehend that Bush and Cheney are
still profiting from 9/11.

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every
occasion its
enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent
attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons..."

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Bush and Cheney certainly have personal reasons for wanting the
crimes of 9/11 to occur. They did all they could to make sure
the crimes would happen, and they're the primary beneficiaries.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
... He's admitted it...

You're easily duped by faked video.

There's also the way Bush hustled the bin Ladens out of the USA.

He'd forced the FBI to stop investigating them when he took office.

http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html

Bush also made sure that the pilots were disarmed, in July of 2001.

Bush and Cheney are still making money on 9/11.

They're the primary beneficiaries of the crime PNAC wanted.

Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
 
slika...
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:45 am
Guest
"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
Quote:

"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of conspirators who have
remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved in a conspiracy to
smuggle explosives into the WTC and install them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been
detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me? Operation needs to be tight. And it was.
In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD. So, like, as I've
said before, you're not too bright, eh Pat?

Quote:
You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Sure. You're the one believing that 110 floors of concrete and steel can collapse
"due to few small oxygen-starved office fires and some minor structural damage"
in less than 20 seconds. Hell, let's be generous.

60 seconds.

Don't know about you, Pat, but there were like 70+ intact floors below both
impact zones. Didn't you notice?

Oh, I remember. You were talking about pancakes right about after 9/11, right?

Are you one of those people? Maybe?

Quote:
Try asking your parents to explain my post for you.

I'll do, but only if you go and ask yours too about what I've said.

Deal or no deal?
 
slika...
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:45 am
Guest
"george" <gblack at (no spam) hnpl.net> wrote in message
news:12282aa1-9611-448f-9c86-3a6388e67e19 at (no spam) i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 30, 7:21 am, "Patrick Keenan" <t... at (no spam) dev.null> wrote:

Quote:
Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved
in a conspiracy to smuggle explosives into the WTC and install them, none
whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.



You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Try asking your parents to explain my post for you.

Like some-one would admit to being its parent......

---

And here comes the turd, hanging out of ol' Pat's arsehole...
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:01 pm
Guest
On Oct 31, 1:37 pm, "Patrick Keenan" <t... at (no spam) dev.null> wrote:
Quote:
"slika" <sl... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:4aec3125$2 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...





"Patrick Keenan" <t... at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

"slika" <sl... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <t... at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <sl... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda9... at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net
wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed
responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of
conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were
involved in a conspiracy to smuggle explosives into the WTC and install
them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me?

No, I'm not.   By necessity, the "controlled demolition" theory involves a
lot of people.

Operation needs to be tight. And it was.

Yes, meaning it was a few fanatics who flew planes into the towers.

In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD.

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is actually zero evidence of controlled
demolition.

Start with identifying the source of the explosives you claim were used and
tracing their path to the walls in the WTC.

Heck, I'd settle for him trying to show me where these silent and
invisible "explosives" are going off. Forget hauling them into the
building and rigging them... there aren't any explosives going off in
the collapses. How do the kooks square that fact with their theories?
 
Patrick Keenan...
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:37 pm
Guest
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4aec3125$2 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...
Quote:

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net
wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed
responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of
conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were
involved in a conspiracy to smuggle explosives into the WTC and install
them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me?

No, I'm not. By necessity, the "controlled demolition" theory involves a
lot of people.

Quote:
Operation needs to be tight. And it was.

Yes, meaning it was a few fanatics who flew planes into the towers.

Quote:
In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD.

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is actually zero evidence of controlled
demolition.

Start with identifying the source of the explosives you claim were used and
tracing their path to the walls in the WTC.

Quote:
So, like, as I've
said before, you're not too bright, eh Pat?

You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Sure. You're the one believing that 110 floors of concrete and steel can
collapse
"due to few small oxygen-starved office fires and some minor structural
damage"

Excuse me, but now would be the time to point out that you are making things
up.

-pk
 
slika...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:24 pm
Guest
"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:cPednVFYcMZPDHHXnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
Quote:
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4aec3125$2 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of conspirators who have
remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved in a conspiracy to
smuggle explosives into the WTC and install them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been
detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me?

No, I'm not. By necessity, the "controlled demolition" theory involves a lot of people.

