|
Guest
|
Ed & Elaine Brown: Affidavit of Jurisdiction
Under the Title 4, 1&2 Flag
UCC-1#20070029134K 2009A.D., May 14
009821
For: Arnold H. Huftalen
William E. Morse
d/b/a Asst. U. S. Attorneys
James Starr
d/b/a Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
55 Pleasant St.
Concord, N.H. [03301]
From: Edward-Lewis:Brown©, Creditor
Elaine-Alice:Brown©, Creditor
c/o 266 County Farm Rd.
Dover, N..H. [03820]
Re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN
Case #09-CR-00030-01/02-GZS and 06-CR-00071-01/02-SM
Affidavit of Edward-Lewis:Brown© and Elaine-Alice:Brown©
of Facts to Challenge Jurisdiction
The living, sentient, free-will natural man and woman known as
Edward-Lewis:Brown© and Elaine-Alice:Brown©, Secured Parties,
Creditors, and Holders-in-due-Course with unlimited commercial
liability, hereinafter “Affiants,” acting with rights granted by life
and upheld by all valid and just law declare and attest that the
following facts are true, correct, and complete to the best of
Affiants’ knowledge and in accord with Affiants’ deeply held spiritual
convictions and creed re God Almighty.
Affiants can find no written evidence that the UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA/UNITED STATES has any jurisdiction over themselves or over the
territory in which they abide, the New Hampshire Republic, which has
not been ceded to the UNITED STATES, and believe that none exists,
for the following reasons:
The United States is defined in 28 USC 3002(15) as a “federal
corporation.”
The United States was incorporated on February 21, 1871, (16 Stat.
419, Chap. 62, 41st Congress, 3rd Session), the purpose being “An Act
to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” reorganized
June 8, 1878, (20 Stat. 102, Chap 180,45th Congress, 2nd Session) as
“An Act providing a permanent form of government for the District of
Columbia.”
“Governments are corporations.” Penhallow vs. Doane’s Administrators,
U.S. Supreme Court, (1795).
Corporations are commercial enterprises that are controlled by the
Uniform Commercial Code.
HJR-192 of June 5, 1933 states the bankruptcy of the United States
Corporation government; a bankrupt corporation has no standing in law
to sue, as it cannot prove its existence and solvency.
The corporation, being imaginary, having no reality or substance, with
limited liability, cannot create or attain parity with the actual,
which has unlimited liability and substance.
Rule 9(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a party can
challenge the existence, capacity of the opposing party to sue or be
sued in order to show jurisdiction; creditors have so challenged by
Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment, court has refused/denied,
thus denying Affiants of due process.
Uniform Commercial Code, UCC9-307(h) states “Location of United
States. The United States is located in the District of Columbia.”
Federal jurisdiction is defined by Article I, Section 8, Cl. 17 of the
Constitution for the United States of America (hereinafter
“Constitution”) “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases
whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as
may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress,
become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to
exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of
the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the
Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful
Buildings..”
Affiants are domiciled on private land in the New Hampshire Republic.
“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to
a state.” 19 Corpus Juris Secundum 541.
Previously submitted ‘Affidavit of Non-corporate Status of
Edward-Lewis:Brown© “ and “Affidavit of Non-corporate Status of
Elaine-Alice:Brown©” have not been rebutted, and thus stand as true.
As non-corporate, sovereign flesh-and-blood man and woman, created by
God, Edward-Lewis:Brown© and Elaine-Alice:Brown© have rights of
association, as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution
for the united States of America.
Affiants have chosen not to join/associate with the UNITED
STATES/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UBS FINANCIAL GROUP corporation, and
thus have no obligation to abide by said private corporation’s
policies.
In People v. Godfrey, 17 Johns, 225, 233 (N.Y. 1819), Chief Justice
Marshall stated, “….to bring the offense within the jurisdiction of
the courts of the union, it must have been committed out of the
jurisdiction of any state; it is not the offense committed, but the
place in which it is committed, which must be out of the jurisdiction
of the state.”
Affiants remained in their home, on private land, in the New Hampshire
Republic.
The United States Attorney General, is, per the 1994 U.S. Government
Manual, (p. 390), “…the permanent representative to INTERPOL…”
INTERPOL’s constitution requires that any such representative
expatriate his/her citizenship. As such, he has sworn his oath of
allegiance to a foreign organization, and not to the United States of
America.
Attorneys, by accepting the title of “esquire” are in violation of the
Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8, said title being a
British title of nobility, below “knight” and above “gentleman:” “No
Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person
holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the
Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or
Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
As per the above paragraphs 8 and 9, said attorneys have no standing
to exercise the “practice of law” or to hold any office of trust.
Affiants further claim the following, due to case #
06-CR-00071-01/02-SM being a part of the indictment in case #
09-CR-00030-01/02-GZS:
The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is a foreign agency domiciled in Puerto
Rico Trust 62 under Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico.
In DIVERSIFIED METAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. T-BOW COMPANY TRUST, INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE, and STEVE MORGAN, 93-405-E-EJL, 1993, United States
Attorney Betty H. Richardson testified that the INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE is not a United States Agency.
27CFR 250.11 defines “Revenue Agent. Any duly authorized Commonwealth
Internal Revenue Agent of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto
Rico.”, this being the only definition of “Revenue Agent” to be found
in CFR or elsewhere.
All INTERNAL REVENUE agents, officers, and employees are thus
unregistered foreign agents conducting business in America in
violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and all its agents, officers, and employees
are thus without jurisdiction in the united States of America, and its
fifty several union States.
27CFR72.11 states: “Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of
crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws;
burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery;
illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including
soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slavery, keeping house of ill
fame, and like offenses); swindling and confidence; and attempting to
commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing
crimes.”
27CFR72.11 confirms the undeniable supremacy and applicability of the
UCC in all legal matters in every American courtroom as well as others
throughout the world.
27CFR is “Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, which is under the
Department of the Treasury/Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico
without jurisdiction in the United States of America.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, domiciled in Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico being
a part of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION/UBS FINANCIAL GROUP, does have
jurisdiction within the UNITED STATES, that being Washington, DC, the
territories and possession.
The purchases of Postal Money Orders occurred on private land, i.e.
the West Lebanon post office and Plainfield post office, which are on
private property, leased, never having been ceded to nor purchased by
the UNITED STATES, and thus not under the jurisdiction of the UNITED
STATES. (See #15 above)
Affiants have discharged alleged charge as Secured Party with
presentment of Bonded Bill of Exchange to the Secretary of the
Treasury, and the claim stamped “Accepted for Value ,” thus settling
the matter, documented and authorized through the following:
Public Policy HJR-192 Supreme Court confirmation in Guaranty Trust of
New York v. Henwood, et al (1939) Title IV, Sec. 401 of the Federal
Reserve Act Public Law 73-10 Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act
An Affidavit not rebutted stands as Truth in Law.
___________________________ _________________________
Edward-Lewis:Brown©, Creditor Elaine-Alice:Brown©, Creditor
Holder-in-due-Course with Holder-in-due-Course with
unlimited commercial liability unlimited commercial liability
*********************************************
"No other man but I in the recorded History of
mankind, including JESUS CHRIST, has directly
revealed to the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to
enslave mankind -- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"
Raymond Ronald Karczewski© http://www.arkenterprises.com |
|
|
