Main Page | Report this Page
Politics Forum Index  »  Reform Politics Forum  »  April 12, 2009 : Open letter from Edward-Lewis: and...
Page 1 of 1    

April 12, 2009 : Open letter from Edward-Lewis: and...

Author Message
Raymond Karczewski...
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:56 am
Guest
Open letter from Edward-Lewis: and Elaine-Alice;Brown

April 12, 2009

We sit here in Strafford Cty. Jail, pondering the issue of utilizing
attorneys in this onslaught of persecution from the federal
government. No matter how we look at it, after researching attorneys’
functions, the definitions of attorneys and whom they represent or
present, it all comes down to all attorneys operate in legal fiction
as foreign agents, dealing in private corporate law (61 million of
them) that is understood only the courts and attorneys can understand.
Or do they – how can anyone understand 61 million laws?

We live under God’s Laws, approximately 100 laws (?), and commercial
law, which has about 1,000 laws. These are easily understood and can
be learned by anyone. These laws are based on time-tested contract
for over 6,000 years. See Shetar Law of the Jews, contract law based
on the Laws of God and honest business dealings with their fellow man.
These rules are time-tested and true substantial law. \The Koran, in
the Second Surah, tells us, “Men need laws to lead orderly lives, but
these laws must be based on the eternal principles of righteousness
and fair-dealing.” The Bible orders us to love our neighbor as
ourselves along with the Ten Commandments, for living righteous lives.

The court has appointed two stand-by attorneys – one a ‘public’
defender, the other a private attorney. We thought stand-by attorneys
were to stand by us as private man and woman, not the ‘public’? We
have informed the court that we do not consent to their attorney
appointments, and we do not consent to participate in any proceedings
in this matter.

Edward’s court-appointed attorney told him some weeks ago that “they
intend to bury you, and if they feel you are putting together a viable
defense, they will separate you and not allow you to further consult
together.” What madness is this? Given this statement, why would we
or any sane or competent man or woman walk into their arena and
attempt to play by their rules? This is why we walked out the first
time.

When asked a few days ago what he thought our chances are of winning
this case, the attorneys alluded there was no chance of winning this
case. Like in the first case, we were denied virtually all evidence
and witnesses; we are again told by these attorneys that the judge
would only allow what “he deems pertinent.” The law has stipulated
for several hundred years that we are absolutely allowed to bring
forth any and all evidence or witnesses that favors our position. The
U.S. Attorney’s office is allowed thousands of pieces of evidence,
unlimited resources of money, manpower, investigative means, means of
keeping their information secret until they wish to disclose (see
enclosed notice to court, “Notice and Response to U.S. Attorney’s
Statements of Benefits to “Defendants”).

Today we received a letter in the mail from the public defender
stating that they are having a difficult time being able to aid in
this case because we are not following “their” prescribed procedures
and methods. They seem to need a ruling from the court as to how to
proceed.

Everyone make note, if we follow the court/government procedures, we
will now be relying on them to state our case or position. That would
mean that we are incompetent, insane, or a child, when if fact the
only reason that we would need or could use an attorney for is to
interpret the legal fiction private law that they operate under. They
have told us that they cannot help us in the manner in which we are
proceeding, the very lawful Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), under
which the court, the entire government, state, federal, county, city,
town, all corporations in the world, operate. We are trying to apply
the same law that they are using in that courtroom right now, yet the
court has denied all our Notices as being “frivolous.” So, if the
court is telling us that everything we are doing is frivolous,
standing on our own as man and woman of God, then the confusion comes
from the fact that the court/government operates under legal law (form
and style of law), , v. lawful law (substance of law, God’s law, if
you will) , which we operate under.

Going into their courtroom which operates as a fiction, would require
us, flesh-and-blood man and woman created by God, to present ourselves
as legal fictions, known as the “strawman” .This would be a dishonor
to God. A fiction cannot interact with the real, a corporation (the
government is a corporation since 1871) can only interact with another
corporation, as corporations are fictions, existing only on paper.
The all capital letter name by which the government address us, is a
fiction. Look up “strawman” on the Internet for in-depth explanation
of this, and of the fraud perpetrated on us by the government.

So you can see just a small part of the paradox of what the
court/government is placing us in, and how and why they win 99% of
their cases. The court, working in collusion with the Department of
Justice U.S. Attorney’s Office, is protecting the information of the
bankruptcy of the United States of June 5, 1933, at any and all costs.


Every single case, criminal as well as civil, state as well as
federal, is operating to keep the fact that all of us in America were
declared slaves, pledged as surety for the bankruptcy of the United
States, as of that date. There is no lawful law, only Law of
Necessity (War Law). The United States Corporation government
declared all Americans “enemies” under the Amendatory Act (48 Stat.1)
of March 9, 1933 to the Trading With the Enemies Act of 1917.

How can anyone use attorneys when they are all pledged to protecting
the bankruptcy with a set of laws no one can understand? We all must
stand under God’s Laws and commercial law, all of which date back to
the beginning of civilization. It is the obligation of everyone to
hold the course in righteousness and fairness, in order that we may
benefit equally, and with justice for all mankind.
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:44 pm