More than 19, yes Patrick. Tens of thousands? Far from it.

But hey. Patrick is using the old disinfo technique: when needed, exaggerate.

Typical shill technique. Another one is having his usenet buddy replying and
using ad-hom riiiight... ...about... now, so just wait for it.

Quote:
Operation needs to be tight. And it was.

Yes, meaning it was a few fanatics who flew planes into the towers.

Well, that would be true if the whole US military was a bunch of retarded
mongoloids, Patrick.

So, either the terrorists had moles in every major part of the US defense
system, or the US military is nothing more than a bunch of retarded
mongoloids.

Because, how did the terrorists pick the right day to have all those fighter
jets participating in various training exercises all over US?

Quote:
In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD.

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is actually zero evidence of controlled demolition.

Prove it. Give me scientific evidence of it, Patrick. Tell me, who looked for
explosives, which techniques did they use, what did they actually find, where
did they look for explosives, which types of explosives did they look for, how
many people were involved in that part of the whole 9/11 investigation...

C'mon, Patrick. I'm all ears.

Quote:
Start with identifying the source of the explosives you claim were used and tracing their path to
the walls in the WTC.

That's not my job. That FBI's job, Patrick. That's the whole point behind asking
for a new investigation, dumbass.

I told you, Keenan... you're obviously not too bright.

Quote:
So, like, as I've
said before, you're not too bright, eh Pat?

You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Sure. You're the one believing that 110 floors of concrete and steel can collapse
"due to few small oxygen-starved office fires and some minor structural damage"

Excuse me, but now would be the time to point out that you are making things up.

Well then, prove me wrong.

I mean, if you're "right" and I'm "wrong", why would it be too difficult for you
to do so.

So, Patrick, go ahead. I'm all ears.
 
BDK...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:51 pm
Guest
In article <4aede022$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org>, slika at (no spam) hotmail.com says...
Quote:

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:cPednVFYcMZPDHHXnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4aec3125$2 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of conspirators who have
remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved in a conspiracy to
smuggle explosives into the WTC and install them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been
detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me?

No, I'm not. By necessity, the "controlled demolition" theory involves a lot of people.

More than 19, yes Patrick. Tens of thousands? Far from it.

But hey. Patrick is using the old disinfo technique: when needed, exaggerate.

Typical shill technique. Another one is having his usenet buddy replying and
using ad-hom riiiight... ...about... now, so just wait for it.

Operation needs to be tight. And it was.

Yes, meaning it was a few fanatics who flew planes into the towers.

Well, that would be true if the whole US military was a bunch of retarded
mongoloids, Patrick.

So, either the terrorists had moles in every major part of the US defense
system, or the US military is nothing more than a bunch of retarded
mongoloids.

Because, how did the terrorists pick the right day to have all those fighter
jets participating in various training exercises all over US?

In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD.

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is actually zero evidence of controlled demolition.

Prove it. Give me scientific evidence of it, Patrick. Tell me, who looked for
explosives, which techniques did they use, what did they actually find, where
did they look for explosives, which types of explosives did they look for, how
many people were involved in that part of the whole 9/11 investigation...

C'mon, Patrick. I'm all ears.

Start with identifying the source of the explosives you claim were used and tracing their path to
the walls in the WTC.

That's not my job. That FBI's job, Patrick. That's the whole point behind asking
for a new investigation, dumbass.

I told you, Keenan... you're obviously not too bright.

So, like, as I've
said before, you're not too bright, eh Pat?

You're not too bright, eh Pat?

Apparently, rather more than you.

Sure. You're the one believing that 110 floors of concrete and steel can collapse
"due to few small oxygen-starved office fires and some minor structural damage"

Excuse me, but now would be the time to point out that you are making things up.

Well then, prove me wrong.

I mean, if you're "right" and I'm "wrong", why would it be too difficult for you
to do so.

So, Patrick, go ahead. I'm all ears.




Hey, where did you disappear to for all that time?

Asylum?
Jail?
Forcibly evicted?
A new cardboard box (You would call it a mansion, I guess) in another
city?
The electric company turned you off??
The judge ordered you off the net during your probation?
Your parents got fed up with all the howling?
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.
 
Patrick Keenan...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:29 pm
Guest
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4aede022$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...
Quote:

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:cPednVFYcMZPDHHXnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4aec3125$2 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man"
libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed
responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of
conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were
involved in a conspiracy to smuggle explosives into the WTC and install
them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me?

No, I'm not. By necessity, the "controlled demolition" theory involves
a lot of people.

More than 19, yes Patrick. Tens of thousands? Far from it.

Tens of thousands is your claim, not mine.

However, there is no way that only nineteen people were involved in a
controlled demolition and remained silent.

The small number of people who were actually responsible for the attacks and
murders were not shielded by the many people they came into contact with.
All the people who fed them, housed them, taught them, rented cars to them,
came forward.

Your idea requires that none of the many people who would have come into
awareness of the procuring and movement of large amounts of explosives have
come forward.

The reality is that they haven't come forward because it didn't happen.

Quote:
But hey. Patrick is using the old disinfo technique: when needed,
exaggerate.

You are, after all, the one exaggerating. You've inflated the numbers
significantly, and are just making things up. .

Quote:

Typical shill technique. Another one is having his usenet buddy replying
and
using ad-hom riiiight... ...about... now, so just wait for it.

Operation needs to be tight. And it was.

Yes, meaning it was a few fanatics who flew planes into the towers.

Well, that would be true if the whole US military was a bunch of retarded
mongoloids, Patrick.

It is true, and they aren't.

Your delusions do not dictate reality.

Quote:
So, either the terrorists had moles in every major part of the US defense
system,

Why do you think that moles would be required? Do you think that the
scheduling of military training exercises in populated areas is secret?

Quote:
or the US military is nothing more than a bunch of retarded
mongoloids.

And of course they aren't, and you are wrong.

Quote:

Because, how did the terrorists pick the right day to have all those
fighter
jets participating in various training exercises all over US?

Of course, such information is not hard to come by.

Quote:
In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD.

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is actually zero evidence of
controlled demolition.

Prove it.

There is no evidence that demonstrates controlled demolition.

And if you had such evidence, you'd be rich.

Quote:
Give me scientific evidence of it, Patrick. Tell me, who looked for
explosives, which techniques did they use,

Read the NIST report. They looked and found no evidence.

Quote:
what did they actually find, where
did they look for explosives, which types of explosives did they look for,
how
many people were involved in that part of the whole 9/11 investigation...

C'mon, Patrick. I'm all ears.

Start with identifying the source of the explosives you claim were used
and tracing their path to the walls in the WTC.

That's not my job.

Since *you* are the one making the claim that it was a controlled
demolition, it most certainly is "your job".

You can't produce *any* evidence that the large qualtity of explosives
required were sourced, obtained, transported, carried past security, or
installed.

You have none of the evidence required to show that explosives were used -
and such evidence would be clear, obvious, and inarguable.

You just don't have it.

Come back when you learn something.

-pk
 
slika...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:37 am
Guest
"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message news:dOGdnaIv4_AfGnLXnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
Quote:
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4aede022$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message news:cPednVFYcMZPDHHXnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4aec3125$2 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message news:j-OdnaBET4e4QHTXnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae77fe9$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Patrick Keenan" <test at (no spam) dev.null> wrote in message
news:A9GdnfK6DvOPj3jXnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"slika" <slika at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4ae423cd$1 at (no spam) news.x-privat.org...

"Electra" <honda900f at (no spam) excite.com> wrote in message
news:580cf602-bd8b-4015-b927-671366c2a5ca at (no spam) m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:00 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:37:40 -0400, "Freedom Man" <libe... at (no spam) once.net> wrote:

Nah, it couldn't have been the handfuls of people who claimed responsibility for it and were
tracked down (after the fact); it must have been the thousands of conspirators who have remained
silent and undetected all this time.

Exactly. And you're one of them.

Sorry, but I'm not the one who thinks that thousands of people were involved in a conspiracy to smuggle
explosives into the WTC and install them, none whom have ever spoken up or ever been detected.

Thousands? Are you kidding me?

No, I'm not. By necessity, the "controlled demolition" theory involves a lot of people.

More than 19, yes Patrick. Tens of thousands? Far from it.

Tens of thousands is your claim, not mine.

Quote, please.

Quote:
However, there is no way that only nineteen people were involved in a controlled demolition and remained
silent.

The small number of people who were actually responsible for the attacks and murders were not shielded by
the many people they came into contact with. All the people who fed them, housed them, taught them, rented
cars to them, came forward.

Your idea requires that none of the many people who would have come into awareness of the procuring and
movement of large amounts of explosives have come forward.

The reality is that they haven't come forward because it didn't happen.

Have any scientific evidence which would prove that no explosives have
been used on 9/11?

Do you, Patrick?

Quote:
But hey. Patrick is using the old disinfo technique: when needed, exaggerate.

You are, after all, the one exaggerating. You've inflated the numbers significantly, and are just making
things up. .

Quote, please.

Quote:
Typical shill technique. Another one is having his usenet buddy replying and
using ad-hom riiiight... ...about... now, so just wait for it.

Operation needs to be tight. And it was.

Yes, meaning it was a few fanatics who flew planes into the towers.

Well, that would be true if the whole US military was a bunch of retarded
mongoloids, Patrick.

It is true, and they aren't.

Your delusions do not dictate reality.

Neither do yours, Patrick. but by some kind of magic, you think they do.

Quote:
So, either the terrorists had moles in every major part of the US defense
system,

Why do you think that moles would be required? Do you think that the scheduling of military training
exercises in populated areas is secret?

Patrick, Patrick. They had to have had moles, because 9.11.2001. turned out to
be a perfect day to hijack 4 aeroplanes and hit 3 out of 4 designated targets.
AND, having US military not firing a single shot. Not even a gun. Nothing.

Capisci?

So, it is not like "any other day", it was THE day. So, sure "terrorists" could have
known about some training exercises that were going on that day, but some training
exercises and details about them are held in secret even today.

But, hey Patrick. Nice spin and manipulation of what's been said. After all, that's
the trait of all debunkers out there, right?

Quote:
or the US military is nothing more than a bunch of retarded
mongoloids.

And of course they aren't, and you are wrong.

Well then, explain it Patrick.

Or, are you in loss for words, because you (as a manipulative and dishonest debunker)
dont' have a preprepared answer, eh?

Negligence and incompetence?

Quote:
Because, how did the terrorists pick the right day to have all those fighter
jets participating in various training exercises all over US?

Of course, such information is not hard to come by.

Well then, prove it, Patrick.

I'm all ears.

Quote:
In one hand it was tight, but on the other hand... obvious CD.

Meanwhile, in the real world, there is actually zero evidence of controlled demolition.

Prove it.

There is no evidence that demonstrates controlled demolition.

And if you had such evidence, you'd be rich.

Give me scientific evidence of it, Patrick.

Quote:
Give me scientific evidence of it, Patrick. Tell me, who looked for
explosives, which techniques did they use,

Read the NIST report. They looked and found no evidence.

Read it to me, Patrick. Please. In which portion of the NIST report do they
mention the techniques used in order to find whether explosives have been
used, how many people were involved, which agencies were involved, how
long and how careful did they look for explosives, give me charts, numbers,
formulas... ANYTHING, Patrick.

Go ahead. I'm waiting.


Quote:
what did they actually find, where
did they look for explosives, which types of explosives did they look for, how
many people were involved in that part of the whole 9/11 investigation...

C'mon, Patrick. I'm all ears.

Start with identifying the source of the explosives you claim were used and tracing their path to the
walls in the WTC.

That's not my job.

Since *you* are the one making the claim that it was a controlled demolition, it most certainly is "your
job".

You can't produce *any* evidence that the large qualtity of explosives required were sourced, obtained,
transported, carried past security, or installed.

You have none of the evidence required to show that explosives were used - and such evidence would be clear,
obvious, and inarguable.

You just don't have it.

Come back when you learn something.

I have "evidence", Patrick. No one looked for explosives. So, in other words,
US government simply said "no explosives have been used" and that's that. US
government did not look specifically for explosives and then base their claims
on scientific evidence.

Sorry, Patrick, but that is not a proper investigation. And it smells like a conspiracy.
And it looks like you're the one involved in the mass cover-up of 9/11. Therein
may be "tens of thousands of people", not "in" the execution of 9/11.

You are definitely a bit dull and retarded, Patrick.

Seriously.
 
 
Page 4 of 8    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:12 pm